research-article

Insights from expert software design practice

Author:

Marian PetreAuthors Info & Claims

ESEC/FSE '09: Proceedings of the 7th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering

Pages 233 - 242

https://doi.org/10.1145/1595696.1595731

Published: 24 August 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Software is a designed artifact. In other design disciplines, such as architecture, there is a well-established tradition of design studies which inform not only the discipline itself but also tool design, processes, and collaborative work. The 'challenge' of this paper is to consider software from such a 'design studies' perspective. This paper will present a series of observations from empirical studies of expert software designers, and will draw on examples from actual professional practice. It will consider what experts' mental imagery, software visualisations, and sketches suggest about software design thinking. It will also discuss some of the deliberate practices experts use to promote innovation. Finally, it will open discussion on the tensions between observed software design practices and received methodology in software engineering.

References

[1]

Allwood, C. M. 1986. Novices on the computer: a review of the literature. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, 633--658.

Digital Library

[2]

Ball, L. J., and Ormerod, T. C. 2000. Putting ethnography to work: The case for a cognitive ethnography of design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 147--168.

Digital Library

[3]

Beck, K. 1999. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley.

Digital Library

[4]

Beyer, H., and Holtzblatt, K. 1988. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann.

Digital Library

[5]

Boehm, B. W., 1981. Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall 'Advances in Computing Science and Technology' series. Prentice-Hall. xxvii, 767.

[6]

Bucciarelli, LL 1988. An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Design Studies, 9, 159--168.

[7]

Craft, B., and Cairns, P. 2006. Using sketching to aid the collaborative design of information visualization software. In Human Work Interaction Design: Designing for Human Work, IFIP vol. 221, 103--122.

[8]

Cross, N. 2006. Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer-Verlag.

[9]

Curtis, B., Krasner, H., and Iscoe, N. 1988. A field study of the software design process for large teams. Communications of the ACM, 31, 11, 1268--1287.

Digital Library

[10]

Damm, C. H., Hansen, K. M., and Thomsen, M. 2000. Tool support for cooperative object-oriented design: gesture based modeling on an electronic whiteboard. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 518--525.

Digital Library

[11]

Fish, J. and Scrivener, S. 1990. Amplifying the mind's eye: sketching and visual cognition, Leonardo, 23, 1, 118--126.

[12]

Flor, N. V., and Hutchins, E. L. 1991. Analysing distributed cognition in software teams: a case study of team programming during perfective software maintenance. In J. Koenemann-Belliveau, T. G. Moher and S. P. Roberston (eds), Empirical Studies of Programmers: Fourth Workshop, Ablex.

[13]

Goel, V. 1995. Sketches of Thought. MIT Press.

[14]

Goldschmidt, G. 1991, The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 2, 123--143.

[15]

Hamming, R. W. 1987. Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers, 2nd ed., Dover Publications.

[16]

Kaplan, S., Gruppen, L., Leventhal, L. M., and Board, F. 1986. The Components of Expertise: A Cross-Disciplinary Review. The University of Michigan.

[17]

Ko, A. J., DeLine, R., and Venolia. G. 2007. Information needs in collocated software development teams. In 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '07), IEEE Computer Society, 344--353.

Digital Library

[18]

Lansdown, J. 1993. Visualising design ideas. In Proceedings of Interacting with Images (London, February). BCS.

[19]

Lawson, B. 2003. Schemata, gambits and precedent: some factors in design expertise. In N. Cross and E. Edmonds (eds), Expertise in Design: Design Thinking Research Symposium 6, Creativity and Cognition Studio Press, 37--50.

[20]

Logie, R. H. 1989. Characteristics of visual short-term memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 275--284.

[21]

Lubars, M., Potts, C., and Richter, C. 1993. Developing Initial OOA Models. In Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, 255--264.

Digital Library

[22]

Luff, P., Heath, C., and Greatbatch, D., 1992. Tasks-in-interaction: paper and screen based documentation in collaborative activity. In Proceedings of CSCW 92, 163--170.

Digital Library

[23]

Miller, G. A. 1993. Images and models, similes and metaphors. In A.Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, 357--400.

[24]

Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. 1990. GPS: A Program that Simulates Human Thought. In Computers and Thought, McGraw-Hill.

Digital Library

[25]

Petre, M. 2004. How expert engineering teams use disciplines of innovation. Design Studies, 25, 477--493.

[26]

Petre, M. 2007. Expert strategies for dealing with complex and intractable problems. Keynote address, Psychology of Programming Interest Group Workshop.

[27]

Petre, M. 2009. Representations for idea capture in software and hardware development. Open University Centre for Research in Computing Technical Report.

[28]

Petre, M. In press. Mental imagery and software visualization in high-performance software development teams. To appear in: Journal of Visual Languages and Computing.

Digital Library

[29]

Petre, M., and Blackwell, A. 1997. A glimpse of programmers' mental imagery. In S. Wiedenbeck and J. Scholtz (Eds), Empirical Studies of Programmers: Seventh Workshop, ACM Press, 109--123.

