Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Persib Bandung season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Persib Bandung season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Team doesn't seem to be fully professional, and there is indication that the 2013 season is notable in and of itself (under WP:NSEASONS). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:31, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - Team is fully professional as plays in a league recognised as such here. As a team playing in a "top professional league" it passes the requirements of NSEASONS. In addition, the article, about an ongoing season contains sourced prose from sources other than the club or leagues official website, so assume by the end of the season any wider GNG requirement will be fulfilled, it certainly appears that there is already a degree of additional coverage to date. Presumably this has been nominated in error? Fenix down (talk) 10:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Fenix down. Appears to meet WP:NSEASONS. Giant Snowman 12:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Per above, clearly meets Subject Specific Guidelines. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 14:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw - Seems I misunderstood NSEASONS (and thanks for the list of fully-professional teams). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.