research-article

Open access

Evidence for Teaching Practices that Broaden Participation for Women in Computing

Authors:

Briana B. Morrison,

Steven Bradley,

Kevin Buffardi,

Brian Harrington,

Miranda Parker,

Jennifer Rosato,

Jane WaiteAuthors Info & Claims

ITiCSE-WGR '21: Proceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Pages 57 - 131

https://doi.org/10.1145/3502870.3506568

Published: 30 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Computing has, for many years, been one of the least demographically diverse STEM fields, particularly in terms of women's participation [12, 36]. The last decade has seen a proliferation of research exploring new teaching techniques and their effect on the retention of students who have historically been excluded from computing. This research suggests interventions and practices that can affect the inclusiveness of the computer science classroom and potentially improve learning outcomes for all students. But research needs to be translated into practice, and practices need to be taken up in real classrooms. The current paper reports on the results of a focused systematic "state-of-the-art" review of recent empirical studies of teaching practices that have some explicit test of the impact on women in computing. Using the NCWIT Engagement Practices Framework as a means of organization, we summarize this research, outline the practices that have the most empirical support, and suggest where additional research is needed.

References

[1]

Christine Alvarado, Zachary Dodds, and Ran Libeskind-Hadas. 2012. Increasing women's participation in computing at Harvey Mudd College. ACM Inroads 3, 4 (Dec. 2012), 55--64. https://doi.org/10.1145/2381083.2381100

Digital Library

[2]

Christine Alvarado and Eugene Judson. 2014. Using targeted conferences to recruit women into computer science. Commun. ACM 57, 3 (March 2014), 70--77. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500883

Digital Library

[3]

Christine Alvarado, Cynthia Bailey Lee, and Gary Gillespie. 2014. New CS1 pedagogies and curriculum, the same success factors?. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 379--384. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538897

Digital Library

[4]

Christine Alvarado, Mia Minnes, and Leo Porter. 2017. Micro-Classes: A Structure for Improving Student Experience in Large Classes. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 21--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017727

Digital Library

[5]

William Aspray. 2010. Participation in computing. The National Science Foundation's Expansionary Programs. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2010).

[6]

Australian Government, Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. 2019. University enrolment and completion in STEM and other fields. https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/stemequity- monitor/university-enrolment-and-completion-in-stem-and-otherfields# university-enrolment-and-completion

[7]

Australian Government, Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. 2020. STEM-qualified occupations. https://www.industry.gov.au/data-andpublications/ stem-equity-monitor/stem-qualified-occupations

[8]

Lecia Barker, Christopher Lynnly Hovey, and Leisa D Thompson. 2014. Results of a large-scale, multi-institutional study of undergraduate retention in computing. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings. IEEE, New York, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044267

[9]

Lecia J. Barker and William Aspray. 2008. The state of research on girls and IT. MIT Press. 3--54 pages.

[10]

Lecia J Barker, Charlie Mcdowell, and Kimberly Kalahar. 2009. Exploring Factors that Influence Computer Science Introductory Course Students to Persist in the Major. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 41, 2 (2009), 282--286.

Digital Library

[11]

Valerie Barr. 2016. Disciplinary Thinking, Computational Doing: Promoting Interdisciplinary Computing While Transforming Computer Science Enrollments. (2016), 10.

[12]

Valerie Barr. 2018. Different denominators, different results: reanalyzing CS degrees by gender, race, and ethnicity. ACM Inroads 9, 3 (2018), 40--47.

Digital Library

[13]

Debarati Basu, Harinni K. Kumar, Vinod K. Lohani, N. Dwight Barnette, Godmar Back, Dave McPherson, Calvin J. Ribbens, and Paul E. Plassmann. 2020. Integration and Evaluation of Spiral Theory based Cybersecurity Modules into core Computer Science and Engineering Courses. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9--15. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366798

Digital Library

[14]

Kara Alexandra Behnke, Brittany Ann Kos, and John K. Bennett. 2016. Computer Science Principles: Impacting Student Motivation & Learning Within and Beyond the Classroom. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 171--180. https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960336

Digital Library

[15]

Michael David Black. 2016. Seven Semesters of Android Game Programming in CS2. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, Arequipa Peru, 5--10. https://doi.org/10. 1145/2899415.2899470

Digital Library

[16]

Kamau Bobb. 2016. Broadening Participation in Computing: A Critical Perspective. ACM Inroads 7, 4 (2016), 49--51.

Digital Library

[17]

Nicholas A. Bowman, Lindsay Jarratt, KC Culver, and Alberto M. Segre. 2021. The Impact of Pair Programming on College Students' Interest, Perceptions, and Achievement in Computer Science. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 21, 3 (May 2021), 19:1--19:19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3440759

Digital Library

[18]

Bo Brinkman and Amanda Diekman. 2016. Applying the Communal Goal Congruity Perspective to Enhance Diversity and Inclusion in Undergraduate Computing Degrees. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 102--107. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844562

Digital Library

[19]

Jeni L. Burnette, Crystal L. Hoyt, V. Michelle Russell, Barry Lawson, Carol S. Dweck, and Eli Finkel. 2020. A Growth Mind-Set Intervention Improves Interest but Not Academic Performance in the Field of Computer Science. Social Psychological and Personality Science 11, 1 (Jan. 2020), 107--116. https: //doi.org/10.1177/1948550619841631

[20]

Zack Butler, Ivona Bezakova, and Kimberly Fluet. 2017. Pencil Puzzles for Introductory Computer Science: an Experience- and Gender-Neutral Context. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Seattle Washington USA, 93--98. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3017680.3017765

Digital Library

[21]

E. Rebecca Caldwell and Elva J. Jones. 2013. Beyond wrestling: using sumobots to engage students in the computer science classroom. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 29, 2 (Dec. 2013), 132--139.

[22]

Tracy Camp, Wendy DuBow, Diane Levitt, Linda J Sax, Valerie Taylor, and Colleen Lewis. 2019. The new NSF requirement for broadening participation in computing (BPC) plans: Community advice and resources. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 332--333.

Digital Library

[23]

Jennifer Campbell, Diane Horton, Michelle Craig, and Paul Gries. 2014. Evaluating an inverted CS1. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE '14. ACM Press, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 307--312. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538943

Digital Library

[24]

Canadian Government, Statistics Canada. 2019. Persistence and representation of women in STEM programs. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/75-006- x/2019001/article/00006-eng.htm

[25]

Yingjun Cao and Leo Porter. 2017. Evaluating Student Learning from Collaborative Group Tests in Introductory Computing. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 99--104. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017729

Digital Library

[26]

Kim Case, Robert Bartsch, Lillian McEnery, Sharon Hall, Anthony Hermann, and David Foster. 2008. Establishing a Comfortable Classroom from Day One: Student Perceptions of the Reciprocal Interview. College Teaching 56, 4 (Sept. 2008), 210--214. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.56.4.210--214

[27]

Sapna Cheryan, Benjamin J. Drury, and Marissa Vichayapai. 2013. Enduring Influence of Stereotypical Computer Science Role Models onWomen's Academic Aspirations. Psychology of Women Quarterly 37, 1 (March 2013), 72--79. https: //doi.org/10.1177/0361684312459328 Working Group Report ITiCSE-WGR '22, June 26--July 1, 2021, Virtual Event, Germany 81

[28]

Sapna Cheryan, Andrew N. Meltzoff, and Saenam Kim. 2011. Classrooms matter: The design of virtual classrooms influences gender disparities in computer science classes. Computers & Education 57, 2 (Sept. 2011), 1825--1835. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.004

Digital Library

[29]

Sapna Cheryan, John Oliver Siy, Marissa Vichayapai, Benjamin J. Drury, and Saenam Kim. 2011. Do Female and Male Role Models Who Embody STEM Stereotypes Hinder Women's Anticipated Success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science 2, 6 (Nov. 2011), 656--664. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1948550611405218

[30]

James P. Cohoon and Luther A. Tychonievich. 2011. Analysis of a CS1 approach for attracting diverse and inexperienced students to computing majors. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 165--170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953217

Digital Library

[31]

RalphW. Crosby, Stephanie Valentine, and Tiffani L.Williams. 2014. Leveraging programming difficulty to improve understanding and perceptions of nonmajors. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 29, 4 (April 2014), 27--35.

[32]

Jan Cuny. 2010. Changing what's happening in HS and introductory college CS: keynote address. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 26, 2 (2010), 5--6.

Digital Library

[33]

Linda Darling-Hammond, Lisa Flook, Channa Cook-Harvey, Brigid Barron, and David Osher. 2020. Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science 24, 2 (2020), 97--140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

[34]

Matthew Dickerson. 2014. Multi-Agent Simulation, NETLOGO, and the Recruitment of Computer Science Majors. Computing Sciences in Colleges (2014), 9.

[35]

Betsy DiSalvo, Mark Guzdial, Amy Bruckman, and Tom McKlin. 2014. Saving Face While Geeking Out: Video Game Testing as a Justification for Learning Computer Science. Journal of the Learning Sciences 23, 3 (2014), 272--315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.893434 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.893434

[36]

Wendy DuBow and Jax J. Gonzalez. 2020. NCWIT Scorecard: The Status of Women in Technology. Boulder, CO: NCWIT.

[37]

Wendy Dubow, Alexis Kaminsky, and Joanna Weidler-Lewis. 2017. Multiple factors Converge to InfluenceWomen's Persistence in Computing: A Qualitative Analysis. Computing in Science & Engineering (5 2017), 30--39. www.computer. org/cise

[38]

Wendy M DuBow, Beth A Quinn, Gloria Childress Townsend, Rosario Robinson, and Valerie Barr. 2016. Efforts to make computer science more inclusive of women. ACM Inroads 7, 4 (2016), 74--80.

Digital Library

[39]

Vincent Duriau, Rhonda Reger, and Michael Pfarrer. 2007. A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements. Organizational Research Methods 10 (01 2007), 5--34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289252

[40]

Karen Kangas Dwyer, Shereen G. Bingham, Robert E. Carlson, Marshall Prisbell, Ana M. Cruz, and Dennis A. Fus. 2004. Communication and connectedness in the classroom: Development of the connected classroom climate inventory. Communication Research Reports 21, 3 (2004), 264--272. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 08824090409359988

[41]

Nathan Ensmenger. 2010. Making programming masculine. IEEE-CS/Wiley. 115--141 pages.

[42]

European Commission. 2020. Women in Digital. https://ec.europa.eu/digitalsingle- market/en/women-digital-0

[43]

Ann Quiroz Gates, Sarah Hug, Heather Thiry, Richard Aló, Mohsen Beheshti, John Fernandez, Nestor Rodriguez, and Malek Adjouadi. 2011. The Computing Alliance of Hispanic-Serving Institutions: Supporting Hispanics at Critical Transition Points. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 11, 3 (Oct. 2011), 16:1--16:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037276.2037280

Digital Library

[44]

Danielle Geerling, Jonathan Butner, Tamra Fraughton, Sungchoon Sinclair, Joseph Zachary, and Carol Sansone. 2020. The Dynamic Association of Interest and Confusion: The Potential for Moderation by Utility Value and Gender. The Journal of Experimental Education 88, 3 (May 2020), 407--430. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00220973.2018.1561403

[45]

David K Gosser. 2001. Peer-led team learning: A guidebook. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.

[46]

Maria J Grant and Andrew Booth. 2009. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal 26, 2 (2009), 91--108.

[47]

Mark Guzdial. 2013. Exploring hypotheses about media computation. In Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research (ICER '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 19--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.2493397

Digital Library

[48]

HussamAHallak, Soad Ibrahim, Christy Low, andAyman El Mesalami. 2019. The Impact of Incorporating Hands-on Raspberry Pi Projects with Undergraduate Education in Boosting Students' Interest in Scientific/Engineering Majors and Encouraging Women and Minorities to Advance their Integration in Practical Fields. (2019), 8.

[49]

Brian Harrington, Jingyiran Li, Mohamed Moustafa, Marzieh Ahmadzadeh, and Nick Cheng. 2019. On the Effect of Question Ordering on Performance and Confidence in Computer Science Examinations. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Minneapolis MN USA, 620--626. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287398

Digital Library

[50]

J. A. C. Hattie. 2003. Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence?. In Building Teacher Quality: What does the research tell us ACER Research Conference. Melbourne, Australia. http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_ 2003/4/

[51]

Sylvia Ann Hewlett, Carolyn Buck Luce, Lisa J. Servon, Laura Sherbin, Peggy Shiller, Eytan Sosnovich, and Karen Sumberg. 2008. The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology., 100 pages. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268325574

[52]

Higher Education Statistics Agency. 2019. Higher Education Student Statistics: UK, 2017/18 - Student numbers and characteristics. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/ news/17-01--2019/sb252-higher-education-student-statistics/numbers

[53]

Bryan Hosack, Billy Lim, andWPaul Vogt. 2012. Increasing Student Performance Through the Use of Web Services in Introductory Programming Classrooms: Results from a Series of Quasi-Experiments. Journal of Information Systems Education 23 (2012), 12.

[54]

Sarah Hug, Heather Thiry, and Phyllis Tedford. 2011. Learning to love computer science: peer leaders gain teaching skill, communicative ability and content knowledge in the CS classroom. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 201--206. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953225

Digital Library

[55]

Sandy Irani and Kameryn Denaro. 2020. Incorporating Active Learning Strategies and Instructor Presence into an Online Discrete Mathematics Class. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1186--1192. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366904

Digital Library

[56]

Leslie Irvine and Jenny R. Vermilya. 2010. Genderwork in a feminized profession: The case of veterinary medicine. Gender and Society 24 (2 2010), 56--82. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209355978

[57]

Alan C. Jamieson, Lindsay H. Jamieson, and Angela C. Johnson. 2012. Application of non-programming focused treisman-style workshops in introductory computer science. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 271--276. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157219

Digital Library

[58]

David S. Janzen, Sara Bahrami, Bruno C. da Silva, and Davide Falessi. 2018. A Reflection on Diversity and Inclusivity Efforts in a Software Engineering Program. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, San Jose, CA, USA, 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658677

Digital Library

[59]

Lindsay Jarratt, Nicholas A. Bowman, K.C. Culver, and Alberto Maria Segre. 2019. A Large-Scale Experimental Study of Gender and Pair Composition in Pair Programming. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 176--181. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3304221.3319782

Digital Library

[60]

Wei Jin, Cynthia L. Johnson, and Sonal Dekhane. 2020. A Guided Inquiry Approach for Detecting and Developing Problem-solving Strategies for Novice Programming Students. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Southeast Conference. ACM, Tampa FL USA, 211--217. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374135.3385289

Digital Library

[61]

Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2020. Exploring the Participation of CS Undergraduate Students in Industry Internships. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Portland OR USA, 1103--1109. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366844

Digital Library

[62]

Karen A. Kim, Amy J. Fann, and Kimberly O. Misa-Escalante. 2011. Engaging Women in Computer Science and Engineering: Promising Practices for Promoting Gender Equity in Undergraduate Research Experiences. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 11, 2 (July 2011), 8:1--8:19. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 1993069.1993072

Digital Library

[63]

Maria Klawe. 2013. Increasing Female Participation in Computing: The Harvey Mudd College Story. Computer 46, 3 (March 2013), 56--58. https://doi.org/10. 1109/MC.2013.4 Conference Name: Computer.

Digital Library

[64]

Alyona Koulanova, Ary Maharaj, Brian Harrington, and Jessica Dere. 2018. Fit-breaks: incorporating physical activity breaks in introductory CS lectures. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 260--265. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197115

Digital Library

[65]

Julie Krause, Irene Polycarpou, and Keith Hellman. 2012. Exploring formal learning groups and their impact on recruitment of women in undergraduate CS. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 179--184. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157192

Digital Library

[66]

Sophia Krause-Levy, Leo Porter, Beth Simon, and Christine Alvarado. 2020. Investigating the Impact of Employing Multiple Interventions in a CS1 Course. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1082-- 1088. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366866 Working Group Report ITiCSE-WGR '22, June 26--July 1, 2021, Virtual Event, Germany 82

Digital Library

[67]

Anagha Kulkarni, Ilmi Yoon, Pleuni S. Pennings, Kazunori Okada, and Carmen Domingo. 2018. Promoting diversity in computing. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, Larnaca Cyprus, 236--241. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091. 3197145

Digital Library

[68]

Celine Latulipe, N. Bruce Long, and Carlos E. Seminario. 2015. Structuring Flipped Classes with Lightweight Teams and Gamification. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 392--397. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677240

Digital Library

[69]

Celine Latulipe, Audrey Rorrer, and Bruce Long. 2018. Longitudinal Data on Flipped Class Effects on Performance in CS1 and Retention after CS1. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 411-- 416. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159518

Digital Library

[70]

Elynn Lee, Victoria Shan, Bradley Beth, and Calvin Lin. 2014. A structured approach to teaching recursion using cargo-bot. In Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research (ICER '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 59--66. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2632320.2632356

Digital Library

[71]

Colleen M. Lewis, Nathaniel Titterton, and Michael Clancy. 2012. Using collaboration to overcome disparities in Java experience. In Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference on International computing education research (ICER '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 79--86. https://doi.org/10.1145/2361276.2361292

Digital Library

[72]

Phil Maguire, Rebecca Maguire, Philip Hyland, and Patrick Marshall. 2014. Enhancing Collaborative Learning Using Pair Programming: Who Benefits? AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 6, 2 (2014), 25.

[73]

David J. Malan. 2021. Toward an Ungraded CS50. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Virtual Event USA, 1076--1081. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432461

Digital Library

[74]

Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press.

[75]

Lauren E. Margulieux, Briana B. Morrison, and Adrienne Decker. 2020. Reducing withdrawal and failure rates in introductory programming with subgoal labeled worked examples. International Journal of STEM Education 7, 1 (Dec. 2020), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00222--7

[76]

Patricia Yancey Martin. 2003. "Said and done" versus "saying and doing": Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0891243203251716

[77]

Monica M. McGill. 2012. Learning to Program with Personal Robots: Influences on Student Motivation. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 12, 1 (March 2012), 4:1--4:32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133797.2133801

Digital Library

[78]

Paola Medel and Vahab Pournaghshband. 2017. Eliminating Gender Bias in Computer Science Education Materials. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 411--416. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3017680.3017794

Digital Library

[79]

Danaë Metaxa-Kakavouli, KellyWang, James A. Landay, and Jeff Hancock. 2018. Gender-Inclusive Design: Sense of Belonging and Bias in Web Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174188

Digital Library

[80]

Alvaro E Monge, Cameron L Fadjo, Beth A Quinn, and Lecia J Barker. 2015. EngageCSEdu: engaging and retaining CS1 and CS2 students. ACM Inroads 6, 1 (2015), 6--11.

Digital Library

[81]

Myob.com. 2020. Women in Tech Report. https://www.myob.com/ content/dam/public-website/docs/misc/myob-women-in-tech-report- 2019.pdf?_ga=2.94641819.683107675.1624717016--243744843.1624717016

[82]

Sathya Narayanan, Kathryn Cunningham, Sonia Arteaga, William J. Welch, Leslie Maxwell, Zechariah Chawinga, and Bude Su. 2018. Upward Mobility for Underrepresented Students: A Model for a Cohort-Based Bachelor's Degree in Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 705--710. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159551

Digital Library

[83]

National Center forWomen & Information Technology. 2020. Engagement Practices Framework. https://www.ncwit.org/engagement-practices-framework

[84]

Tia Newhall, Lisa Meeden, Andrew Danner, Ameet Soni, Frances Ruiz, and Richard Wicentowski. 2014. A support program for introductory CS courses that improves student performance and retains students from underrepresented groups. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 433--438. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538923

Digital Library

[85]

Jacqueline Ng Lane, Bruce Ankenman, and Seyed Iravani. 2018. Insight into Gender Differences in Higher Education: Evidence from Peer Reviews in an Introductory STEM Course. Service Science 10, 4 (Dec. 2018), 442--456. https: //doi.org/10.1287/serv.2018.0224

Digital Library

[86]

Keith J. O'Hara, Kathleen Burke, Diana Ruggiero, and Sven Anderson. 2017. Linking Language&Thinking with Code: Computing within aWriting-Intensive Introduction to the Liberal Arts. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, Bologna Italy, 269--274. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059018

Digital Library

[87]

Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C Hoffmann, Cynthia D Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M Tetzlaff, Elie A Akl, Sue E Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth W Loder, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A McGuinness, Lesley A Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C Tricco, Vivian A Welch, Penny Whiting, and David Moher. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (March 2021), n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

[88]

Jennifer Parham-Mocello, Shannon Ernst, Martin Erwig, Lily Shellhammer, and Emily Dominguez. 2019. Story Programming: Explaining Computer Science Before Coding. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 379--385. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287397

Digital Library

[89]

Jennifer Parham-Mocello, Martin Erwig, and Emily Dominguez. 2019. To Code or Not to Code? Programming in Introductory CS Courses. In 2019 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC). IEEE, Memphis, TN, USA, 187--191. https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2019.8818909

[90]

Nayna Patel, Willem-Paul Brinkman, and Jane Coughlan. 2012.Work placements and academic achievement: undergraduate computing students. Education & Training 54, 6 (2012), 523--533. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211254299

[91]

Jon K. Piper and Dwight Krehbiel. 2015. Increasing STEM Enrollment Using Targeted Scholarships and an Interdisciplinary Seminar for First- and Second- Year College Students. Journal of STEM Education : Innovations and Research 16, 4 (Dec. 2015), 36--43. http://www.proquest.com/docview/1767144450/abstract/ 5BB8B973D9046FEPQ/1

[92]

Leo Porter and Beth Simon. 2013. Retaining nearly one-third more majors with a trio of instructional best practices in CS1. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 165--170. https://doi.org/10. 1145/2445196.2445248

