research-article

DynaVis: Dynamically Synthesized UI Widgets for Visualization Editing

Authors:

Priyan Vaithilingam,

Elena L. Glassman,

Jeevana Priya Inala,

Chenglong WangAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 985, Pages 1 - 17

https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642639

Published: 11 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Users often rely on GUIs to edit and interact with visualizations — a daunting task due to the large space of editing options. As a result, users are either overwhelmed by a complex UI or constrained by a custom UI with a tailored, fixed subset of options with limited editing flexibility. Natural Language Interfaces (NLIs) are emerging as a feasible alternative for users to specify edits. However, NLIs forgo the advantages of traditional GUI: the ability to explore and repeat edits and see instant visual feedback.

We introduce DynaVis, which blends natural language and dynamically synthesized UI widgets. As the user describes an editing task in natural language, DynaVis performs the edit and synthesizes a persistent widget that the user can interact with to make further modifications. Study participants (n=24) preferred DynaVis over the NLI-only interface citing ease of further edits and editing confidence due to immediate visual feedback.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File - Video Presentation

Video Presentation

Transcript for: Video Presentation

References

[1]

2020. OpenAI API. https://openai.com/blog/openai-api. Accessed: 2023-9-13.

[2]

2023. Apache OpenNLP. https://opennlp.apache.org/. Accessed: 2023-9-13.

[3]

2023. Cloud Natural Language. https://cloud.google.com/natural-language. Accessed: 2023-9-13.

[4]

2023. D3 by Observable. https://d3js.org/. Accessed: 2023-9-14.

[5]

2023. ggplot2. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/. Accessed: 2023-9-14.

[6]

2023. Microsoft PowerBI. https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/. Accessed: 2023-9-14.

[7]

2023. npm: html-react-parser. https://www.npmjs.com/package/html-react-parser. Accessed: 2023-12-6.

[8]

2023. pandas documentation — pandas 2.1.0 documentation. https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/index.html. Accessed: 2023-9-14.

[9]

2023. spaCy - Industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python. https://spacy.io/. Accessed: 2023-9-13.

[10]

2023. Tableau: Business Intelligence and Analytics Software. https://www.tableau.com/. Accessed: 2023-9-14.

[11]

2023. The Two UX Gulfs: Evaluation and Execution. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/two-ux-gulfs-evaluation-execution/. Accessed: 2023-9-14.

[12]

2023. Use natural language to explore data with Power BI Q&A - Power BI. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/natural-language/q-and-a-intro. Accessed: 2023-9-13.

[13]

Shraddha Barke, Michael B. James, and Nadia Polikarpova. 2023. Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating Models. Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 7, OOPSLA1, Article 78 (apr 2023), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586030

Digital Library

[14]

Yonatan Belinkov and James Glass. 2019. Analysis methods in neural language processing: A survey. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 7 (2019), 49–72.

[15]

Raluca Budiu. 2014. Memory Recognition and Recall in User Interfaces. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/recognition-and-recall/. Accessed: 2023-9-12.

[16]

Qiaochu Chen, Shankara Pailoor, Celeste Barnaby, Abby Criswell, Chenglong Wang, Greg Durrett, and Işil Dillig. 2022. Type-directed synthesis of visualizations from natural language queries. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages 6, OOPSLA2 (2022), 532–559.

Digital Library

[17]

Yiru Chen. 2020. Monte Carlo Tree Search for Generating Interactive Data Analysis Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGMOD ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2837–2839. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318464.3384404

Digital Library

[18]

Yiru Chen, Ryan Li, Austin Mac, Tianbao Xie, Tao Yu, and Eugene Wu. 2022. NL2INTERFACE: Interactive Visualization Interface Generation from Natural Language Queries. ArXiv abs/2209.08834 (2022). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252367337

[19]

Yiru Chen and Eugene Wu. 2022. PI2: End-to-end Interactive Visualization Interface Generation from Queries. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data (Philadelphia, PA, USA) (SIGMOD ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1711–1725. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514221.3526166

Digital Library

[20]

Andrew Crotty, Alex Galakatos, Emanuel Zgraggen, Carsten Binnig, and Tim Kraska. 2015. Vizdom: interactive analytics through pen and touch. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 8, 12 (2015), 2024–2027.

