User talk:LogFTW

Template:Syrian Civil War detailed map

You break the rules by adding the citys on map without specifying the source! Here two maps from the pro opposition sources can use it as a source of.map 1 map 2 Hanibal911 (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Listen guy! I gave you several sources who could confirm your edits on the map but you ignored them. Also understand that the map data Wikimapia are not grounds for that would enhance the towns and villages on a map. If you'll continue add on the map the city or village without a corresponding source it is would violate the rules of editing. And thus other editors can accuse you of vandalism so I ask you not to break the rules for editing the map. Hanibal911 (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assal al-Ward

I have to ask you a one question! Why are you on my talk page three times repeated the same message although I all understood from your first message. And I absolutely agree with you that the rebels are far away from the city Assal al-Ward and soon I will remove the green icon near to it. Hanibal911 (talk) 17:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC) ok[reply]

east hama changes

the changes were done via SOHR

and check the discussions also hannibal agreed on the changes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Alhanuty#Hama_2

SO,Self-Revert.Alhanuty (talk) 21:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are now subject to a general sanction

As you have continued an edit war on Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map by reverting instead of joining the discussion already on the talk page and given your previous sanctions for behaviour on that page you are now subject to the following sanction:

You are banned from editing Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map for a period of six months from the date of my signature. You may edit the talk page and other pages. Please note that any further violations of editing norms will likely result in an indefinite sanction.

This sanction is applied in accordance with the general sanctions authorised by the community for pages in the Syrian Civil War topic area. If you violate this ban you may be blocked or otherwise sanctioned to enforce it. You may appeal this sanction to me on my talk page or to WP:AN. If you have any questions please feel free to ask on my talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LogFTW, I suggest you self-revert this edit. Boredwhytekid (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Boredwhytekid (talk) 18:15, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for your continued edits at Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map after you were banned from it.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Nyttend (talk) 03:48, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Excirial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Equipment of the modern Egyptian Army with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 21:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice per WP:GS/SCW

To enforce community authorised sanctions, and for violating your page ban on the page Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map, as described at WP:GS/SCW,

you have been blocked from editing for three months. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: Community sanctions are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or consensus at a community noticeboard (you may need to copy and paste their statement to a community noticeboard).

Reference errors on 20 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Rojava conflict page, your edit caused a duplicate page number error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Douma massacre page rename

Please use Template:Requested_move Gizmocorot (talk) 12:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Douma massacre (2015), without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gizmocorot (talk) 09:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

Your feedback requested here:Template:Syrian_Civil_War_infobox Gizmocorot (talk) 10:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Liance. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:32, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In case the warning was unclear, please remember to WP:CITE a source, not just link it in revision history. ~Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LogFTW. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]