Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 16

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion‎ | Log

May 16

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 16, 2022.

Social unit

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 5#Social unit

List of royal visits by Queen Elizabeth II

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 06:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As an American, I would have expected this to point to List of state visits made by Elizabeth II. I take it "royal visits" is understood to mean to Commonwealth realms? If this is widely understood throughout the Commonwealth, maybe this is just a case for hatnotes. But given the existing hatnote at List of state visits made by Elizabeth II, and the fact that her visits to Commonwealth realms are a logical subtopic, I recommend retargeting.

Note also that Royal visit redirects to State visit. --BDD (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 17:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep or perhaps disambiguate. She is Queen of Australia, for example, so I don't think it's appropriate to call it a "state visit", as she is not visiting representing a foreign country. Further, per State visit#United Kingdom, state visits do not occur between the United Kingdom and Commonwealth realms, technically. Searching online indicates that the existing target is the primary one for "royal visits", certainly List of state visits made by Elizabeth II is not the primary topic as far as I can tell. A7V2 (talk) 03:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per A7V2's research. Another ignorant American here, but it looks like this is "just a case for hatnotes" after all. -- Tavix (talk) 00:32, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more relist for a firmer consensus following a trend towards keep.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: As stated by A7V2, as she is often the Head of State in these countries that she is visiting, they are typically not referred to as state visits. The current target is a bit more accurate, but I am fine with hatnotes also. TartarTorte 16:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Settings in Battlestar Galatica

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 12#Settings in Battlestar Galatica

Erik Young

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 24#Erik Young

Αγήνωρ

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 24#Αγήνωρ

Cosmic Evolution

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus / retarget to Cosmic Evolution (book). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This term is based on a broad, multi-discipline definition by the author Eric Chaisson.[1] It is not discussed in that context in the physical cosmology article; indeed, the term isn't even mentioned in the article body. The hatnote on the physical cosmology article almost resembles self-promotion. Hence I propose that the redirect be pointed to Cosmic Evolution (book). Praemonitus (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

North East Indian cuisine

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Northeast India#Cuisines. signed, Rosguill talk 06:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The target does not specify what cuisine is considered "North East Indian", leaving readers searching for these terms without specific information about what they are looking for. In addition, North East Indian cuisine was formerly an article for about 9 years before it was WP:BLAR-ed. Steel1943 (talk) 04:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:52, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per BDD. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 23:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

🐱‍🚀

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 9#🐱‍🚀

Sarbhangi

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 07:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Google Scholar searches suggest that Sarbhangi and Sansi are distinct castes (e.g. [4]). Unless RS can be provided that claim they are in fact the same, it looks like this should be deleted to encourage article creation. signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Allegheny County

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest a retarget to Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, the original target, with a hatnote to the dab page. It was changed to its current target by Nyttend in 2013 with the rationale Change target; yes, it's the only one with this spelling, but it could easily mean one of the others with similar spellings and identical pronunciations, but WP:MINORDETAILS exists, and in addition to being the only one with this specific spelling, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania is the most prominent county on the dabpage by far (by population, pageviews, etc; certainly a primary topic for its, again, unique spelling). eviolite (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Young Kindaichi’s Casebook

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 25#Young Kindaichi’s Casebook

Diphosphorus trisulfide

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 23#Diphosphorus trisulfide

SLAY

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 25#SLAY

Palindromes.

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 13:45, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UNNATURAL spelling with trailing full stop. 1234qwer1234qwer4 08:20, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Epitipe

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 25#Epitipe

Letter of protest

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 30#Letter of protest

MOS:PSEUDOCODE

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 24#MOS:PSEUDOCODE

Park Jimin (musician)/junk

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Having a "Junk" redirect is not useful. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:32, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

200-gon

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of polygons. ✗plicit 00:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects for polygons with arbitrary number of sides; all not described at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:40, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retargeting to List of polygons might be an option. 1234qwer1234qwer4 08:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nonadecagram

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 06:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects for specific star polygons neither mentioned at target nor at Star polygon, Polygram (geometry) or elsewhere on the English Wikipedia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and article improvement. These are actual (legal, existing) names, and so the target is the place to go for further understanding. The target should be improved with a more clarifying overview (keyword); likey the target can be {{anchor}}ed there. -DePiep (talk) 14:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
These redirects were initially targeting the articles for the corresponding convex polygons until the latter were redirected to this page. I disagree that the current target is helpful for further understanding in its current state, but if these terms were added to this wiki, I suppose the place would be Polygram (geometry). 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Enneagram of Process

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Article's history contains a poorly written article superseded in scope by the various articles at Enneagram that is not needed for attribution signed, Rosguill talk 06:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, neither appears the history of this redirect to be used there. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:33, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page's history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heteropalindrome

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:heteropalindrome. signed, Rosguill talk 05:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia; could be soft-redirected to wikt:heteropalindrome though. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Semordnilap

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only passing mentions on the English Wikipedia, but could be soft-redirected to wikt:semordnilap. Note that there is some history behind the first one of these. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_May_16&oldid=1092738602"