research-article

Alabib-65: A Realistic Dataset for Algerian Sign Language Recognition

Authors:

Rachid SeghirAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing, Volume 22, Issue 6

Article No.: 178, Pages 1 - 23

https://doi.org/10.1145/3596909

Published: 17 June 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Sign language recognition (SLR) is a promising research field that aims to blur boundaries between Deaf and hearing people by creating a system that can transcribe signs into a written or vocal language. There is a growing body of literature that investigates the recognition of different sign languages, especially American sign language. So far, to the best of our knowledge, no study has considered the Algerian SLR. This is mainly due to the lack of datasets. To address this issue, we created the Alabib-65, the first Algerian Sign Language dataset. It consists of up to 6,238 Videos recorded from 41 native signers under realistic settings. This dataset is challenging due to a variety of reasons. First, there is a little inter-class variability. The 65 sign classes are similar in terms of hands’ configuration, placement, or movement and can share the same sub-parts. Second, there is a large intra-class variability. Furthermore, compared to other SL datasets that were collected from an indoor environment with a static and simple background, our videos were recorded from both indoor and outdoor environments with 22 backgrounds varying from simple to cluttered, and from static to dynamic. To underpin future research, we provided baseline results on this new dataset using state-of-the-art machine learning methods, namely: IDTFs with Fisher vector and SVM-classifier, VGG16-GRU, I3D, I3D-GRU, and I3D-GRU-Attention. The results show the validity and the challenges of our dataset.

References

[1]

M. A. Abdel-Fattah. 2005. Arabic Sign Language: A perspective. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 10, 2 (2005), 212–221.

[2]

M. Al-Faris, J. Chiverton, D. Ndzi, and A. I. Ahmed. 2020. A review on computer vision-based methods for human action recognition. J. Imag. 6, 6 (2020), 46–46.

[3]

K. Al-Fityani. 2010. Deaf people, modernity, and a contentious effort to unify arab sign languages: a dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. https://www.proquest.com/docview/821548359.

[4]

K. Al-Fityani and C. Padden. 2008. A lexical comparison of sign languages in the Arab world. Trabalho Apresentado ao TISLR 9 (2008).

[5]

Kinda Al-Fityani and Carol Padden. 2010. Sign language geography in the Arab world. In Sign Languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), Diane Brentari (Ed.). Cambridge University Press New York, Cambridge, 433–450.

[6]

M. Alfonse, A. Ali, A. S. Elons, N. L. Badr, and M. Aboul-Ela. 2015. Arabic Sign Language benchmark database for different heterogeneous sensors. In 5th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA). 1–9.

[7]

Pablo Andres Millan Arias and Julian Armando Quiroga Sepulveda. 2018. Deep learned vs. hand-crafted features for action classification. In IEEE 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE). 170–171.

[8]

Saeideh Ghanbari Azar and Hadi Seyedarabi. 2020. Trajectory-based recognition of dynamic Persian sign language using hidden Markov model. Comput. Speech Lang. 61 (2020), 101053.

Digital Library

[9]

Nanziba Basnin, Lutfun Nahar, and Mohammad Shahadat Hossain. 2021. An integrated CNN-LSTM model for Bangla lexical sign language recognition. In International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering. 695–707.

[10]

James Bergstra, Dan Yamins, and David D. Cox. 2013. Hyperopt: A Python library for optimizing the hyperparameters of machine learning algorithms. In 12th Python in Science Conference.

[11]

Yunus Can Bilge, Ramazan Gokberk Cinbis, and Nazli Ikizler-Cinbis. 2023. Towards zero-shot sign language recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 45, 1 (2023), 1217–1232.

[12]

Helen Blom, Marc Marschark, Mathijs P. J. Vervloed, and Harry Knoors. 2014. Finding friends online: Online activities by deaf students and their well-being. PloS One 9, 2 (2014), e88351.

[13]

M. Borg and K. P. Camilleri. 2019. Sign language detection “in the wild” with recurrent neural networks. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 1637–1641.

[14]

Aldjia Boucetta and Kamal Eddine Melkemi. 2013. Hand shape recognition using Hu and Legendre moments. In 6th International Conference on Security of Information and Networks. 272–276.

Digital Library

[15]

Abdelbasset Boukdir, Mohamed Benaddy, Ayoub Ellahyani, Othmane El Meslouhi, and Mustapha Kardouchi. 2022. Isolated video-based Arabic Sign Language recognition using convolutional and recursive neural networks. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 47, 2 (2022), 2187–2199.

[16]

Danielle Bragg, Abraham Glasser, Fyodor Minakov, Naomi Caselli, and William Thies. 2022. Exploring collection of sign language videos through crowdsourcing. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–24.

Digital Library

[17]

Danielle Bragg, Oscar Koller, Mary Bellard, Larwan Berke, Patrick Boudreault, Annelies Braffort, Naomi Caselli, Matt Huenerfauth, Hernisa Kacorri, and Tessa Verhoef. 2019. Sign language recognition, generation, and translation: An interdisciplinary perspective. In 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 16–31.

Digital Library

[18]

Josueé Espejel Cabrera, Jair Cervantes, Farid Garciía Lamont, Joseé Sergio Ruiz Castilla, and Laura D. Jalili. 2021. Mexican sign language segmentation using color based neuronal networks to detect the individual skin color. Expert Systems with Applications 183 (2021), 115295.

Digital Library

[19]

N. C. Camgöz, A. A. Kğlu, S. Karabüklü, M. Kelepir, A. S. Özsoy, and L. Akarun. 2016. BosphorusSign: A Turkish sign language recognition corpus in health and finance domains. In 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16). 1383–1388.

[20]

Joao Carreira and Andrew Zisserman. 2017. Quo vadis, action recognition? A new model and the kinetics dataset. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 6299–6308.

[21]

Ka Leong Cheng, Zhaoyang Yang, Qifeng Chen, and Yu-Wing Tai. 2020. Fully convolutional networks for continuous sign language recognition. In European Conference on Computer Vision. 697–714.

Digital Library

[22]

Navneet Dalal, Bill Triggs, and Cordelia Schmid. 2006. Human detection using oriented histograms of flow and appearance. In European Conference on Computer Vision. 428–441.

Digital Library

[23]

J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L. J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei. 2009. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 248–255.

[24]

J. Donahue, L. A. Hendricks, S. Guadarrama, M. Rohrbach, S. Venugopalan, K. Saenko, and T. Darrell. 2015. Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition and description. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2625–2634.

[25]

A. K. Dubey and V. Jain. 2019. A review of face recognition methods using deep learning network. J. Inf. Optim. Sci. 40, 2 (2019), 547–558.

[26]

E. Efthimiou and S. E. Fotinea. 2007. GSLC: Creation and annotation of a Greek sign language corpus for HCI. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. 657–666.

[27]

M. Elpeltagy, M. Abdelwahab, M. E. Hussein, A. Shoukry, A. Shoala, and M. Galal. 2018. Multi-modality- based Arabic Sign Language recognition. IET Comput. Vis. 12, 7 (2018), 1031–1039.

[28]

Marco Fagiani, Emanuele Principi, Stefano Squartini, and Francesco Piazza. 2015. Signer independent isolated Italian sign recognition based on hidden Markov models. Pattern Anal. Applic. 18, 2 (2015), 385–402.

Digital Library

[29]

Uzma Farooq, Mohd Shafry Mohd Rahim, Nabeel Sabir, Amir Hussain, and Adnan Abid. 2021. Advances in machine translation for sign language: approaches, limitations, and challenges. Neural Computing and Applications 33, 21 (2021), 14357–14399.

Digital Library

[30]

M. Geetha and M. R. Kaimal. 2018. A 3D stroke based representation of sign language signs using key maximum curvature points and 3D chain codes. Multim. Tools Applic. 77, 6 (2018), 7097–7130.

Digital Library

[31]

VIPL group, ICT, and CAS. 2015. DEVISIGN Database. http://vipl.ict.ac.cn/homepage/ksl/data.html.

[32]

G. Guo and N. Zhang. 2019. A survey on deep learning based face recognition. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 189 (2019), 102805–102805.

Digital Library

[33]

M. Hrúz, J. Trojanová, and M. Železný. 2012. Local binary pattern based features for sign language recognition. Pattern Recog. Image Anal. 22, 4 (2012), 519–526.

Digital Library

[34]

Ming-Kuei Hu. 1962. Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Trans. Inf. Theor. 8, 2 (1962), 179–187.

[35]

Noureldien Hussein, Efstratios Gavves, and Arnold W. M. Smeulders. 2019. Videograph: Recognizing minutes-long human activities in videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.05143 (2019).

[36]

N. B. Ibrahim, M. M. Selim, and H. H. Zayed. 2018. An automatic Arabic Sign Language Recognition System (ArSLRS). J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci. 30, 4 (2018), 470–477.

[37]

H. Idrees, A. R. Zamir, Y. G. Jiang, A. Gorban, I. Laptev, R. Sukthankar, and M. Shah. 2017. The THUMOS challenge on action recognition for videos “in the wild.” Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 155 (2017), 1–23.

[38]

Pat Jangyodsuk, Christopher Conly, and Vassilis Athitsos. 2014. Sign language recognition using dynamic time warping and hand shape distance based on histogram of oriented gradient features. In 7th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. 1–6.

Digital Library

[39]

Pavel Jedlička, Zdeněk Krňoul, Miloš Železny, and Luděk Müller. 2022. MC-TRISLAN: A large 3D motion capture sign language data-set. In LREC2022 10th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Multilingual Sign Language Resources. 88–93.

[40]

H. R. V. Joze and O. Koller. 2018. MS-ASL: A large-scale data set and benchmark for understanding American Sign Language. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01053 (2018).

[41]

Ildar Kagirov, Dmitry Ryumin, and Alexandr Axyonov. 2019. Method for multimodal recognition of one-handed sign language gestures through 3D convolution and LSTM neural networks. In International Conference on Speech and Computer. 191–200.

Digital Library

[42]

Will Kay, Joao Carreira, Karen Simonyan, Brian Zhang, Chloe Hillier, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Fabio Viola, Tim Green, Trevor Back, and Paul Natsev. 2017. The kinetics human action video dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06950 (2017).

[43]

Harry Knoors and Marc Marschark. 2014. Teaching Deaf Learners: Psychological and Developmental Foundations. Oxford University Press.

[44]

Oscar Koller. 2020. Quantitative survey of the state of the art in sign language recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.09918 (2020).

[45]

Deep Kothadiya, Chintan Bhatt, Krenil Sapariya, Kevin Patel, Ana-Belén Gil-González, and Juan M. Corchado. 2022. DeepSign: Sign language detection and recognition using deep learning. Electronics 11, 11 (2022), 1780.

[46]

Ines Kožuh and Matjaž Debevc. 2020. The utilisation of social media among users with hearing loss: An analysis of Facebook communities. Univ. Access Inf. Societ. 19, 3 (2020), 541–555.

Digital Library

[47]

Ines Kožuh, Manfred Hintermair, and Matjaž Debevc. 2016. Community building among deaf and hard of hearing people by using written language on social networking sites. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65 (2016), 295–307.

Digital Library

[48]

Ines Kožuh, Manfred Hintermair, Andreas Holzinger, Zala Volčič, and Matjaž Debevc. 2015. Enhancing universal access: Deaf and hard of hearing people on social networking sites. Univ. Access Inf. Societ. 14, 4 (2015), 537–545.

Digital Library

[49]

Ines Kožuh, Peter Čakš, and Matjaž Debevc. 2022. Contemporary assistive technologies for students with hearing loss in higher education. In International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. 512–521.

Digital Library

[50]

D. Li, C. Rodriguez, X. Yu, and H. Li. 2020. Word-level deep sign language recognition from video: A new large-scale dataset and methods comparison. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. 1459–1469.

[51]

Minh-Thang Luong, Hieu Pham, and Christopher D. Manning. 2015. Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.04025 (2015).

[52]

Hadis Madani and Manoochehr Nahvi. 2013. Isolated dynamic Persian sign language recognition based on camshift algorithm and radon transform. In 1st Iranian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (PRIA). 1–5.

[53]

Sarfaraz Masood, Adhyan Srivastava, Harish Chandra Thuwal, and Musheer Ahmad. 2018. Real-time sign language gesture (word) recognition from video sequences using CNN and RNN. In Intelligent Engineering Informatics, Vikrant Bhateja, Carlos A. Coello Coello, Suresh Chandra Satapathy, and Prasant Kumar Pattnaik (Eds.). Vol. 695. Springer Singapore, 623–632.

[54]

M. Oszust and M. Wysocki. 2013. Polish sign language words recognition with Kinect. In 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI). 219–226.

[55]

Oğulcan Özdemir, Necati Cihan Camgöz, Lale Akarun, et al. 2016. Isolated sign language recognition using improved dense trajectories. In 24th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference (SIU). 1961–1964.

[56]

Oğulcan Özdemir, Ahmet Alp Kindiroğlu, Necati Cihan Camgöz, and Lale Akarun. 2020. Bosphorussign22k sign language recognition dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.01283 (2020).

[57]

Carol Padden and Tom Humphries. 2009. Inside Deaf Culture. Harvard University Press.

[58]

F. Perronnin, J. Sánchez, and T. Mensink. 2010. Improving the Fisher kernel for large-scale image classification. European Conference on Computer Vision. 143–156.

[59]

F. Quiroga, R. Antonio, F. Ronchetti, L. C. Lanzarini, and A. Rosete. 2017. A study of convolutional architectures for handshape recognition applied to sign language. In XXIII Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación.

[60]

J. L. Raheja, Anand Mishra, and Ankit Chaudhary. 2016. Indian sign language recognition using SVM. Pattern Recog. Image Anal. 26, 2 (2016), 434–441.

Digital Library

[61]

Razieh Rastgoo, Kourosh Kiani, and Sergio Escalera. 2021. Sign language recognition: A deep survey. Expert Systems with Applications 164 (2021), 113794.

[62]

Razieh Rastgoo, Kourosh Kiani, and Sergio Escalera. 2020. Video-based isolated hand sign language recognition using a deep cascaded model. Multim. Tools Applic. 79 (2020), 22965–22987.

[63]

Razieh Rastgoo, Kourosh Kiani, and Sergio Escalera. 2021. Hand pose aware multimodal isolated sign language recognition. Multim. Tools Applic. 80, 1 (2021), 127–163.

Digital Library

[64]

Franco Ronchetti, Facundo Quiroga, César Armando Estrebou, Laura Cristina Lanzarini, and Alejandro Rosete. 2016. LSA64: An Argentinian sign language dataset. In XXII Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación (CACIC 2016).

[65]

Khadidja Sadeddine, Zohra Fatma Chelali, Rachida Djeradi, Amar Djeradi, Sidahmed Benabderrahmane, et al. 2021. Recognition of user-dependent and independent static hand gestures: Application to sign language. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 79 (2021), 103193.

Digital Library

[66]

Tamer Shanableh and Khaled Assaleh. 2011. User-independent recognition of Arabic Sign Language for facilitating communication with the deaf community. Digit. Sig. Process. 21, 4 (2011), 535–542.

Digital Library

[67]

S. Shivashankara and S. Srinath. 2022. Signer independent real-time hand gestures recognition using multi-features extraction and various classifiers. International Journal of Information Technology 14, 3 (2022), 1229–1240.

[68]

S. M. Shohieb, H. K. Elminir, and A. M. Riad. 2015. SignsWorld Atlas; a benchmark Arabic Sign Language database. J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci. 27, 1 (2015), 68–76.

Digital Library

[69]

Ala Addin I. Sidig, Hamzah Luqman, Sabri Mahmoud, and Mohamed Mohandes. 2021. KArSL: Arabic Sign Language database. ACM Trans. Asian Low-resour. L. Inf. Process. 20, 1 (2021), 1–19.

Digital Library

[70]

Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).

[71]

Ozge Mercanoglu Sincan, Julio Junior, C. S. Jacques, Sergio Escalera, and Hacer Yalim Keles. 2021. ChaLearn LAP large scale signer independent isolated sign language recognition challenge: Design, results and future research. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3472–3481.

[72]

O. M. Sincan and H. Y. Keles. 2020. AUTSL: A large scale multi-modal Turkish Sign Language dataset and baseline methods. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 181340–181355.

[73]

Dushyant Kumar Singh. 2021. 3D-CNN based dynamic gesture recognition for Indian Sign Language modeling. Procedia Comput. Sci. 189 (2021), 76–83.

[74]

T. Singh and D. K. Vishwakarma. 2019. Video benchmarks of human action datasets: A review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 52, 2 (2019), 1107–1154.

Digital Library

[75]

A. Sridhar, R. G. Ganesan, P. Kumar, and M. Khapra. 2020. INCLUDE: A large scale dataset for Indian Sign Language recognition. In 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1366–1375.

[76]

Chao Sun, Tianzhu Zhang, and Changsheng Xu. 2015. Latent support vector machine modeling for sign language recognition with Kinect. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 6, 2 (2015), 1–20.

Digital Library

[77]

Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. 2015. Going deeper with convolutions. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1–9.

[78]

Narada Thiracitta and Herman Gunawan. 2021. SIBI sign language recognition using convolutional neural network combined with transfer learning and non-trainable parameters. Procedia Comput. Sci. 179 (2021), 72–80.

[79]

Anil Osman Tur and Hacer Yalim Keles. 2021. Evaluation of hidden Markov models using deep CNN features in isolated sign recognition. Multim. Tools Applic. 80, 13 (2021), 19137–19155.

Digital Library

[80]

Ajay Vasudevan, Pablo Negri, Camila Di Ielsi, Bernabe Linares-Barranco, and Teresa Serrano-Gotarredona. 2022. SL-Animals-DVS: Event-driven sign language animals dataset. Pattern Anal. Applic. 25, 3 (2022), 505–520.

Digital Library

[81]

Adithya Venugopalan and Rajesh Reghunadhan. 2021. Applying deep neural networks for the automatic recognition of sign language words: A communication aid to deaf agriculturists. Expert Systems with Applications 185 (2021), 115601.

Digital Library

[82]

Hanjie Wang, Xiujuan Chai, Xiaopeng Hong, Guoying Zhao, and Xilin Chen. 2016. Isolated sign language recognition with Grassmann covariance matrices. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8, 4 (2016), 1–21.

Digital Library

[83]

H. Wang and C. Schmid. 2013. Action recognition with improved trajectories. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 3551–3558.

[84]

Youzi Xiao, Zhiqiang Tian, Jiachen Yu, Yinshu Zhang, Shuai Liu, Shaoyi Du, and Xuguang Lan. 2020. A review of object detection based on deep learning. Multim. Tools Applic. 79, 33 (2020), 23729–23791.

Digital Library

[85]

S. Yang, S. Jung, H. Kang, and C. Kim. 2020. The Korean sign language dataset for action recognition. In International Conference on Multimedia Modeling. 532–542.

Digital Library

[86]

Fan Zhang, Valentin Bazarevsky, Andrey Vakunov, Andrei Tkachenka, George Sung, Chuo-Ling Chang, and Matthias Grundmann. 2020. MediaPipe hands: On-device real-time hand tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10214 (2020).

[87]

Jihai Zhang, Wengang Zhou, and Houqiang Li. 2015. A new system for Chinese Sign Language recognition. In IEEE China Summit and International Conference on Signal and Information Processing (ChinaSIP). 534–538.

[88]

Jihai Zhang, Wengang Zhou, Chao Xie, Junfu Pu, and Houqiang Li. 2016. Chinese Sign Language recognition with adaptive HMM. In IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME). 1–6.

[89]

Kai Zhao, Kejun Zhang, Yu Zhai, Daotong Wang, and Jianbo Su. 2021. Real-time sign language recognition based on video stream. Int. J. Syst. Contr. Commun. 12, 2 (2021), 158–174.

[90]

Guangming Zhu, Liang Zhang, Peiyi Shen, and Juan Song. 2017. Multimodal gesture recognition using 3D convolution and convolutional LSTM. IEEE Access 5 (2017), 4517–4524.

Cited By

Muhammed Farsin KMohammed Ashfaque PMohamed Abdul Shahid PMohammad Mirdas CAnish Kumar BJemsheer Ahmed P(2025)Sign Language Transformation: AI-Enabled Communication for the DeafIntelligent Communication, Control and Devices10.1007/978-981-97-8329-8_57(787-802)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8329-8_57
Bellil LGhiri MBoulesnane A(2024)Empowering Deaf Community in Healthcare Communication: 1D-CNN-Based Algerian Sign Language Recognition System2024 6th International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Systems (PAIS)10.1109/PAIS62114.2024.10541233(1-7)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/PAIS62114.2024.10541233
Chandra ARanjan ASahu DPrakash SYang TRathore RVajpayee A(2024)An Efficient Model for American Sign Language Recognition Using Deep-Neural Networks2024 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA)10.1109/DASA63652.2024.10836568(1-5)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA63652.2024.10836568
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Alabib-65: A Realistic Dataset for Algerian Sign Language Recognition

Recommendations

A multimodal LIBRAS-UFOP Brazilian sign language dataset of minimal pairs using a microsoft Kinect sensor
Abstract
Sign language recognition has made significant advances in recent years. Many researchers show interest in encouraging the development of different applications to simplify the daily life of deaf people and to integrate them into the ...
Highlights
- There are limited publicly datasets that provide complete RGB-D and skeleton data.
LSA-T: The First Continuous Argentinian Sign Language Dataset for Sign Language Translation
Advances in Artificial Intelligence – IBERAMIA 2022
Abstract
Sign language translation (SLT) is an active field of study that encompasses human-computer interaction, computer vision, natural language processing and machine learning. Progress on this field could lead to higher levels of integration of deaf ...
The Korean Sign Language Dataset for Action Recognition
MultiMedia Modeling
Abstract
Recently, the development of computer vision technologies has shown excellent performance in complex tasks such as behavioral recognition. Therefore, several studies propose datasets for behavior recognition, including sign language recognition. ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing

ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing Volume 22, Issue 6

June 2023

635 pages

ISSN:2375-4699

EISSN:2375-4702

DOI:10.1145/3604597

Editor:
Imed Zitouni
Google, USA

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 June 2023

Online AM: 10 May 2023

Accepted: 04 May 2023

Revised: 12 April 2023

Received: 20 August 2021

Published in TALLIP Volume 22, Issue 6

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
307
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)101
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

Reflects downloads up to 31 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Muhammed Farsin KMohammed Ashfaque PMohamed Abdul Shahid PMohammad Mirdas CAnish Kumar BJemsheer Ahmed P(2025)Sign Language Transformation: AI-Enabled Communication for the DeafIntelligent Communication, Control and Devices10.1007/978-981-97-8329-8_57(787-802)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8329-8_57
Bellil LGhiri MBoulesnane A(2024)Empowering Deaf Community in Healthcare Communication: 1D-CNN-Based Algerian Sign Language Recognition System2024 6th International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Systems (PAIS)10.1109/PAIS62114.2024.10541233(1-7)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/PAIS62114.2024.10541233
Chandra ARanjan ASahu DPrakash SYang TRathore RVajpayee A(2024)An Efficient Model for American Sign Language Recognition Using Deep-Neural Networks2024 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA)10.1109/DASA63652.2024.10836568(1-5)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA63652.2024.10836568
Alharthi NAlzahrani S(2023)Vision Transformers and Transfer Learning Approaches for Arabic Sign Language RecognitionApplied Sciences10.3390/app13211162513:21(11625)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111625
Sahu SPalisetti SPeddinti HYalamati SVajja PRushyasrungu G(2023)Comprehensive study of Sign Language Conversion Using Machine Learning2023 10th IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON)10.1109/UPCON59197.2023.10434799(1069-1075)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/UPCON59197.2023.10434799

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Figures

Tables

Media

View full text|Download PDF

View Issue’s Table of Contents