Digital Library

[21]

Kedar Dhamdhere, Kevin S. McCurley, Ralfi Nahmias, Mukund Sundararajan, and Qiqi Yan. 2017. Analyza: Exploring Data with Conversation. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Limassol, Cyprus) (IUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025171.3025227

Digital Library

[22]

Victor Dibia. 2023. LIDA: A Tool for Automatic Generation of Grammar-Agnostic Visualizations and Infographics using Large Language Models. (6 March 2023). arxiv:2303.02927 [cs.AI]

[23]

Victor Dibia and Çağatay Demiralp. 2019. Data2vis: Automatic generation of data visualizations using sequence-to-sequence recurrent neural networks. IEEE computer graphics and applications 39, 5 (2019), 33–46.

[24]

Michael H. Fischer, Giovanni Campagna, Euirim Choi, and Monica S. Lam. 2021. DIY assistant: a multi-modal end-user programmable virtual assistant. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (Virtual, Canada) (PLDI 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453483.3454046

Digital Library

[25]

Krzysztof Gajos and Daniel S. Weld. 2004. SUPPLE: automatically generating user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Funchal, Madeira, Portugal) (IUI ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/964442.964461

Digital Library

[26]

Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Daniel S. Weld. 2007. Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users’ motor and vision capabilities. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Newport, Rhode Island, USA) (UIST ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/1294211.1294253

Digital Library

[27]

Tong Gao, Mira Dontcheva, Eytan Adar, Zhicheng Liu, and Karrie G. Karahalios. 2015. DataTone: Managing Ambiguity in Natural Language Interfaces for Data Visualization. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (Charlotte, NC, USA) (UIST ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807478

Digital Library

[28]

Jeffrey Heer, Maneesh Agrawala, and Wesley Willett. 2008. Generalized selection via interactive query relaxation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy) (CHI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 959–968. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357203

Digital Library

[29]

Doris Jung-Lin Lee, John Lee, Tarique Siddiqui, Jaewoo Kim, Karrie Karahalios, and Aditya Parameswaran. 2019. You can’t always sketch what you want: Understanding sensemaking in visual query systems. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 26, 1 (2019), 1267–1277.

[30]

Toby Jia-Jun Li, Marissa Radensky, Justin Jia, Kirielle Singarajah, Tom M. Mitchell, and Brad A. Myers. 2019. PUMICE: A Multi-Modal Agent that Learns Concepts and Conditionals from Natural Language and Demonstrations. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New Orleans, LA, USA) (UIST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347899

Digital Library

[31]

Zhicheng Liu, John Thompson, Alan Wilson, Mira Dontcheva, James Delorey, Sam Grigg, Bernard Kerr, and John Stasko. 2018. Data Illustrator: Augmenting Vector Design Tools with Lazy Data Binding for Expressive Visualization Authoring. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Montreal QC, Canada,) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173697

Digital Library

[32]

Edward Loper and Steven Bird. 2002. Nltk: The natural language toolkit. arXiv preprint cs/0205028 (2002).

Digital Library

[33]

Dylan Lukes, John Sarracino, Cora Coleman, Hila Peleg, Sorin Lerner, and Nadia Polikarpova. 2021. Synthesis of web layouts from examples. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (Athens, Greece) (ESEC/FSE 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 651–663. https://doi.org/10.1145/3468264.3468533

Digital Library

[34]

Yuyu Luo, Xuedi Qin, Nan Tang, Guoliang Li, and Xinran Wang. 2018. DeepEye: Creating Good Data Visualizations by Keyword Search. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data (Houston, TX, USA) (SIGMOD ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1733–1736. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183713.3193545

Digital Library

[35]

Christopher Manning, Mihai Surdeanu, John Bauer, Jenny Finkel, Steven Bethard, and David McClosky. 2014. The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit. In Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, Kalina Bontcheva and Jingbo Zhu (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-5010

[36]

Ruhaab Markas. 2018. Ask Data: Simplifying analytics with natural language. https://www.tableau.com/blog/ask-data-simplifying-analytics-natural-language-98655. Accessed: 2023-9-13.

[37]

Dominik Moritz, Chenglong Wang, Greg L Nelson, Halden Lin, Adam M Smith, Bill Howe, and Jeffrey Heer. 2018. Formalizing visualization design knowledge as constraints: Actionable and extensible models in draco. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 25, 1 (2018), 438–448.

[38]

Arpit Narechania, Arjun Srinivasan, and John Stasko. 2020. NL4DV: A toolkit for generating analytic specifications for data visualization from natural language queries. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 2 (2020), 369–379.

[39]

Jeffrey Nichols, Brad A. Myers, Michael Higgins, Joseph Hughes, Thomas K. Harris, Roni Rosenfeld, and Kevin Litwack. 2003. Personal universal controllers: controlling complex appliances with GUIs and speech. In CHI ’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI EA ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 624–625. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765896

Digital Library

[40]

Jeffrey Nichols, Brad A. Myers, and Brandon Rothrock. 2006. UNIFORM: automatically generating consistent remote control user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (CHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124865

Digital Library

[41]

Jeffrey Nichols, Brandon Rothrock, Duen Horng Chau, and Brad A. Myers. 2006. Huddle: automatically generating interfaces for systems of multiple connected appliances. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Montreux, Switzerland) (UIST ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1145/1166253.1166298

Digital Library

[42]

Jakob Nielsen. 2020. 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/. Accessed: 2023-9-13.

[43]

Donald Norman. 1986. User centered system design. New perspectives on human-computer interaction (1986).

[44]

Raja Parasuraman and Victor Riley. 1997. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human factors 39, 2 (1997), 230–253.

[45]

Donghao Ren, Bongshin Lee, and Matthew Brehmer. 2018. Charticulator: Interactive construction of bespoke chart layouts. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 25, 1 (2018), 789–799.

[46]

Arvind Satyanarayan and Jeffrey Heer. 2014. Lyra: An Interactive Visualization Design Environment. Computer Graphics Forum 33, 3 (2014), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12391 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.12391

[47]

Arvind Satyanarayan, Dominik Moritz, Kanit Wongsuphasawat, and Jeffrey Heer. 2016. Vega-lite: A grammar of interactive graphics. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 23, 1 (2016), 341–350.

Digital Library

[48]

Vidya Setlur, Sarah E. Battersby, Melanie Tory, Rich Gossweiler, and Angel X. Chang. 2016. Eviza: A Natural Language Interface for Visual Analysis. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Tokyo, Japan) (UIST ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984588

Digital Library

[49]

Leixian Shen, Enya Shen, Yuyu Luo, Xiaocong Yang, Xuming Hu, Xiongshuai Zhang, Zhiwei Tai, and Jianmin Wang. 2022. Towards natural language interfaces for data visualization: A survey. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics (2022).

[50]

Tarique Siddiqui, Paul Luh, Zesheng Wang, Karrie Karahalios, and Aditya Parameswaran. 2020. ShapeSearch: A Flexible and Efficient System for Shape-based Exploration of Trendlines. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGMOD ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318464.3389722

Digital Library

[51]

Arjun Srinivasan and Vidya Setlur. 2023. BOLT: A Natural Language Interface for Dashboard Authoring. (2023).

[52]

Arjun Srinivasan and John T. Stasko. 2017. Natural Language Interfaces for Data Analysis with Visualization: Considering What Has and Could Be Asked. In EuroVis 2017 - Short Papers, Barbora Kozlikova, Tobias Schreck, and Thomas Wischgoll (Eds.). The Eurographics Association, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.2312/eurovisshort.20171133

Digital Library

[53]

Priyan Vaithilingam and Philip J. Guo. 2019. Bespoke: Interactively Synthesizing Custom GUIs from Command-Line Applications By Demonstration. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New Orleans, LA, USA) (UIST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347944

Digital Library

[54]

Lea Verou, Amy X. Zhang, and David R. Karger. 2016. Mavo: Creating Interactive Data-Driven Web Applications by Authoring HTML. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Tokyo, Japan) (UIST ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984551

Digital Library

[55]

Yun Wang, Zhitao Hou, Leixian Shen, Tongshuang Wu, Jiaqi Wang, He Huang, Haidong Zhang, and Dongmei Zhang. 2022. Towards natural language-based visualization authoring. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 1 (2022), 1222–1232.

[56]

Leland Wilkinson. 2005. The Grammar of Graphics, Second Edition. Springer.

[57]

Kanit Wongsuphasawat, Zening Qu, Dominik Moritz, Riley Chang, Felix Ouk, Anushka Anand, Jock Mackinlay, Bill Howe, and Jeffrey Heer. 2017. Voyager 2: Augmenting Visual Analysis with Partial View Specifications. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2648–2659. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025768

Digital Library

[58]

Tom Young, Devamanyu Hazarika, Soujanya Poria, and Erik Cambria. 2018. Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing. ieee Computational intelligenCe magazine 13, 3 (2018), 55–75.