[93]

Cyndi Rader, Doug Hakkarinen, Barbara M. Moskal, and Keith Hellman. 2011. Exploring the appeal of socially relevant computing: are students interested in socially relevant problems?. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 423--428. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953288

Digital Library

[94]

National Public Radio. 2014. Episode 576: When Women Stopped Coding. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/17/356944145/episode-576- when-women-stopped-coding

[95]

Sagar Raina, Blair Taylor, and Siddharth Kaza. 2015. Security Injections 2.0: Increasing Engagement and Faculty Adoption Using Enhanced Secure Coding Modules for Lower-Level Programming Courses. In Information Security Education Across the Curriculum (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology), Matt Bishop, Natalia Miloslavskaya, and Marianthi Theocharidou (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 64--74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--18500--2_6

[96]

Nancy Ramsey and Pamela McCorduck. 2005. Where are the women in information technology. Report of Literature Search and InterviewsPrepared for the National Center for Women & Information Technology (2005).

[97]

Yolanda A. Rankin, Jakita O. Thomas, and India Irish. 2019. Food for Thought: Supporting African American Women's Computational Algorithmic Thinking in an Intro CS Course. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 641--646. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287484

Digital Library

[98]

Katie Redmond, Sarah Evans, and Mehran Sahami. 2013. A large-scale quantitative study of women in computer science at Stanford University. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 439-- 444. https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445326

Digital Library

[99]

Anja Remshagen and Christine Rolka. 2014. Contextualized learning tools: animations and robots. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Southeast Regional Conference (ACM SE '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2638404.2638458

Digital Library

[100]

Barbara F. Reskin and Patricia A. Roos. 1990. Job Queues, Gender Queues Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations. Temple University Press.

[101]

Penny Rheingans, Anne Brodsky, Jill Scheibler, and Anne Spence. 2011. The Role of Majority Groups in Diversity Programs. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 11, 2 (July 2011), 11:1--11:15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993069.1993075

Digital Library

[102]

Christine Rolka and Anja Remshagen. 2015. Showing Up is Half the Battle: Assessing Different Contextualized Learning Tools to Increase the Performance in Introductory Computer Science Courses. Georgia Educational Researcher 9, 1 (Jan. 2015). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090110

[103]

Audrey Smith Rorrer, Joseph Allen, and Huifang Zuo. 2018. A National Study of Undergraduate Research Experiences in Computing: Implications for Culturally Working Group Report ITiCSE-WGR '22, June 26--July 1, 2021, Virtual Event, Germany 83 Relevant Pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Baltimore Maryland USA, 604--609. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159510

Digital Library

[104]

Lauren Russell. 2017. Can learning communities boost success of women and minorities in STEM? Evidence from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Economics of Education Review 61 (Dec. 2017), 98--111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. econedurev.2017.10.008

[105]

Adrian Salguero, Julian McAuley, Beth Simon, and Leo Porter. 2020. A Longitudinal Evaluation of a Best Practices CS1. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 182--193. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406274

Digital Library

[106]

Benjamin J. Schreiber and John P. Dougherty. 2017. Assessment of Introducing Algorithms with Video Lectures and Pseudocode Rhymed to a Melody. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 519--524. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017789

Digital Library

[107]

Amber Settle, James Doyle, and Theresa Steinbach. 2017. The Effect of a Computing-focused Linked-courses Learning Community on Minority and Female Students. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153--158. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125659.3125679

Digital Library

[108]

Amber Settle, John Lalor, and Theresa Steinbach. 2015. Evaluating a Linkedcourses Learning Community for Development Majors. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 127--132. https://doi.org/10. 1145/2808006.2808031

Digital Library

[109]

Amber Settle and Theresa Steinbach. 2018. Retention Rates for the First Three Years of a Linked-courses Learning Community. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 166--171. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3241815.3241854

Digital Library

[110]

Sadia Sharmin, Daniel Zingaro, Lisa Zhang, and Clare Brett. 2019. Impact of Open-Ended Assignments on Student Self-Efficacy in CS1. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education. ACM, Chengdu,Sichuan China, 215--221. https://doi.org/10.1145/3300115.3309532

Digital Library

[111]

Max O. Smith, Andrew Giugliano, and Andrew DeOrio. 2018. Long Term Effects of Pair Programming. IEEE Transactions on Education 61, 3 (Aug. 2018), 187--194. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2017.2773024

[112]

STEM Women. 2021. Percentages of Women in STEM Statistics. https://www.stemwomen.co.uk/blog/2021/01/women-in-stem-percentagesof- women-in-stem-statistics

[113]

Jeffrey A. Stone and Tricia K. Clark. 2011. The impact of problem-oriented animated learning modules in a CS1-style course. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51--56. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 1953163.1953182

[114]

Elizabeth Sweedyk. 2011. Women build games, seriously. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 171--176. https: //doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953218

Digital Library

[115]

Andrea Tartaro and Haley Cottingham. 2014. A problem-based, survey introduction to computer science for majors and non-majors. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 30, 2 (Dec. 2014), 164--170.

