User talk:ClarkSui

This user may have left Wikipedia. ClarkSui has not edited Wikipedia since 9 September 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, ClarkSui, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- ReyBrujo 21:11, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translations

Hello ClarkSui, I notice in your user page a list of articles, many from the Spanish wikipedia which you have translated directly but have not placed the template indicating that the articles were in fact translated. I had participated in some of those articles, correcting and adding bibliography which I see has been copied directly in the English version without mentioning that the article is a translation from another wikipedia, as recommended in [1] I'm not sure about en.wikipedia, but in the Spanish version, we must indicate, when applicable, if an article has been translated from another wikipedia.

The ones I checked (not all in the table in your user page) and which are translations from the Spanish wikipedia are as follows (all created recently - end of March, early April):

Pedro Fernández de Fuentencalada translated from Pedro Fernández de Castro «Potestad» [2]. By the way, Fuentencalada is incorrect (no "n" in the middle) and there is no House of Fuentecalada and he is better known as a Castro.
Pedro Alfonso de León, translated from [3]
Rodrigo Íñiguez translated from [4]
Gonzalo Ruiz Girón, translated from [5]
Pedro Núñez, translated from the very poor and unreferenced Spanish version [6]
Pedro Ruiz de Villegas II translated from [7]. This one should have been left untranslated. If you check the talk page in the Spanish version, you will see a long argument I had with the original author who claimed the Villegas came from the Laras, had included many undocumented facts, and it was I who placed two warning signs on that article which still requires a total overhaul and references and is not worth translating, in its current Spanish version, into English.

There are other articles which you also translated, such as Alonso Meléndez de Guzmán, Garci Álvarez de Toledo (Grand Master of Santiago), Pedro Muñiz de Godoy y Sandoval, Garci Lasso de la Vega I and Garci Lasso de la Vega II (I worked pretty hard on these two in the Spanish version correcting all the errors in the original article and adding references and bibliography), all without indicating that they are translations. Regards, --Maragm (talk) 11:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC) PD: I mentioned this to another user at en.wikipedia and he has confirmed that these articles should be tagged as translations.[8] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maragm (talk • contribs) 14:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message in the talk page of user Agricolae [9] since he also edits articles on Spanish genealogy. I see that you continue to translate articles from the Spanish wiki without tagging such articles as translations. I have participated in some of those articles in es.wiki, doing research and including good references. It's only fair (and necessary due to copyright issues) that you tag those articles that you are translating as translations, and, of course, you should fully translate and not leave phrases or references in Spanish. Regards, --Maragm (talk) 07:36, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the explanations on the template is here: [10]. It should be placed on the discussion page. Also, on the article on Pedro Fernández de Fuentencalada, I suggest you change his name since he is generally known as a Castro, but in any case, it's Fuentecalada without the "n" in the middle. Also, the page on Mécia Lopes de Haro, you should check if it would be preferable to have her as Mencía López de Haro since she was Spanish, not portuguese. Not all the articles in es.wiki on these medieval characters are correct. I try to correct as much as possible but haven't gotten around to all of them, so if you have any doubts, you can contact me. The one on the Villegas, is really incorrect since those filiations in the article in Spanish have not been confirmed. Regards, --Maragm (talk) 09:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I named him Pedro Fernández de Castro «Potestad» in es.wiki. You can also add him to: Pedro Fernández de Castro (disambiguation) and then paste the template (edit this page and you'll see that template) on the top of the page. Regards, --Maragm (talk) 09:50, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which page linked to which? re Pedro Laso de la Vega. --Maragm (talk) 05:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Template

When adding the European History Wikiproject onto a talkpage, please add the

European history NA‑class

	Europe portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
NA	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

template instead of the navigation template for the project. Much Ado, --MOLEY (talk) 02:33, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Casa de la Vega

