User talk:Littleboyblue2000

Welcome!

Hi Littleboyblue2000! I noticed your contributions to Sidney Poitier and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 23:21, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 13:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco del Rosario Sánchez

Apologies, I have no idea what I did there... it could be possible that you slipped and typed something before you saved your edit. In any cases, please accept my apology for what I did on that page. — 3PPYB6 ^{(T / C / L)} — 14:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted Littleboyblue2000 (talk) 03:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Matías Ramón Mella

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Matías Ramón Mella. 2001:44C8:460B:70E5:A791:9F12:B74D:4FF6 (talk) 03:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I don't understand, how did I vandilize Littleboyblue2000 (talk) 03:45, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, you didn't. They are the real vandal. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Matías Ramón Mella

added a link pointing to Haitian

Sebastián Lemba

added a link pointing to Genoese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Captaincy General of Santo Domingo

A tag has been placed on Category:Captaincy General of Santo Domingo indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manifesto of January 16, 1844 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Manifesto of January 16, 1844, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 01:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manifesto of January 16, 1844 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Manifesto of January 16, 1844, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 07:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem, I just started the page, I need some to time to go look for the sources, once I find them, i will site the sources. Littleboyblue2000 (talk) 13:32, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dominican Declaration of Indepndence

Hello, Littleboyblue2000,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Dominican Declaration of Indepndence for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales^Parley 13:46, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Littleboyblue2000. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

To the administration team, I want to start off by saying sincerely apologize for my conduct. I am guilty of what I have done, my only defense to this is that I am new to this space, I have not grasp the full procedures on how to source images properly. The first time after my account was Disabled, I was shocked, but I didn't quite understand the terms of the cancellation of the account. I assumed that perhaps I could make it right by creating a new account and going back and properly sourcing and licensing the images to avoid copyright issues. But I was wrong, again, I later discovered that my second act was that if sockpuppeting, another term of which I am very much new to as well. I've now learned of the full consequences, and I take full accountability for both my actions. But I assure you that to cause harm, disruption and even perhaps confusion to an audience who enter this space to acquire information that is provided to the best of context was never my intention. Just like them, I too wish to learn, and in addition, teach others. I promise you the contributions I've made to some of the articles gives information that has not been seen by the public eye. I wish to continue feeding the viewers with new valuable information, and to treat that with the upmost respect. But in regards to my conduct, I once again apologize sincerely, and I ask genuinely to allow me another chance, and I promise to never engage in that conduct again. Littleboyblue2000 (talk) 22:36, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Littleboyblue2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To the administration team, I want to start off by saying sincerely apologize for my conduct. I am guilty of what I have done, my only defense to this is that I am new to this space, I have not grasp the full procedures on how to source images properly. The first time after my account was Disabled, I was shocked, but I didn't quite understand the terms of the cancellation of the account. I assumed that perhaps I could make it right by creating a new account and going back and properly sourcing and licensing the images to avoid copyright issues. But I was wrong, again, I later discovered that my second act was that if sockpuppeting, another term of which I am very much new to as well. I've now learned of the full consequences, and I take full accountability for both my actions. But I assure you that to cause harm, disruption and even perhaps confusion to an audience who enter this space to acquire information that is provided to the best of context was never my intention. Just like them, I too wish to learn, and in addition, teach others. I promise you the contributions I've made to some of the articles gives information that has not been seen by the public eye. I wish to continue feeding the viewers with new valuable information, and to treat that with the upmost respect. But in regards to my conduct, I once again apologize sincerely, and I ask genuinely to allow me another chance, and I promise to never engage in that conduct again Littleboyblue2000 (talk) 00:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There may be a pathway to you being unblocked, but you will also need to discuss the issues with your image sourcing/licensing. 331dot (talk) 11:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What's the pathway? Littleboyblue2000 (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dominican Declaration of Independence moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dominican Declaration of Independence, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Littleboyblue2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good evening to the administration, I'm writing to you to present my second block request. I've decided that I will no longer be uploading photos, I'll strictly just be editing pages and citing reliable sources. I've learned my lesson about uploading content without considering of copyright.

Decline reason:

Declining per below discussion with blocking admin. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Rosguill: In what way is this user an asset to the project?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bbb23, they seem to have spent a fair deal of effort expanding articles on Caribbean history. Spot checking them at random, while I wouldn't endorse every single edit I came across, the edits seem to be productive overall and I don't see any evidence that this editing work caused any problems that would precipitate a block. My understanding is that the primary issues with this editor's past record were a) image licensing and b) sockpuppetry to continue the inappropriate addition of improperly licensed images (following a block at Commons? Trying to puzzle together the unblock request explanation w/ the original sockpuppetry report). So, from my point of view, if the only actual disruption was related to image copyright and sockpuppetry, and the above unblock request proposes avoiding image work entirely together with a plausible explanation and apology for the sockpuppetry, then the issues that led to the block have been addressed. If there's additional problematic editing at hand, however, that would be a different story. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosguill: The socking is not just about image licensing. It's also about editing the same articles. See this table. The sock made 65 edits to Wikipedia, of which 64 intersected on 14 different articles. I don't buy the user's story about how new they are, how inexperienced, how they didn't understand, etc.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha, in that case I misunderstood the issue at-hand. Oddly, it looks like their accounts were blocked on Commons but postdate this block by over a month, so image licensing seems like a tangential issue. In light of your comments, we need to see a more convincing explanation (Littleboyblue: is there another account that you were using prior to creating this account?). _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, all I had was just this one and the sockpuppet one. I only joined Wikipedia a year ago. Littleboyblue2000 (talk) 16:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And also to address the blocking administrators remark about the edits I made under the sockpuppet account, those edits consisted of valuable information in which I did properly source many of them, so it's not like I was vandalizing those pages. Littleboyblue2000 (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Socking is socking, whether it's vandalism or not. In addition, even after you knew what socking was because of your block here in January, you continued to sock at Commons in February. I find your defenses and excuses at best disingenuous.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So then issue was about Commons, like the other administrator said, because that was the original reason how I was blocked in the first place. That's why I made the second account because I thought i could go back in fix it, only to end up having that account blocked as well. I already addressed both issues in both of my requests and apologized for them. I didn't mean no harm in them, but I own up to them I pledge that I would only just stick to editing pages and away from uploading images through wizard. Littleboyblue2000 (talk) 17:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 and Rosguill: Not sure if I should open a new investigation but the socking is very clearly persisting as an IP: see 2600:4040:AAD3:C900:C986:D784:4E8B:52F4, 2600:4040:AAD3:C900:C9FF:66A1:D163:8204, and 2600:4040:AAD3:C900:854B:98FB:BF10:8C1. Per a quick editor interaction check, I'm requesting a range block on the IP. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked the /64 range for 3 months, and I also blocked ChillCaribbeanu718 as a suspected sock.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Bbb23! ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 and @Pbritti looks like that have picked back up under a different range, 2600:4040:AAF9:B700:0:0:0:0/64. I noticed it at Draft:Dominican Declaration of Independence. S0091 (talk) 14:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091: looks quackers to me. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked one month. Thanks for the ping.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:First Dominican Republic

A tag has been placed on Category:First Dominican Republic indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Manifesto of January 16, 1844 (draft 2)

Hello, Littleboyblue2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Manifesto of January 16, 1844 (draft 2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Manifesto of January 16, 1844

Hello, Littleboyblue2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Manifesto of January 16, 1844, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]