Panamitsu
| This is Panamitsu's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 Archives (Index) |
DYK for September 11 Digital Archive
edit
On 26 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article September 11 Digital Archive, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that misinformation added to the September 11 Digital Archive is considered useful to historians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/September 11 Digital Archive. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, September 11 Digital Archive), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Owha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
The article Owha you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Owha and Talk:Owha/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 01:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
The article Owha you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Owha for comments about the article, and Talk:Owha/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Palace Theater Light
edit On 17 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Palace Theater Light, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Palace Theater light bulb has been running since 1908? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Palace Theater Light. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Palace Theater Light), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 16,398 views (683.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2024 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Edmonds Band Rotunda
edit
Hello! Your submission of Edmonds Band Rotunda at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
DYK nomination of GeoNet (New Zealand)
edit Hello! Your submission of GeoNet (New Zealand) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 12:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification of proposed deletion of List of discontinued Guinness World Records
edit
The article List of discontinued Guinness World Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Failure to meet WP:NLIST; no discussion of this topic as a list/set among reliable sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Happy to discuss this further on the talk page or if there is a deletion discussion page, but I do not believe notability guidelines are met for this article. No ill-will intended. Dingers5Days (talk) 18:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
The article List of discontinued Guinness World Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Failure to meet WP:NLIST
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dingers5Days (talk) 16:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of List of discontinued Guinness World Records for deletion
edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of discontinued Guinness World Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.