User talk:Microplastic Consumer

Welcome!

Hello, Microplastic Consumer! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 18:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Peaceray (talk) 18:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sugi Fumi

Hello, Microplastic Consumer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sugi Fumi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sugi Fumi

Hello, Microplastic Consumer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sugi Fumi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on William McFarland (American Policeman)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page William McFarland (American Policeman), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaozicoin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gaozicoin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 17:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gaozicoin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gaozicoin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 18:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaozicoin (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing stated in the article constitutes an "inherent" notability claim that would guarantee inclusion in Wikipedia, and none of the referencing constitutes reliable source coverage about Gaozicoin in real media -- more than half of the footnotes are completely unacceptable references (YouTube videos, etc.) that cannot be used in Wikipedia articles at all, and even the few footnotes that do come from real media are not about Gaozicoin, nor do they even seem to mention Gaozicoin at all, but seem to be here merely to verify tangential facts that have nothing to do with the notability of Gaozicoin.
None of this, neither in the content nor in the sourcing, constitutes reasons why a person would qualify for a Wikipedia article at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaozicoin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 18:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright friend, thank you for looking at the article. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 15:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Microplastic Consumer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 18:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Vasile Tonoiu

Hello, Microplastic Consumer,

Thank you for creating Vasile Tonoiu.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I don't think this page meets the notability criteria at WP:ACADEMIC. Are there perhaps reviews of some of his works that could be cited to help establish this?
Also, the article tells the reader almost nothing about his contributions to the discipline—or even his area of specialization.
I'm not going to nominate for deletion because the current article is quite innocuous and might be improved with minimal work, should good sources exist.
If these two points are not addressed, however, I would expect another editor to make that nomination.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|PatrickJWelsh}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 22:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late response! But I mainly believe membership of the Romanian Academy qualifies him for a wiki page, despite the fact that the current page is lacking. If you have any other concerns please bring them to my attention, thanks Microplastic Consumer (talk) 03:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi Microplastic Consumer! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. While I appreciate your hard work in finding additional candidates, adding them to the page should not be marked as a minor edit. Thank you for your work in improving Wikipedia. ~Politicdude (About me, talk, contribs) 00:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention! Moving forward, I will mark them as regular edits rather than minor. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 03:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Siteny Randrianasoloniaiko, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Hi, please be sure to properly cite your sources. It is easy, in the editor just go up to the toolbar, click on the quotation marks, and paste in the link to your source. Unsourced material, such as that in the page listed above (which you created) can be removed, especially when it is in a biography of a living person as it is in this case. See WP:BLP AriTheHorse 02:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Siteny Randrianasoloniaiko

The article Siteny Randrianasoloniaiko has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 02:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The issue has been resolved. AriTheHorse 02:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gaozicoin

Hello, Microplastic Consumer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gaozicoin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naang Naang for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naang Naang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naang Naang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maria Perez (New Hampshire politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Zong Qinghou

On 29 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Zong Qinghou, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 06:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Seattle mayoral election moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Seattle mayoral election. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:TOOSOON. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sounder Bruce 04:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An upcoming mayoral election in a city of over 100,000 is notable- just wait for more coverage to be added Microplastic Consumer (talk) 04:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, this is a textbook case of WP:TOOSOON. A single speculative piece on potential candidates is not enough to spin off into a separate article. Sounder Bruce 04:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Hovde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Withdrawal from Afghanistan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Everyone Knows That unofficial cover.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Everyone Knows That unofficial cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pyraminxsolver (talk) 03:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brigitte García

The article Brigitte García has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, WP:1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 🔥Jala peño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 11:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brigitte García for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brigitte García is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigitte García until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joseph2302 (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yapping for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yapping, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yapping until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ermina Lekaj Prljaskaj

Hello, Microplastic Consumer,

Thank you for creating Ermina Lekaj Prljaskaj.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Good start. Please improve categorisation.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sam Sloan, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Do not add citations to content that does not contain the information you claim it supports. Come on, Sam. – notwally (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was very surprised to see this in my email! Let me set the record straight- I am not Sam Sloan nor do I have any association with him. If you'd have taken a look at my contributions, Sam Sloan is not a frequent topic of interest. It appears that in that edit I cited the wrong source and meant to use the MediaMax Article, which directly supported my edit. I am retired from Wikipedia and no longer have much interest in editing.

Thank you for reaching out,

Microplastic Consumer Microplastic Consumer (talk) 00:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sam Sloan. Thank you. – notwally (talk) 23:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

notwally, you got all that from an infobox? Where is the SPI? Drmies (talk) 00:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, did you genuinely not see the other edits to content beyond the infobox, including puffing up the lead with non-notable descriptors and adding multiple pictures published by the article subject? These changes are typical of Sam Sloan's sockpuppet editing pattern. In addition, the removal of the phrase "by the couple who had adopted her" in the sentence "In 1986, he was accused of kidnapping his daughter by the couple who had adopted her" is one of the most common patterns by the sockpuppets of Sam Sloan. There are reasons why Sam Sloan has had so many sockpuppet accounts blocked, despite a general lack of SPIs, and I would encourage you to look into his history if you are not familiar with it. If you would like me to file an SPI at that point, please let me know. At least for now, others who see problematic edits by this account can be aware that more investigation may be needed. – notwally (talk) 14:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

notwally, yes, I genuinely did not see whatever you want me to see. What I did see was you throwing a really serious accusation at a user, and telling them to make their case at an SPI which doesn't exist. You should put your money where your mouth is: either you start an SPI or you don't, and if you don't, don't make these threats.

As for the article and MC's supposed fluffing--they made two edits, two. I don't know how many socks are blocked, and I really don't care right now, not until there is an SPI. Drmies (talk) 15:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, feel free to look at the actual edits and get back to me then. Take care. – notwally (talk) 15:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you, User:Notwally, get back to me when you file the SPI and build an argument. In the meantime, stop with the accusations: this is harassment. Drmies (talk) 16:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, those pictures of him are found directly on his flickr account and were posted nearly 10 years ago. Out of my 200+ edits, less than 1% are about Sam Sloan.

I am from the Midwest, not New York or Virginia- that alone should prove I am not him. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Microplastic Consumer, let me know if this picks up again. Acroterion, these are the posts that prompted my warning--and thanks for having looked into it. Drmies (talk) 18:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Noel Fiorino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Boomer slang for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Boomer slang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Boomer slang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⇌ Jake Wartenberg 16:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Naang Naang

Hello, Microplastic Consumer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naang Naang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Paul Noel Fiorino

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paul Noel Fiorino you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d -- Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 01:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Paul Noel Fiorino

The article Paul Noel Fiorino you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Paul Noel Fiorino for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d -- Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 01:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anarcho-monarchism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anarcho-monarchism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anarcho-monarchism (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grnrchst (talk) 08:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism

Hi Microplastic Consumer,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

We also have a live cleanup drive, if you'd like to participate, and a mailing list if you'd like to be notified of upcoming edit drives.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 19:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Three Girls Revitalizing Asia

Hello! Your submission of Three Girls Revitalizing Asia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! lullabying (talk) 05:49, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abe Hamadeh article

I'm not sure if you should have removed the redirect, especially for the reason that its someone "who has high chance of being elected to office" (WP:CRYSTALBALL). There's a draft at Draft:Abe Hamadeh that has more information, but it seems that he doesn't meet WP:NPOL until he would (likely) be elected as a U.S. Representative. Also, I'm concerned by the usage of "crooked editors" on your userpage just became your articles were deleted for the same reasoning. reppop^talk 19:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That phrase is a joke used by me and some friends, it is not meant to target anyone. With Hamadeh, there are numerous sources explaining that he is likely to win and his district is rated as "Solid Republican" by nearly every outlet, if he were to loose it would be the result of a major upset that isn't supported by any polling atm. Thanks for sending me the draft, the info can likely be transferred to the main article. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 21:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but as NPOL says, being an unelected candidate for political office does not guarantee notability, and it doesn't seem he meets GNG quite yet as most of the sources have been about the elections themselves and not Hamadeh himself. If I were you, I would have waited or worked on the draft until Novmber, and if he wins, move the draft to mainspace. reppop^talk 21:08, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is does not, but in practice a nominee in a safe district who has a 99%+ chance of being elected have traditionally been allowed. For example, Greg Lopez had an article made between his primary victory and his election win. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 21:11, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lopez's article was moved to mainspace on June 25, the date of the special election, not his primary. His article was started on March 29 and declined on March 31 because he failed NPOL. Not sure where you got that his article was made before the general election. reppop^talk 21:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah sorry, I for some reason thought he was a candidate in 2022. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2028 Democratic National Convention for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2028 Democratic National Convention is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2028 Democratic National Convention until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PlateOfToast (talk) 05:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sofia Nelson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sofia Nelson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofia Nelson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 07:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In Defence

Hi @Microplastic Consumer: Are you not coming to defend your articles at Afd. I think its worth doing it. scope_creep^Talk 09:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really neutral on Sofia Nelson (the only article of mine currently up for ADF). If I get some free time I may go in and try to find more coverage about them as a person. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 16:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was nice of you to reach out by the way, thank you for doing that. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 16:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Darrell Castle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darrell Castle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darrell Castle (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 08:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ankit Jain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ankit Jain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankit Jain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C F A 💬 16:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Three Girls Revitalizing Asia

On 17 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Three Girls Revitalizing Asia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Empire of Japan created a girl group as propaganda? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Three Girls Revitalizing Asia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Three Girls Revitalizing Asia), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Microplastic Consumer. Thank you for your work on Anthony "Ford" Walker. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Add years to the election table captions

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Boricua Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boricua Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boricua Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

reppop^talk 18:40, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Donald Hovde.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Donald Hovde.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Masuo Matsuoka

Hello, Microplastic Consumer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Masuo Matsuoka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kentucky Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kentucky Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kentucky Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-Samoht27 (talk) 20:18, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]