[59]

Bowen Yu and Cláudio T Silva. 2019. FlowSense: A natural language interface for visual data exploration within a dataflow system. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 26, 1 (2019), 1–11.

[60]

JD Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, and Qian Yang. 2023. Why Johnny can’t prompt: how non-AI experts try (and fail) to design LLM prompts. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–21.

Digital Library

[61]

Emanuel Zgraggen, Robert Zeleznik, and Steven M Drucker. 2014. Panoramicdata: Data analysis through pen & touch. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 20, 12 (2014), 2112–2121.

[62]

Dan Zhang, Yoshihiko Suhara, Jinfeng Li, Madelon Hulsebos, Çağatay Demiralp, and Wang-Chiew Tan. 2019. Sato: Contextual semantic type detection in tables. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.06311 (2019).

[63]

Haoci Zhang, Viraj Raj, Thibault Sellam, and Eugene Wu. 2018. Precision interfaces for different modalities. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data. 1777–1780.

Digital Library

Cited By

Xie LZheng CXia HQu HZhu-Tian C(2024)WaitGPT: Monitoring and Steering Conversational LLM Agent in Data Analysis with On-the-Fly Code VisualizationProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676374(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676374
Cheng RBarik TLeung AHohman FNichols J(2024)BISCUIT: Scaffolding LLM-Generated Code with Ephemeral UIs in Computational Notebooks2024 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00012(13-23)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00012
Wang HGordon MBattle LHeer J(2024)DracoGPT: Extracting Visualization Design Preferences from Large Language ModelsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345635031:1(710-720)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456350
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

DynaVis: Dynamically Synthesized UI Widgets for Visualization Editing
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms
      1. Graphical user interfaces
      2. Natural language interfaces
    2. Interactive systems and tools
  2. Interaction design
    1. Interaction design process and methods
      1. User interface design
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software notations and tools
    1. Context specific languages
      1. Visual languages
    2. Development frameworks and environments
      1. Integrated and visual development environments

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Usability studies on a visualisation for parallel display and control of alternative scenarios
AVI '04: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces

Many applications require comparison between alternative scenarios; most support it poorly. A subjunctive interface supports comparison through its facilities for parallel setup, viewing and control of scenarios. To evaluate the usability and benefits ...
Capricorn - an intelligent user interface for mobile widgets
MobileHCI '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services

Widgets are embeddable objects that provide easy and ubiquitous access to dynamic information sources, e.g., weather, news or TV program information. Interactions with widgets take place through a so-called widget engine, which is a specialized client-...
Extending the Utility of Treemaps with Flexible Hierarchy
IV '04: Proceedings of the Information Visualisation, Eighth International Conference

Treemaps are a visualization technique for presenting hierarchical information on two-dimensional displays. Prior implementations limit the visualization to pre-defined static hierarchies. Flexible hierarchy, a new capability of Treemap 4.0, enables ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2024

18961 pages

ISBN:9798400703300

DOI:10.1145/3613904

Editors:
Florian Floyd Mueller
Monash University
,
Penny Kyburz
The Australian National University
,
Julie R. Williamson
University of Glasgow
,
Corina Sas
Lancaster University
,
Max L. Wilson
University of Nottingham
,
Phoebe Toups Dugas
Monash University/New Mexico State University
,
Irina Shklovski
University of Copenhagen

Copyright © 2024 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 May 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Badges

Best Paper

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

National Science Foundation

Conference

CHI '24

Sponsor:

CHI '24: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 11 - 16, 2024

HI, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
2,768
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)2,768
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)225

Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Xie LZheng CXia HQu HZhu-Tian C(2024)WaitGPT: Monitoring and Steering Conversational LLM Agent in Data Analysis with On-the-Fly Code VisualizationProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676374(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676374
Cheng RBarik TLeung AHohman FNichols J(2024)BISCUIT: Scaffolding LLM-Generated Code with Ephemeral UIs in Computational Notebooks2024 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00012(13-23)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00012
Wang HGordon MBattle LHeer J(2024)DracoGPT: Extracting Visualization Design Preferences from Large Language ModelsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345635031:1(710-720)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456350
Narechania AOdak KEl-Assady MEndert A(2024)ProvenanceWidgets: A Library of UI Control Elements to Track and Dynamically Overlay Analytic ProvenanceIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345614431:1(1235-1245)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456144

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Table of Contents