skip to main content
10.1145/3649405.3659531acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Exploring Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Computer Science Undergraduate Curricula

Published: 08 July 2024 Publication History

Abstract

One of the less explored approaches to foster equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in Computer Science (CS) is through changes to the curriculum. Despite sporadic work on the adoption of Culturally Responsive Computing (CRC) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL), the inclusion of equity-minded courses, or modifications on specific elements of the curriculum such as introductory programming courses, there has never been a wide exploration or adoption of a successful equity-minded undergraduate CS curriculum.
In this work, we explore undergraduate CS curricula, with a special focus on upper division, lower division, and service courses (courses offered to non-CS students). For each group, we examine the design and adoption of successful equity-minded approaches, exploring fair access, motivation, engagement, and rigour.

References

[1]
Isis Artze-Vega, Flower Darby, Bryan Dewsbury, and Mays Imad. 2023. The Norton Guide to Equity-Minded Teaching. New York: WW Norton.
[2]
Ouldooz Baghban Karimi, Giulia Toti, Mirela Gutica, Rebecca Robinson, Lisa Zhang, James Paterson, Peggy Lindner, and Michael O'Dea. 2023. Enhancing Diversity and Inclusion in Computer Science Undergraduate Programs: The Role of Admissions. In Proceedings of the 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Turku, Finland) (ITiCSE-WGR '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--29. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3623762.3633496
[3]
Alina Berry, Susan McKeever, Brenda Murphy, and Sarah Jane Delany. 2022. Addressing the "Leaky Pipeline": A Review and Categorisation of Actions to Recruit and Retain Women in Computing Education. 9405--9416. https://doi.org/ 10.21125/edulearn.2022.2274
[4]
James P. Cohoon and Luther A. Tychonievich. 2011. Analysis of a CS1 approach for attracting diverse and inexperienced students to computing majors. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Dallas, TX, USA) (SIGCSE '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 165--170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953217
[5]
Ron Eglash, Juan E. Gilbert, and Ellen Foster. 2013. Toward culturally responsive computing education. Commun. ACM 56, 7 (July 2013), 33--36. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/2483852.2483864
[6]
Dan Garcia, Maria Camarena, Kevin Lin, and Jill Westerland. 2023. Equitable Grading Best Practices. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1200--1201. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3545947.3569602
[7]
Rosalinda Garcia, Patricia Morreale, Lara Letaw, Amreeta Chatterjee, Pankati Patel, Sarah Yang, Isaac Tijerina Escobar, Geraldine Jimena Noa, and Margaret Burnett. 2023. ?Regular" CS × Inclusive Design = Smarter Students and Greater Diversity. ACM Transactions on Computing Educaction 23, 3, Article 34 (July 2023), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3603535
[8]
Albert Lionelle, Mckenna Quam, Carla Brodley, and Catherine Gill. 2024. Does Curricular Complexity in Computer Science Influence the Representation of Women CS Graduates?. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2024). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 729--735. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630835
[9]
Briana B. Morrison, Beth A. Quinn, Steven Bradley, Kevin Buffardi, Brian Harrington, Helen H. Hu, Maria Kallia, Fiona McNeill, Oluwakemi Ola, Miranda Parker, Jennifer Rosato, and Jane Waite. 2022. Evidence for Teaching Practices that Broaden Participation for Women in Computing (ITiCSE-WGR '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 57--131. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3502870.3506568
[10]
Pankati Patel, Patricia Morreale, Yulia Kumar, Daehan Kwak, Jean Chu, Rose Garcia, and Margaret Burnett. 2023. Embedding Equitable Design in the CS Computing Curricula. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1332. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3545947.3576278
[11]
Jeria Quesenberry and Carol Frieze. 2016. Change culture, not curriculum, to get more women into computer science. https://blog.google/outreachinitiatives/ education/change-culture-not-curriculum-to-ge/ [Online; accessed 17-Jan-2024].
[12]
David Rose. 1999. Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Special Education Technology 15 (1999), 67--70. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500108

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Computer Science Undergraduate Curricula

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ITiCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2
    July 2024
    125 pages
    ISBN:9798400706035
    DOI:10.1145/3649405
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 July 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. computer science
    2. curriculum
    3. diversity
    4. equity
    5. inclusion

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Conference

    ITiCSE 2024
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 111
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)111
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media