[116]

Dilan Ustek, Erik Opavsky, Henry M. Walker, and David Cowden. 2014. Course development through student-faculty collaboration: a case study. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education - ITiCSE '14. ACM Press, Uppsala, Sweden, 189--194. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2591708.2591723

Digital Library

[117]

Roli Varma and Deepak Kapur. 2015. Decoding Femininity in Computer Science in India. Commun. ACM 58 (4 2015), 56--62. Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2663339

[118]

Elsa Q Villa, Kerrie Kephart, Ann Q Gates, Heather Thiry, and Sarah Hug. 2013. Affinity research groups in practice: Apprenticing students in research. Journal of Engineering Education 102, 3 (2013), 444--466.

[119]

Becky Wai-Ling Packard, Jaemarie Solyst, Anisha Pai, and Lu Yu. 2020. Peer- Designed Active Learning Modules as a Strategy to Improve Confidence and Comprehension Within Introductory Computer Science. Journal of College Science Teaching 49, 5 (June 2020), 76--83. http://search.ebscohost.com/login. aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=143188756&site=ehost-live&scope=site

[120]

Dana LinnellWanzer, Tom McKlin, Jason Freeman, Brian Magerko, and Taneisha Lee. 2020. Promoting intentions to persist in computing: an examination of six years of the EarSketch program. Computer Science Education 30, 4 (Oct. 2020), 394--419. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1714313

[121]

Hayden Wimmer. 2019. Hour of Code: A Study of Gender Differences in Computing. (2019), 10.

[122]

Women in Communication and Technology. 2018. Where are the Women in the Canadian ICT Industry. https://www.wct-fct.com/sites/default/files/wctupthenumbers- report-2018-final.pdf

[123]

Rebecca N. Wright, Sally J. Nadler, Thu D. Nguyen, Cynthia N. Sanchez Gomez, and Heather M. Wright. 2019. Living-Learning Community for Women in Computer Science at Rutgers. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 286--292. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287449

Digital Library

[124]

Xin Xu andWei Jin. 2021. Game development workshops designed and delivered by peer mentors to increase student curiosity and interest in an introductory programming course. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Southeast Conference (ACM SE '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 87--92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409334.3452046

Digital Library

[125]

Kimberly Michelle Ying, Lydia G. Pezzullo, Mohona Ahmed, Kassandra Crompton, Jeremiah Blanchard, and Kristy Elizabeth Boyer. 2019. In Their OwnWords: Gender Differences in Student Perceptions of Pair Programming. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1053--1059. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287380

Digital Library

[126]

Kimberly Michelle Ying, Fernando J. Rodríguez, Alexandra Lauren Dibble, Alexia Charis Martin, Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, Sanethia V. Thomas, and Juan E. Gilbert. 2021. Confidence, Connection, and Comfort: Reports from an All- Women's CS1 Class. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 699--705. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432548

Digital Library

[127]

Leila Zahedi, Jasmine Batten, Monique Ross, Geoff Potvin, Stephanie Damas, Peter Clarke, and Debra Davis. 2021. Gamification in education: a mixedmethods study of gender on computer science students' academic performance and identity development. Journal of Computing in Higher Education (March 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09271--5

[128]

Daniel Zingaro. 2014. Peer instruction contributes to self-efficacy in CS1. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 373-- 378. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538878

Digital Library

[129]

Daniel Zingaro. 2015. Examining Interest and Grades in Computer Science 1: A Study of Pedagogy and Achievement Goals. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 15, 3 (July 2015), 14:1--14:18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2802752

Digital Library

Cited By

Rosato JThigpen LBrunson FTise JMcGill M(2024)Coaching Teachers to Teach Computer Science with Equity-focused Teacher StandardsProceedings of the 19th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research10.1145/3677619.3678119(1-10)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677619.3678119
Baghban Karimi OGao ALindner PToti GEngineer RHur JMcNeill FReckinger SRobinson RSollazzo AWicentowski RMonga MLonati VBarendsen ESheard JPaterson J(2024)Exploring Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Computer Science Undergraduate CurriculaProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 210.1145/3649405.3659531(765-766)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3649405.3659531
Buffardi KBrooks JAlexander DMonga MLonati VBarendsen ESheard JPaterson J(2024)Designing a CURE for CS1Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653573(660-666)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3649217.3653573
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Chronicling the Evidence for Broadening Participation
ITiCSE '21: Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2

Computing has, for many years, been one of the least demographically diverse STEM fields, particularly in terms of women's participation [2] and those from minoritized racial and ethnic groups. In the case of higher education, one of the most powerful ...
Implementing evidence-based practices makes a difference in female undergraduate enrollments
SIGCSE '12: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education

While many computing departments may be aware there are "promising" and "proven" practices for recruiting and retaining female students, there seems to be a drive to try new and novel approaches rather than use what is known, or strongly suspected, to ...
How to Launch a STARS Computing Corps Cohort to Improve Retention and Broaden Participation in Computing (Abstract Only)
SIGCSE '16: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education

The STARS Computing Corps is a national alliance with the mission to grow a diverse community of computing leaders. STARS serves as a framework for integrating civic engagement into college computing departments with the goals of broadening ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ITiCSE-WGR '21: Proceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

December 2021

188 pages

ISBN:9781450392020

DOI:10.1145/3502870

Co-chairs:
Birgit R. Krogstie
Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Norway
,
Keith Quille
Technological University Dublin, Ireland
,
General Chairs:
Carsten Schulte
Paderborn University, Germany
,
Brett A. Becker
University College Dublin, Ireland

Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 December 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ITiCSE 2021

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

ITiCSE 2021: 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

June 26 - July 1, 2021

Virtual Event, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

14
Total Citations
View Citations
2,132
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)677
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)85

Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Rosato JThigpen LBrunson FTise JMcGill M(2024)Coaching Teachers to Teach Computer Science with Equity-focused Teacher StandardsProceedings of the 19th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research10.1145/3677619.3678119(1-10)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677619.3678119
Baghban Karimi OGao ALindner PToti GEngineer RHur JMcNeill FReckinger SRobinson RSollazzo AWicentowski RMonga MLonati VBarendsen ESheard JPaterson J(2024)Exploring Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Computer Science Undergraduate CurriculaProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 210.1145/3649405.3659531(765-766)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3649405.3659531
Buffardi KBrooks JAlexander DMonga MLonati VBarendsen ESheard JPaterson J(2024)Designing a CURE for CS1Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653573(660-666)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3649217.3653573
Love THughes A(2023)A Physical Computing Professional Development Study: Examining Differences in Male and Female Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Computing (Evaluation, Diversity)2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings10.18260/1-2--42458Online publication date: Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--42458
Bradley SParker MAltin RBarker LHooshangi SKunkeler TLennon RMcNeill FMinguillón JParkinson JPeltsverger SSibia NLaakso MMonga MSimon Sheard J(2023)Modeling Women's Elective Choices in ComputingProceedings of the 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3623762.3633497(196-226)Online publication date: 22-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623762.3633497
Baghban Karimi OToti GGutica MRobinson RZhang LPaterson JLindner PO'Dea MLaakso MMonga MSimon Sheard J(2023)Enhancing Diversity and Inclusion in Computer Science Undergraduate Programs: The Role of AdmissionsProceedings of the 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3623762.3633496(1-29)Online publication date: 22-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623762.3633496
Bradley SParker MAltin RBarker LHooshangi SKamal SKunkeler TLennon RMcNeill FMinguillón JParkinson JPeltsverger SSibia NLaakso MMonga MSimon Sheard J(2023)A Methodology for Investigating Women's Module Choices in Computer ScienceProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 210.1145/3587103.3594209(569-570)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3587103.3594209
Ola OChávez VLiao SPeña JZhang LDoyle MStephenson BDorn BSoh LBattestilli L(2023)Creating Safe Spaces for Instructor Identity in ComputingProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 210.1145/3545947.3569603(1196-1197)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545947.3569603
Chen HFong MHerman GSilva M(2023)Student Autonomy in Collaborative Learning: Effects of Meeting Time and Team Consistency2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343523(1-9)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343523
Albakri SAda MMorrison A(2023)Exploring Student Engagement, Confidence, and Usefulness for Female Students in CS Class at High School Using Machine Learning2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343402(1-9)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343402
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents