Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/02/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 8th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have to exchange another image is correct. 2001:1284:F016:62B7:3822:B726:6882:5494 00:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have to exchange another image is correct. Ludovica80 (talk) 00:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gift Ahm.jpg Abderrachid zeha (talk) 01:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the owner of this picture and I have not taken a permission from the subject. Missingyou99 (talk) 04:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the owner of this picture and I have not taken a permission from the subject. Missingyou99 (talk) 04:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this assuming it met the Soviet / Russian public domain rules but it appears not to meet the stated conditions on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Russia-1996 Shyamal L. 04:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Abhishek62037 (talk) 11:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after uplaod. --Rosenzweig τ 12:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation from https://www.cosenzapost.it/mister-italia-2021-alle-prefinali-anche-il-calabrese-26enne-giovanni-pupo/ g (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Gianfranco, next time use {{SD}}. Thanks Ruthven (msg) 14:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Osama Eid (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:09, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian: OoS --Alaa :)..! 22:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:Yann. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claims that the image is "extracted from the official", which I do not see any proof inside the website. There is no information indicating how this image is obtained to the website. ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 16:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To anybody who can't read Chinese, this image depicts Mikhail Suslov.--ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 16:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed there is a copyright icon inside the website, I will transfer this to copyvio. --ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 16:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Polarlys (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsourced; vandal author Xdtp (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tagjfgdghgfjhghgvncggdfgm 73.230.195.122 21:09, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 22:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photograph of a screen, not an original photograph. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work of non-free content (F3) - screenshot of this; uploader serial copyvio LTA. --Эlcobbola talk 01:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing description, new upload will fix that.

Norman.seibert (talk) 20:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing description, new upload will fix that.

Norman.seibert (talk) 20:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing description, new upload will fix that.

Norman.seibert (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SHYT JUST LIKE ENTIRE WMF IS archi'e.is/Y0BB especially antiCompositeNumber who ll nevere delete it LOL LOL LOL 186.32.218.113 05:09, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism by known LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 09:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ant war edits 24/7, never contributes, here is proof this is copyrighted image: https://c8.alamy.com/comp/2E16XWW/usa-california-santa-barbara-december-18-2020-closeup-of-green-metal-mv-conception-fire-and-sinking-disaster-memorial-is-green-metal-plate-with-2E16XWW.jpg 201.242.102.192 02:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism by globally banned LTA. Completely different image @ alamy. Revenge nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 11:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be movie-poster[1]; Tasnim-agency will hardly have the copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blogger scope 186.172.83.234 00:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Allegedly violating the copyright regulation: this image is 100% downloaded from the internet and uploaded here. Hwi.padam (talk) 01:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the flickr user posts the photo under Public Domain, the flickr user most likely does not own the photo. Photo is used on multiple sites - https://www.rollbamaroll.com/2021/9/12/22670160/watch-devonta-smith-scores-td-on-first-nfl-drive and https://touchdownwire.usatoday.com/2022/08/25/devonta-smith-philadelphia-eagles-wawa-locations/ but the owner of the photo is shown as Dale Zanine of USA TODAY Sports. On these sites the license of photo is not shown. Putitonamap98 (talk) 02:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Obvious (though likely accidental) Flickrwashing. I have listed the account for blacklisting at COM:QFI. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree license (CC3.0-U is invented by uploader) Mateus2019 (talk) 03:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that; I was meant to upload this under "non-free file".-Prince Silversaddle (talk) 04:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Prince Silversaddle: Non-free file are prohibited on Commons. Some Wikipedia site allows "fair use", you may consider uploading this to the corresponding Wikipedia site. (Fair use claims are also prohibited on Commons). --A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel - Do I need to wait until after it gets deleted here first? Prince Silversaddle (talk) 05:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not necessary. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The website label is clear. It is not personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a book can't be a personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:37, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architectural copyright violation. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Kyrgyzstan, and this commercially-licensed photo violates architects' copyrights.

Per w:ru:Белый дом (Бишкек), it was completed in 1985 and authored by the employees of «Фрунзегорпроект» institute, with Урмат Алымкулов, Александр Зусик, Рафгат Мухамадиев, Олег Лазарев, and Сапарбек Султанов as head architects. A commercial license clearance from them is required since the country does not allow commercial FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist de:Carl Otto Czeschka died in 1960, so this is not in the PD in Austria yet. The file can be restored in 2031. Rosenzweig τ 08:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file needs VRT-permission from prize creator. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculptor of this 1915 lectern in a public building in Germany, Heinrich Walldorf jr., died in 1954, which means it is not in the public domain yet. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany, so the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2025. Rosenzweig τ 09:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's bio as PDF, out of scope. Achim55 (talk) 11:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. If you claim, that the logo is very old, then better source than own work is needed, real author and better license are needed. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map of a 1918 battle. Looks taken from a French book and probably after 1952. Talk page mentions that it could be from 1967 book. Uploader claims own work, which could just be default settings in which case this won't be free in France or the US for some time or it is the uploader's work and previously published, which would require VRT confirmation to be on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram-code in metadata suggests image is copied from social media. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram-code in metadata suggests image is copied from social media. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-CAGov/PD-California does not apply; photo was taken by a photographer before Soto-Martinez's election to City Council, seen at https://www.hugo2022.com/media-toolkit, meaning that it was not taken by a California government unit. reppoptalk 19:53, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Though expressedly claimed as own work by uploader, the same photo, though with watermarks, was published here (Copyright © 2005 SPIQ.CA, Alle Rechte vorbehalten), and the deeplink (http://www.spiq.ca/v2/ailleurs/new_york/newyork_2005_011.jpg) suggests it's from 2005, not 2011. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, obviously personal image of likely non-notable person and possibly unwanted outing. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem (wrt the 1st mentioned problem):


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DavidAngelesPizan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All personal images and all are out of scope.

Davey2010Talk 21:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isa Akimaliev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files (homework assignments/essays). Outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader has no other contributions.

Marbletan (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since I'm getting banned here, then Wikipedia doesn't need my work PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since I'm getting banned here, then Wikipedia doesn't need my work PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The claim of "own work" is clearly fake, since I have a DVD in my collection with this exact cover. See for instance https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71rc0t98QbL._AC_SL1087_.jpg displayed at https://www.amazon.co.uk/Doctor-Who-Five-Doctors-Anniversary/dp/B0010TG1QC Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 22:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The claim of "own work" is fake, see for instance https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51NDZ75G43L._AC_.jpg displayed at https://www.amazon.co.uk/Doctor-Who-Curse-Fatal-Death/dp/B00004CZDX Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 22:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Boca Juniors paintings

[edit]

Paintings by Argentine artist Miguel Angel Di Pasqua, who specialises in football art. The artist is still alive and his paintings (including these) are posted on his Instagram and Facebook pages. Both need a permission.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 22:55, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Beautiful mosque, but there is no freedom of panorama in Sudan. It was completed in 2010, thus too recent to be considered as in public domain. These photos of the Ottoman-style work need commercial license permission from the building designers.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Whilst I can't trace the origin of this derivative image, the background is clearly https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjM3NDYwMjE1OV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwOTQyMTc3MTE@._V1_FMjpg_UX1000_.jpg see gallery at https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1795139/ and the copyright owner is almost certainly the BBC Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 23:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No notability, no encyclopedic value CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque began construction in 2001 according to this. Unfortunately, Sudan doesn't have freedom of panorama, and licensing permission from the architect or whoever is the designer or copyright holder of the depicted architectural work is required.

Out of the photos in Category:Siadah Sanhory mosque in Manshiya Khartoum, this is the only photo that intentionally focuses on the mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is misleading especially considering the location of the territories 2600:100C:A21B:9ED1:CC6B:4BA:E5AC:8861 23:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:18, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOO UK, the threshold of originality in the United Kingdom is incredibly low. The design on the top right corner is complex enough to warrant copyright protection. plicit 23:56, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's bio as PDF, out of scope. Achim55 (talk) 11:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo Trade (talk) 13:39, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Flickrwashing. Google Street View screenshot (see watermark in left top corner). Frodar (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:37, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

We do not keep images of copyrighted sculpture (which includes trophies) without permission of the sculptor. 83.61.124.239 15:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please provide links to laws which forbid using trophy photos.--Anatoliy (talk) 14:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: see OTRS #2012070510006137, FIFA doesn't allow the commercial use of your trademarks Ezarateesteban 14:24, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photograph of a trophy apparently taken in Italy, which does not have freedom of panorama, Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Fma12 (talk) 18:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Does not meet any of the conditions of the PD template. The author died in 2004. / Ne répond à aucune des conditions énoncées dans le modèle de DP. L'auteur est mort en 2004.

Also:

-- Asclepias (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 17:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to w:Ak Orda Presidential Palace, this is a building in Kazakhstan constructed between 2001 and 2004. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case.

Stefan4 (talk) 21:03, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan. The building inception was in 2004; licensing clearance from the designers of the palace building is a must.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fma12 as no permission (No permission since) GDuwenTell me! 19:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete after this discussion, it was decided that {{PD-AR-Gov}} would not be considered a valid license, therefore all the municipal or national emblems in Argentina are subject of copyright (unless their PD status can be proved).
The coat of arms of Chos Malal is not PD in Argentina so according to this source (La Mañana de Neuquen) it was designed by artist Mario Mastice who died in 2016. Therefore that COA will enter to the PD in Jan 2087. Fma12 (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by User:Krd. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architectural copyright violation. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Kyrgyzstan, and this commercially-licensed photo violates architects' copyrights.

Per w:ru:Белый дом (Бишкек), it was completed in 1985 and authored by the employees of «Фрунзегорпроект» institute, with Урмат Алымкулов, Александр Зусик, Рафгат Мухамадиев, Олег Лазарев, and Сапарбек Султанов as head architects. A commercial license clearance from them is required since the country does not allow commercial FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:55, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architectural copyright violation. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Kyrgyzstan, and this commercially-licensed photo violates architects' copyrights.

Per w:ru:Белый дом (Бишкек), it was completed in 1985 and authored by the employees of «Фрунзегорпроект» institute, with Урмат Алымкулов, Александр Зусик, Рафгат Мухамадиев, Олег Лазарев, and Сапарбек Султанов as head architects. A commercial license clearance from them is required since the country does not allow commercial FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These commercially-licensed photos are all copyvios. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Kyrgyzstan; according to the infobox at w:ru:Центральная мечеть (Бишкек), the construction finished in 2017 and the architectural work author was Угур Таньели. Elaborate interior architecture and designs are also included; these may still be under their designers' copyrights.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:14, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The current building is unfree; there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Kyrgyzstan. According to w:ru:Киргизский государственный исторический музей, the current building of the museum was completed in 1984, by a team of architects under Киргизгипрострой project, led by architects С. Абышева, Р. Асылбекова, А. Кудели, В. Иванова, and М. Сатыбалдиева. Commercial license permission from them is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use. Article in ru-wiki requested for deletion for spam and advertising Drakosh (talk) 09:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:56, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 10:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:56, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unambiguous advertising or promotion Ivanbranco (talk) 11:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:54, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in the public domain: the artist died in 1962. Daehan (talk) 11:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tag is based on US federal government creation, but this is a work of a local county government, not the US federal government. Likely above COM:TOO. Hog Farm (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 01:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Copyright rules by territory/European Union the national side of EU coins can be copyrighted per the laws of the specific country. So in this case I assume images of the coin would be copyrighted by Germany. Adamant1 (talk) 05:55, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Das Foto wurde von mir erstellt. Die Urheberrechte für das Foto liegen daher bei mir.
The photo was created by me. The copyright for the photo therefore belongs to me. Rawis90 (talk) 21:07, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's not really how images of otherwise copyrighted works. Although now that I looked at it I don't think the eagle is copyrighted since it's a generic state symbol. Maybe I accidentally nominated the wrong image for deletion because of having to many browser windows open at the same time or something. Who knows. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is Adelheid Fuss, Potsdam, apparently alive. --Rosenzweig τ 08:29, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SorcenNecros (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with widely disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. One file already speedily deleted as copyvio (File:Léa Lee.jpg).

P 1 9 9   18:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BenedictA23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data or taken from FB. Several previous DR's, unreliable uploader.

P 1 9 9   18:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as "own work" by uploader User:Stundra, but author-entry "Kevin Delaney". -- Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as "own work" by uploader User:Stundra, but author-entry is "Augusto Giammatteo". -- Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Slight doubt about "own work"-claim by uploader, as the same image is published at https://collections.lib.utah.edu/details?id=229314 under "Digital image copyright 2003, Murray City Corporation. All rights reserved", though not dated. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SuperWIKI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Previously tagged as copyvio by Lonparis. Converting to DR to give the uploader a chance to explain how they are freely licensed.

King of ♥ 22:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would have loved these photos to be freely licensed, but, as i am familiar with GPO photos and restrictions, these photos needs to have ORTS premmisions from the GPO, which I'm very skeptical he got. If he did, it is great. These photos are not PD-israel and not CC BY-SA 3.0, they need premmision before uploading them. Therfore they are by definition copvio. Waiting for a comment. Lonparis (talk) 00:18, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was unaware of that. Feel free to delete. Apologies for the inconvenience. SuperWIKI (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
King of Hearts, you may delete it now. Lonparis (talk) 19:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

he uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:16, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely from insta. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German coins are copyrighted per the usual Life + 70 years terms for normal works. In this case the coin designer, Sneschana Russewa-Hoyer, isn't dead. So the coins she created will be copyrighted at least for the foreseeable future.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright to images of coins belongs not to engraver or coin designer but to state. In this case to Germany. Due to {{PD-GermanGov-currency}} they are free to use.  Keep Ibidem (talk) 07:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:CUR Germany disagrees and says "Not OK except for Deutsche Mark bank notes". The files can be restored 70 years after the artist's death. --Rosenzweig τ 08:19, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Germany, German coins are copyrighted. These coins are the work of en:Sneschana Russewa-Hoyer, who is alive, so the files should be deleted. They can be restored 70 years pma.

Rosenzweig τ 21:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake WeJosRock (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no such license in the source (copyviol. + license washing) Mateus2019 (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indiaglitz website grants "world-wide, royalty free and non-exclusive license(s)" for all the images present in its website, which is mentioned in its terms and conditions page "https://www.indiaglitz.com/terms.php". Fasowa7984 (talk) 07:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The problem is that this site accepts photos from users and then re-licenses them, whether or not the person has the right to post them in the first place. --Gbawden (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Powinien mieć nazwę: Dobieszewice. Dwór z pierwszej połowy XIX wieku 1 Gorofil (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion. Please request specific new file name following guidelines at Commons:File renaming. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niewłaściwa nazwa pliku Gorofil (talk) 16:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before. --Rosenzweig τ 20:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Powinien mieć nazwę: Dobieszewice. Dwór z pierwszej połowy XIX wieku 2 Gorofil (talk) 11:45, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jankowo. Pałac z 1880 r. 1.jpg, please request specific new file name following guidelines at Commons:File renaming. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niewłaściwa nazwa pliku Gorofil (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before. --Rosenzweig τ 20:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Powinien mieć nazwę: Dobieszewice. Dwór z pierwszej połowy XIX wieku 3 Gorofil (talk) 11:45, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jankowo. Pałac z 1880 r. 1.jpg, please request specific new file name following guidelines at Commons:File renaming. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niewłaściwa nazwa pliku Gorofil (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before. --Rosenzweig τ 20:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Powinien mieć nazwę: Dobieszewice. Dwór z pierwszej połowy XIX wieku 4 Gorofil (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jankowo. Pałac z 1880 r. 1.jpg, please request specific new file name following guidelines at Commons:File renaming. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niewłaściwa nazwa pliku Gorofil (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before. --Rosenzweig τ 20:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Powinien mieć nazwę: Dobieszewice. Dwór z pierwszej połowy XIX wieku 5 Gorofil (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jankowo. Pałac z 1880 r. 1.jpg, please request specific new file name following guidelines at Commons:File renaming. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niewłaściwa nazwa pliku Gorofil (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before. --Rosenzweig τ 20:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Powinien mieć nazwę: Dobieszewice. Dwór z pierwszej połowy XIX wieku 6 Gorofil (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jankowo. Pałac z 1880 r. 1.jpg, please request specific new file name following guidelines at Commons:File renaming. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niewłaściwa nazwa pliku Gorofil (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before. --Rosenzweig τ 20:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Powinien mieć nazwę: Dobieszewice. Dwór z pierwszej połowy XIX wieku 7 Gorofil (talk) 11:43, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jankowo. Pałac z 1880 r. 1.jpg, please request specific new file name following guidelines at Commons:File renaming. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niewłaściwa nazwa pliku Gorofil (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before. --Rosenzweig τ 20:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Powinien mieć nazwę: Dobieszewice. Dwór z pierwszej połowy XIX wieku 8 Gorofil (talk) 11:43, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jankowo. Pałac z 1880 r. 1.jpg, please request specific new file name following guidelines at Commons:File renaming. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niewłaściwa nazwa pliku Gorofil (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before. --Rosenzweig τ 20:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Powinien mieć nazwę: Dobieszewice. Dwór z pierwszej połowy XIX wieku 9 Gorofil (talk) 11:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jankowo. Pałac z 1880 r. 1.jpg, please request specific new file name following guidelines at Commons:File renaming. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niewłaściwa nazwa pliku Gorofil (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No unknown author - picture by Austrian photographer Otto Zell (1909–1964) from 1941, still under copyright. Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2037. --Rosenzweig τ 20:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader was not aware of the automatic free licensing (crosswiki upload). The uploader has requested it to be deleted after I explained the situation to them [2] (diff is in Finnish). kyykaarme (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend deletion per request. It was uploaded yesterday.-- Htm (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, discussion, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An East German sound recording from the 1949-1990 period that is almost certainly not actually under the claimed licence (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International) and probably still under copyright. Polyna V. (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP (including various subtitle files). Sound recordings have their own terms of protections, 70 years in the EU, even longer in the US. This recording of a 1949 song is probably not older than 70 years. --Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on Twitter but with a slightly lower resolution A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ceci est une insulte au pays libre qui est l'Algérie, cette image porte atteinte au symboles nationaux 105.100.45.8 18:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

L'image concerne le temps quand l'Algérie était sous le gouvernement de la France. Pas de raison pour supprimer l'image.  Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Thuresson (talk) 22:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag does not exist, Algeria has it's official map and it's official Flag Riad Salih (talk) 23:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: You misinterpret the previous DR. Nobody said this had anything to do with an actual flag that existed. Only that this file of imaginary personal artwork of the uploader is supposed to somehow evoke French Algeria. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This flag has never existed it's a map of algeria with a french map color there is no source for this flag at all Riad Salih (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC) Riad Salih (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused, make-believe flag which trys to assert that one country is property of another. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Image was also the subject of a targeted vandal-attack. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this picture!! I have not agreeed to This! DELETE!!!! 2A00:801:723:1FFE:406D:268B:7D91:BC08 12:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this picture! 2A00:801:723:1FFE:406D:268B:7D91:BC08 12:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Based on their username and file description, the uploader claims to be the subject of the photo. Wedding photos are very unlikely to be self-taken, so we do not have permission from the copyright holder. --King of ♥ 02:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why does using it as an official portrait place it in the public domain? That's not a case listed on {{PD-Sri Lanka}}. 25stargeneral (talk) 04:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is indeed an official portrait (original source is gone but see here) but this is not listed on {{PD-Sri Lanka}} and no other proof was presented for the claim that this is in the public domain. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 04:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I took the picture in person, though it is on the screen that amplified the visual. Dr. Blazer (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We do not doubt that you took this photo from the screen but this makes it a derived work from a copyrighted original. And as long the copyright status of the original is not addressed, we cannot keep this image. If the original photo is your own work, please upload it along with the EXIF data and not just a photo of the screen showing it. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lemonaka as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Invalid use of F4 since there is no source to review. Please supply a link to an earlier version of this image from the Internet. King of ♥ 05:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The link is here from a Facebook posting in 5 June 2019. The file at Commons has been uploaded on 8 February 2023, hence we have a case of a previous publication and COM:CSD#F1 applies. @Lemonaka: Please do not forget to add the link to the previous publication and use F1 instead of F4 for such cases. This indeed allows it to be deleted more speedily without having to research this again. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Luan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Quem carregou não demonstra ser válida a informação "Own work" para um escudo de clube social e esportivo brasileiro. Vide pt:Ficheiro:ABB.png. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 05:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per the rationale of IronGargoyle. I've fixed source, author and license accordingly. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fma12 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://seeklogo.com/vector-logo/209668/municipalidad-de-posadas . PD claim, should be discussed. King of ♥ 05:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete First of all, the license {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} in wrong so the author was revealed, according to this source and this source. As the coat was designed in 1971, {{PD-old-70}} does not apply either.
Second; the logo was taken from Seek Logo website, a popular emblem host. Moreover, this is a singular representation of the coat of arms of Posadas than differs significantly from this or this, which seem to be closer to the official emblem created by Álvarez in 1971.
To finish: If the COA would have been created by the uploader I would not have started this DR, tagging it as {{COA blazon}} as a personal work. But this is not the case, for the reasons given above. Fma12 (talk) 09:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per the rationale by Fma12. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP laws in Germany don't apply to building interiors per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany. So images of these windows, which were created by Carl Otto Czeschka, are copyrighted until at least 2030 if not latter since he in 1960.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:09, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I agree with that. The windows are

Ras67 (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I agree with your de minimis arguments. The windows make up half of the photographs or more and you can see specific detailing on them. Like with File:Wismar Friedh Kap mit Phönix-.jpg your claiming the chapel is the main subject, which is clearly nonsense since the chapel is extremely dark except for the window. So it's ridiculous to claim the chapel is the subject of the photograph. You can't even see the chapel. More so since the file is literally named Wismar Friedh Kap mit Phönix. So the photographer clearly wanted the Phonix to be what we are looking at, not some random chair in the foreground that it's to dark make out any details of. You can't just put an otherwise copyrighted image in front of a black background and then claim it's de minimis because the area of black is larger then the copyrighted image. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You do not have to agree to my arguments, these are only hints for the closing admin.
  • First, the "detailed" windows in the "Great Hall" are due to the high resolution photographing technology, but with the room they are "Beiwerk", same with the "Stairs Hall".
  • Second, your monitor or your eyes seem to be impoverished, i can see the entire chapel very clearly. Your example with the "black background" is ridiculous.
Ras67 (talk) 19:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but this is a discussion. In the meantime Commons:Deletion requests says "the burden of showing that the file can be validly hosted here lies with the uploader and anyone arguing that it should be kept." It's perfectly reasonable for someone to point out if your failed to that. If nothing else at least so you can clarify things for the closing admin if something you said is vague or doesn't fit with the 3 points laid out in the overview section of Commons:Deletion requests. More on topic, the question isn't if the windows are "accessories" or not. Whatever that means. What matters here if they are a trivial element of the photographs and they clearly aren't since they take up almost half of the images. That's clearly not trivial. Especially with File:Hochschule für Bildende Künste, Hamburg, Treppenhalle.jpg since you can make out specific artists elements in the windows.
Other then that, sure I can see the chapel in File:Wismar_Friedh_Kap_mit_Phönix-.jpg it's still extremely dark and not what the main element of the image is though. Be my guest and switch out the "black background" example for say an image of the Mona Lisa in a gallery where most of room is darkened and the painting is bathed in flood lights. Yeah, sure you can probably still make out the room if you have good eyesight or squint or whatever. It doesn't change the fact it's clearly an image of the Mona Lisa. Just like the image in question is still of a window. It's ridiculous to try and make this about gradients of light in the room as if that has anything to do with the image or copyright law.--Adamant1 (talk) 11:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
BTW the image of the day is a perfect example of exactly what we are discussing. "Uuuhh, that's clearly not an image of a stained glass window because we can see the room!" Sure dude. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as these photos are derived works of the art by Carl Otto Czeschka who died in 1960 for which we have no freedom of panorama. His works will be in the public domain in 2031. However, some cases will be kept per de minimis. This includes File:Handwerkskammer (Hamburg-Neustadt).Haupttrakt.Großer Saal.Fenster (Czeschka).0.12703.ajb.jpg and File:Panorama -Dez 2012.jpg where the artwork is hardly visible unless if we expand the pictures to maximal resolution. But even if we can recognize the existence of artwork at that point, it is hardly recognizable as the images are blurred at full resolution and as the photos do not have the dynamic range to cope well with the fine details of the artwork. However, I do not see a case of de minimis for File:Hochschule für Bildende Künste, Hamburg, Treppenhalle.jpg where the artwork is an important element of the picture and where it can be well seen. I also do not accept a case of de minimis for File:Wismar Friedh Kap mit Phönix-.jpg where the stained glass window is the central focus of the image. However, I exclude File:Lerchenfeld-Fenster (i).jpg which is a picture of the floor with reflections from the window. The artwork cannot be recognized here. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shchb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images with questionable licenses. More details follow.

