Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/03/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_gezeichnet_von_Karl_Schmidt-Rottluff,_1911.png){kind=link}
Files of Гончиглувсангийн Энхбаатар
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Гончиглувсангийн Энхбаатар (talk · contribs):
- File:MGA1707.jpg (camera Canon EOS 5D Mark III, author MIGMARSUREN)
- File:Хөдөлмөрийн баатар С.Доржнамжил.jpg (camera NIKON D80)
- File:Хөдөлмөрийн баатар С.Доржнамжил 2009 он.jpg (camera Canon EOS 450D)
Metadata is always different. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 03:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
(c)STEFAN_KAMINSKI, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Speedy delete as copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Seems copyrighted http://www.ecran-et-toile.com/les-magritte-du-cinema.html
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Speedy deleted as copyvios. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright TV show Masem (talk) 19:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks at 04:55, 12 März 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:TWD913Chokepoint.jpg: Copyright TV show --Krdbot 07:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Not acceptable. E4024 (talk) 01:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete file:Ultra-mcranger.jpg due to same reason. Small unused personal files with bad quality, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Weiterleitung wird nicht benötigt Im Fokus (talk) 02:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, cross-namespace redirect, author's request on creation day. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
wrong file uploaded SuswethaK (talk) 09:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
no confirmation that the image is cc 4.0 Snowflake91 (talk) 10:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Info from EXIF: "Copyright(C) 2014 by JiYoon All Rights Reserved"; IMO, this qualifies for speedy. Ankry (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, I just want to clarify that I obtained the image from a website. I uploaded it in wiki commons for it to be used on a page. Im relatively new here. Anyways it was not uploaded to make any profit or other ill intention -- Asikm03 (talk) 10:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, speedily deleted as copyright violation. Do not do it again. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Hola equipo, Carlarocaoporto (talk) 10:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
la foto no es mía y no sé por qué está a mi nombre. Pueden borrarla? Muchas gracias :-) Carlarocaoporto (talk) 10:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation (author and copyright holder Sam Rey). Uploader's request and his only upload. Taivo (talk) 10:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
wrong file name; original uploader's request. Solomon203 (talk) 12:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 10:41, 12 März 2019 UTC: Unused and implausible redirect (G2): author's request --Krdbot 14:00, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect structure (CH2 missing); correct version File:GV-2D-skeletal.png available. Leyo 21:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Keep Insufficient reason for deletion. corrected, therefore invalid now. Not a duplicate either, because the other version is a bitmap. – Sivizius (talk) 22:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)- Keep I see no reason for deleting this file! It´s a high-quality vector graphic with terminal CH3 groups! I don´t support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn since a corrected version was uploaded. --Leyo 22:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This has nothing beyond "excluded educational content" (because it's mere text and its formatting or other visual details are of no significance); viewed less charitably, it's promotion (and probably self-promotion). Hoary (talk) 22:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Re-upload out of process. --Ronhjones (Talk) 20:37, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
photo from Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10216092731983055&set=a.1465921340003&type=3&theater Gower (talk) 17:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 06:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
author request Medzeth (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - in use. --E4024 (talk) 03:53, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Medzeth as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The picture is inadequate to share.
Converted by me to DR as file does not qualify for speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - The picture is inadequate to share. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medzeth (talk • contribs) 11:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept, the file is used, apparently its quality is enough good. Taivo (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blacktyr222 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos
Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
{{BadGIF}}, orphaned, better alternatives available in Category:Carvone. Leyo 11:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality chemical diagram, also blurred! Have File:Carvone without stereochemistry.svg as high-quality vector replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal image, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, per nomination--Strainu (talk) 11:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
redundant to File:The location where the statue of Joe Paterno once stood.jpg Begoon 11:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, quality is much worse. Taivo (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Not own work, taken from https://twitter.com/reverskinegh?lang=en Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete It's also at https://www.facebook.com/RevErskineGh/. This is merely the latest attempt by various "editors" at en:Erskine Amo Whyte to upload copyvio publicity photos of this person, e.g. File:ERSKINE.jpg, File:Erskine.jpg, File:Erskine at 4syte tv music awards 2017.jpg, File:Erskine whyte photo.jpg, File:Official erskine.jpg, etc. Voceditenore (talk) 13:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suryakant sengar jalaun (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, out of scope
- File:Sengar jalaun.jpg
- File:Suryakant sengar.jpg
- File:Rajput. Jpg.jpg
- File:Suryakant.jpg
- File:Suryasengar.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photos without metadata, bad quality. Taivo (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AniketChauhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
No evidence of particpant consent for use of this media on Wikimedia Commons presented, despite identification of parties being possible. Media also depicts content which may not be allowed with respect to certain jurisidctions. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn per advice recived in a discussion off wiki. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawn :by Nominator, per discussions in related DR's and off wiki ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:35, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Assumed as own work, but no evidence of participant consent for use of this media on Wikimedia presented. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn per advice received in a discussion off-wiki ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawn :by Nominator, per discussions in related DR's and off wiki ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:35, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
No evidence presented on Commons or on source site as to particiapnt consent for use of this media. Commons should delete these images of this kind for privacy reasons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawn : Per comments in other DR, and off-wiki. (Non-admin-closure)
No evidence of particpant consent for use of this media on Commons presented, in addition the credited author is not the uploader ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawn: By Nominator, per disscussions and advice in related DR's and off wiki. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:31, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Support, out of scope. --Jcornelius (talk) 10:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 20:08, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 01:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 01:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
No BollywoodHungama watermarks, https://www.bollywoodmantra.com/picture/ammaji-ki-galli-serial-launch-20/ Biplab Anand (Talk) 06:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Seems like copyright violation, watermark "BM". Taivo (talk) 09:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Scarscarin
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Scarscarin (talk · contribs):
Unused personal files, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Daft11
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Daft11 (talk · contribs):
Unused photos about unknown people in unknown country. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
unused personal image Migebert (talk) 08:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I added a copy uploaded after creation of the request. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Artworks by Ferenc B. Mikli
[edit]
These paintings made by Ferenc B. Mikli died in 2013. Source: here. --Regasterios (talk) 09:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Unfortunately Hungarian freedom of panorama does not apply indoors. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Littlestar Bhauttik Child Artist (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Prayer For People.jpg
- File:Pose On Own Poster.jpg
- File:Shoot on Progress.jpg
- File:Proud MySelf To Be Aclaimed Award.jpg
- File:CG Work Studio.jpg
- File:Feel Star.jpg
- File:Screen Shot.jpg
- File:Take A Ride BroooommmmmBrhoooom.jpg
- File:Party Time.jpg
- File:Home Side.jpg
- File:Shoot Set.jpg
- File:Total Relex Mood.jpg
- File:Take Snapshot.jpg
- File:Relex.jpg
- File:Dont Drink Alcohol.jpg
- File:Pose Time.jpg
- File:Lets Swim.jpg
- File:Take Some Rest.jpg
- File:Back Of Camera.jpg
- File:Evening Vview.jpg
- File:Photo Shoot Pose.jpg
- File:Poster Boy Kid Littlestar Bhauttik.jpg
- File:Ready For Attend Marriage.jpg
- File:Slaam Aalekum Aadaab Arj Hai.jpg
- File:Its Dubbing time.jpg
- File:Dashing.jpg
- File:Pose With Memorises.jpg
- File:Group Pose.jpg
- File:Poster Launch WhyNot.jpg
- File:Littlestar Hug.jpg
- File:Littlestar Bhauttik.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leehnetinka13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Stefania Romeo with Lee Hnetinka.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka with Stefania Romeo.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Vacation Time Pic.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka taking selfie.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Take a Selfie.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka on vacation.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka selfie.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: done by Jon Kolbert. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amazoncalluk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gianluca Marzola (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Picozzo.jpg
- File:Karrasko.jpg
- File:Ken..jpg
- File:Federiko kome amico.jpg
- File:Sclappy.jpg
- File:Ken la Fen Band.jpg
- File:Band Ken la Fen .jpg
- File:Le pulci della sabbia.jpg
- File:Mi Kiaco Ken.jpg
- File:Ken la Fen.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Scanned from unknown source. Unlikely own photo: no EXIF. Ankry (talk) 13:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
copyviol: the book cover is property of the publisher Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 13:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Liliana Maresca, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Besides no COM:FOP for 3-D artworks in Argentina. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by Minujín, Marta, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Besides no COM:FOP for 3-D artworks in Argentina. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sourabhsambrekar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Sourabhsambrekarhandsome0.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekarhandsomeo.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekarhandsomep.jpg
- File:Sourabh sambrekar handsome.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekarhandsome12.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekarhandsome1.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekarmodel8.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekarstyle.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekarmodel.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekarfriends.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekar77.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekar9.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekar6.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekar8.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekar7.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekar5.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekar4.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekar3.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekarhandsome.jpg
- File:Sourabh sambrekar 1.jpg
- File:Sourabhsambrekar2.jpg
- File:Sourabh sambrekar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajansounthar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:MladenSAtanasijevic.jpg
- File:Veroljub M Atanasijevic 1998.jpg
- File:Veroljub M Atanasijevic 1994.jpg
- File:Veroljub M Atanasijevic 1992.jpg
- File:Veroljub M Atanasijevic 1968 CB.jpg
- File:VeoljubMAtanasijevic 1998.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, probably from Facebook, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Дамдинсүрэнгийн Баянжаргал.jpg
- File:Лувсансодовын Чимэд-Очир.jpg
- File:С.Очирбат.jpg
- File:Г.Өсөхбаяр.jpg
Yann (talk) 14:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:31, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history (blocked three times for uploading copyvio).
- File:Түмэн-Өлзийн Баярмагнай.jpg
- File:Темирбекийн Жархын.jpg
- File:Ганбатын Алтангэрэл.jpg
- File:Эрдэнэ-Очирын Түмэн-Өлзий.jpg
- File:Дагдангийн Цэдэггомбо.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
File used on http://www.aleidashiatsu.nl/?page_id=32, explicit permission is missing. Encycloon (talk) 15:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused JPEG logo, should SVG if useful. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused GIF logo, should SVG if useful. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused JPEG logo, should SVG if useful. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 16:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Flowimagenes192 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 16:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Goyocashmere (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Goyocashmere)
- File:Goyo Process Of Creating.jpg
- File:Goyo Sweater.jpg
- File:Goyo Yarn.jpg
- File:Goyo Shawl.jpg
- File:Гоёо Лого Цагаан.png
- File:About Us.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright © 2017 Sunrise Newspaper Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 18:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 18:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 18:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
(c)Sergio Carvalho, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/76143262@N05/6985856407/ The license says All rights reserved Ovruni (talk) 22:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
wrong PD Kesting died 1970 Goesseln (talk) 12:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- The license is CC BY-SA 3.0, so not PD. Habitator terrae 🌍 15:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep "wrong PD" is obviously wrong, I cant't find anywhere a PD mark. Also this file is already proofed. --Stepro (talk) 19:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- The UBH has retired the CC license (which was nevertheless proofed already). --Stepro (talk) 21:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The given license is wrong. The file is neither PD nor CC but under VVG, see this start page which means it is not free in any case. @xqt 03:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I did not know this. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete "Old" users have seen this UB Heidelberg Nutzungsbedingungen vom 22. 2. 2019.png, but UB Heidelberg has changed its terms of use on 13. March 2019 Mutter Erde (talk) 08:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused out of COM:SCOPE images (:en:User:Hussee89/sandbox/Tara Lynn Gerard).
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE, deleted the corrupted duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Probably derived from this picture, not own work https://nuprop.my/johor/kulai/d-putra-suites *angys* (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
https://uemsunrise.com/property/buyers-guides/johor-bahru *angys* (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
https://uemsunrise.com/property/buyers-guides/johor-bahru *angys* (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Image is copyrighted (see watermark at the top) Yanguas (talk) 15:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; clearly not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:ÇamlıcaMosque (2).jpg CeeGee (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not a real user nor actor. Pure self promotion. Let's delete all his personal images. E4024 (talk) 18:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 02:07, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user nor actor. Pure self promotion. Let's delete all his personal images. E4024 (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user nor actor. Pure self promotion. Let's delete all his personal images. E4024 (talk) 18:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user nor actor. Pure self promotion. Let's delete all his personal images. E4024 (talk) 18:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user nor actor. Pure self promotion. Let's delete all his personal images. E4024 (talk) 18:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user nor actor. Pure self promotion. Let's delete all his personal images. E4024 (talk) 18:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user nor actor. Pure self promotion. Let's delete all his personal images. E4024 (talk) 18:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE applies. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 02:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DR, This is currently under a self-license, but the subject of the photo is a certification card, whose design is most likely held by a third party (such as the issuing organisation). Media like this would meet the criteria for Non-free use on a local project, as illustration of certifications to permit recognition does not in my view interfere with any commercial interests. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, @ShakespeareFan00: this is a work I uploaded before I understand copyright, you could convert it into a speedy deletion. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The subject of the photo is a 2D sign/poster art which would be subject to it's own copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, @ShakespeareFan00: this is a work I uploaded before I understand copyright, you could convert it into a speedy deletion. This is a non-permanent work in the Netherlands so FOP doesn't apply. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Subject of photo, is 2D poster-art, which would be subject to it's own seperate copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, @ShakespeareFan00: this is a work I uploaded before I understand copyright, you could convert it into a speedy deletion. Plus I believe Ellin Beltz already deleted the other one. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Portrait of the Dutch royal couple at the Royal Embassy of the Netherlands in Hanoi 2017.jpg
[edit]
Subject of photo is a 2D photo which would have it's own seperate copyright. However, this looks like it would be an official portrait, would these be exempt in their origin country, as opposed to being own work of the uploader here. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, @ShakespeareFan00: this is a work I uploaded before I understand copyright, you could convert it into a speedy deletion. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
The subject of the photo (the portraits) would be subject to it's own seperate copyright, as opposed to the photo ( claimed as own work). Are official portratis like this ( and the crown design on the top of the frame) exempt in the origin country? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, @ShakespeareFan00: this is a work I uploaded before I understand copyright, you could convert it into a speedy deletion. Although I don't know if Danish government works are exempt of copyright, if it doesn't then tag it as speedy. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- I had considered that, but wanted to wait for a view as to possible exemptions that may apply first. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Subject of photo is a 2D advertising poster, which would be subject to a seperate copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, @ShakespeareFan00: this is a work I uploaded before I understood how copyright © rules work on Wikimedia Commons, you could convert it into a speedy deletion. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
The same picture is visible here from 2016, a copyright violation is very probable, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 19:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; very doubtful claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Appears to have been published at https://anamariabraga.globo.com/materia/ana-maria-usa-macacao-com-estampa-criativa-de-olhinhos Ytoyoda (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ernesto Vieco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE images (Luis Miguel Aparisi de Lorenzo)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: We need the artists permission, copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
The website does not provide information of a free license, but its watermark has the symbol of copyright. Ovruni (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Selfie of OoS couple. E4024 (talk) 01:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Comment Do not delete used files! Taivo (talk) 09:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE applies. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Not Proper Image Makwana1993 (talk) 07:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Makwana1993: What's wrong with the image? Taivo (talk) 10:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of ZheniaST
[edit]ZheniaSt (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:ForrestBerry.png
- File:KefirGalychyna.png
- File:KefirGalychynaSmaky.png
- File:YoghurtGalychyna.png
- File:YoghurtGalychynaGranola.png
- File:ФілософіяГаличини.png
Per COM:PACKAGING OTRS-permission from producing company is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Uploads by KunstBrosfan
[edit]- File:Beno in Aleks.jpg
- File:Aleks Kunst.jpg
- File:Beno Kunst.jpg
- File:Beno in Aleks Kunst.jpg
- File:Aleksander Kunst.jpg
- File:Beno Kunst..jpg
Personal photos, out of scope. According to the (now deleted) "article" on :slwiki, this is just a random group of high-school friends. File:BenoKunst....jpg by the same user was nominated separately before realizing that the same user uploaded a bunch of files. --— Yerpo Eh? 07:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Panoramio upload bot
[edit]Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Subiendo Al Salto - panoramio.jpg
- File:Subiendo Al Salto - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Subiendo Al Salto - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Subiendo Al Salto - panoramio (4).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Random uploads from Panoramio. Out of scope, because they are very blurry. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:European Court of Human Rights
[edit]DR due to the media nominated containg views of a "recent" architectural work in France, which does not have Freedom of Panorama. (I appreciate that it's somewhat irritating that a prominent building connected with civil liberties, cannot be illustrated because of restrictive copyright laws.)
- File:14-02-06-Parlement-européen-Strasbourg-RalfR-003.jpg
- File:CEDH.JPG
File:Chantier ligne E chantier juillet 2007 13.JPGDe minimis- File:Cour Européenne des Droits de l'Homme de Strasbourg.png
File:Cour européenne des droits de l'homme en Hiver.JPGDe minimis- File:Cour européenne des droits de l'homme.JPG
- File:Court of human rights from roof european parliament 2.jpg
File:ECHR-CEDH.jpgPreviously kept per De minimis, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:ECHR-CEDH.jpgFile:Ep strasbourg 24.jpgDe minimis (?)- File:European Court Of Human Rights (19364335).jpeg
- File:European Court of Human Rights- Av. de l'Europe.jpg
File:European Court of Human Rights.jpg- Previously nominated.- File:European Human Rights Court - panoramio.jpg
- File:European Human Rights Court, Strassbourg - panoramio.jpg
- File:Manifestation contre la réforme territoriale 13-12-2014 27.jpg
- File:NEAStrasbourg.jpg
File:Piece of Berlin Wall in front of the European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg.jpgAlready discussed in 2010 (!) at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Piece of Berlin Wall in front of the European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg.jpg, and kept.- File:Strasbourg EuropeDroitsHomme n05.JPG
- File:Strasbourg EuropeDroitsHomme n09.JPG
- File:Strasbourg, Fachwerkhäuser, Gassen, EU 01.jpg
File:Strasbourg- Av. de l'Europe (Rue Sforza).jpgDe Minimis- File:Straßburg Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte 1.jpg
- File:Straßburg Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte 2.jpg
- File:Straßburg Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte 3.jpg
- File:Straßburg Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte 4.jpg
- File:Straßburg Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte 5.jpg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- I believe this one should be Keep, as the building is very much accessory to the picture: File:Chantier ligne E chantier juillet 2007 13.JPG.-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Would you concur that the same view would appply to File:Strasbourg- Av. de l'Europe (Rue Sforza).jpg also? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keepall !!Hello , this is my work and this,photo taken from my balcony, what's the problem ??the question has already been asked in France but there is absolutely no restriction coe.int coe.int (en) the only restriction is to credit the architects, only if the photos were made by the council of europe!!!!!--Nicoleon (talk) 18:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- If you feel strongly that the disclaimer is all that applies ask the ECHR to confirm the exact situation via OTRS.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- It's completely ridiculous, read this [1]. Every day there are dozens of journalists who photograph these buildings, there are no restrictions.--Nicoleon (talk) 22:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- If you feel strongly that the disclaimer is all that applies ask the ECHR to confirm the exact situation via OTRS.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Ep strasbourg 24.jpg and File:Cour européenne des droits de l'homme en Hiver.JPG, as the buildings is not the main subject of the photo (and couldn't even be viewed in any way that would abuse the copyright of the architect).-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Strasbourg- Av. de l'Europe (Rue Sforza).jpg : the subject is obviously not the building, which is only incidental to the photo.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- I may vote Keep based on the court's copyright page: They have a section called "Reproduction of photos of the Human Rights Building", and they imply that such photos are allowed, only that The name of the architects must be mentioned: "Richard Rogers Partnership" and "Atelier Claude Bucher Architectes". Most every other section in there tries to prevent commercial use (such as text and photos found on their website), but that section mentions nothing of that sort. So this may be a single-building FoP license, basically. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep all, per Clindberg.-- Darwin Ahoy! 15:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: stupida lex, sed lex, some kept as De minimis. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:European Court of Human Rights
[edit]Court filings and rulings are not necessarily PD or CC licensed. Furthermore some of these are claimed as self, with no obvious link between the uploader and parties to the filing or ruling.
- File:CASE OF REPUBLICAN PARTY OF RUSSIA v. RUSSIA.pdf
- File:CEDH 33273-12.jpg
File:ВС РФ - отмена ликвидации РПР 1.jpgFile:ВС РФ - отмена ликвидации РПР 2.jpgFile:ВС РФ - отмена ликвидации РПР 3.jpg- File:ДЕЛО “РЕСПУБЛИКАНСКАЯ ПАРТИЯ РОССИИ ПРОТИВ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ”.pdf
- File:Решение ЕСПЧ (Дело СССР).jpeg
.jpeg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Striking out three entries from the request that would reasonably be exempt. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Court filings and laws are PD in most countries due to the exception in the Berne Convention. I don't see the cause to delete them. Off course we should improve metadata --Hannolans (talk) 10:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Many countries do not protect court rulings. They are fine in the U.S. per {{PD-EdictGov}}. Submissions by the parties are not rulings however, so those are copyrightable and would need a license (though they could possibly be filed by a government which does not allow copyright in the first place). Article 44 of the European Convention on Human Rights mandates their rulings are published, unsure if that implies some sort of free license or not. Their copyright page does seem to claim copyright (and give a non-commercial license) on all "texts and videos" on the website, which is wider in scope than the actual rulings. It would only be the actual rulings which could be OK. Obviously they would want to make sure that the content is as unchanged as possible. Unsure if that is enough for the rulings. Obviously, Commons is non-commercial and educational in nature so we are within their general license. Frankly... given the mandate to publish them in the convention in the first place, I would have no problem keeping them. They are fine in the U.S. for sure. Seems like a pretty edgy deletion. However, arguments submitted by the parties would be different. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Minded to withdraw, pending someone getting a more definitive position, from someone appropriately qualified. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
(c)Nadia Diakova, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Elena Ishcheeva is the owner of FINPARTY and has the rights to the photo of Nadia Dyakova: https://finparty.ru/personal/nadya-dyakova/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burdyugova (talk • contribs) 14:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Burdyugova: And what Finparty has to do with: it's a work of Banki.ru? Commons policy requires that, for files previously published under an unfree license prior of being uploaded here, copyright holder must send a permission via COM:OTRS. So Elena Ishcheeva has to send the same way a transfer a ownership from Nadia Dyakova to her. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; please send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal image Afifa Afrin (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- It is used on the user's user page at English Wikipedia. Jianhui67 T★C 04:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no longer in user. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Veselkova Vlada
[edit]Here are all contributions of Veselkova Vlada (talk · contribs):
ru:Атакишиев Энвер Акиф оглы was deleted due to non-notability. Photos and signature of non-notable person, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
out of scope - unused fantasy election results & insignia - https://www.nationstates.net/nation=eraver Cabayi (talk) 21:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
out of scope - unused fantasy election results Cabayi (talk) 21:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wingfoot Air Express
[edit]Files derived from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9a3c1JiuWQ. According to the copyright holder at OTRS ticket:2019030910000264 - these are unpublished photographs taken by the copyright holder's grandfather who died in 1961. Therefore according to Commons:Hirtle chart - "Unpublished works" - "Known author with a known date of death: 70 years after the death of author". = 1st Jan 2032.
- File:Wingfoot Air Express (1).png
- File:Wingfoot Air Express (2).png
- File:Wingfoot Air Express (3).png
- File:Wingfoot Air Express (4).png
- File:Wingfoot Air Express (5).png
- File:Wingfoot Air Express (7).png
- File:Wingfoot Air Express (8).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ronhjones (Talk) 02:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Kelcieprost
[edit]Here are all contributions of Kelcieprost (talk · contribs):
- File:Arizona Icecat Sophomore Chris Vining checking Riley Stockton of Arizona State University.jpg (500×332)
- File:Icecats out for revenge today against Arizona State at TCC.jpeg (515×458)
- File:Seattle area hockey player Chris Vining returning to Seattle to help develop and coach the program he started at 20 years ago!.jpg (1288×1841)
- File:Seattle Sno-King Hockey - Bantam Tier I-AAA Team 2001-2002.jpg (1483×1168, not own work)
- File:Surrey Eagles celebrating late 2nd period goal scored by Chris Vining ( 11) over regional rival Langley Hornets.jpg (551×306)
- File:University of Arizona Hockey bound Chris Vining (White-Kent Valley Midget Tier I-AAA Storm) pushing for position in the USA Hockey Pacific Distric Regionals vs. host Las Vegas Wranglers.jpg (1471×2062)
- File:University of Arizona Wildcat Men's Ice Hockey leading scorer Mickey Meehan (Left), Shaun Brooks (Center) and star freshmen Chris Vining (left) posing in an interview with the Daily Wildcat.jpg (200×300)
- File:USA Hockey increasing numbers at Major-Junior League Showcase Camps and Invitational Team Camps.jpg (400×250)
- File:WIAA 4A Washington State Champions.jpg (1328×1050, multiple watermarks)´
_over_regional_rival_Langley_Hornets.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pushing_for_position_in_the_USA_Hockey_Pacific_Distric_Regionals_vs._host_Las_Vegas_Wranglers.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Shaun_Brooks_(Center)_and_star_freshmen_Chris_Vining_(left)_posing_in_an_interview_with_the_Daily_Wildcat.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mostly small photos, always without metadata. All photos depict en:Chris Vining, twice deleted for non-notability. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 06:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Елена Внукова
[edit]Here are last remaining contribtutions of Елена Внукова (talk · contribs):
- File:Актриса Елена Внукова (из личного архива) IMG 1738.jpg.ty.jpglll.jpg
- File:Актриса Елена Внукова (фото из личного архива)IMG 6948.jpg
- File:Елена Внукова. Актриса театра и кино. IMG 6989k.jpg
- File:Елена Внукова. (из личного архива) IMG 1248.jpg
_IMG_1738.jpg.ty.jpglll.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
IMG_6948.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_IMG_1248.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Photos from personal archive, uploader is always herself depicted. Not own work. OTRS-permission from photographer(s) is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Samantaparra
[edit]Here are both contributions of Samantaparra (talk · contribs):
Uploader is herself depicted and they are not selfies. Probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 07:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Daegucity.kr
[edit]Daegucity.kr (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:2.28 Memorial Park.jpg (739×464, no FOP in South Korea)
- File:Daegu Church.jpg (258×368)
- File:EWORLDAND83TOWER.jpg (995×665)
- File:Gukchae Bosang Memorial Park.jpg (541×327)
- File:Gyesan Chruch.jpg (256×352)
- File:HILLCRESTDAEGU.jpg (996×663)
- File:PARKAPSAN.jpg (1003×667)
- File:Su Seong Lake.jpg (5520×3680, camera NIKON D800)
Mostly small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of CSaulL
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of CSaulL (talk · contribs):
- File:Daniel Ferruelo.jpg (960×527)
- File:Daniel Ferruelo - Belton - Texas.jpg (517×200)
- File:Daniel Ferruelo - CPRA.png (766×906, big watermark)
- File:Daniel Ferruelo - Fort Worth.jpg (960×652, watermark "Scott's Photos 9.22.01")
- File:Daniel Ferruelo - Monta de toros 1.jpg (960×646)
- File:Daniel Ferruelo - Monta de toros 2.jpg (960×651)
Small photos without metadata, different watermarks. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Кринична Анна
[edit]Кринична Анна (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Memorial,Martove(01).JPG
- File:Monument,Martove (02).JPG
- File:Monument,Martove (03).JPG
- File:Monument Mass Grave of Soviet Soldiers,Martove.JPG
- File:Sanatorium Martove Village Sign.JPG
- File:Statue of Lenіn,Martove.JPG
- File:The memorial sign to soldiers-villagers,Martove.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and sign author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Rushinblue
[edit]Here are all contributions of Rushinblue (talk · contribs):
- File:Nuevos trenes Tramo Caracas Charallave Cua 2015.JPG (548×541)
- File:TransCarabobo Venezuela.JPG (597×285)
- File:Transmaracay Aragua Venezuela.JPG (594×397)
- File:Trolcable de Merida Venezuela.JPG (787×518)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Колосенко Ірина
[edit]Колосенко Ірина (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Братська могила і памятний знак с.ЛЮБИМІВКА, 20 м. від магазину.jpg
- File:Братська могила радянських воїнів, в центріс. Лебединці.jpg
- File:ВОЛОСІВ братська могила на кладовищі 1.jpg
- File:ГАЛЬЧИН братська могила детально.jpg
- File:Глинівці Бр. мог р.в.jpg
- File:Глинівці Бр. мог. р.в. фрагмент.jpg
- File:ІВАНКІВ братська могила радянських воїнів, на кладовищі.jpg
- File:ІВАНКІВ братська могила радянських воїнів, на кладовищі 1.jpg
- File:ЛЕБЕДИНЦІ могила Берельсона О.І., західна частина кладовища.jpg
- File:ЛЕБЕДИНЦІ могила Макарова І.Й., східна частина кладовища.jpg
- File:Могила Верескова В.О, с. Івниця.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник воїнам-односельчанам (вигляд з боку), с.Камені, в центрі.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник воїнам-односельчанам c.Городище.jpg
- File:Памятник воїнам-односельчанам с.Городище фрагмент.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник воїнам-односельчанам с.Городківка.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам Голодомору с.Городківка.jpg
- File:С.Забара Група (2) братських могил, в центрі.jpg
- File:С.Зарубинці братська могила радянських воїнів, в центрі.jpg
- File:С.Івниця Братська могила радянських воїнів, в центрі.jpg
- File:С.ІВНИЦЯ військове кладовище,.jpg
,_%D1%81.%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%96,_%D0%B2_%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%80%D1%96.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BB,_%D0%B2_%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%80%D1%96.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' copyright. Some monuments contain photos with unknown origin and maybe they violate photographers' copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Ubik2097
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Ubik2097 (talk · contribs):
- File:Détail d'un panneau type des Olympiades.jpg
- File:Détail de la façade de la tour Tokyo.jpg
- File:Détail de la Tour Mexico.jpg
- File:Détail des panneaux de façade des tours Cortina et Helsinki..jpg
- File:Immeubles de Paris Habitat.jpg
- File:L'accès à la Gare des Gobelins.jpg
- File:La dalle des Olympiades à Paris.jpg
- File:La Tour Athènes et le Panthéon.jpg
- File:La Tour Cortina.jpg
- File:Le Périscope.jpg
- File:Les tours Sapporo, Athènes, Mexico, Helsinki et Cortina.jpg
- File:Tours Nuages Aillaud et Rieti à Nanterre.jpg
- File:Tours Nuages Aillaud - Tour B1.jpg
- File:Tours Nuages fenêtre carrée extérieur.jpg
- File:Tours Nuages - fenêtre ronde extérieur.jpg
- File:Tours Nuages fenêtre sauge extérieur.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in France and the photos violate architects' copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of 1917grocery
[edit]Here are all contributions of 1917grocery (talk · contribs):
- File:Historical Metcalfes IGA storefront.jpg (300×193, historical photo)
- File:Metcalfe's Hilldale grocery store produce department.jpg (260×173, author and copyright holder Metcalfe's Market)
- File:Metcalfe's Hilldale store cheese department.jpg (300×200, author and copyright holder David Nevala)
- File:Metcalfe's Market Hilldale seafood deapartment.jpg (300×200, author and copyright holder David Nevala)
- File:Tim and Kevin Metcalfe.jpg (300×255, author and copyright holder David Nevala)
OTRS-permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of 3BYK BETPA
[edit]3BYK BETPA (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Место боя 11 воинов-саперов Панфиловской дивизии 20150525 110712.jpg
- File:Место боя 11 воинов-саперов Панфиловской дивизии 20150525 110816.jpg
No freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures. After-WWII monument. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Gracasola
[edit]Gracasola (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Espanaduero-logo.png
- File:Logo Caja España-Duero.jpg
- File:Logotipo del nuevo banco, EspañaDuero.jpg
- File:Obra Social Caja España.jpg
- File:Posibilidades estudiadas del logotipo, que dio lugar al actual..jpg
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Boris Bućan, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Boris Bućan Fire Bird and Petrushka.jpg
- File:Boris Bućan Bijeg u Egipat.jpg
- File:Boris Bućan Eiffelov toranj.jpg
- File:Boris Bućan Seljak na njivi.jpg
- File:Boris Bućan Bara.jpg
- File:Boris Bućan Pablo Picasso.jpg
- File:Boris Bućan Ray Charles.jpg
- File:Jabuka youth club poster.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ayanda Thabethe1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The subject claims that these are "own work", but it is hard to believe that these are selfies. Given that the subject is a supermodel, I think these were probably taken by a professional photographer. Very similar images appear on her web site, http://ayandathabethe.com, with "Copyright AYANDA THABETHE 2016. Rights Reserved."
"
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Historical book page. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Romymacari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical book pages. License tags should be corrected.
- File:Book of Ascension 17r.jpg
- File:Book of Ascension 3v.jpg
- File:Book of Ascension 53r.jpg
- File:Book of Ascension 59r.jpg
- File:Folio from a Falnama.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Media missing permission AmericanAgent (talk) 18:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense nomination by now-blocked user. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Pixelated and incorrect geometry of the alkyne (shoud be linear). Have File:Acetylenedicarboxylic acid lindlar.png as high quality and geometrically correct, and also a better illustration for the previous use-case of the nom'ed file (fr:Catalyseur de Lindlar discussing both the product and the nonproduct). DMacks (talk) 05:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 14:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lespouliot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Why using PDF for simple images? Why not uploading the original image files instead? Low resolution, huge white borders.
- File:Blake Pouliot Posed.pdf (https://images.radio-canada.ca/v1/ici-musique/1x1/blake-pouliot-violoniste.jpg)
- File:Blake Pouliot Photo.pdf
- File:Blake and Yo Yo Ma.pdf
- File:Blake with Yo Yo Ma.pdf
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Probable screenshots, and copyvios. --Yann (talk) 21:54, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Bogus license, false own work claim. Uploader did not create 3D object depicted. Autor uk:Євстифеєв Михайло Федорович dead 2010. No Permisiion.
And others uploaded files this user - Obvious copyright violation, Autor - uk:Євстифеєв Михайло Федорович.
- File:Brytsky Marchenko.jpg
- File:Franko Marchenko.jpg
- File:Hrushevsky Marchenko.jpg
- File:Marchenko Evstifeyev 2.jpg
- File:Marchenko Evstifeyev.jpg
- File:Marchenko Franko.jpg
- File:Marchenko Mykola. Sculptor.jpg
- File:Mykola MarchenkoTheophan Prokopovych.jpg
- File:Portrait of Father Marchenko.jpg
- File:Portrait of Father. Marchenko.jpg
- File:Portrait of Mother Marchenko.jpg
- File:Portrait of professor.jpg
- File:Portrait of Shevchenko.jpg
- File:Scovoroda Marchenko.jpg
- File:The End of the 2nd World War.jpg
- File:Virskiy Marchenko.jpg {{NoFoP-Ukraine}}
- File:Virsky Marchenko.jpg {{NoFoP-Ukraine}}
- File:Yevstifeyev Marchenko.jpg
similar files have been deleted
- File:Mykola Marchenko.Virsky.jpg
- File:Mykola Marchenko. Van Gogh.tif
- File:МД Выпускникам (1).jpg {{NoFoP-Ukraine}}
- File:Shevchenko Marchenko.jpg
- File:Van Gogh. Marchenko.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
@JuTa:
Микола Василечко (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
insufficient PD, no author given Goesseln (talk) 21:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- The license is CC BY-SA 3.0, so not PD. Habitator terrae 🌍 15:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep "insufficient PD" is obviously wrong, I cant't find anywhere a PD mark. --Stepro (talk) 19:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Die Quelle (URL) ist richtig angegeben und eine Lizenz der Quellwebsite ist auch eingetragen. Was will man mehr? 44Pinguine (talk) 19:11, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep After UB Heidelberg has changed some licences on March 13, 2019, I would prefer now {{Anonymous-EU}} and {{PD-US-1923}} Mutter Erde (talk) 07:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 23:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Αλεξάνδρεια στον Καύκασο Alexandria ad Caucasum Александри́я Кавка́зская Effect 20181102 163627.jpg
[edit]
Making a map looking at a "globe" does not look very convincing to me. As stated by another user on the uploader's TP, this is more like a DW. E4024 (talk) 19:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
What are you talking about? Do you speak English? Your words have no sense.Do you read English? It is a photo picture of the 3D globus of the Earth, what is your problem? Are you launching your personal harrasment against me or my work?НазариНазар (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Oh, I get it. You ,E4024 ,are personally hate me because of my nationality, because I am Armenian. This is against all Wikipedia rules, you should be banned from here for this kind of things.НазариНазар (talk) 19:53, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Are you? Why should I hate you for being this or that? Do you? BTW, speaking about nationalities, the great Turkish Armenian photographer Ara Güler, with whom I had the chance to talk, if he were alive and heard or read you, would have told you something beginning with an f-word, in such a sympathetic manner, that you would not even think of getting angry with him. I knew nobody else who could swear everybody using the strongest words, -as I already said in such a sympathetic way- and nobody would feel offended. I wish he were alive and come say to me: F-king Turk, why are you disturbing the f-king Armenian?" or something like that and would make me smile with all his sympathy and love towards everybody. Let him sleep in peace. And you stay in peace, because I do not hate you. Best. --E4024 (talk) 20:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC) Note: Mr Güler (even his surname means "smiles" in Turkish :) would not have censured the f-words, he would rather "emphasize" them. (I try to censure myself because I have a self-promise to leave Commons if I am blocked even once. Now Güler is swearing at me in his tomb: "F-king E4024, if you want to tell a story about me tell it using all the f-king f words possible you f-king Commoner... :)
Are you f-n insane!? Why are you swering like parrot, non stop?? Why are you liyng about me, I didn't swear at you even once. I just stating a fact that it is obvious you're Turkish nationality, and you know I'm Armenian, so that's why you launch this attacks on my work , accusing me of this and that ,FOR NO REASON!!! Do you ever seen large 3D globus of the Earth? Probably you didn't seen it,other wise,I don't know then, it is a sabotage from your side.НазариНазар (talk) 22:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
I see you are not answering and explain anything over the problem you create with this file. So what is your problem, because I took a photo picture of the part of the 3D globus, with my phone camera and added to the picture, with phone's pics modification, clouds and Greek letters used by Alexander the Great himself, now you "F-king E4024", how you calling you self, want to delete this work, write?Is that what you trying to do here?НазариНазар (talk) 10:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- @НазариНазар: : The potential problem here is that the 3D globe might itself be an artistic work, and so your photo might be a derivative work of that globe and hence a copyright violation. E4024 acted quite reasonably in raising the issue, though his his tone above could have been more mellow. --bjh21 (talk) 14:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you bjh21, indeed I'm always trying to be mellow and appreciate people who are. I was only in a cheerful mood above, trying to reach a user who accuses others of "hating" them (I have no idea who he or she is) outright upon opening a regular DR. I regretted though trying to make a human bond in a media where you cannot use your face and gestures. Sorry for my part. --E4024 (talk) 14:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
I suspect E4024 of national hate towards me because it is second file of mine he(or she) was attacked for miserable reasons in a matter of two days. The photo I took of globus is low resolution and it is an image of just a part of the globus, this facts are very important not to hence copyright.НазариНазар (talk) 02:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you bjh21,I will explain you,why I'm not worry about copyrights violation of this work.1.The Globus, I took photo picture from,is not design, neither for public or commercial observation or use and;2.I was only permitted to use low resolution photo image of the part of that Globus for my educational/art work.НазариНазар (talk) 08:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW - Uploader acknowledges that this is a derivative work. COM:L and COM:EVID require evidence that the underlying work (globe) is free, which has not been provided. --Эlcobbola talk 20:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect colour used in file I created. A better (more correct) version has replaced this at File:1st Division 1st AIF formation colour patch.png AustralianRupert (talk) 00:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, unused file, uploader's request. Should be .svg, if really useful. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect colour used in the file that I created. It has been replaced by a better (more correct) version here: File:3rd Division 1st AIF formation colour patch v2.png AustralianRupert (talk) 00:53, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, unused, uploader's request. Should be .svg, if really useful. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
File name is wrong Oum13928 (talk) 05:55, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Oum13928: What is wrong about the file name? I declined your rename request as there was a file called File:Thai Local Road-สค.ถ 4-0003.svg but this was a duplicate of this file (File:Thai Samut Sakhon Local road 4-0003.svg) so now that redirects here. If we can agree on the correct name we can sort this out Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, unused file, uploader's request. If really useful, then can recreated. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
the quality is super bad, it's hard to be used in any context. Jcornelius (talk) 09:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, I have seen worse, but ... no educational value. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photograph taken at an unknown date, by an unknown photographer. No history of publication available. Not old enough to assume it is in the public domain (could be taken as late as 1937). BrightRaven (talk) 10:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- From Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France: "Anonymous works: 70 years after publication (if author never disclosed)" – applicable here? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Without information about the original publication of the image, it is impossible to check if the image was published anonymously. Any image found on the web without information about its author cannot be considered as anonymous. BrightRaven (talk) 13:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, If you have evidence, that the photo is anonymous, then please present it and the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
This is not simple geometry, it is a (probably copyrighted) photograph. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 13:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of South Africa.svg Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Grand Central Publishing logo.svg Salavat (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Grand Central Publishing logo.svg Salavat (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
EXIF names author = JM Le Cardiet. File description names someone else. Uploader claims Own Work. It may be one or the three, but unless we can be convinced that it is actually the work of the uploader, it cannot stay on Commons without a license from the photographer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:55, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
incorrect information 65.92.132.252 15:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Not so. This is indeed the work of Claes Rålamb, who died in the 17th century.--Underlying lk (talk) 19:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:56, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
irrelevant to the sayyid caste 65.92.132.252 15:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, the file is obviously in scope, because it is used in 3 projects. But original uploader into en.wiki claimed own work and this is doubtful. Original uploader was indefinitely blocked there for sockpuppetry and one of his/her socks for copyright violations. The photo was made not later than 1984, when the subject died. Probably copyvio. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Belarus. Ymblanter (talk) 15:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, I'll delete file:Jubileinaja.JPG due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- This is anonymous work.--Venzz (talk) 16:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, anonymous works are protected 70 years from creation. Depicted academician Yuryev died in 1962, so the memorial stone is protected until 2033 (probably longer). Taivo (talk) 09:26, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Essionblack (talk · contribs)
[edit]per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Liuye UploadPic 3.jpg
- File:Liuye UploadPic 7.jpg
- File:Liuye UploadPic 6.jpg
- File:Liuye UploadPic 4.jpg
- File:Liuye UploadPic 2.jpg
- File:Liuye UploadPic 1.jpg
- File:Liuye Figure 1.jpg
Jcb (talk) 15:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
photo qualitiy not sufficient Antonfrei (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept, normal quality. Uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload; here 5 months have passed. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Das Bild wurde durch ein besseres Bild ersetzt. Antonfrei (talk) 09:14, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
File bitte löschen. Wurde durch File mit besserer Bildqualität ersetzt. Antonfrei (talk) 09:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Wass soll gelöst werden, das Alte, Neue oder beides? Laut EXIF ist das Neue Bild von etwa 1970. Stimmt das? --Wimmel (talk) 13:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: something unclear here. The image is new, doesn't look like 1960-1970. And it was overwritten by a different image by the same uploader though it should have been uploaded as a different one. --rubin16 (talk) 06:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Exif-Daten enthalten Realnamen des hochladenden Benutzers. Kasimir Blaumilch (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, OTRS-permission from Kauffmann is needed for restoring the photo. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Galantjeanc (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Château de Saint dezezry.jpg
- File:Chateau de Gondin.jpg
- File:Château d'André.jpg
- File:Pierre Pomme Privadière .gif
Didym (talk) 17:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Clearly a publicity photo as can be seen from https://www.summerlandreview.com/entertainment/enterprise-earth-to-descend-upon-kelowna-with-new-sound/ The publication date there predates this one by four days. Unless there is Fair use rationale or an OTRS indication that the copyright has changed, we cannot keep it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Albert Kostin died in 1984. "Private Collection" could mean unpublished which means not free until 2055, 70 years after the death of the artist.
- File:Park in New York.jpg
- File:Composition with white cup.jpg
- File:Composition with green apples.jpg
- File:Abstract composition.jpg
- File:Composition with fruit.jpg
Abzeronow (talk) 18:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
User:Artieques thx Abzeronow. The paintings were exhibited in public exhibitions by two different galleries. In 1994 and 2014. Should I change 'Private Collection'to the name of the galleries that exhibited the paintings? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Artieques/sandbox/Albert_Kostin
- Thanks for the info. Was 1940 the first time his works to that date were publicly exhibited? (going by that sandbox draft) @Clindberg: Abzeronow (talk) 15:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, will be restored in 2055. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Many findings in the Internet like here, used as singe cover, PCP! Ras67 (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user nor actor. Pure self promotion. Let's delete all his personal images. E4024 (talk) 18:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user nor actor. Pure self promotion. Let's delete all his personal images. E4024 (talk) 18:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user nor actor. Pure self promotion. Let's delete all his personal images. E4024 (talk) 18:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user nor model. Pure self promotion. Let's delete his OoS personal image. E4024 (talk) 18:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user or musician nor model. Pure self promotion. Let's delete his OoS personal image. E4024 (talk) 18:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a real user nor model. Pure self promotion. Let's delete her OoS personal image. E4024 (talk) 19:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, would be in scope due to big size and good quality, but I'll delete it as copyright violation. Uploader is herself depicted and likely this is not a selfie. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
DR- because the subject of the photo would be subject to a seperate copyright as a work of artistic design. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Vietnam#Freedom of Panorama and this is a permanent work situated in a public space. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:52, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept, per Donald Trung. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
DR as it's unclear on the file description, as to how this could be own work. Copyrights in Logos and title cards for television series are typically held by the prodcuers or distributors of those series. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
This is my creation. i done this work for my urdu page , other wikis are using this image. Nooruddin2020 (talk) 14:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, sorry, I really do not believe own work. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Sie stört beim Update 2003:DC:F725:401:C104:1E15:7D1D:AB16 16:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Deleting the video at Youtube doesn't cancel the CC licence. --Sporti (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept, license was reviewed. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Derivate work. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:10, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note that I had initially thought that this was a modern reproduction of an older work but haven't been able to find the older work so I would say that this falls under "COM:PCP" unless someone could find the original and find a statement that it is in the public domain however my own search is fruitless and I haven't searched in much depth due to time constraints. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- I had considered placing this at DR myself, but COM:FOP Vietnam seemed to be reasonably liberal about 2D artworks. I will not oppose a deletion as DW, but would suggest the uploader considers instead adding a clarifcation note on the upload, and the original artists details if they are known or could be determined.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, not sure if this is permanently placed. If you have evidence, that it is situated here permanently, please request undeletion. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
I don't have any need for it on any of my userspace pages anymore, so it serves no purpose. Skahmed23 (talk) 21:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope of wikipedia. According to web archives of the official website of en:Gateway Communications at gatewaycomms.com, this file is not the logo for the company that was mentioned in the article . Probably a namesake, but the nameske, Gateway Communications, Inc., did not have an article and non-notable Matthew hk (talk) 22:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:07, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist born in 1957, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 23:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Germany indoors. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
I doubt this is an own work. Look at the date at the MD. It is not only different from the upload date, but also from the "declared" date of shooting. E4024 (talk) 23:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, we have enough girls with bikinis in Commons. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL, not found the satement ""De acuerdo con el Senado de la República, la reproducción total o parcial de esta imagen está autorizada siempre que se atribuye a la fuente original."" neither. Besides Mexican Government works are protected 100 years after publication. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ángel Aguirre Rivero.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:28, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate iamg Sermarvs (talk) 23:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
Deleted, complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
No FoP in Denmark for 3D objects. 2806:104E:1D:3428:A197:71E6:E8EB:FE21 23:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:32, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Itecjuba
[edit]ITECJUBA (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Estudiantado.png (1280×720)
- File:Promoción 2019.jpg (960×720)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 06:52, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:17, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Files of Piotrus
[edit]Piotrus (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Seoraksan National Park trip Feb 2014 30.JPG
- File:Seoraksan National Park trip Feb 2014 45.JPG – only first version
- File:Seoraksan National Park trip Feb 2014 69.JPG
- File:Seoraksan National Park trip Feb 2014 81.JPG
There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea and the photos violate sign authors' copyright. Taivo (talk) 06:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. Copyright paranoia, but it is the rule here, so - shrug. Just crop the sign out of File:Seoraksan National Park trip Feb 2014 45.JPG, most of that picture is usable and copyright free (old temple/nature). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 09:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Right, I cropped it. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Nominating this for review, I say that the text is too simple as it mostly contains Chinese characters and that the rest would fall under "COM:DM" but another editor asked for a review as the COM:TOO regarding calligraphic works is uncertain. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Really sorry, but I don't think that " the rest is DM". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Belarus. Ymblanter (talk) 15:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Разрешение на оформление названия станции получено от скульптора. Необходимо разрешение на "цветочки" на стене. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 23:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Permission received. — Racconish 💬 10:29, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Belarus. Ymblanter (talk) 15:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Разрешение от скульптора получено, необходимо разрешения на свободные лицензии от архитектора Владимира Телепнева. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 23:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Permission received. — Racconish 💬 10:29, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Wrong PD died 1956 Goesseln (talk) 12:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- The license is CC BY-SA 3.0, so not PD. Habitator terrae 🌍 15:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep "wrong PD" is obviously wrong, I cant't find anywhere a PD mark. Also this file is already proofed. --Stepro (talk) 19:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep CC verified before that.--Roy17 (talk) 17:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
VG Wort is not CC, and Kadar is not in PD. Please go to the UB Heidelberg-link and read yourself. my goodness... --Goesseln (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional work of art is not considered to be copyrightable by the WMF, but the Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg has never the less published their photo of the work under CC. The Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg does not own the copyright of the underlying work of art, which may or may not be copyrighted by the artist. Germany has pma + 70 yrs, so this should not be undeleted until at least 2027. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Who is the painter and why is the work public domain + provide a link to http://www.bitmuna.com/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- [2] se supone que aqui está la imagen. Hay que revisar en el apartado "Gabinete Nacional", presionar el Número 11 - Ministro de Salud y dirigirse al apartado "Currículum del Ministro". Ahí estará la imagen. Está publicada en la Web de la Casa Rosada y, por tanto, NO tiene derechos de autor. Bastaba con revisar un poco. Saludos.--FelipeRev (talk) 21:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel Aquí está el link correcto, seguramente cometí un error al dejarlo, pero la imagen sí está en el sitio web. Saludos.--FelipeRev (talk) 02:39, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment: can someone with OTRS access check the ticket for this image and say if the license is valid? Thanks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: ticket and license are ok. --Ezarateesteban 23:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
wrong PD Wauer died 1962 Goesseln (talk) 12:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- The license is CC BY-SA 3.0, so not PD. Habitator terrae 🌍 15:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep "wrong PD" is obviously wrong, I cant't find anywhere a PD mark. Also this file is already proofed. --Stepro (talk) 19:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- again: an artists work must be in PD, unless there is a reliable declaration on the work for instance by OTRS. By the way: the artist is marked with Template:NoUploads.
- The uploader should verify before uploading, that the UB Heidelberg can claim to be the owner of the rights of this sculpture, a fact which is very very implausible, in my humble opinion. --Goesseln (talk) 13:46, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 14:14, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
I'm opening this new deletion request as the previous request by Goesseln was closed as "kept" under wrong assumptions. Apparently, Leoboudv has mistakenly reviewed the license of this file. The University Library of Heidelberg releases some of its media under CC-BY-SA, but not that specific one. If you look at the source page, it says clearly "Wahrnehmung der Rechte durch die VG Wort" in the button at the left of the page, where otherwise the CC license would be displayed. This means that the rights are managed through the German copyright collective "VG Wort" and this photograph isn't free. Pinging also Ruthven, maybe you could reconsider your decision and so shorten this process? Gestumblindi (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Please feel free to revert my pass but I hope that the uploader Mutter Erde can clear up this problem in this DR. I have no problem with deletion. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- It was CC BY SA but it changed.--Roy17 (talk) 09:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Roy17: No, actually it wasn't. The Internet Archive has a snapshot from February 2 when this image was uploaded here, and also back then, it said VG Wort, not CC-BY-SA. Gestumblindi (talk) 09:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- PS: I don't know what's going on, but now the Internet Archive says "not found" if you click on that link. But if you enter the original URL in the Wayback Machine, it works. Gestumblindi (talk) 10:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- On the day I have uploaded this file, UB-Heidelberg has presented a CC-BY-SA 3.0 DE licence as in File:UB Heidelberg Nutzungsbedingungen vom 22. 2. 2019.png. They changed it in March, at least two times. See also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum/Archiv/2019/February#Bitte_durchsehen (for example Stepro .. 19:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC) and some more. Mutter Erde (talk) 10:43, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Mutter Erde: These were the general terms of use, but if you enter the specific file description page http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/walden1963/0036/image into the Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web/ (I have no idea why the direct archive link I gave above doesn't work), you get a snapshot of February 2, 2019 (your upload date of that file) which clearly states "Wahrnehmung der Rechte durch die VG Wort" to the left and no CC license. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:31, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- NB: I checked now several times; for some strange reason the archived page still seems only to work if you open it from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine search results, not as a direct link. But if you use the Wayback Machine, you should see it. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:47, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Now I have a working direct archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190202183613/http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/walden1963/0036/image - strangely enough, if you visit it, the slash between "web.archive.org/web/" and the date gets removed from the URL bar (why???) and then the link doesn't work if you copy it. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I see as well "Wahrnehmug des Rechte durch die VGC", in both archived versions. Imho we should keep monitoring the source page for a license change, and meanwhile, delete the file. I can proceed if there is consensus. --Ruthven (msg) 08:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- I would change the description as: Author= Photographer not credited & {{Anonymous-EU}} & {{PD-US-1923}} and all may be happy, including UB Heidelberg Mutter Erde (talk) 10:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- There are two copyrights that come into play in this case: That of the photographer and that of the sculptor of the Walden bust, William Wauer. Even though the photographer might be anonymous, we still know that the bust was made by William Wauer who died in 1962, so it is proteced until January 1, 2033, and it's certainly not de minimis in this photograph, I think you would agree? Gestumblindi (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- I agree. Is there a tool which handles the transfer of this file to English wikipedia? Mutter Erde (talk) 05:19, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- There are two copyrights that come into play in this case: That of the photographer and that of the sculptor of the Walden bust, William Wauer. Even though the photographer might be anonymous, we still know that the bust was made by William Wauer who died in 1962, so it is proteced until January 1, 2033, and it's certainly not de minimis in this photograph, I think you would agree? Gestumblindi (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- I would change the description as: Author= Photographer not credited & {{Anonymous-EU}} & {{PD-US-1923}} and all may be happy, including UB Heidelberg Mutter Erde (talk) 10:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Now I have a working direct archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190202183613/http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/walden1963/0036/image - strangely enough, if you visit it, the slash between "web.archive.org/web/" and the date gets removed from the URL bar (why???) and then the link doesn't work if you copy it. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- NB: I checked now several times; for some strange reason the archived page still seems only to work if you open it from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine search results, not as a direct link. But if you use the Wayback Machine, you should see it. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:47, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Mutter Erde: These were the general terms of use, but if you enter the specific file description page http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/walden1963/0036/image into the Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web/ (I have no idea why the direct archive link I gave above doesn't work), you get a snapshot of February 2, 2019 (your upload date of that file) which clearly states "Wahrnehmung der Rechte durch die VG Wort" to the left and no CC license. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:31, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- On the day I have uploaded this file, UB-Heidelberg has presented a CC-BY-SA 3.0 DE licence as in File:UB Heidelberg Nutzungsbedingungen vom 22. 2. 2019.png. They changed it in March, at least two times. See also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum/Archiv/2019/February#Bitte_durchsehen (for example Stepro .. 19:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC) and some more. Mutter Erde (talk) 10:43, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- PS: I don't know what's going on, but now the Internet Archive says "not found" if you click on that link. But if you enter the original URL in the Wayback Machine, it works. Gestumblindi (talk) 10:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Roy17: No, actually it wasn't. The Internet Archive has a snapshot from February 2 when this image was uploaded here, and also back then, it said VG Wort, not CC-BY-SA. Gestumblindi (talk) 09:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
I would go for {{PD-old-auto-expired|deathyear=1962}} for the bust, and {{Anonymous-EU}} for the photo. @Mutter Erde: To transfer, I fear that you must do it by hand... Ruthven (msg) 10:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: I don't quite understand why you would use {{PD-old-auto-expired|deathyear=1962}} for the bust. Do you mean in 2033? Because the copyright of the bust in Germany will not be expired before that year. PD-old-auto-expired is basically the same thing as PD-old-auto, that is, a template for works where the duration of copyright has expired in a source country with a life plus x years rule (70 years, in most cases), and just additionally adds an "expired" PD for the US for works (currently) first published before 1924. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:26, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have tried to upload this file on English wikipedia (as w:File:Herwarth Walden with his portrait bust by William Wauer, 1918), but it's not possible. I guess, as long as the commons file is online. Here's my description and licence:
| Description | Herwarth Walden with his portrait bust by William Wauer, 1918 |
| Date | |
| Source | Nell Walden: Herwarth Walden: ein Lebensbild — Berlin, Mainz, 1963 |
| Author | Photographer not credited |
| Permission (Reusing this file) |
Note:: Having been published before 1923, this work is believed to be in the public domain in the U.S. Do not copy this image to the Commons because of German artist William Wauer (1866-1962) |
- Mutter Erde (talk) 09:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: When did the author died? 1962? In that case, {{PD-old-auto-expired|deathyear=1962}} is the most correct, also because the bust was created before 1924.--Ruthven (msg) 09:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: No, I think you're getting something wrong here. Yes, the sculptor died in 1962. But it's a work from Germany where a copyright protection of 70 years after death (p.m.a.) applies. The PD-old-auto-expired tag is meant for cases where that protection has expired. 1962 + 70 = 2032. Protection expires on January 1 of the year after that. So, the protection hasn't expired yet - and therefore I don't understand why you suggest that tag. Gestumblindi (talk) 10:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: In the template page, I can read: "This template is like {{PD-old-auto}} except it also indicates the work was first published before 1924, and so is also in the public domain in the United States." If the tag is wrong, it has to be corrected. Ruthven (msg) 11:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: There's nothing wrong with the tag itself. I just don't see why it should be used in this case. {{PD-old-auto-expired}} is a combination tag that basically combines {{PD-old-auto}} and {{PD-US-expired}} to make it easier to express that a particular file is free both in the source country with a life plus x years rule and in the US because it was first published before 1924 (used to be 1923, but from this year on, it's a moving wall of 95 years). Instead of using two separate templates. Or in other words: If you use that particular tag for a file, you make two statements:
- The author of the depicted work died long enough ago for it to be free in the source country
- The depicted work was published more than 95 years ago and so is also free in the US
- In the case discussed here, the first statement wouldn't be true, because it's 70 years after death in Germany. But Commons requires files to be free in the source country. So why do you suggest using that tag? Gestumblindi (talk) 18:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: I now see what's not clear: I was proposing using these templates in case the file was deleted and then restored... in 2033. --Ruthven (msg) 07:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: Ah, then we are in agreement after all! :-) Of course in 2033 this would be an appropriate template. I did ask further up in the discussion "Do you mean in 2033?"; if you had confirmed that then, we could have saved us this side discussion :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 11:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: I now see what's not clear: I was proposing using these templates in case the file was deleted and then restored... in 2033. --Ruthven (msg) 07:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: There's nothing wrong with the tag itself. I just don't see why it should be used in this case. {{PD-old-auto-expired}} is a combination tag that basically combines {{PD-old-auto}} and {{PD-US-expired}} to make it easier to express that a particular file is free both in the source country with a life plus x years rule and in the US because it was first published before 1924 (used to be 1923, but from this year on, it's a moving wall of 95 years). Instead of using two separate templates. Or in other words: If you use that particular tag for a file, you make two statements:
- @Gestumblindi: In the template page, I can read: "This template is like {{PD-old-auto}} except it also indicates the work was first published before 1924, and so is also in the public domain in the United States." If the tag is wrong, it has to be corrected. Ruthven (msg) 11:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: No, I think you're getting something wrong here. Yes, the sculptor died in 1962. But it's a work from Germany where a copyright protection of 70 years after death (p.m.a.) applies. The PD-old-auto-expired tag is meant for cases where that protection has expired. 1962 + 70 = 2032. Protection expires on January 1 of the year after that. So, the protection hasn't expired yet - and therefore I don't understand why you suggest that tag. Gestumblindi (talk) 10:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: When did the author died? 1962? In that case, {{PD-old-auto-expired|deathyear=1962}} is the most correct, also because the bust was created before 1924.--Ruthven (msg) 09:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- Mutter Erde (talk) 09:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- Is copying this photo to Commons violation of copyright?
- No, if considering {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}.
- Is this photo itself a violation of copyright?
- Not likely. The photo was provided by Archiv Nell Walden, Herwarth's wife!, who was still alive when this book was published! The photographer might be Herwarth or Nell themselves, or someone with permission from them to take a photo. The photo taking might enjoy freedom of panorama too.
- When someone finds an unattributed photo of a sculpture from the sculptor's archives/collections, should this photo be challenged on the grounds the photographer might not have obtained permission to take a pic of the sculpture?--Roy17 (talk) 22:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- The sculpture is protected by copyright, and its creator (William Wauer) is known. That a photograph of it was reproduced with permission in a book doesn't magically create a Commons-compatible free license for that sculpture. So, you're asking the wrong question - it doesn't matter whether or not the photographer and reproducer of that photo had obtained permission. And it is obviously an indoor photograph, so no freedom of panorama in Germany. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- I wouldn't dismiss this argument so easily. If the photographer obtained the permission to photograph the sculpture (by the artist himself, apparently, as it is a staged photo), the permission wasn't simply for personal usage, but for publication (as it was published in a book years later). Thus this sculpture has the artist's permission to appear in this photo (not any photo, but this particular one). Ruthven (msg) 07:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. I have no doubts that this photo was taken and published with permission. But this doesn't change the copyright status of the sculpture. If I take a photo of a sculpture with the artist's permission and also have permission to publish that photo, that doesn't create a permission for anyone else to depict that sculpture (whether using my photo or someone else's). Gestumblindi (talk) 11:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: Well, I don't see it like that. Imagine the case we have a photograph of a sculpture uploaded by the photographer and then the artists writes us via OTRS stating: "I agree that this photo of my sculpture can be published with CC BY-SA 4.0 license". This obviously doesn't mean that all photographs of the sculpture are with free license, because the sculpture is not under CC BY-SA (like this one). Does this means that nobody can use this photograph of the sculpture or modify it? --Ruthven (msg) 11:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- That would indeed be a different case and not really comparable. In the case of this historic photograph, there was of course no release under a free license. We can assume that the photographer and publisher had appropriate permissions specifically for them to take the photograph and to publish it, but that's the case for most published photographs - which we still can't use. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: Well, I don't see it like that. Imagine the case we have a photograph of a sculpture uploaded by the photographer and then the artists writes us via OTRS stating: "I agree that this photo of my sculpture can be published with CC BY-SA 4.0 license". This obviously doesn't mean that all photographs of the sculpture are with free license, because the sculpture is not under CC BY-SA (like this one). Does this means that nobody can use this photograph of the sculpture or modify it? --Ruthven (msg) 11:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. I have no doubts that this photo was taken and published with permission. But this doesn't change the copyright status of the sculpture. If I take a photo of a sculpture with the artist's permission and also have permission to publish that photo, that doesn't create a permission for anyone else to depict that sculpture (whether using my photo or someone else's). Gestumblindi (talk) 11:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- I wouldn't dismiss this argument so easily. If the photographer obtained the permission to photograph the sculpture (by the artist himself, apparently, as it is a staged photo), the permission wasn't simply for personal usage, but for publication (as it was published in a book years later). Thus this sculpture has the artist's permission to appear in this photo (not any photo, but this particular one). Ruthven (msg) 07:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- The sculpture is protected by copyright, and its creator (William Wauer) is known. That a photograph of it was reproduced with permission in a book doesn't magically create a Commons-compatible free license for that sculpture. So, you're asking the wrong question - it doesn't matter whether or not the photographer and reproducer of that photo had obtained permission. And it is obviously an indoor photograph, so no freedom of panorama in Germany. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: at least the bust is still under copyright, also COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MichaelMoessmer (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of this user's uploads seem to be attributed to "moessmer.at" or "oesterreichfotos.at". Indeed, at least some of those whose filenames start with "Moessmer.at" are available here; I haven't checked for the others. Dubious own work claim; if this account does represent the owner of that website, we need COM:OTRS permission.
- File:Moessmer.at 22AT8428.jpg
- File:Moessmer.at 22AT8433.jpg
- File:Moessmer.at 22AT7595.jpg
- File:Moessmer.at 22AT8363.jpg
- File:Moessmer.at 22AT8389.jpg
- File:StiftLilienfeld 220710 moessmer.at 22AT9580 e.jpg
- File:StiftZwettl 130813 mmoessmer 22AT9420.jpg
- File:Innsbruck oefotos 22AT4292.jpg
- File:Innsbruck oefotos 22AT4339.jpg
- File:Innsbruck oefotos 22AT4330.jpg
- File:Textautor und Komponist Leo Parthé.jpg
Tokfo (talk) 06:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Hallo Tofko, habe soeben alle Fotos vereinheitlicht - danke! Michael Mössmer — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelMoessmer (talk • contribs) 09:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS permission has not been received. --Majora (talk) 03:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a violation of the copyright in the original mural. According to Geograph[3] the author of the mural is Astrid Jaekel, who is still alive[4]. I don't think Freedom of panorama applies because the mural appears to be a graphical work, and not a sculpture or a work of artistic craftsmanship. bjh21 (talk) 18:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Have contacted the artist to see if they are happy for the image to be openly released. Changing to OTRS pending. Stinglehammer (talk) 14:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- The artist has replied as follows "Thank you for getting in touch with me. I am very happy to have my work featured alongside the entry for Christina Kay. And in fact I'm very excited to learn of her as I had not known of her existence until now. Thanks for asking and thank you even more for featuring my work! Best wishes, Astrid."... so I'll ask her to send an OTRS email through for this image. Don't delete without contacting me about this, please. Stinglehammer (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No OTRS email in the system that I can find. --Majora (talk) 03:26, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
wrong PD, Kokoschka died 1980, so it will be 2051, that is some years ahead from now Goesseln (talk) 12:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep CC-BY-SA-3.0 as per source. --Migebert (talk) 22:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- The license is CC BY-SA 3.0, so not PD. Habitator terrae 🌍 15:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep "wrong PD" is obviously wrong, I cant't find anywhere a PD mark. --Stepro (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
to the keepers: you sincerely do know, that the work of Kokoschka must be in PD, before it can be free to everyone for every purpose. peculiar. --Goesseln (talk) 13:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Nobody besides you have stated, that it would be "free to everyone for every purpose". No one claims PD. It's CC-BY-SA-3.0. --Stepro (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- by CC-BY-SA-3.0 the Kokoschka-painting would be "Approved for Free Cultural Works", but it is not free but in the domain of the heirs of Kokoschka until 2051, unless they have declared this work to be free. Attend this declaration to the article and any doubt will be obsolet. The same concerning the heirs of William Wauer, Béla Kádár, Edmund Kesting, Karl Schmidt-Rottluff. and so with the unknown photographers in the same bulk. --Goesseln (talk) 16:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
The License stated at the picture is:
Wahrnehmung der Rechte durch die VG Wort
Lizenz: Wahrnehmung der Rechte durch die VG WORT (VGG § 51, 52)Die Digitalisierung und Bereitstellung dieses vergriffenen Werkes erfolgt aufgrund einer Lizenzvereinbarung mit der VG Wort auf Grundlage des Verwertungsgesellschaftengesetz (VGG).
According to this the picture is NOT free, but the University has the right to show it on its site. Kersti (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Please delete, because Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg has changed its terms of use on March 13, 2019 Mutter Erde (talk) 07:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 20:10, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Der Prinz von Theben (Else Lasker-Schüler), gezeichnet von Karl Schmidt-Rottluff, 1911.png
[edit],_gezeichnet_von_Karl_Schmidt-Rottluff,_1911.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_gezeichnet_von_Karl_Schmidt-Rottluff,_1911.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong PD Karl Schmidt-Rottluff died 1976 Goesseln (talk) 13:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- The license is CC BY-SA 3.0, so not PD. Habitator terrae 🌍 15:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep "wrong PD" is obviously wrong, I cant't find anywhere a PD mark. Also this file is already proofed. --Stepro (talk) 19:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep CC verified.--Roy17 (talk) 17:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Please delete. UB Heidelberg has changed its terms of use on March 13, 2019 and again on April 04, 2019. Mutter Erde (talk) 17:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete It doesn't meet any of the following exceptions:
- The work was first published in the United States and one of the United States public domain tags applies;
- The work is permitted by a legal exception such as freedom of panorama or de minimis;
- The work was released by the author or their heirs via E-mail confirmed authorisation;
- The work was released by the author under an open licence on their website, or an official account with a site such as Flickr;
- The work is known to be in the public domain for some other clear reason.
- Works of this artist first published before 1924 can be uploaded to English Wikipedia (see en:Template:PD-US-1923-abroad). For more information, see Commons:Licensing and Commons:Derivative works.
--Chiyako92 (talk) 09:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The author died in 1976 and the license terms have changed. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:26, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete with Leoboudv. Should be deleted. Jolmia (talk) 14:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 20:11, 13 August 2019 (UTC)