Search Results (340)

Background/Objectives: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most prevalent incurable nontraumatic neurological disability in young individuals. It causes numerous symptoms, including tingling, fatigue, muscle spasms, cognitive deficits, and neuropsychiatric disorders. This disease significantly worsens quality of life (QoL), and this dimension of general functioning provides valuable information about the effectiveness of treatment and well-being. There are psychological interventions that can improve QoL, but their number is limited. Therefore, searching for new methods that are as effective and safe as possible is ongoing. Methods: This review examines the potential effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in improving the quality of life in patients with MS. Searches were conducted in the PubMed/Medline, Research Gate, and Cochrane databases. Results: The search yielded seven studies in which QoL was a primary or secondary outcome. Stimulation protocols displayed heterogeneity, especially concerning the choice of the stimulation site. Four studies demonstrated the effectiveness of tDCS in improving QoL, all of which (two) used anodal stimulation of the left DLPFC. Stimulation of the motor cortex has produced mixed results. The potential mechanisms of action of tDCS in improving QoL in MS are explained. These include improved synaptic plasticity, increased cerebral blood flow, salience network engagement through tDCS, and reduction of beta-amyloid deposition. The limitations are also detailed, and recommendations for future research are made. Conclusions: While the evidence is limited, tDCS has shown potential to improve QoL in MS patients in some studies. Prefrontal stimulation appears promising, and further research is recommended to explore this approach. Full article

Background/Objectives: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) can boost motor recovery after a stroke. Certain movement phases are more responsive to NIBS, so a system that auto-detects these phases would optimize stimulation timing. This study assessed the effectiveness of various machine learning models in identifying movement phases in hemiparetic individuals undergoing simultaneous NIBS and EEG recordings. We hypothesized that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of NIBS, would enhance EEG signals related to movement phases and improve classification accuracy compared to sham stimulation. Methods: EEG data from 10 chronic stroke patients and 11 healthy controls were recorded before, during, and after tDCS. Eight machine learning algorithms and five ensemble methods were used to classify two movement phases (hold posture and reaching) during each of these periods. Data preprocessing included z-score normalization and frequency band power binning. Results: In chronic stroke participants who received active tDCS, the classification accuracy for hold vs. reach phases increased from pre-stimulation to the late intra-stimulation period (72.2% to 75.2%, p < 0.0001). Late active tDCS surpassed late sham tDCS classification (75.2% vs. 71.5%, p < 0.0001). Linear discriminant analysis was the most accurate (74.6%) algorithm with the shortest training time (0.9 s). Among ensemble methods, low gamma frequency (30–50 Hz) achieved the highest accuracy (74.5%), although this result did not achieve statistical significance for actively stimulated chronic stroke participants. Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms showed enhanced movement phase classification during active tDCS in chronic stroke participants. These results suggest their feasibility for real-time movement detection in neurorehabilitation, including brain–computer interfaces for stroke recovery. Full article

Introduction: Neuropsychiatric symptoms such as depression and anxiety are a significant burden on patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Their pathophysiology is complex and yet to be fully understood. There is an urgent need for non-invasive treatments that directly target the brain and help patients with MS. One such possible treatment is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a popular and effective non-invasive brain stimulation technique. Methods: This mechanistic review explores the efficacy of tDCS in treating depression and anxiety in MS while focusing on the underlying mechanisms of action. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial, as neuropsychiatric symptoms in MS arise from complex neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes. This review offers insights that may direct more focused and efficient therapeutic approaches by investigating the ways in which tDCS affects inflammation, brain plasticity, and neural connections. Searches were conducted using the PubMed/Medline, ResearchGate, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases. Results: The literature search yielded 11 studies to be included in this review, with a total of 175 patients participating in the included studies. In most studies, tDCS did not significantly reduce depression or anxiety scores as the studied patients did not have elevated scores indicating depression and anxiety. In the few studies where the patients had scores indicating mild/moderate dysfunction, tDCS was more effective. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed as moderate. Despite the null or near-null results, tDCS may still prove to be an effective treatment option for depression and anxiety in MS, because tDCS produces a neurobiological effect on the brain and nervous system. To facilitate further work, several possible mechanisms of action of tDCS have been reported, such as the modulation of the frontal–midline theta, reductions in neuroinflammation, the modulation of the HPA axis, and cerebral blood flow regulation. Conclusions: Although tDCS did not overall demonstrate positive effects in reducing depression and anxiety in the studied MS patients, the role of tDCS in this area should not be underestimated. Evidence from other studies indicates the effectiveness of tDCS in reducing depression and anxiety, but the studies included in this review did not include patients with sufficient depression or anxiety. Future studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of tDCS in neuropsychiatric dysfunctions in MS. Full article

Background/Objectives: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological condition that impairs motor and sensory functions, particularly gait. Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques aim to enhance functional recovery and motor–cognitive outcomes, though their effectiveness remains debated. This study compared the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT), on motor function and fatigue in people with MS (pwMS). Methods: This double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial included 35 pwMS, who participated in 12 sessions of 20 min anodal tDCS (n = 11), cathodal tsDCS (n = 12), or sham treatment (n = 12), in addition to RAGT. Primary outcomes were assessed using the Timed 25-foot Walk (T25-FW), Timed Up and Go (TUG), walking speed, and Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12). Fatigue was assessed with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS). ClinicalTrials number: NCT06121635. Results: Significant improvements in gait speed, T25-FW, MSWS-12, TUG scores, and fatigue (FSS) favored tDCS and tsDCS over sham stimulation. While no differences were found between tDCS and tsDCS, the tsDCS group showed a significant improvement in the FIS physical subscale compared to sham, unlike the tDCS group. Conclusions: tDCS and tsDCS, combined with RAGT, improve walking and reduce fatigue in pwMS, highlighting their potential in motor rehabilitation. Full article

Stroke remains a leading cause of global disability and mortality despite advancements in acute interventions. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has primarily been studied for its effects on cortical excitability, with limited exploration of its neuroprotective and hemodynamic benefits. This review examines the role of tDCS in stroke, with a focus on neuroprotection in acute settings and cerebral blood flow (CBF) modulation in both acute and chronic phases. tDCS offers rapid, localized delivery to salvageable ischemic tissue, exerting pleiotropic effects that address a broader spectrum of pathological processes compared to pharmacological agents. Cathodal tDCS shows promise in acute ischemic stroke for neuroprotection in small-scale clinical studies, enhancing CBF and promoting vessel recanalization, while anodal tDCS demonstrates stronger effects on CBF, particularly in chronic stroke and hypoperfusion cases. Bihemispheric stimulation may offer additional benefits, with evidence suggesting a dose-dependent relationship between stimulation parameters and therapeutic outcomes. Further research is warranted to optimize stimulation protocols, evaluate safety and feasibility, and explore the potential of tDCS to promote neuroplasticity and functional recovery across different stroke populations and stages. By addressing these gaps, tDCS could emerge as a valuable adjunctive therapy in stroke management, complementing current interventions and expanding therapeutic windows. Full article

Cognitive deficits are emerging as critical targets for managing schizophrenia and enhancing clinical and functional outcomes. These deficits are pervasive among individuals with schizophrenia, affecting various cognitive domains. Traditional pharmacotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) have limitations in effectively addressing cognitive impairments in this population. Neuromodulation techniques show promise in improving certain cognitive domains among patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Understanding the mechanisms of neural circuits that underlie cognitive enhancement is essential for elucidating the pathophysiological processes of the disorder, and these insights could significantly optimize strategies for managing schizophrenia. Meanwhile, although there is an increasing body of evidence demonstrating the therapeutic effects of neuromodulation in this area, further research is still needed, particularly regarding topics such as different treatment protocols and the long-term effects of treatment. Full article

People with fibromyalgia (FM) exhibit alterations in brain electrical activity and autonomic modulation compared to healthy individuals. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on brain electrocortical activity and heart rate variability (HRV), specifically targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in both healthy controls (HC) and FM groups, to identify potential differences in the responses between these groups, and to compare the effectiveness of two distinct tDCS intensities (1 mA and 2 mA) against a sham condition. Methods: Electroencephalography and electrocardiogram signals were recorded pre- and post-tDCS intervention. All participants underwent the three conditions (sham, 1 mA, and 2 mA) over three separate weeks, randomized in order. Results: No statistically significant baseline differences were found in the investigated HRV variables. In the FM group, 1 mA tDCS induced significant increases in LF, LF/HF, mean HR, SDNN, RMSSD, total power, SD1, SD2, and SampEn, and a decrease in HF, suggesting a shift toward sympathetic dominance. Additionally, 2 mA significantly increased SampEn compared to sham and 1 mA. In the HC group, sham increased DFA1 compared to 1 mA, and 2 mA induced smaller changes in SampEn relative to sham and 1 mA. No significant differences were found between FM and HC groups for any tDCS intensity. Conclusions: The effects of dlPFC-tDCS on HRV are intensity- and group-dependent, with the FM group exhibiting more pronounced changes at 1 mA and 2 mA. These findings emphasize the need for individualized stimulation protocols, given the variability in responses across groups and intensities. Full article

Objective: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a promising complementary treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, its efficacy varies due to diverse participant profiles and methodologies. This meta-analysis, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023457269), seeks to assess NIBS efficacy in improving cognitive deficits and clinical symptoms in individuals with ADHD. Methods: We systematically searched five databases (October 2024) for randomized controlled trials focusing on cognitive functions and clinical symptoms in individuals meeting the DSM/ICD criteria for ADHD. A meta-analytical synthesis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1. Results: Meta-analyses found significant improvement in inhibitory control, working memory, and inattention in active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) groups compared with sham groups. Conversely, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) did not demonstrate significant therapeutic benefits for ADHD symptoms. Additionally, four transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and three transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) studies demonstrated promising improvements in executive functions and the alleviation of ADHD symptoms. Conclusions: The findings from this meta-analysis highlight NIBS as a promising adjunctive therapy for managing ADHD, advancing both theoretical knowledge and practical treatment options in this field. Full article

Background: Individualizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) parameters can improve precision in neuropsychiatric disorders. One important decision for the clinician is the selection of an appropriate montage—conventional or high-definition (HD)—to implement dose-controlled tDCS while maintaining the patient’s safety. Method: The present study simulated tDCS administration using T1-weighted brain images of 50 dementia, 25 depression patients, and 25 healthy individuals for two conventional and HD montages, targeting the regions of interest (ROIs) in the dorsal and ventral pathways that support language processing. For each tDCS configuration, the electric fields at the ROIs and the individualized dose required to achieve the desired current intensity at the target ROI across the subjects were estimated. Linear regression was performed on these parameters. Result: A significant relationship between atrophy and current dose that varies according to the disease was found. The dementia patients with significant brain atrophy required a higher personalized dosage for HD montage, as the current intensity at the target ROIs was lower and more variable than that of conventional montage. For dementia, tDCS individualization is pathway-dependent, wherein HD configuration of the dorsal route requires current dosages above the safety limit (>4 mA) for 46% of individuals. However, there was no significant difference in electrode configurations between the HD and traditional setups for depression and healthy volunteers without significant brain atrophy. Conclusions: HD-tDCS with fixed locations is limited, making conventional tDCS more effective for dose-controlled applications. In patients with atrophy, individualized adjustments based on simulations are needed due to the variable stimulation strength in the ROI. Full article

(1) Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) accounts for 70% of dementia cases and with no effective pharmacological treatments, new rehabilitation methods are needed. Motor and cognitive activities and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have shown promise in stabilizing and enhancing cognitive functions. Objective: we want to investigate the effects of tDCS combined with motor or cognitive activity on cognitive functions in AD patients. (2) Methods: Patients with mild or moderate AD were randomized between anodic tDCS groups (MotA or CogA) and sham tDCS groups (MotS or CogS). They received two weeks of treatment (45 min, five days/week), with the first 15 min using tDCS stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive assessments were conducted pre-treatment (T0), post-treatment (T1), and one week after (T2). (3) Results: Twenty-three patients were included. Statistical analysis showed significant differences between anodic tDCS groups (MotA + CogA) and sham tDCS groups (MotS + CogS) with advantages for the first in improving global cognitive status (p = 0.042), selective attention (p = 0.012), and sustained attention (p = 0.012). Further analysis indicated no differences between the two anodic tDCS groups between T0 and T1. (4) Conclusions: combined anodal tDCS with motor or cognitive activity could improve global cognitive state and attention, slowing cognitive decline in AD patients. The trial was registered on Clinical Trials: NCT06619795. Full article

This study systematically reviews the literature on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) interventions for lower-limb endurance performance in healthy adults and provides a summary of the effects and underlying mechanisms of tDCS on lower-limb endurance performance. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The electronic search totaled 341 studies. Twenty-one studies were included in the review after screening. The results show that tDCS effectively improved time to task failure (TTF), increased blood lactate accumulation, and reduced the rating of perceived exertion during cycling. However, the tDCS failed to significantly improve the TTF, relieve muscle pain, and reduce fatigue indices during single-joint fatigue tasks in the knee. Moreover, tDCS intervention caused the effective improvement of the overall lower-limb endurance performance but exerted no uniformly conclusive effect on knee endurance performance. This finding can be partly attributed to varying stimulation protocols across studies. Future studies may focus on the effects of the application of stimulation protocols, such as multitarget stimulation and personalized dosage, to develop targeted stimulation protocols. Full article

Background/Objectives: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by tremors, balance impairments, and mobility limitations. Innovative approaches like combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with exercise show promise in addressing these symptoms. This study investigates the effects of exercise combined with tDCS on mobility and tremor management in PD patients. Methods: Twenty-five individuals aged 60−75 (66.6 ± 7.33), diagnosed with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage 2−3), were assigned to three groups in a randomized controlled design: exercise with active tDCS (n = 8), exercise with sham tDCS (n = 8), and a control group (n = 9). Dual-task training sessions focusing on walking speed, balance, and force control were conducted over ten sessions. Results: No significant differences were detected across the groups for grip strength or force control measures (p > 0.05). Significant improvements were observed in the intervention group: the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test showed a significant reduction in time (mean difference = 2.498 s, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.331); anterior–posterior displacement significantly increased (mean difference = 21.375 mm, p = 0.0269, ηp² = 0.303); and force-tremor decoupling improved, with coherence in the 1−4 Hz band significantly decreasing (p = 0.0067). Finally, changes in TUG from post- to pre-treatment values were significantly positively correlated with the changes in coherence (R = 0.468, p = 0.018). Conclusions: Combining tDCS with exercise enhances mobility and tremor management in PD patients. These findings support the potential for such interventions to improve functional outcomes and quality of life for individuals with PD. Full article

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is often reported to have positive effects on brain hemodynamics as well as cognitive performance. Binaural beats (BBs) have also shown the potential to improve cognitive performance. However, we could not find any studies assessing prefrontal hemodynamics using a combination of these techniques or assessing the effects on hemodynamic response at different intensity levels of tDCS (two and three mA). This study aimed to compare the immediate hemodynamic responses to tDCS at different intensities (two and three mA) with and without 40 Hz BBs. Sixty-eight healthy young individuals of both sexes were split into four groups: the tDCS 2 mA group; tDCS 3 mA group; tDCS 2 mA + BB group; and tDCS 3 mA + BB group. All groups received 20 min tDCS (F3-Fp2) alone or combined with BBs. The hemodynamic effect was assessed using a functional near-infrared intracranial spectroscope (fNIRS) positioned on the left supraorbital region (Fp1). The mean values of rates of oxygen saturation (SatO₂) were recorded at baseline, during the intervention period, and post-stimulation. The oxygenated hemoglobin rates (HbO) were also extracted. No between-group differences were observed. The within-group analysis did not show significant differences in terms of the time×groups factor. However, the time factor showed significant within-group differences. No differences were found for the HbO rates. The present findings showed that two and three mA tDCS had effects on pre-frontal cortex SatO₂; however, the use of additional BBs did not change the SatO₂ levels compared to the use of tDCS alone. Full article

Background/Objectives: Post-traumatic growth (PTG) has the potential to draw positive consequences from trauma. Hence, there is interest in finding ways to promote PTG. Research has identified an attentional bias towards positive resilience-related words (e.g., “persistence”, “purpose”) in university students who report high PTG after experiencing adversities. Although people can respond to these experiences by showing low PTG, this bias seems to help with their struggle by making purposeful contents more accessible. Therefore, boosting attentional bias towards positive resilience-related words could help people with low PTG. Methods: In this study, the participants were thirty-six university students who had experienced bullying before entering university. Using a Stroop emotional task, they identified the color of resilience and neutral words, either positive or negative, before and after being submitted to transcranial direct current stimulation. Stimulation was targeted at the right temporal area involved in intentionality processing. Results: In the anodal condition, the results support a stimulation effect on the resilience attentional bias that could benefit participants with low PTG. A significant moderation of approach motivation for this effect was also found. Specifically, only when participants had medium or high approach motivation did stimulation boost the attentional bias in students with low PTG. Conclusions: These results support that tDCS stimulation in this brain area is effective in enhancing resilience attentional bias in low-PTG students. However, for this effect to occur it is necessary to have approach motivation, which is motivation related to goals. Full article

Background/Objectives: Age-related decline in balance and postural control is common in healthy elders and is escalated in aging adults with stroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as one of the promising brain stimulations adjoining therapeutic exercise to enhance the recovery of balance and motor functions in persons with and without neurological disorders. This review aims to summarize and compare the available evidence of the tDCS on improving balance in the older adults without neurological disorders and the older adults with stroke. Methods: The Ovid (Medline) database was searched from its inception through to 06/15/2024 for randomized controlled trials investigating tDCS for improving balance in older adults with and without stroke. Results: Overall, 20 appropriate studies (including 271 stroke subjects and 259 healthy older adults) were found. The data indicate mixed results of tDCS for improving balance in older adults with and without stroke. Conclusions: Based on current research evidence, we have not found a specific tDCS protocol that is more effective than other tDCS protocols for improving balance and postural control in healthy older adults and older adults with stroke. Further research should explore the ideal tDCS approach, possibly in conjunction with standard interventions, to optimize postural control and balance in healthy older adults and older adults with stroke. Full article