Black and white, suspected old photos. Proper documentation of publication date and place of first public publication is required so as to determine if these are already in public domain or not. Maybe these were first published during Soviet times (???).
Showing some strange social media transmission codes in EXIF metadata, some bearing Facebook transmission codes.

- Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of these images and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the originals overwrite these FB-derived images, if the images are truly self-photographed works of the uploader.

_JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:16, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the user had been warned before but chose to ignore. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as these appear to be all copyvios. Take for example File:Nikita Khrushchev at Frunze Airport.jpg which has been published before. see for example this article from 2015 where the photo is marked © Предоставлено Центральным Госархивом КР. Or File:BISHKEK KNATOB MALACHITE HALL.jpg which has been published before on 21 February 2017. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's highly implausible that the uploader owned the rights to this picture in 2005. A version with a man holding the bottle up was already online in 2004. Emufarmers (talk) 21:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:47, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The is a picture of a file or a website. It is not personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is unlikely the own work of the uploader as claimed. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a post on a website can't be a personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is a quote from a Wikipedia article. This would be usually out of COM:SCOPE. However, as it is in in use, I've kept it and fixed the file description page accordingly. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a post on a website can't be a personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is a screenshot from Otoman Zar-Adusht Ha'nish#1920 charges. This would usually out of COM:SCOPE. However, as it is in use, I've kept it and fixed the file description page accordingly. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a person that died in 1936 can't be a personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:13, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster of a commercial can't be a personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:13, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from the rapper Lil darkie who I assume isn't the uploader. So it's probably copyrighted. The same goes for File:Lil-darkie--1931712857-300x300.jpg. Adamant1 (talk) 07:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fazntasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:40, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Afeez555 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional descriptions and somewhat personal pictures. Unused, low Q.

Lymantria (talk) 08:46, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Afeez555 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No meaningful exif, black border gives a clue that it was cropped from something. Unlikely to be own work. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photo Dionisio.Calucci (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9   01:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photo Dionisio.Calucci (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9   01:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photo Dionisio.Calucci (talk) 11:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9   01:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photo Dionisio.Calucci (talk) 11:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9   01:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photo Dionisio.Calucci (talk) 11:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9   01:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaiser Fulbright (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Files uploaded for Sandbox experiments, now unused.

TilmannR (talk) 12:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no encyclopedic use and incorrectly categorised as David Shayler the whistleblower Darrelljon (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Visual characteristics suggest screenshot of news program (see here, for example)--also low res, no EXIF, and uploader serial copyright violator. Эlcobbola talk 16:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It’s an old photo of me that I took, that is not being used nor has it been used anywhere, and I would highly appreciate if it could be deleted if possible. Thank you! TomsvenlO (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   01:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality image of Chicago Loop Krok6kola (talk) 23:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This depicts copyright text (and gets it wrong). It shows a lightly but horribly distorted version of the second stanza of a poem titled "Sonnet and Limerick" (of which the first stanza is a sonnet) by Morris Bishop that is presumably copyright. (Bishop died in 1973.) The two-stanza poem can be found on p. 21 of the 23 October 1937 issue of The New Yorker; in Bishop's 1942 collection Spilt Milk (although I haven't seen this myself); and in Charlotte Putnam Reppert, ed., The Best of Bishop (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1980; ISBN 0-8014-1310-9), p. 40. You'll also find the limerick sans sonnet (or distortions) attributed to Bishop in many anthologies, of which I'll list four: Bennett Cerf, ed., Out on a Limerick: A Collection of over 300 of the World's Best Printable Limericks (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1960), p. 22. William S. Baring-Gould, ed., The Lure of the Limerick: An Uninhibited History (New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1963), p. 10. G. Legman, ed., The Limerick: 1700 Examples, with Notes, Variants, and Index (New York: Bell, 1969), p. xi. E. O. Parrott, ed., The Penguin Book of Limericks (Harmondsworth, Middx: Penguin, 1984; ISBN 0-14-007669-7), p. 21. A number of these books (and more) can, for no charge, be "borrowed" (i.e. viewed for an hour) at the Internet Archive: Immediately below the search box, click "Text contents", and in the search box, enter "limerick is furtive and mean" (complete with quotation marks). Hoary (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS (after a night's sleep): Yes, "that is presumably copyright" (above) means "that I imagine is copyright, though I haven't been bothered to check". I haven't yet been able to view that issue of The New Yorker, let alone a copy of Spilt Milk, and therefore I can't claim that the poem is copyright. However, while I'd agree that photographs of plaques are very often worthwhile, this is a visually unremarkable plaque that does no more than present a mildly garbled version of a limerick and thus does a disservice to the limerick's author; it seems to me that it's out of scope of Commons. -- Hoary (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This has been photographed at the corner of O'Donnell Street and Glentworth Street in Limerick (geographic location 52.661016, -8.629528). {{FoP-Ireland}} applies for this plaque as this is a “work of artistic craftmanship”. This is independent from the copyright status of the displayed text. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 86.15.122.201 as Fair use (Non-free use rationale) and the most recent rationale was: logo A09 (talk) 11:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-simple and PD-text applies. Added {{Vectorize}} on filepage. A09 (talk) 11:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is the logo for the Together Trust to serve as a means of identification. 86.15.122.201 11:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment This was already resolved via {{Trademarked}}. A09 (talk) 11:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: UK has a very low threshold or originality for logos. --Sreejith K (talk) 13:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a post on a website can't be a personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is a screenshot from Otoman Zar-Adusht Ha'nish#1912 arrest. This would usually out of COM:SCOPE. However, as it is in use, I've kept it and fixed the file description page accordingly. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elpunketo

[edit]

The source of these images is a wiki called "Logos Fandom" with a weak licensing conditions (it would only be limited the CC.by-sa license to text, but not the images), leaving a gray area over copyrighted content (as fair use); generating a license washing with these logos. In addition, the user who uploaded the logos is uploading again the deleted files and seeks its restoration, so I prefer the deletion request of all his files. --Taichi (talk) 06:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with IronGargoyle and I'd say most of these are simple enough to be PD-text-logo. I think the only ones that are possibly above the WP:TOO are:
I would  Keep everything else. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:31, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete for File:Canal 9 (Logo 2003).jpg, and File:Canal 9 (Logo 2002).png -  Keep for the rest, as PD-textlogos or {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} Fma12 (talk) 00:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many of these logos are cases of {{PD-textlogo}} as they are below the threshold of originality, these are kept. Unfortunately, we do not have much information yet about to which extent this is seen by Argentinian case law. Hence, I delete the non-obvious cases: File:Canal 9 (Logo 2003).jpg (three-dimensional appearing with lighting, currently unused), File:Canal 9 (Logo 1974).png (includes image of a sun with a face, an unusual set of stripes, and a “9” with an arrow, currently unused), File:Canal 9 (Logo 2002).png (three-dimensional with lighting), File:Canal 9 Cadete (Logo 1960).png (multi-layered complex logo). --AFBorchert (talk) 22:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Kyrgyzstan. According to w:en:Kyrgyz National Philharmonic, the building dates to 1980 and its author was architect A. Pechonkin. Nominated photos show the building as well as the Manas monument (in front) in a non-incidental or main-subject manner.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yearbook cover photos uploaded by Atwingirl

[edit]
  1. File:1989 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  2. File:1990 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  3. File:1991 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  4. File:1992 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  5. File:1993 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  6. File:1994 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  7. File:1995 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  8. File:1996 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  9. File:1997 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  10. File:1998 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  11. File:1999 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  12. File:2000 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  13. File:2001 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  14. File:2002 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  15. File:2003 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  16. File:2004 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  17. File:2005 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  18. File:2006 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  19. File:2007 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  20. File:2008 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  21. File:2009 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  22. File:2010 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  23. File:2011 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  24. File:2012 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  25. File:2013 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  26. File:2014 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  27. File:2015 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  28. File:2016 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  29. File:2017 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  30. File:2018 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  31. File:2020 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  32. File:2021 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg
  33. File:2022 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg


All of these are photos taken by the uploader of en:William Allen High School yearbook covers from 1989 to 2022 (there's no upload for 2019) found in Category:Yearbooks of William Allen High School. i've numbered them to make them easier to discuss. The photo of the 1989 cover is licensed as {{PD-US-no notice}} and all of the rest are licensed {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. The 1989 photo could possibly be {{PD-US-1978-89}} if published prior to March 1, 1989, clearly shown to haven't been published with a copyright notice, and copyright wasn't subsequently registered with five years; the other yearbooks, however, wouldn't have been required to have been published with a copyright notice to be eligible for copyright protection. All of these photos would seem to be slavish reproductions under US copyright law per COM:2D copying with no new copyright being created by taking the photos; so, the only thing the matters is the copyright status of the each yearbook itself. Even if a "cc-by-sa-4.0" license was necessary due to the photos being derivative works, it would only apply to the photo and not the yearbook cover.
I don't think the copyright status of the 1989 yearbook can be accurately assessed as "PD-US-notice" from just looking at its cover since there could've been a copyright notice on one of the inner pages. If it can be shown that no copyright notice was on any of the inner pages and copyright wasn't registed within five years, then that file could possibly be kept as licensed with only some minor tweaking needed. An argument could also be made that the cover is too simple to be eligible for copyright protection per COM:TOO US and thus a {{PD-logo}} license could be added for the cover to the file's page.
Some of the other covers might also be considered too simple for copyright protection, and thus OK to relicense as "PD-logo"; however, quite a few do have various graphic or photographic elements that are probably too complex for PD status and those probably will need to have the COM:CONSENT of the copyright holder verified by VRT in order to be kept. Determining who is the copyright holder could be tricky because it could be a student, it could be a teacher, it could be an outside third-part and it could be the school itself. --Marchjuly (talk) 07:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. I do not think that any of them are covered by {{PD-textlogo}}, even the simpler ones like File:1990 - William Allen High School Class Yearbook - Allentown PA.jpg are designed with sophisticated reliefs. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infrigement: Copy of https://france-inflation.com/inflation-depuis-1901.php Bokken (talk) 08:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.
This image adds value to the article as consistent with the text already in place.
It gives a visual of the inflation since 1900.
And I am the author of the file, so no right violation.
I added source as explained in your tutorial.
If you decide to cancel it, I would appreciate the reason to be able to contribute in the appropriate way. Jean.web (talk) 08:38, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Media files which have been published before (like in this case) need a written permission by the respective copyright holders that are to be forwarded to our support team. Or, alternatively, if you are indeed the author, simply put the diagram under a free license at the original site. Right now we have following notice: “Copyright France Inflation 2008, tous droits réservés”. Please add a link to this deletion request if you contact the support team. If the diagram is put under a free license on the source website, just request an undeletion on COM:UDEL. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the signature on the side, this 1931 bust in a public building in Germany is the work of sculptor de:Friedrich Bursch, who died in 1968. So the bust ist still protected by copyright. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany, so the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2039.

Rosenzweig τ 08:53, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. As usual this can be restored earlier if a written permission of the heirs of Friedrich Bursch can be forwarded to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.66.172 09:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Has been published before at http://www.dircultureto.dz/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/34_direction_de_la.jpg – hence a copyvio is indeed likely. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Belbury as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.albiladpress.com/news/2021/4806/bahrain/736965.html
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as external hit is younger (December 2021) than our upload (September 2021), so it can't be the source. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Missed the exact date on that one. https://tineye.com/search/8f20abfe209720fb9a4ae1a12c5092725673b634?sort=size&order=desc&page=1 shows versions of the image in use on press articles as early as 2019, although I can't see any at this high a resolution. Belbury (talk) 10:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Upload date is 5 September 2021. There are earlier publications, even with a larger format (but lower resolution) like this one from 17 May 2020. This looks like an official portrait which possibly was available through some press map which is meanwhile gone. Hence, this appears to be indeed a copyvio. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 10:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This has been published before. For example at [3] in 2022 (see tineye.com). --AFBorchert (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found there as video thumbnail https://military-wiki.com/what-opportunity-for-turkish-altay-mbt/ Shadow4dark (talk) 12:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photo taken at 19.01.2021 but this page used this photo at 04.06.2021 so this photo not copyied this site. I requested and taken this photo from original source. Please delete this deletion request. @Shadow4dark Umut NAZLI (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The file has no source or author listed. Without them it cannot be kept on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You say that there is no source of the photo, but I have shown the source of the photo. what else do i need to do @Jameslwoodward Umut NAZLI (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One of the earlier versions of the file, not the current version, shows the source as https://www.savunmasanayist.com/fnss-samur-altayi-sirtladi/. That page is clearly marked with "SavunmaSanayiST.com 2022 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır". .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thumb
I got permission to use the photo from the source @Jameslwoodward Umut NAZLI (talk) 16:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Such permission must be sent directly from the copyright holder to VRT. We do not accept licenses forwarded by the uploader. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ticket:2022121810004694 is related to this image. Unfortunately no reply came forward after the last response by a VRT team member from 30 December 2022. This photo can be restored as soon Umut NAZLI proceeds as advised in that ticket. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ArthurAbi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User has uploaded various medium-resolution, no-EXIF images which exist elsewhere online all credited to different photographers. I started searching and flagging them individually but every single one has been a copyvio.

Belbury (talk) 13:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Some of the files were already speedily deleted by Túrelio: File:Ibibindi.jpg, File:Inzu ya kinyarwanda 02.jpg, and Inzu ya kinyarwanda 01.jpg. The remaining images appear to be copyvios as well. File:Gushengerera no kubaza abakuru.jpg has been published one day before at twitter.com, likewise File:Umupfumu.jpg at twitter.com. File:Guterekera.jpg is a stock photo attributed to Thomas Mukoya. Etc. Deleted the whole remaining lot. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ArthurAbi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All credited to "Lion Portraits" in the EXIF, which doesn't match the uploader name.

Belbury (talk) 20:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 09:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama in Slovenia Hladnikm (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question. Do we know who the sculptor is? The statue seems to be dated 1936, which puts a number of public domain scenarios into play, depending on if the sculptor is known and when the sculptor died. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked a native speaker for help. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, AFBorchert. If Mr Hladnikm doesn't know, you can safely assume it is an orphan work. I've done my bit of research though and was unable to find the author's name. --TadejM (t/p) 04:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Thanks for the research but if we are unable to identify the sculptor we cannot assume that this work is already in the public domain. We also do not know that it is orphan without checking the sculpture at its location as many sculptures are signed somewhere. I'm afraid this requires more research. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The claim of "own work" is clearly fake, see https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51apQWsDbRL._AC_.jpg displayed at https://www.amazon.co.uk/Doctor-Who-Scream-Shalka-DVD/dp/B00DP26RPM Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 22:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Kadi. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No notability, no encyclopedic value, Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No notability, no encyclopedic value, Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from bad author list of Flickr, dubious copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An F10 man 186.174.85.141 16:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in PD as Aldo Raimondi died in 1997 Goesseln (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

::remark, I placed it into this category based on the "A. Raimondi" in the subtitle. Aldo was a prolific artist when the illustration was published in 1928. That is all the connection I had, and I was at least 75% sure it was him, not a full 100%. The A. Raimondi illustrating newspapers might have been someone else. Anyway, when in doubt go with the precautionary principle and don't forget to Undelete in 2068. best, --Enyavar (talk) 22:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I misread somewhere that the image was created 1928, in fact it was of course 1937, and that was the year before Aldo became officially the illustrator of the Corriere. Now I'm 99% certain it's him. --Enyavar (talk) 23:05, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio, no proof the artists has released her work under a CC-license, uploaded by a red-linked user, likely not by the artist. Oaktree b (talk) 15:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio, no proof the artists has released her work under a CC-license, uploaded by a red-linked user, likely not by the artist. Oaktree b (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has history of uploading copyright images without permission // sikander { talk } 🦖 16:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that the photo was uploaded by somebody from the PR team of Petr Pavel during the electoral campaign. I have written an email to the communication manager of Petr Pavel asking if they know the photo and if they have the the right and are willing to release it under a free licence. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 12:51, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have not received any answer yet, so I have repeated the request. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Still no answer, so it seems deletion is necessary. Besides this one there are two more files affected: File:Petr Pavel photo 6474 cropped.jpg and File:Petr Pavel photo 6474 (cropped 2).jpg. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've just requested a "universal replace" on User:CommonsDelinker/commands, on the assumption that this is going to be deleted. - Jmabel ! talk 21:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all three per nom and Jan. They have been replaced by File:Petr Pavel (2023-02-14) (cropped).jpg.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Peintre morte en 1955 H2O(talk) 21:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

erfgenamen geven toestemming voor publicatie Obelix 087 (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - permission must be given in writing via VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Peintre mort en 1955 H2O(talk) 21:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

erfgenamen geven toestemming voor publicatie Obelix 087 (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Peintre mort en 1955 H2O(talk) 21:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

erfgenamen geven toestemming voor publicatie Obelix 087 (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Peintre mort en 1955 H2O(talk) 21:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

erfgenamen geven toestemming voor publicatie Obelix 087 (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Peintre mort en 1955 H2O(talk) 21:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

erfgenamen geven toestemming voor publicatie Obelix 087 (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright, even tho they said it's their own work. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I took this picture myself. I told I have asked to Menotti Lerro the permission to use some of his pictures and him gave me it. But in this case I have made the picture myself.Gingeksace (talk) 23:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Netherzone as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. In some countries this photo would be ok per freedom-of-panorama, as the mosaic seems to be located ourdoors. Unfortunately, Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception. Therefore, a permission by the artist is required or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

he uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

he uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

he uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

he uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

he uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

he uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:16, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not take te picture myself. I have only asked to Menotti Lerro permission in this case...Gingeksace (talk) 23:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

he uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from bad author list of Flickr, dubious copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete photographer died in 2015. Undelete in 2086. Abzeronow (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from bad author list of Flickr, dubious copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. The photographer (who was native to Vietnam) is still living, I believe. He was alive in 2011 where it was stated that he lived in California. It's an AP photo so the question of whether the copyright was renewed should be checked. Abzeronow (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot that post-1964, things with proper notice wouldn't have to be renewed.  Delete per nomination. Abzeronow (talk) 20:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work but low-res/web-size screengrab; note border on right. Also added the cropped derivative:

P 1 9 9   19:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculpture in Norway - 2018 artwork [4] — Racconish💬 20:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the picture of the Wittgenstein monument should be kept. The monument was created with funding from KORO, Norway´s national body responsible for curating, producing and activating art in public space. https://koro.no/english/
The local muncipalty of Skjolden was very proud of the monument and several stories were printed and sent about the event. See: https://www.nrk.no/vestland/wittgenstein-monument-pa-plass-i-skjolden-1.14170522
The Norwegian, English and French wiki´s use the picture in their articles about Wittgenstein. I know the artists personally so if it is because of fear for copyright reasons I can ask them to give their permission in writing for it being on Wiki commons. (I'm not quite sure what you mean with "FOP"). Bair175 (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Bair175: FOP refers to the Commons:Freedom of panorama. Since there is no freedom of panorama form monuments in Norway, the image has to be deleted unless we have a permission from the author (see Commons:Licensing). Vanjagenije (talk) 06:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no FOP in Norway. --Rosenzweig τ 07:20, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation by cropping; there is no commercial freedom of panorama in the source country Kazakhstan. As per w:fr:Transport Tower, it was incepted in 2003 and authored by KAZGOR Design Academy. Commercial license permit from KAZGOR Design Academy is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:32, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Building is no longer de minimis in the crop. It is in the original photograph. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:53, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, probably wrong author, probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As a 1976 photograph, it is very likely still under copyright, and the uploader has a history of copyvios. I doubt this was an own work. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Low resolution photograph, deleted per COM:PCP. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:35, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubt about "own work"-claim by uploader, as the identical image (same size and metadata) was published at http://en.comuni-italiani.it/094/052/foto/ (deeplink: http://www.comuni-italiani.it/imco/094/052/castello.jpg). -- Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader has a long history of copyvio, and Comuni Italiani could have been the original. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original photography is not own work of the uploader and may still be in copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per IronGargoyle. Photo is public domain in Italy and the US. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please, check the licence. "Agreement of the author" sounds far from "the material may be used freely by anyone" to me. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:34, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So this is a selfie by Henri Courseaux and he published it. And "own work" means user Michaudière is this known actor. The pictures is also at https://www.agents-associes.com/artiste/henri-courseaux/ Where is the proof that it has been licensed under CC license? 178.9.152.115 00:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No proof of a Creative Commons license at source. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like selfie, possible copyvio. 83.220.239.229 14:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:59, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtlich geschütztes Logo GerritR (talk) 20:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a website logo in the lower right corner. The same image with better resolution already exists at File:宋监察御史程颢.jpg Yinweiaiqing (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the other version has different colors, and it is not known which one is the right one. So decided to keep the image. --Ellywa (talk) 20:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from bad author list of Flickr, dubious copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Pre-1964 Associated Press photograph. Exact publication information would be useful in checking whether copyright was renewed for the photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. There is no evidence per COM:EVID that the file is in the public domain. --Ellywa (talk) 20:38, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Text enthält Aussagen, die durch meine neueren Forschungen widerlegt sind. J. Obernburger war nie Gouverneur von Kärnten. 31.187.90.252 20:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Behalten:
Hinweis: Gilt wie beim Löschantrag auf [5]: Fehler im Textinhalt eines fotografierten Bildes sind kein valider Löschgrund. Hier schiesst der Antragsteller, wenn auch verständlich, weit über das Ziel hinaus. Ein Bild ist ein Bild, unabhängig, ob es tw unrichtige Texte fotografiert, die sich erst aus neueren Forschungen ergaben. Wieviele Denkmäler und Bücher müssten wir sonst verbrennen oder wegreißen???  Keep: No valid reason for deletion. Ich werde aber einen Hinweis auf den fehlerhaften Text im Bild in die Textbeschreibung des Bildes einfügen. MfG --Commander-pirx (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per remark of Commander-pirx. --Ellywa (talk) 20:39, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]