Digital Library

[30]

Petre, M., and Green, T. R. G. 1990. Where to draw the line with text: some claims by logic designers about graphics in notation. In D. Diaper, D. Gilmore, G. Cockton, and B. Shackel (eds.), Human-Computer Interaction: Interact'90, North-Holland, 463--468.

Digital Library

[31]

Rittel, H., and Webber, M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155--169.

[32]

Schön, D. 1988. Design rules, types and worlds. Design Studies, 9, 3, 181--190.

[33]

Schön, D. A., 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books.

[34]

Simon, H. A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed., MIT Press.

Digital Library

[35]

Vincenti, W. G. 1990. What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cited By

Seero LBurge JSoria AVan Der Hoek A(2023)Exploring a Research Agenda for Design Knowledge Capture in Meetings2023 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)10.1109/CHASE58964.2023.00013(37-42)Online publication date: May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/CHASE58964.2023.00013
Sarkar ABorghouts JIyer AKhullar SCanton CHermans FGordon AWilliams JBernhaupt RMueller FVerweij DAndres JMcGrenere JCockburn AAvellino IGoguey ABjørn PZhao SSamson BKocielnik R(2020)Spreadsheet Use and Programming Experience: An Exploratory SurveyExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3382807(1-9)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3334480.3382807
Loksa DXie BKwik HKo AZhang JSherriff MHeckman SCutter PMonge A(2020)Investigating Novices' In Situ Reflections on Their Programming ProcessProceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3328778.3366846(149-155)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3328778.3366846
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Insights from expert software design practice
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Designing software

Recommendations

Engaging Feminist Solidarity for Comparative Research, Design, and Practice

Research in the fields of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is increasingly embracing and moving across borders. While universalism in such research is widely rejected, sole focus on the "particular'' is also ...
Bridging Work Practice and System Design: Integrating Systemic Analysis, Appreciative Intervention and Practitioner Participation

This article discusses the integration of work practice and system design. By scrutinising the unfolding discourse of workshop participants the co-construction of work practice issues as relevant design considerations is described. Through a mutual ...
Affordances for practice

This paper argues that Gibson's concept of affordance inserts a powerful conceptual lens for the study of sociomateriality as enacted in contemporary organizational practices. Our objective in this paper is to develop a comprehensive view of affordances ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ESEC/FSE '09: Proceedings of the 7th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering

August 2009

408 pages

ISBN:9781605580012

DOI:10.1145/1595696

General Chair:
Hans van Vliet
VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Program Chair:
Valerie Issarny
INRIA-Paris-Rocquencourt, France

Copyright © 2009 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 August 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ESEC/FSE09

Sponsor:

ESEC/FSE09: Joint 12th European Software Engineering Conference

August 24 - 28, 2009

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Acceptance Rates

ESEC/FSE '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 32 of 217 submissions, 15%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 112 of 543 submissions, 21%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

33
Total Citations
View Citations
837
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)21
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Seero LBurge JSoria AVan Der Hoek A(2023)Exploring a Research Agenda for Design Knowledge Capture in Meetings2023 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)10.1109/CHASE58964.2023.00013(37-42)Online publication date: May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/CHASE58964.2023.00013
Sarkar ABorghouts JIyer AKhullar SCanton CHermans FGordon AWilliams JBernhaupt RMueller FVerweij DAndres JMcGrenere JCockburn AAvellino IGoguey ABjørn PZhao SSamson BKocielnik R(2020)Spreadsheet Use and Programming Experience: An Exploratory SurveyExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3382807(1-9)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3334480.3382807
Loksa DXie BKwik HKo AZhang JSherriff MHeckman SCutter PMonge A(2020)Investigating Novices' In Situ Reflections on Their Programming ProcessProceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3328778.3366846(149-155)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3328778.3366846
Ozkaya I(2020)Building Blocks of Software DesignIEEE Software10.1109/MS.2019.295904937:2(3-5)Online publication date: Mar-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2019.2959049
Famelis MChechik M(2019)Managing design-time uncertaintySoftware and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)10.1007/s10270-017-0594-918:2(1249-1284)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10270-017-0594-9
Chechik MGrünbacher P(2018)Guest editorialAutomated Software Engineering10.1007/s10515-017-0222-525:1(45-46)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10515-017-0222-5
Kleffmann MRöhl SBook MGruhn V(2018)Evaluation of a traceability approach for informal freehand sketchesAutomated Software Engineering10.1007/s10515-017-0221-625:1(1-43)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10515-017-0221-6
Kannengiesser U(2016)The Future: Obstacles and OpportunitiesS-BPM in the Production Industry10.1007/978-3-319-48466-2_8(209-230)Online publication date: 16-Dec-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48466-2_8
Kleffmann MRöhl SGruhn VBook MMäder POliveto R(2015)Establishing and navigating trace links between elements of informal diagram sketchesProceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Software and Systems Traceability10.5555/2821445.2821447(1-7)Online publication date: 16-May-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2821445.2821447
Famelis MBen-David NDi Sandro ASalay RChechik MBertolino ACanfora GElbaum S(2015)Mu-MmintProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 210.5555/2819009.2819141(697-700)Online publication date: 16-May-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2819009.2819141
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents