It's time for a new way, a third way that breaks the entrenchment of the two sides' narratives and cuts across the divisive rhetoric that has destroyed this discourse.
A year ago, there was reason to believe that President Joe Biden was on the cusp of a major geopolitical victory, coaxing Israel and Saudi Arabia into a peace arrangement.
The days of prostrating before marauding murderers are over. We are open to all discussions related to coexistence. We will not debate national suicide.
With the growing demand for more choices, there may well be a stronger and more experienced candidate next time who bucks the spoiler problem and runs.
As we mark the anniversary of the October 7 Hamas attack and the beginning of Israel's asymmetrical response, we have to recognize Western countries' hypocrisy.
Whoever ends up winning the White House next month will need to reframe the way America thinks about Great Power Competition in order to adequately respond to the collective threat now posed by Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran.
If you work for a living, you owe every comfort—every safety measure, every break, every vacation day—to Frances Perkins, the nation's first-ever woman to serve as a Cabinet secretary.
When asked on Oct. 2 whether he would support an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear program, President Joe Biden replied "no." It's the right answer and one I hope he sticks to.
As Republican members of the Oklahoma legislature, we strongly support the death penalty—but not in the case of an innocent man convicted on knowingly false testimony.