skip to main content
10.1145/2957276.2957279acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"Hey, I know what this is!": Cultural Affinities and Early Stage Appropriation of the Emerging Bitcoin Technology

Published: 13 November 2016 Publication History

Abstract

User appropriation can be immensely helpful to bootstrap emerging technologies; but how do new and lesser known technologies attract these earliest adopters? This paper investigates user appropriation of emerging computing technologies, by focusing on Bitcoin, a digital monetary system supported by a peer-to-peer network of computing devices. We conducted in-depth interviews with sixteen Bitcoin community participants in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Baltimore. We describe user appropriation in this case of Bitcoin as a sociocultural journey-from encounter, research and learning, to socialization. We contribute the concept of cultural affinities, including conceptual, contextual and social dimensions, as important mediators leading to early-stage user appropriation.

References

[1]
Serkan Akinci, Safak Aksoy, and Eda Atilgan. 2004. Adoption of Internet banking among sophisticated consumer segments in an advanced developing country. International Journal of Bank Marketing 22, MAY 2004: 212--232. http://doi.org/10.1108/02652320410530322
[2]
Alex Leavitt. 2016. Collaborative Appropriation: The Emergence of Breaking News Collaborations on reddit.com. Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Computersupported Cooperative Work 2016 Extended Abstract, ACM Press.
[3]
Amaury Belin and Yannick Prié. 2012. DIAM: Towards a model for describing appropriation processes through the evolution of digital artifacts. Dis 2012: 645--654. http://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318053
[4]
Nancy Jo Black, Andy Lockett, Heidi Winklhofer, and Christine Ennew. 2001. The adoption of Internet financial services: a qualitative study. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 29, 8: 390--398. http://doi.org/10.1108/09590550110397033
[5]
Alexander Boden, Gabriela Avram, Liam Bannon, and Volker Wulf. 2012. Knowledge sharing practices and the impact of cultural factors: Reflections on two case studies of offshoring in SME. Journal of software: Evolution and Process, 139--152. http://doi.org/10.1002/smr.473
[6]
Susanne Bødker and Ellen Christiansen. 2012. Poetry in motion. Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics - ECCE '12, ACM Press, 78. http://doi.org/10.1145/2448136.2448152
[7]
John M. Carroll, Mary Beth Rosson, Umer Farooq, and Jamika D. Burge. 2009. Community collective efficacy. In Handbook of Research on Socio-Technical Design and Social Networking Systems. 607--618. Retrieved from http://jcarroll.ist.psu.edu/files/cce2009.pdf
[8]
Paul Dourish. 2003. The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal 12, 4: 465--490. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026149119426
[9]
David S Evans and Richard Schmalensee. 2005. Paying with plastic: The digital revolution in buying and borrowing. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/38224406?accountid=96 30 http://zw4gk5cr3l.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver= Z39.88--2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ:ibssshell&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:k ev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=unknown&rft.jtitle=
[10]
Florian Graillot. 2015. Bitcoin Might Be The Next Big Thing In The Remittance Market. Techcrunch. Retrieved from http://techcrunch.com/2015/05/25/bitcoin-might-be-the-nextbig-thing-in-the-remittance-market/
[11]
James Paul Gee. 1989. What is literacy. Journal of Education 71, 1: 18--25.
[12]
G. Gowrisankaran and J Stavins. 2004. Network externalities and technology adoption: Lessons from electronic payments. RAND Journal of Economics 35, 2: 260--276. http://doi.org/10.2307/1593691
[13]
Jina Huh, Mark W Newman, and Mark S Ackerman. 2011. Supporting Collaborative Help for Individualized Use. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 3141--3150. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979408
[14]
Ioanna Iacovides, Charlene Jennett, Cassandra CornishTrestrail, and Anna L Cox. 2013. Do games attract or sustain engagement in citizen science? A study of volunteer motivations. CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1101--1106. http://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468553
[15]
Jordan Maglich. 2014. Texas Man Arrested For $4.5 Million Bitcoin Ponzi Scheme. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jordanmaglich/2014/11/06/texas -man-arrested-for-4-5-million-bitcoin-ponzischeme/#53ffb18ce1d3
[16]
Robert E. Kraut and Paul Resnick. 2012. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. The MIT Press: 328. http://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201300062
[17]
Chris J. Lintott, Kevin Schawinski, An??e Slosar, et al. 2008. Galaxy Zoo: Morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 389, 3: 1179--1189. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x
[18]
Caitlin Lustig and Bonnie Nardi. 2015. Algorithmic Authority: The Case of Bitcoin. http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.95
[19]
Wendy March, Margot Jacobs, and Tony Salvador. 2005. Designing technology for community appropriation. CHI 05, 2126--2127. http://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1057120
[20]
Bill Maurer, Taylor C. Nelms, and Lana Swartz. 2013. "When perhaps the real problem is money itself!": the practical materiality of Bitcoin. Social Semiotics 23, 2: 261--277. http://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2013.777594
[21]
Timothy May. 1994. Crypto Anarchy and Virtual Communities. In Crypto Anarchy Cyberstates and Pirate Utopias. 65--79. Retrieved from http://www.textfiles.com/internet/anarchy
[22]
Sally McKechnie, Heidi Winklhofer, and Christine Ennew. 2006. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the Online Retailing of Financial Services. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 34, 4/5: 388--410. http://doi.org/10.1108/09590550610660297
[23]
Michelle Price and Lizzie Ko. 2015. Hong Kong lawmakers urge ban on bitcoin as scam victims turn to police. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-fraudbitcoin-hongkong-idUSKBN0LF0WS20150211
[24]
Mike Orcutt. 2015. Why Bitcoin Could Be Much More Than a Currency. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/537246/why-bitcoincould-be-much-more-than-a-currency/
[25]
Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. www.bitcoin.org, 9. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-008-9062-0
[26]
WJ Orlikowski, JA Yates, Orlikowski, Yates, Okamura, and Fujimoto. 1995. Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use. Organization Science 6, 4: 423--444. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.423
[27]
27. Bernd Ploderer and Peter Thomas. 2008. Being Online, Living Offline: The Influence of Social Ties over the Appropriation of Social Network Sites. Information Systems Journal: 333--342. http://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460618
[28]
Reid Priedhorsky, Mikhil Masli, and Loren Terveen. 2010. Eliciting and Focusing Geographic Volunteer Work. 2010 Acm Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work: 61--70. http://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718931
[29]
Pablo-Alejandro Quinones. 2014. Cultivating practice & shepherding technology use. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW '14, FEBRUARY 2015: 305--318. http://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531698
[30]
M. Jordan Raddick, Georgia Bracey, Pamela L. Gay, et al. 2010. Galaxy Zoo: Exploring the Motivations of Citizen Science Volunteers. Astronomy Education Review 9, 1: 010103. http://doi.org/10.3847/AER2009036
[31]
Paul Resnick, Joseph Konstan, Yan Chen, and Robert E. Kraut. 2011. Starting New Online Communities. In Evidencebased Social Design Mining the Social Sciences to Build Online Communities. 231--281.
[32]
Joel Ross, Andrew Zaldivar, Lilly Irani, and Bill Tomlinson. 2010. Who are the Turkers? Worker Demographics in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Chi Ea 2010: 2863--2872. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753873
[33]
Antti Salovaara. 2007. Appropriation of a MMS-Based Comic Creator?: From System Functionalities to Resources for Action. CHI 2007 Proceedings: 1117--1126. http://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240794
[34]
34. E. T. Straub. 2009. Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning. Review of Educational Research 79, 2: 625--649. http://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
[35]
Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. In Basics of. Qualitatice Research 2nd edition. 3--14. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
[36]
Nick Szabo. 1997. Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday 2, 9. http://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i9.548
[37]
Joshua Tanenbaum, Karen Tanenbaum, and Ron Wakkary. 2012. Steampunk as Design Fiction. Chi, May 5: 1583--1592. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208279
[38]
Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G Morris, Gordon B Davis, and Fred D Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27, 3: 425--478. http://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
[39]
39. E Wenger. 1998. Communities of Practice?: Learning as a social system. Systems thinker 9, 5: 2--3. http://doi.org/10.2277/0521663636

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GROUP '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
November 2016
534 pages
ISBN:9781450342766
DOI:10.1145/2957276
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 November 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. appropriation
  2. bitcoin
  3. sociocultural

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

GROUP '16
Sponsor:
GROUP '16: 2016 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork
November 13 - 16, 2016
Florida, Sanibel Island, USA

Acceptance Rates

GROUP '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 111 submissions, 32%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

Upcoming Conference

GROUP '25
The 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
January 12 - 15, 2025
Hilton Head , SC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media