Hi, I just wrote to the author of that article to tell him that the succession box is wrong. Firstly, there is no proof that Diego Gómez (who would not be an Aza) was the head of this lineage, plus, if he was, there would be a few more generations before getting to the first Garci Lasso. I asked him to remove that box since it only adds to confusion. The ancestry of the first Garci Lasso is not documented, even though some authors say he was the son of a Rui Pérez de la Vega, but there is no documentary proof of that, and like I mentioned before, thre are a few generations before we would get to the hypothetical ancestor, Diego Gómez. Regards, --Maragm (talk) 06:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On Álava

Hi ClarkSui, I noticed that you added the coat of arms of Álava to the articles on Rodrigo of Castile, Álvaro Herrameliz, Fernán González of Castile. At that time, no coats of arms were used and, most importantly, the boundaries of Álava at that time were quite different from the current ones. Also, on Sancha Sánchez de Pamplona, I think that it would be more correct to call her Sancha Sánchez of Pamplona (the same as in, for example, the first two characters I mention above. Regards, --Maragm (talk) 13:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flávio Teodósio de Coimbra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flávio Teodósio de Coimbra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flávio Teodósio de Coimbra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Agricolae (talk) 01:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Andalus as a belligerent

I note that in the page Battle of Rueda you list one belligerent side as Al-Andalus. This term is a generic adjective for the portion of Iberia under muslim occupation/rule, and not a state. (It would be like saying the British fought the Battle of Cowpens against troops from the eastern seaboard, then listing Eastern Seaboard as a belligerent.) I will fix this one, but you would know better which others you might have created with the same problem - Al-Andalus should be replaced with Emirate of Cordoba, Caliphate of Cordoba, or the specific Taifa involved. Agricolae (talk) 13:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC) Hi Agricolae, Good point there. I had just translated directly from the Spanish version for the article in question, thanks for the help. -ClarkSui[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Congratulations, ClarkSui, for recently making your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia! Thank you for all the great work you've done on historical biographies of Castillian nobility, and for all your contributions to the encyclopedia. Keep it up! :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:13, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Lilybaeum (250 BC)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Siege of Lilybaeum (250 BC), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/siege_lilybaeum.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 04:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Lilybaeum (250 BC):

Hello there! It appears that some of your entries on the above titled page seem to be a direct copy from a website. If you would like some help completing this article, just leave a note on my page and we'll work together to keep this thing going. Thanks! keystoneridin! (talk) 04:34, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why the Coren Search BOT identified this article as a copyright violation. I checked your text against the source and it appears completely different. (The BOT does make errors!) However, since you have claimed that you translated this page from the Spanish Wikipedia, please add the {{Translated page}} template to the talk page so that the original Spanish authors may be properly attributed. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:09, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan, while the text is a bit different, it is true that the general content is very similar, not sure if it is different enough to meet wiki standards. The article probably needs to be rewritten, I'll get to it later. Have already mentioned the translation on the talk page, just put the disclaimer in the References section to make sure nobody was confused. Thanks for your help - Clark

Hello ClarkSui, I saw this message a couple of days ago and looked at the Spanish version and then checked it against the website and confirmed that it had been copied and translated from that website word for word. I mentioned it to an Admin who then erased it. Regards, --Maragm (talk) 22:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Burdigala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Germanic, Gallic and KIA

Ruy Pérez Ponce de León (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Grand Master and Juan González

Servius Cornelius Scipio Salvidienus Orfitus (consul 51) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Roma and Ostia

Battle of the Colline Gate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to KIA

María II Díaz de Haro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Toro

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Señores de Vizcaya

Hi ClarkSui, I replied in my talk page. Regards, --Maragm (talk) 14:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sieges of Gibraltar

Hi there. I've seen the work you've done for Algeciras and was wondering if you'd be interested in creating articles for the remaining Sieges of Gibraltar? Your help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, --Gibmetal 77^{talk 2 me} 06:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great, thanks! You can count on my help, just let me know when you start having a crack at them. --Gibmetal 77^{talk 2 me} 10:35, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That was quick, I'm impressed! I'll have a read and see how I can assist over the next few days. I'd then like to nominate the article for DYK, we have until 14 July to do that. --Gibmetal 77^{talk 2 me} 23:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your great work! I'm not sure of the whereabouts of the siege's hotspots in Gibraltar to be able to add relevant photos but I've added one of the castle which dates to the same period. Sorry I've not got as involved as I would have liked but I've been busy getting ready to launch GibraltarpediA which was last night. Please check it out. It would be great if you could participate! --Gibmetal 77^{talk 2 me} 11:38, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! By the way I nominated the article for WP:DYK. --Gibmetal 77^{talk 2 me} 14:19, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grand Masters of the Order of Calatrava

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Grand Masters of the Order of Calatrava requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --IShadowed 01:45, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the CSD tag that I had placed on your article, as I concluded that it would be reasonable to assume it a list. In the future, please indicate the subject/purpose of the article with a lead section "Example is..." or, in this case "The following is a list of..." etc. Thanks! --IShadowed 01:49, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicts

I'm not sure of the reasoning behind this edit you made. Was I doing something wrong? St Anselm (talk) 02:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the category because it is already in the subcategory Category:Conflicts in 484. St Anselm (talk) 02:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Siege of Gibraltar (1309)

On 18 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Siege of Gibraltar (1309), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Siege of Gibraltar of 1309 was a battle of the Reconquista which saw a Castilian victory ending almost 600 years of Muslim rule over the city of Gibraltar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Siege of Gibraltar (1309). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Grandes de España (Current)

I've raised the issue of whether diputaciondelagrandeza.es is a reliable source at WP:RSN#diputaciondelagrandeza.es. As this article falls under our WP:BLP policy, the source must be ironclad. Please join in there. Dougweller (talk) 20:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish translation

I notice your work on Juan de Castilla y Haro. Are you interested in translating some other articles on the Kings of Leon and Castile and their family and children?--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 04:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some shorter requests like John II of Castile, Henry I of Castile, Ordoño III of León, Sancho I of León, Ordoño IV of León, García I of León and Sancho Ordóñez, which I think only need a few extra sections. On the larger sides are Ferdinand IV of Castile or John of Castile, Lord of Valencia de Campos. I've started listing some here too. The smaller one on the verge of completion are my bigger concern though.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 05:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ClarkSui and Emperor, sorry to butt in, but I wanted to mention something. I participate mainly in es.wiki and going over the articles on kings and queens I noticed that they needed to be cleaned up a bit, expanded, corrected, etc. I made a working list on a personal page, which you can check here [11]. Another user and I are going over them, erasing stuff that is not correct, adding more references, etc. and the ones on the list with a checkmark after them have been revised already. If you're going to start translating the kings and queens, maybe you should start with these so you don't include the mistakes that we will be cleaning up. Best regards, --Maragm (talk) 08:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maragm, well noted with your list, I think I had actually seen that before, so we can work from that. Best, -Clark Sui (talk) 02:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lope Díaz de Haro

Hello Clark Sui, It just came to my attention that you made this edit in the article on Lope Díaz de Haro in the es.wiki: [12]. That is incorrect. This Lope Díaz de Haro was not a señor de Vizcaya and the roman numeral would lead readers to believe that he was since this is the way we have been naming the various holders of this title. Also, there are others with the same name and it would be quite difficult to keep track if we start adding Roman numerals to all, in the event that other articles are written on characters with the same name in the future (and there are quite a few). This has led to a discussion on the respective page in es.wiki. I see that in en.wiki you have named him Lope Díaz IV de Haro. I created a disambiguation page for the various characters named Lope D. de H., I had originally moved the title to Lope Díaz de Haro (m. 1322) believing that it was more correct, even though another option, which we will be discussing in es.wiki, is to name him something like Lope Díaz de Haro (señor de Orduña). Regards, --Maragm (talk) 07:29, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ClarkSui, I don't think I would name that character you mentioned with a Roman numeral in the title. In the case of the señores de Vizcaya who share the same name, it makes sense, but if a new titleholder came up who had anothr name I would not add it unless there were others afterwards with the same name, which in respect of these señores de Vizcaya, is not the case. Best regards, --Maragm (talk) 08:32, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the interwiki in the Spanish version and will do likewise in the article you just renamed after we decide on the name. Many thanks, --Maragm (talk) 08:42, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, ClarkSui, I finally opted for Lope Díaz de Haro (m. 1322). You don't have to follow suit and can leave it as you prefer. I checked to see if there was any rule against adding a date in the title of an article and did not find any, and I just think this is clearer since we have cases where people share the same title, have no nicknames, etc. and the date is the only choice in order to differentiate them (e.g. the two Elvira Menéndez, queens of Asturias. Best regards, --Maragm (talk) 09:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Cite Harvard"

English Wikipedia does not have a template called "Cite Harvard". I think the equivalent is {{Harvard citation}} (or {{Harvard citation no brackets}}, depending on where you're using it). — Paul A (talk) 02:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lope Díaz II de Haro

You're welcome, ClarkSui. Happy to contribute when and how I can. ADAMGARRIGUS talk 20:19, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juan Buenaventura de Borja y Armendía, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chilean and Mint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join MILHIST

Hello ClarkSui! Thank you for your contributions.

If you would be interested in joining a group of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, please take a look at the Military history WikiProject—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please sign your name here, and a project coordinator will soon be along with a formal welcome. Regards, Anotherclown (talk) 22:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you have an idea for improving the project, we have a strategy think tank that provides a dedicated forum for discussing it.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! AustralianRupert (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of the Guadalquivir (206 BC), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celtiberian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gaius Veturius Geminus Cicurinus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Roman, A.K.A. and Patrician

Marcus Minucius Augurinus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Roman and Patrician

Publius Minucius Augurinus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Roman and Patrician

Aulus Sempronius Atratinus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Roman

Quintus Cloelius Siculus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Roman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of the Caecus River, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Galatian and Migration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gaius Marcius Censorinus (General) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Legions, Roman, Samnite and Marcia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Rosetta Barnstar
	For your outstanding work in the translation of Spanish military history articles. Thank you! Byblios (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Sulla's first civil war

I noticed your comments on this page about moving/merging the article on Sulla's first civil war. I agree with you on the matter, and wanted to let you know I wrote an article a few years ago on Sulla's civil wars, which gives a general overview of the period and two sub-sections about the respective conflicts. Perhaps a merge with that page would be possible? dci | TALK 07:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Concha

Hello ClarkSui, I edited[13] the entry regarding Manuel de la Concha in the article you started about the Battle of Temalaca. Regards, Tortillovsky (talk) 02:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited São Carlos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardinal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

José Salomé Pina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Archduke Maximilian

María Díaz II de Haro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Grandson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sinyoría d'Albarrazín (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to AKA and Ferdinand of Aragon

Titus Veturius Geminus Cicurinus (consul 494 BC) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Patrician

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsed campaignbox

I have modified Template:Campaignbox Reconquista to accept "collapsed" as a parameter, added this when the campaignbox appears in Siege of Málaga (1487), Siege of Algeciras (1342–1344) and Siege of Algeciras (1369), and removed Template:History of Spain from these articles. I am in strongly in favor of navigational templates, but in these cases the effect was to push the maps, which may help a reader understand the article, down to the back where they will be hard to find. Collapsing Template:Campaignbox Reconquista solves part of the problem. I don't think Template:History of Spain is appropriate. The siege articles are part of the Reconquista series, and that in turn is part of the History of Spain series. To me, a navigational template should only appear in articles that are listed in the template, and as stated in the essay on Wikipedia:Navigation templates (not a guideline, but sensible in my view), few articles need more than one sidebar. Maybe just my personal preference. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I hope my note was not too abrupt. Again, navigation templates like Template:Campaignbox Reconquista are really valuable in encouraging readers to browse to other articles. But a map can be important in helping the reader understand the article they are reading, particularly with military subjects. So there is a balance to be struck. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Titus Sicinius Sabinus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Titus Sicinius Sabinus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titus Sicinius Sabinus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uberaccount (talk) 03:31, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muhammed IX, Sultan of Granada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sacking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Katkari

Moved Katkari (tribe) to Katkari people, more neutral imo. Thanks. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Second Latin War

Hello ClarkSui. Recently you moved this article. It has been proposed at WP:RM/TR to move it back. There is a discussion at Talk:Second Latin War suggesting that this name can't be supported in the literature. One editor stated "I'm worried that by moving this page to its current location we are displacing nomenclature well-established in reliable sources with an artificial Wikipedia-only creation." Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Siege of Uxellodunum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Archer and Alesia

Elinard de Bures (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Crusader

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Siege of Jaén (1225) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Toledo and Castilian

List of Castilian battles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Battle of Gibraltar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Jaén (1230), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jaén and Ávila (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Latin War (498–493 BC), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Etruscan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juan Rodríguez Juárez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Rodríguez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 18:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tianducheng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 22:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Publius Minucius Augurinus

Thanks for that. I have a bit more work to do on the article, primarily for 491 BC.

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

House of Moncada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Catalan, Gerona, Moncada and Noble

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gregorio de Salinas Varona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Tejas and Mexican

Governor of Nuevo León (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diego Rodríguez

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Señorío de Torre de Canals may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Category:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:16, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

dates
years
commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

(This even applies to infoboxes.)

Thanks, and my best wishes.

PS You might consider now widening the year-range column a little.

Tony (talk) 07:31, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Museo Nacional de Arte, Mexico City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cristobal Colon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Diego López de Haro y Sotomayor

added a link pointing to Córdoba

Marquesado del Carpio

added a link pointing to Province of Córdoba

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Señorio del Castillo de Carpio) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Señorio del Castillo de Carpio, ClarkSui!

Wikipedia editor Jbhunley just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Well done article.

To reply, leave a comment on Jbhunley's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diego López de Haro y Sotomayor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francisco Fernández de Córdoba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Garcí Méndez II de Sotomayor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cordoba, Galicia and Province of Córdoba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the House of Méndez de Sotomayor page, your edit caused a duplicate page number error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited River Witham Sword, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Registrar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Casa Fuerte de la Cruceta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coastal defense. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spanish ship Nuestra Señora de la Encarnación y Desengaño, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Canton and Edward Cooke. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Spanish ship Galicia (1750)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Spanish ship Galicia (1750), ClarkSui!

Wikipedia editor NorthBySouthBaranof just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment on NorthBySouthBaranof's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spanish ship Galicia (1750), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cartagena and Ferrol. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HI ;)

Hi, Clark,, i assume youre a Spaniard native or a fan of the country Spain, i am the latter, i put a comment in the talk page of the marquesado del carpio, see it. the best for you too.--Vvven (talk) 04:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of current Grandees of Spain

Hola ClarkSui

I like the way you have reworked the table of Grandes de España: this of course creates more work which, if it is to be completed satisfactorily, will require a group effort - so unsure why you stated publicly your disagreement, without explanation, as to whether Spanish noble titles should be displayed in their original Spanish form or (bad) English?

Let's work together on this - a very good & informative layout - I like it, so long as it is completed correctly!

L'honorable (talk) 19:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS. the Spanish nobility article should maintain consistency between the various noble ranks: dukedom, marquessate, countship, viscountcy & barony (ie. Duke, Marquis, Count, Viscount, Baron). — Preceding unsigned comment added by L'honorable (talk • contribs) 20:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grandeza de España

Hola de nuevo ClarkSui

¡I am leaving a message on my Talk page as this exercise is becoming a bit complicated!

Por favor. L'honorable L'honorable (talk) 03:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:49, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ClarkSui. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Conflicts in 496 BC has been nominated for discussion

Category:Conflicts in 496 BC, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Sulla's First Civil War

Template:Campaignbox Sulla's First Civil War has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ClarkSui. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ClarkSui. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ClarkSui. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Islamic Conquest of Hispania

Template:Campaignbox Islamic Conquest of Hispania has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Napoleonland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Napoleonland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Napoleonland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reyk _YO! 11:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rohrbaugh Firearms

Hello, ClarkSui. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rohrbaugh Firearms".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 17:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Jeon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Jeon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Jeon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]