User talk:Coasterlover1994/Archive 1
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Coasterlover1994. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
For the most recent topics, please see here.
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Coasterlover1994, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Coca-Cola formula. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Marek.69 talk 03:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Wickstrom
Good work there, I blocked the IP for 31 hours. Dougweller (talk) 06:15, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Phoebe
Is this because I changed the info box layout? I did that because it doesn't look right? I don't understand why the name is just sticking out randomly? IMissAremid (talk) 02:31, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- She isn't a Buffyverse character. She is a Charmed character. Coasterlover1994 02:33, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- I know, but is there anyway to change the layout of that? IMissAremid (talk) 02:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- There is nothing wrong with the layout, so I don't know what you are talking about. Coasterlover1994 02:37, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- I checked the history, and it doesn't look right because the picture caption is center-justified. Coasterlover1994 02:39, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Alright. Sorry the name on top was just bugging me, but I can get over it. IMissAremid (talk) 02:42, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Warning vandals
{{subst:uw-vandal1}} for an edit that called a living person a child molester? That kind of thing is worthy of as {{subst:uw-biog4im}} at best. Try to make your warnings proportional to the "offence". Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:18, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, that option didn't stand out. I will remember that as a possible option next time. Coasterlover1994 20:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- No worries. I see you use Twinkle, so it might be worth the extra few clicks to scroll down the menu and find the most relevant template you can, but there are some edits that are not worthy of an assumption of good faith (including allegations of child molestation). If you come across something like that in future, it's probably worth finding an admin to delete the revision as I've done in this case. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:34, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Reverted edit
You reverted my edit as vandalism, claiming it was not properly cited. Specifically, I added a mention of the plagiarism of the work roots to the article's first paragraph. This plagarism is discussed later in the article and is appropriately cited (citations 1 and 2). Please actually do a little research into the my edit before you call it vandalism and revert it. If I did not appropriately mention the later citation, I appologize. You could remedy this or ask me to instead of calling my edit vandalism. It was not.
- If it was already mentioned, it did not need to be mentioned earlier in the article. And please sign your articles by typing 4 tildes (~). Coasterlover1994 22:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Really? It is a mistake to mention that George Washington was the first president both in the introduction to his article, and later in the body of the article? Of course not.98.212.214.4 (talk) 22:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, since the fact that Washington was a president is a major part of the article. Coasterlover1994 01:50, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Really? It is a mistake to mention that George Washington was the first president both in the introduction to his article, and later in the body of the article? Of course not.98.212.214.4 (talk) 22:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia and Era conventions
Hi there. Just FYI, Wikipedia allows either BC/AD or BCE/CE in articles. I noticed your single change from BC to BCE, and edit summary, in Venus (mythology). I've reverted your change for the sake of consistency – the article has used BC for some time. Please note WP:ERA in Wikipedia:Manual of Style on this matter. Regards, Haploidavey (talk) 10:30, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Your request for rollback
Hi Coasterlover1994/Archive 1. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY (TALK) 06:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Nice job
I've seen you around reverting vandalism, and you're doing a great job! Keep up the good work! Access Denied(t|c|g|d|s) 03:31, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Please do not revert-and-warn users that are blanking articles created by themselves where there are no significant edits by other authors, even if they are 'removing a speedy notice'. Essentially they are requesting speedy deletion by their blanking of the page, and it should not be considered vandalism. I have reverted your warning and deleted the article. Syrthiss (talk) 18:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, didn't see that it was the same person that created the article Coasterlover1994 18:59, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Mold, Mould, Let's call the whole thing offal!
I didn't realise that 'mold' was an American spelling of the English word 'mould'. This was not an act of vandalism ... check 'My contributions' for my clean-as-a-whistle history. Going slightly off-piste ... I don't know if you're from Lancaster, New York, but I'm actually from the original Lancaster in England. Cheers, User:Solatha 7/9/10 (GMT) 00.42
- Eh, sorry about that. I admit, I made a mistake there by not checking the differences between British and American English. I'll try not to let that happen again. By the way, I do reside in Lancaster, New York, a sad place compared to the original Lancaster. I changed my settings so that you don't show up on Huggle, since a check of your contributions shows that you can be trusted. Sorry about the confusion, Coasterlover1994 03:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
For all your hard work
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your anti-vandal efforts, even if you are leaving with a backlog to clean up at AIV! You're doing a good job. Keep it up. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
Thank you! I'm only doing what any honest person would do to help this vandal-prone online encyclopedia. Coasterlover1994 22:43, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!
Kwiki (talk) 01:03, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
And thanks from me too! Musdan77 (talk) 19:26, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
How
How was my edit vandalism? I was reporting a false positive at toilet paper orientation. That article isn't suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia, so I tagged it as such. --138.110.206.101 (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- If it was featured on WP:DYK, it is suitable for Wikipedia. There are other things on here that are MUCH less worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia. Coasterlover1994 23:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
88.104.91.137
Just another sock of the banned user "Light current". He's got millions of them. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 01:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Concerns about several issues
I am PN, MA Ling, who a short time ago attempted to edit the article on "y'all". I do not like how you removed my attempted edits in such a high-handed manner. I do have qualifications related to this subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PN, MA Ling (talk • contribs) 04:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- I removed the comments written by the IP 96.37.151.176. The second edit made by the IP was not appropriate for the article page, but it is welcomed on the article's talk page. I did not remove any edits made by PN, MA Ling. Hope this helps, Coasterlover1994 04:51, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- This is what I saw, with your name attached to it:
- User talk:96.37.151.176
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search [edit] July 2010
- Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Y'all worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Coasterlover1994 04:10, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- User talk:96.37.151.176
- Are you saying somebody else signed your name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PN, MA Ling (talk • contribs) 05:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- As the above statement says, I removed the comments written by 96.37.151.176, and thus, did not remove anything that was written by the username PN, MA Ling. I apologize for any confusion, but that last edit by the IP belonged on the talk page. Coasterlover1994 05:33, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I was mistaken, I apologize, and I appreciate your involvement in this. Do you believe 96.37.151.176 is a vandal? He/she signed your handle, which would appear to be the act of a trouble-maker. PN, MA Ling —Preceding unsigned comment added by PN, MA Ling (talk • contribs) 15:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- No, I do not believe that the IP was a vandal. I just believe that the comment belonged on the talk page, per WP:MOS. Unlike many people on here, I do not believe that all IPs that edit are here to vandalize Wikipedia. Again, sorry about any confusion. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 18:05, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
???????
How am I vandalizing anything? I'm trying to insert an external link. Get real.68.1.89.162 (talk) 18:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- As was explained to you in an edit summary, there is no point in having an external link for something that is already linked in the text of the article. Drmies (talk) 18:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's not vandalism.68.1.89.162 (talk) 18:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's mentioned in the article, and you are violating WP:3RR Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 18:45, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- I'M THE ONE THAT PUT IT IN THE ARTICLE. I want my warnings redacted, as I didn't vandalize anything. Assume good faith? Guess not. 68.1.89.162 (talk) 18:48, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- I am assuming good faith. It's just that a link that is already in the article is not needed in the external links section of the article. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 18:49, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- My warnings should be redacted as they do not constitute vandalism.68.1.89.162 (talk) 18:50, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- However, violating WP:3RR does constitute vandalism. Editors are not allowed to revert edits on a page more than three times within a 24-hour period (unless blatant vandalism is being reverted), or else a 24-hour block may be imposed. You have edited that page nearly 20 times within the past 24 hours, with many of those edits involving reinstatement of removed material. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 19:01, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for informing me of this information, I wasn't aware that it constituted vandalism. 68.1.89.162 (talk) 19:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- However, violating WP:3RR does constitute vandalism. Editors are not allowed to revert edits on a page more than three times within a 24-hour period (unless blatant vandalism is being reverted), or else a 24-hour block may be imposed. You have edited that page nearly 20 times within the past 24 hours, with many of those edits involving reinstatement of removed material. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 19:01, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- My warnings should be redacted as they do not constitute vandalism.68.1.89.162 (talk) 18:50, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- I am assuming good faith. It's just that a link that is already in the article is not needed in the external links section of the article. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 18:49, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- I'M THE ONE THAT PUT IT IN THE ARTICLE. I want my warnings redacted, as I didn't vandalize anything. Assume good faith? Guess not. 68.1.89.162 (talk) 18:48, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's mentioned in the article, and you are violating WP:3RR Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 18:45, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's not vandalism.68.1.89.162 (talk) 18:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Unnecessary references
If you need references for something as well known as this episode ( witch problem even more known then skater in that article ) Then you need references for everything you write, her birth, age, medal and every single accomplishment. 70.53.242.93 (talk) 22:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, but since I (along with many others) have never heard of the episode, it needs a citation. The episode's Wikipedia page should provide the references that are needed. Everything should be cited, or at least provided in an external link. Hope this will help, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks...
...for reverting my user page. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 22:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. I've had my user page vandalized at least twice a day for the past week, so I know what it feels like. Reverting vandalism has its downside... Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
M-A92
M-A92 apparently tried to leave a talk message to you on your guestbook. It's all in French, but looks like he might have a valid explanation for what he's been doing with Dalton McGuinty. Bart133 t c @ 05:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- He just moved it to the talk page of your guestbook - looks like he's trying to be constructive. Bart133 t c @ 05:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Bonsoir, j'ai tiens a vous dire que pourquoi? j'ai copier-coller la même page de Dalton McGuinty dans la page Dalton McGuinty, Jr., le saviez-vous que il y a 2 noms Dalton McGuinty, celui qu'il est un ancien député provinciale de la circonscription de Ottawa-South de 1987 à sa mort en 1990 Dalton McGuinty, Sr., dont que, celui vient remplacer son propre en 1990 qu'il vient d'être un nouveau député provinciale de l'Ontario de la circonscription de Ottawa-Sud alors qui devient un chef du Parti libéral de l'Ontario depuis 1996 et il devenit un premier ministre de l'Ontario qui remporte son élection ontarienne depuis 2003 est notamment Dalton McGuinty, Jr.. Dont la page Dalton McGuinty devenit une page de homonymie peut désigner des personnes du même nom et peut'être pendant quelques jours je vais faire une nouvelle page de la biographie Dalton McGuinty (père) sur Wikipedia en francais et vous pouvez voir la page de Discussion Dalton McGuinty (père) seulement en francais.M-A92 (d) 16 juillet 2010 à 00:34 (CEST).Je ne sais pas ecrit in english.
(Translation) Hello, I would like to tell you why? I copy and paste the same page of Dalton McGuinty in the Dalton McGuinty, Jr., did you know that there are two names Dalton McGuinty, that he is a former MLA for the constituency of Ottawa-South from 1987 until his death in 1990 , Dalton McGuinty, Sr., which is that it replaces its own in 1990 it has been a New MLA Ontario riding of Ottawa South, then who becomes a leader of the Liberal Party of Ontario since 1996 and he became a Premier of Ontario who wins Ontario election since 2003 shall include Dalton McGuinty, Jr.. Dalton McGuinty whose page become a disambiguation page can appoint someone of the same name and peut'être few days I'll make a new page in the biography Dalton McGuinty (father) in Wikipedia in french and you can see the page of [ [Discussion Dalton McGuinty (father)]] only in french. A92-M ( d) July 16, 2010 at 00:34 (EST) . I do not know writing in English.
- (In English) Alright, I understand what you are trying do do. There are two people named Dalton McGuinty, and searching for that name brings you to Dalton McGuinty, Jr. I started a discussion topic on Talk:Dalton McGuinty that recommends renaming the page to "Dalton McGuinty Jr.", and creating a disambiguation page called "Dalton McGuinty." Hope this will help, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 17:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- (En français) Bon, je comprends ce que vous voulez faire faire. Il ya deux personnes nommées Dalton McGuinty, et la recherche de ce nom vous amène à Dalton McGuinty, Jr., j'ai commencé un sujet de discussion sur Talk: Dalton McGuinty qui recommande de renommer la page "Dalton McGuinty, Jr.", et la création d'un page d'homonymie appelé "Dalton McGuinty". Espérons que cela aidera, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 17:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- (In English) Dalton McGuinty was not renamed, however, a note was placed at the top of the page directing people to Dalton McGuinty, Sr. if they were looking for him. Thanks for bringing that up, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- (En français) Dalton McGuinty n'a pas été renommé, toutefois, une note a été placée au sommet de la population de diriger la page Dalton McGuinty, Sr. s'ils étaient à sa recherche. Merci de soulever ce point, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
User talk:Karlosgaona
Hi there, I just saw you delivered him a warning via Huggle because he blanked a page. In that case it was totally ok, because he was the author of this new article. Authors of recently created articles may blank the page so as to request its speedy deletion. Anyway, the article NTI Corporation is up for speedy deletion for other reasons, so it didn't matter. But please be a little careful with dealing out vandalism warnings. Regards, De728631 (talk) 19:15, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- He was removing a deletion template, and I was restoring it. The thought of placing a CSD-G7 evaded me at the moment. A CSD-G4 has since been placed on the page. Sorry about any trouble, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- I could not find "Authors of recently created articles may blank the page so as to request its speedy deletion" listed as an exception to "Blanking" at WP:VANDTYPES. Is it in some other policy or guideline? Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ 07:07, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
T.G.I.F. Please
Explain how I might better edit the incorrect atrocities with the term "T.G.I.F." I am quite serious. I'd like to know how to best go about this correction. I've many and I do mean many years of academic research in Greek and similar mythology. I'd be delighted to include numerous journals, studies, etc ... As you so boldly accused me of vandalism and poor commenting, elucidate if you will?
- The etymology of "Friday" belongs in article Friday. Please see WP:CITATION for info on how to cite sources. — Jeff G. ツ 04:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I was going to say that, but Jeff G. beat me to it. Enjoy Wikipedia, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 04:03, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Tree (data structure) edit: Unconstructive?
I disagree with you that my edit to the article Tree (data structure) was unconstructive. I clarified the parenthetical remark, "(by convention, trees grow down, not up as they do in nature)" to "(by convention, trees grow down, not up as the plants called trees do in nature)". Perhaps you find this a little awkward (as I do) or overly precise (which I don't), but the sentence as originally written is logically weak and more awkward. Literally, it says that trees, meaning tree data structures, grow down, not up as they [tree data structures] do in nature. The logical antecedent of the pronoun "they" is tree data structures: "trees" in the same sense as it was used earlier in the sentence. In nature, tree data structures obviously do not grow at all, or even exist, since they are abstractions. Some specific identification of tree plants (the organisms with woody stems and usually green leaves that collect sunlight energy) is necessary in place of the word "they" in order to correct this literal defect. I attempted to contribute such a replacement; you rejected my contribution (but did not offer an alternative improvement).
Undoubtedly, this is a minor issue, but a high quality encyclopedia is one that pays attention to all details, not one that just avoids glaring errors and omissions. I tried to correct this glitch because it disturbed my continuity of thought and my smooth flow of reading when I came to it. In general, when I find such flaws in Wikipedia, I try to contribute quick fixes for them, as my way of contributing in return for the benefit of free use of the encyclopedia.
I have done my part in pointing out and trying to correct this error. Please either restore my edit, or make another one of your own that addresses the flaw in this sentence (or solicit someone else to do it). I would consider fully satisfactory any change that makes unambiguous, at the literal level, the fact that two completely different concepts of "tree" are being compared here. 141.158.233.114 (talk) 04:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I see your point. What you want to contribute is necessary to the article, but it sounds awkward (which is why I removed it). Post a message on Tree (data structure)'s discussion page that says what you want to do, and see how the community thinks it should be phrased. I apologize for any trouble, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 04:15, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- I have to agree with 141.158.233.114 in both points: the original sentence needs improvement, and you should not revert an edit which is not clearly vandalism without an edit comment stating your reasons. In fact, you have done that at least two other times today (I didn't check older contributions), here and here. It is very frustrating when someone else reverts one's edit without giving a reason, this might even turn away new contributors, so please do not do that if it isn't vandalism. Interesting reading on this topic is WP:Reverting and WP:Revert only when necessary.
- In the "Tree (data structure)"-case you shouldn't have reverted at all, since the edit didn't make the article worse. In fact, someone might have seen the new formulation and improved it, without removing information. If you find a sentence which doesn't sound good, improve it, but don't remove it only because it doesn't sound good. – Adrianwn (talk) 06:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- Coasterlover1994, apology accepted. The talk page discussion suggestion was a good one, but no longer necessary: Adrianwn has made an alternate edit that fully satisfies my concerns, sounds not at all awkward, and is even a further improvement. I posted my comments, thanks, and a little of my relevant personal Wikipedian history (which (s)he and/or others may or not be at all interested in) on Adrianwn's talk page here
- –Stephen 141.158.233.114 (talk) 10:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- @Adrianwn- At the time, it appeared to be unnecessary. Huggle automatically provides a prewritten edit summary, and many administrators, such as Tide rolls, have edit summaries very similar, if not exactly the same, as mine. If you don't believe me, look for yourself. I have read WP:Reverting and follow it as policy. Hope this will help, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 22:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Brian Williams
Regarding an edit to Brian Williams, here, you mistakenly reverted an edit. Your reversion reintroduced vandalism. It has since been corrected. I would appreciate it if you would correct your comment attributing vandalism to 67.244.89.230 67.244.89.230 (talk) 06:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. Looks like we may have been trying to do the same thing at the same time, or I looked at the wrong diff. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 21:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Gary Ablett
You contacted me about Gary Ablett. The information which I wrote about Mr. Ablett was written by me as I have a good knowledge of Gary's time in charge of Stockport County, as misguided as it was. It was not, and never will be, intended to be offensive to Mr. Ablett, I have a trememdous respect for him and have met him on several occasions, and I can assure anyone who is concerned that anyone who ever has the fortune to cross Gary's path will tell you that he is a top, top man with a heart of gold. However, with regards the content i wrote, it cannot be verified as such as all events unfolded without being well documented in an unbiased fashion, as the case almost always is in football. However, I can assure you that it was fact, not ficiton, and I am quite confident that Mr. Ablett would confirm that all content was the truth - for example his daily struggles at work due to a lack of funding and basic equipment; I haven't obtained much of this information from any other source but directly from Gary. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SCFC1883 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- I reread the changes I reverted, and I remember why I changed it. Articles such as the one you edited have to conform to WP:BLP, and terminology such as "sacked" is not appropriate for any Wikipedia article, let alone a biography. Many other editors on this site would have done the same thing. I hope this will help, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Notice
1. Stop abusing automated tools. 2. Read: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fandraltastic/The_Avengers_%282012_film%29&action=history
Don't edit my page again without comprehension. 67.170.86.33 (talk) 03:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- User pages should not have redirects to the article namespace, and I am not abusing semi-automated tools. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 03:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Chennappa Naicker
I've created a redirect for the same as per your suggestion in my talk page.:)
Raghavan(Talk) 04:06, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism
Hi, actually I am not intended to do some vandalism of the article of Masjid Cut Mutiah, but I am trying to be consistent by moving back the article to the original Indonesian name, Masjid Cut Mutiah. Therefore what I did is delete the revert in the Masjid Cut Mutiah and trying to move the Cut Mutiah Mosque into Masjid Cut Mutiah. Apologize for that and please help me in putting back the article into Masjid Cut Mutiah. ThanksNaidNdeso (talk) 04:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't think that you were. However, the edit that I reverted contained nothing but violations of WP:MOS, since another Wikipedia page should only be linked to once per article (however, infoboxes, tables, and the like are exempt). Hope this will help, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 04:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the information, since I used to be editing in Wiki ID and this is my first time in Wikipedia English to improving some article about Indonesia. Hope, by doing this, a lot of people will know more about Indonesia. Again thanks for that.NaidNdeso (talk) 04:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Welcome to English Wikipedia! Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 04:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the information, since I used to be editing in Wiki ID and this is my first time in Wikipedia English to improving some article about Indonesia. Hope, by doing this, a lot of people will know more about Indonesia. Again thanks for that.NaidNdeso (talk) 04:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Semi-protection?
You might want to semi-protect your userpage. That should stop the idiots who vandalise it. Access Denied(t|c|g|d|s) 22:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- Good idea. I just submitted a request. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 23:28, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for this! :) --Mithrandir∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 03:36, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I just noticed that I was temp. blocked from editing, and when I checked why, it said I made edits to the Chiari Center (or something like that). I've never heard of it, and I dont remember making those edits at ALL. Any suggestions how that happened? 76.193.175.232 (talk) 16:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Amusement Park WikiProject
Hello Coasterlover1994. Recently, the Amusement Parks WikiProject was reformatted and revived. As part of this process other related WikiProjects (such as Disneyland, Herschend Family Entertainment, Universal Parks & Resorts and Walt Disney World) were also revived and have now become part of the Amusement Park WikiProject as task forces. If you would like to remain listed as a member on these WikiProjects please re-add your name to the appropriate lists at the participants page. All names currently on the list have been cleared. If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you for your cooperation, Themeparkgc Talk 08:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC).
Vandalism??
Hi, I have received this message from you:
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Michelangelo. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 03:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
As far as I know, I have not even been to this page and have certainly not even edited it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.105.178 (talk) 05:45, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
George Northcott
Hi received this message from you: Please do not add unsourced negative or controversial biographical material to pages, as you did with this edit to George Northcott. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 21:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
What exactly is negative or controversial about what I put??? I sourced it to a newspaper report. Everything I put in my edit was truthful and can be cross referenced. Helpful and constructive advice on how it could be improved would be better not just removing something about a subject you probably know next too nothing about is not the way too go about things. Anyway cant be bothered now too continue with other updates to articles I know about, ill let some other mug research it i'll get on with my life. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.91.251 (talk) 21:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Since he isn't dead yet, it is a violation of WP:BLP to add a date of death, even if a "source" is included. Enjoy Wikipedia, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 21:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
EAST AND WEST PAKISTAN
This is such a waste of space on the article. East and West Pakistan are already mentioned on the "Pakistan (disambiguation)" article. Also, East and West Pakistan are also mentioned in the article itself. This incident occurred 40 years ago and it's not like current affairs for the region. --- (NapoleonARS (talk) 02:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC))
- It is relevant, as it refers to the former provinces of Pakistan. Also, if you remove it once more, it will be in violation of WP:3RR, and you will be reported. Enjoy Wikipedia, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 03:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
user page
i received a message from you saying i vandalized another users page when i clearly did not. I haven't even edited anything at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harvhawk (talk • contribs) 22:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- You made personal attacks and replaced the content of a page with "ITS ME A MARIO". [1] How is that not vandalism?
- my little brother just admitted to me that he did that i am sorry for his actions and for wasting your time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harvhawk (talk • contribs) 23:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. At least you aren't one of the many people who have threatened me over reverting their vandalism. Apology accepted. You should be off our radar within a few days. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:52, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- my little brother just admitted to me that he did that i am sorry for his actions and for wasting your time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harvhawk (talk • contribs) 23:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Balls
Excuse me sir, do you speak Japanese? If you did you'd know that 'Tama' (たま) does indeed translate as 'Ball' or 'Balls', and therefore is not an act of vandalism as you defined it. Please respect wikipedia's tireless quest for consistent accuracy. Do your research sir, before you point virtual fingers. Good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlashyrkhXander (talk • contribs) 01:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- "The name of the owner's wife..." was Tama. "Jewel" sounds like a name. "Balls" does not sound like a name to me. [2] I was just taking it in context. If her name really is "balls", then I was mistaken. Enjoy Wikipedia, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 02:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:28, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
New York
I've removed your AfD template from New York as it seems disruptive to me. If you're really serious, put it back, but I wouldn't. Station1 (talk) 02:43, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Nah, it was meant as an April Fools joke. Evidently, nobody got it...[tear] Coasterlover1994Leave your mark!
- Aww, please don't cry. Sorry about that - guess I should have realized. Station1 (talk) 01:10, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
improper restoration of {{prod}} template, improper warning
Anyone may contest a proposed deletion template. Restoring it is considered disruptive. Your warnings on User talk:Ohiostateeagles for removing AFD templates was inappropriate as the editor removed a {{prod}} template which s/he is allowed to do. Your restoring it amounts to edit warring. Please be more careful. Toddst1 (talk) 01:52, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:43, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:53, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Coasterlover1994/Archive 1! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:32, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:11, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Huggle analysis?
What's a Huggle analysis? Adding that text to the top of the Calvary Chapel article wasn't particularly helpful either. Not even sure what sort of tag should be added. Also, the page has been tagged for POV in the past and it has been determined that it is neutral. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions about User:Coasterlover1994. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |