Article

Free access

Usability testing with screen reading technology in a Windows environment

Author:

Kitch BarnicleAuthors Info & Claims

CUU '00: Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability

Pages 102 - 109

https://doi.org/10.1145/355460.355543

Published: 01 November 2000 Publication History

Abstract

Ever since applications with graphical user interfaces were introduced, individuals who are blind have experienced great difficulty accessing these applications. The quality of access provided through a combination of screen reading software and speech synthesizer is greatly dependent on the design of the mainstream application interface. In attempt to better understand the access strategies employed by users of screen readers, this study was designed to (a) examine the interaction between users of screen reading technology and graphical user interface (GUI) elements and (b) to identify the type and significance of obstacles encountered during these interactions. Fifty-eight unique obstacles encountered by participants were identified. These obstacles were encountered by the thirteen participants a total 534 times. Although many obstacles lead to minor delays, the cumulative effect of these obstacles was to significantly delay, and in many cases, prevent task completion.

References

[1]

Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. Human computer interaction (2nd ed.). London: Prentice-Hall Europe, 1998.

Digital Library

[2]

Earl, C., & Leventhal, J. A survey of Windows screen reader users: Recent improvements in accessibility. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness (JVIB), 93, 3 (1999), 174-177.

[3]

Fowler, S. GUI Design Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.

Digital Library

[4]

Galitz, W. O. The essential guide to user interface design: An introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.

Digital Library

[5]

Lewis, C. Using the "thinking-aloud" method in cognitive interface design (RC 9265 (#40713)). Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center. 1982.

[6]

Lewis, C., & Rieman, J. Getting to know users and their tasks. In R. M. Baecker, W. Buxton, & J. Grudin (Eds.), Readings in human-computer interaction : Toward the year 2,000 (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman Publishers, (1995), 122-127.

Digital Library

[7]

Leventhal, J., & Earl, C. Accessing Microsoft Windows with synthetic speech: A user survey. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness (JVIB) News Service, 91,1 (1997), 12-16.

[8]

Marcus, A. Graphical user interfaces. In M. Helander, T. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of humancomputer interaction (2nd ed.), completely revised. Amsterdam: Elsevier,(1997), 423-440.

[9]

McKinley, J., & Sacco, T. Access to graphical user interface by blind and visually impaired computer users: A nationwide survey. Palo Alto, CA: Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 1995.

[10]

Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Office 2000 Accessibility. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation, 1998.

[11]

Morkes, J., & Nielsen, J. Concise, SCANNABLE, and objective: How to write for the web: useit.com. Available at http://www.useit.com/papers/ webwriting/writing.html.

[12]

Nielsen, J. Usability engineering. Boston: AP Professional, 1993.

Digital Library

[13]

Nielsen, J. Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons, (1994), 25-62.

Digital Library

[14]

Paap, K. R. and Cook, N.J. Design of Menus. In M. Helander, T. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed), completely revised. Amsterdam: Elsevier, (1997), 423-440.

[15]

Raman, T. V. Auditory user interfaces: Toward the speaking computer. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.

Digital Library

[16]

Scadden, L. A. (1984). Blindness in the information age: Equality or irony? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 78,9 (1984), 394-400.

[17]

Shneiderman, B. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1997.

Digital Library

[18]

Tyler, K. Software certifications boost productivity. HR Magazine: Society for Human Resource Management (1997, May).

Cited By

Evans SDouglas G(2019)E-Learning and Blindness: A Comparative Study of the Quality of an E-Learning ExperienceJournal of Visual Impairment & Blindness10.1177/0145482X0810200203102:2(77-88)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0810200203
Gerber E(2019)The Benefits of and Barriers to Computer use for Individuals who are Visually ImpairedJournal of Visual Impairment & Blindness10.1177/0145482X030970090597:9(536-550)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0309700905
Do Carmo Nogueira TFerreira DCarvalho SOliveira Berretta LGuntijo M(2019)Comparing sighted and blind users task performance in responsive and non-responsive web designKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-018-1188-858:2(319-339)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10115-018-1188-8
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Usability testing with screen reading technology in a Windows environment

Recommendations

Tactile Accessibility: Does Anyone Need a Haptic Glove?
ASSETS '16: Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

Graphical user interfaces (GUIs) are widely used on smartphones, tablets, and laptops. While GUIs are convenient for sighted users, their accessibility for blind people, who use screen readers to interact with GUIs, remains to be problematic. Even the ...
Look Ma, no ARIA: generic accessible interfaces for web widgets
W4A '15: Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All Conference

Once simple and static, many web pages have now evolved into complex web applications. Hundreds of web development libraries provide ready-to-use custom widgets, which can be further customized to fit the needs of individual web applications. Web ...
Implementing Assistive Technology on Wearable Computers

The article presents the author's work in developing assistive technology for disabled users. He makes a case for wearable computers and focuses on design strategies that accommodate the users' changing needs. He points out that what might seem ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CUU '00: Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability

November 2000

165 pages

ISBN:1581133146

DOI:10.1145/355460

Chairman:
Jean Scholtz
DARPA ITO, Arlington, VA
,
Editor:
John Thomas
IBM Research Hawthorne, Yorktown Heights, NY

Copyright © 2000 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

American Library Association: American Library Association Office of Info. Systems Policy
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
British HCI Group
AFIHM: Ass. Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine
USACM: United States Association for Computational Mechanics
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGACCESS: ACM Special Interest Group on Accessible Computing
SIGCAS: ACM Special Interest Group on Computers and Society
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2000

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

CUU00

Sponsor:

American Library Association
SIGGRAPH
British HCI Group
AFIHM
USACM
SIGIR
SIGCHI
SIGACCESS
SIGCAS
SIGDOC

CUU00: ACM Conference on Universal Usability

November 16 - 17, 2000

Virginia, Arlington, USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

30
Total Citations
View Citations
1,847
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)165
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14

Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Evans SDouglas G(2019)E-Learning and Blindness: A Comparative Study of the Quality of an E-Learning ExperienceJournal of Visual Impairment & Blindness10.1177/0145482X0810200203102:2(77-88)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0810200203
Gerber E(2019)The Benefits of and Barriers to Computer use for Individuals who are Visually ImpairedJournal of Visual Impairment & Blindness10.1177/0145482X030970090597:9(536-550)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0309700905
Do Carmo Nogueira TFerreira DCarvalho SOliveira Berretta LGuntijo M(2019)Comparing sighted and blind users task performance in responsive and non-responsive web designKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-018-1188-858:2(319-339)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10115-018-1188-8
Washington BFeng J(2019)Proper Implementation of Website Features Affecting the Use of Screen ReadersAdvances in Usability and User Experience10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_79(813-823)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_79
Li M(2019)Usability Problems and Obstacles to Addressing Them in Health Information Software ImplementationsInformation and Communication Technologies for Development. Strengthening Southern-Driven Cooperation as a Catalyst for ICT4D10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_20(241-252)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_20
Celesti AMulfari DFazio MVillari MPuliafito A(2016)Improving desktop as a Service in OpenStack2016 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC)10.1109/ISCC.2016.7543755(281-288)Online publication date: Jun-2016
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2016.7543755
Thani DStockman T(2016)Reflections on the Research Methods Used in an Investigation of Cross-modal Collaborative Information Seeking2016 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS)10.1109/CTS.2016.0095(511-517)Online publication date: Oct-2016
https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2016.0095
Mulfari DCelesti AVillari M(2015)A computer system architecture providing a user-friendly man machine interface for accessing assistive technology in cloud computingJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.035100:C(129-138)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.035
Mulfari DCelesti AVillari MPuliafito A(2014)Using Virtualization and noVNC to Support Assistive Technology in Cloud ComputingProceedings of the 2014 IEEE 3rd Symposium on Network Cloud Computing and Applications (ncca 2014)10.1109/NCCA.2014.28(125-132)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/NCCA.2014.28
Van Hees KEngelen J(2013)Equivalent representations of multimodal user interfacesUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-012-0282-z12:4(339-368)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10209-012-0282-z
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents