Next Article in Journal
Chondroitin Sulfate Nanovectorized by LC-PUFAs Nanocarriers Extracted from Salmon (Salmo salar) by Green Process with Decreased Inflammatory Marker Expression in Interleukin-1β-Stimulated Primary Human Chondrocytes In Vitro Culture
Previous Article in Journal
Genome Analysis of a Polysaccharide-Degrading Bacterium Microbulbifer sp. HZ11 and Degradation of Alginate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Eicosapentaenoic Acid Production via Synthetic Biological Strategy in Nannochloropsis oceanica

1
School of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
2
College of Food Science of Technology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Marine Resource Utilization in South China Sea, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 7 November 2024 / Revised: 14 December 2024 / Accepted: 16 December 2024 / Published: 19 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthetic Biology in Marine Microalgae)

Abstract

:
The rational dietary ratio of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) to eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) can exert neurotrophic and cardiotrophic effects on the human body. The marine microalga Nannochloropsis oceanica produces EPA yet no DHA, and thus, it is considered an ideal EPA-only model to pursue a rational DHA/EPA ratio. In this study, synthetic biological strategy was applied to improve EPA production in N. oceanica. Firstly, to identify promoters and terminators, fifteen genes from N. oceanica were isolated using a transcriptomic approach. Compared to α-tubulin, NO08G03500, NO03G03480 and NO22G01450 exhibited 1.2~1.3-fold increases in transcription levels. Secondly, to identify EPA-synthesizing modules, putative desaturases (NoFADs) and elongases (NoFAEs) were overexpressed by the NO08G03500 and NO03G03480 promoters/terminators in N. oceanica. Compared to the wild type (WT), NoFAD1770 and NoFAE0510 overexpression resulted in 47.7% and 40.6% increases in EPA yields, respectively. Thirdly, to store EPA in triacylglycerol (TAG), NoDGAT2K was overexpressed using the NO22G01450 promoter/terminator, along with NoFAD1770NoFAE0510 stacking, forming transgenic line XS521. Compared to WT, TAG-EPA content increased by 154.8% in XS521. Finally, to inhibit TAG-EPA degradation, a TAG lipase-encoding gene NoTGL1990 was knocked out in XS521, leading to a 49.2–65.3% increase in TAG-EPA content. Our work expands upon EPA-enhancing approaches through synthetic biology in microalgae and potentially crops.

1. Introduction

Long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), primarily eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), have been widely reported to be beneficial in reducing the risks of cardiovascular diseases and preventing neurodegenerative diseases [1,2]. However, the results from various studies are more or less inconsistent, leading to controversies as to the benefits of EPA and DHA [3,4]. Recently, the EPA/DHA ratio was found to be a key factor that probably affects the treatment of cardiovascular diseases [5], nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases [6], diabetes [7], and Alzheimer’s disease [8]. Moreover, DHA/EPA supplementation in a ratio of 1/1.3 has been shown to lead to EPA accumulation in cord blood during the last trimester of pregnancy [9]. Therefore, a rational dietary DHA/EPA ratio could potentially enhance cardiotrophic and neurotrophic health in humans.
For decades, DHA and EPA have primarily been sourced from marine sources like seaweed or fish [10]. Unfortunately, due to global warming, these compounds are becoming scarce for humans due to stock depletion and overfishing [11]. Moreover, due to the similar physicochemical properties of DHA and EPA, it is difficult, if not impossible to fine-tune the ratio of DHA/EPA in fish oil [12]. To tackle this problem, either EPA- or DHA-containing modules have been developed to provide pure EPA and DHA for a ratio-specific mixture [13,14]. As the initial producers of EPA and DHA, microalgae represent an attractive and competitive source, especially because of their photosynthetic system for efficient energy–biomass conversion [15]. Moreover, unlike fish oils that contain both EPA and DHA, many microalgae contain only EPA or DHA. In this context, EPA or DHA purification from microalgal extracts may be simpler than that from fish oils. On one hand, Schizochytrium sp. and Aurantiochytrium sp. have been used for industrial-scale production of DHA worldwide [16,17]. On the other hand, Nannochloropsis sp. is considered to be a promising EPA-producing module [18,19]. Nannochloropsis species are increasingly valued as models for studying microalgal lipid metabolism and as platforms for synthetic biology; however, commercial production of EPA from Nannochloropsis-derived sources remains unachieved. Therefore, enhancing biomass accumulation and EPA content is critical to improving EPA yields in Nannochloropsis.
Several approaches, such as strain improvement, fermentation process optimization, and genetic engineering, have been evaluated for increasing EPA titer and productivity [20,21,22,23]. As a derivative of genetic engineering, synthetic biology presents rational design, high efficiency, and stable modification. On one hand, studies on the EPA metabolic mechanism in Nannochloropsis have been initiated. A series of desaturases, elongases, isomerases, and related factors have been identified as key enzymes in EPA accumulation (Figure 1) [19,21,24,25]. On the other hand, techniques for synthetic biology, such as gene stacking, targeted gene disruption, and repression, have been developed in the Nannochloropsis genus [26,27]. These tools enable gene-specific, mechanistic studies and have already facilitated the engineering of improved Nannochloropsis strains with greater EPA production [25,28,29,30]. However, the lack of well-characterized genetic tools, including promoters and terminators, significantly hinders advancements in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering in Nannochloropsis. Promoters and terminators are crucial regulatory elements that control the transcription and stability of genetic constructs; however, the available resources in microalgae are limited and often species-specific. Most studies rely on a small set of endogenous promoters and terminators, which may not provide optimal expression levels or compatibility for heterologous gene expression. Furthermore, a lack of standardized characterization methods adds to the challenge, limiting the scalability of engineered pathways. Expanding the library of reliable and modular promoters and terminators for Nannochloropsis is essential to unlock the full potential in industrial and environmental applications [26,27]. Besides the lack of promoters and terminators resources, the current EPA yield is still far from profitable cost. Meanwhile, free EPA, which is considered to be toxic to Nannochloropsis cells, should be esterified for cellular storage. Thus, for the Nannochloropsis EPA industry, characterization of endogenous elements (e.g., promoters, terminators, enhancers, inhibitors, etc.) plus EPA-biosynthesizing modules (e.g., desaturases, elongases, isomerases, β-oxidation enzymes, etc.) are ever necessary.
Nitrogen starvation and high light are common stress conditions in Nannochloropsis cultivation. Understanding how constitutive promoters perform under such stress conditions is crucial for ensuring consistent expression of engineered pathways. This characterization is essential for developing robust genetic tools and maintaining metabolic efficiency during production processes. Therefore, in this study, to identify promoters and terminators, fifteen genes from N. oceanica were isolated using a transcriptomic approach. Compared to α-tubulin, NO08G03500, NO03G03480, and NO22G01450 exhibited 1.2~1.3-fold increases in transcription level. Secondly, to identify EPA-synthesizing modules, putative desaturases (NoFADs) and elongases (NoFAEs) were overexpressed by NO08G03500 and NO03G03480 promoter/terminator in N. oceanica. Compared to the wild type (WT), NoFAD1770 and NoFAE0510 overexpression resulted in 47.7% and 40.6% increases in EPA yield, respectively. Thirdly, in order to store EPA in triacylglycerol (TAG), NoDGAT2K was overexpressed by NO22G01450 promoter/terminator plus NoFAD1770NoFAE0510 stacking, forming the line XS521. Compared to WT, XS521 exhibited a 154.8% increase in TAG-EPA content. Finally, to inhibit TAG-EPA degradation, NoTGL1990 was knocked out in XS521, leading to 49.2–65.3% increases in TAG-EPA content. Our work expands upon the methods for enhancing EPA via synthetic biology in microalgae and potentially higher plants.

2. Results

2.1. Transcriptome-Based Identification of Endogenous Promoters for Overexpression in N. oceanica

Promoters play a key role in the synthetic biology of microalgae. Among promoters, the constitutive promoter is considered to facilitate stable transcription and thus to maintain cellular function under both normal conditions and stresses [26]. Therefore, the constitutive promoter is an important module for EPA enhancement in this study. To identify robust constitutive promoters (RCPs), transcriptomes of N. oceanica were analyzed under normal conditions (N+ NL), nitrogen starvation (N− NL), and high light (N+ HL) (Section 4; Supplemental Dataset S1). The RNA-Seq reads were aligned to the complete genome sequence of N. oceanica IMET1 to produce transcriptomic data, and the resulting transcriptomic data were annotated using the IMET1 reference in the NanDeSyn website (https://nandesyn.single-cell.cn, accessed on 22 September 2024) [31].
A total of 10,333 genes were isolated from the transcriptomic data, with a mean FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped fragments) value of 102. Among these genes, 63 high-transcription genes (HTGs) were identified through RPKM screening (i.e., RPKM value > 1000 under N+ NL, N− NL and N+ HL), with a mean FPKM value of 4072. By comparison with the HTG α-tubulin (NanDeSyn ID NO12G02410, FPKM = 1909 ± 324), the top 15 HTGs, with a mean FPKM value of 6356, were selected as the RCP candidates (Figure 2A).
To further validate the transcriptome-based identification, the transcription of the top 15 HTGs were characterized via RT-qPCR (Reverse Transcription Quantitative PCR) under N+ NL (Section 4; Supplemental Dataset S1). Consistent with the transcriptomic results (Figure 2A), the top seven HTGs exhibited higher transcription level than α-tubulin. Moreover, the transcription levels of NO08G03500, NO03G03480, and NO22G01450 (i.e., the top three HTGs) exhibited 1.3-, 1.3-, and 1.2-fold higher values than α-tubulin under N+ NL, respectively (Figure 2B). On the NanDeSyn website, both NO08G03500 and NO03G03480 were annotated as light-harvesting complex (LHC) proteins, while NO22G01450 was annotated as the eukaryotic translation elongation factor EEF1A2. Thus, these three genes are considered to be highly and stably expressed, supporting cell activities under both normal and stress conditions. Therefore, the promoters of NO08G03500 (P1), NO03G03480 (P2), and NO22G01450 (P3), along with their terminators (Supplemental Dataset S2), are considered endogenous RCPs for use in overexpression and gene stacking in N. oceanica.

2.2. Identification of EPA-Synthesizing Modules by Endogenous Overexpression of Desaturases and Elongases in N. oceanica

Fatty acid desaturases (FADs) and elongase (FAEs) are considered core enzymes in EPA biosynthesis. FAD introduce a double bond into an acyl chain by removing two hydrogen atoms, while promote fatty acid elongation, ultimately leading to the production of EPA [32]. In this study, two FADs (NoFAD0120 and NoFAD1770) and two FAEs (NoFAE0510 and NoFAE0440) were isolated from the N. oceanica genome for subsequent EPA enhancement (i.e., PUFA FADs and long-chain FAEs). In NanDeSyn, NoFAD0120 (NO06G00120) and NoFAD1770 (NO26G01770) are annotated as “PUFA delta-5-desaturases”, while NoFAE0510 (NO29G00510) and NoFAE0440 (NO16G00440) are annotated as “long chain fatty acid elongases”. Additionally, two other FADs, NoFAD4670 (NO01G04670, delta-4 FAD) and NoFAD2680 (NO16G02680, delta-5 FAD), are also annotated in N. oceanica, but they are not classified as PUFA FADs [31]. Using a phylogenetic approach, the amino acid sequences of NoFADs and NoFAEs were compared with functionally validated FADs and FAEs from animals, plants, fungi, and microalgae. On one hand, microalgal FADs cluster with those animals, plants, and fungi, with NoFADs grouping alongside fungal FADs (Figure 3A). On the other hand, microalgal FAEs (including NoFAEs) form a distinct clade parallel to FAEs from animals and plants (Figure 3B). These results suggest that the aforementioned NoFADs and NoFAEs are potential EPA-synthesizing modules in N. oceanica.
To probe the in vivo activities, NoFAD0120, NoFAD1770, NoFAE0510, and NoFAE0440 were individually overexpressed in N. oceanica IMET1 (Section 4). Based on the promoter identification (Figure 2B), NoFAD0120 and NoFAD1770 were subcloned into plasmid pXY510, which contains the NO08G03500 promoter and terminator, generating plasmids pXY514 and pXY515, respectively. Similarly, NoFAE0510 and NoFAE0440 were inserted into plasmid pXY511 (harboring NO03G03480 promoter and terminator) to produce plasmid pXY516 and pXY517. These four plasmids (pXY514–pXY517) were then separately transformed into N. oceanica, resulting in the establishment of transgenic lines XS514–XS517 (Figure 4A; Section 4). Compared to the N. oceanica wild type (WT), the NoFAD0120, NoFAD1770, NoFAE0510, and NoFAE0440 transcripts exhibited 3.9~6.7-fold increases in the overexpression lines (Figure 4B). However, no significant differences (p < 0.01) in lipid content were observed between the overexpression lines and the WT (Figure 4C). Regarding EPA yield, while XS514 and XS517 showed no significant change (p < 0.01) compared to the WT, XS515 (which harbors NoFAD1770) and XS516 (which harbors NoFAE0510) exhibited increases of 47.7% and 40.6%, respectively (Figure 4D). Therefore, NoFAD1770 and NoFAE0510 are identified as EPA-synthesizing modules for further gene stacking in N. oceanica.

2.3. EPA Improvement by Gene Stacking in N. oceanica

Since a series of EPA-synthesizing modules (i.e., RCPs, terminators, NoFADs, and NoFAEs) was identified through the above efforts, EPA enhancement was further investigated in N. oceanica. Initially, NoFAD1770 and NoFAE0510 were co-expressed using the NO08G03500 and NO03G03480 promoters and terminators in the transgenic line XS518 (Section 4; Figure 5A). Compared to N. oceanica WT, the transcripts of NoFAD1770 and NoFAE0510 exhibited 6.2- and 5.9-fold increases in XS518 (Figure 5B). Although no significant changes (p < 0.01) were observed in lipid content (Figure 5C), the EPA yield in XS518 increased by 45.2% (Figure 5D). Therefore, the stacking of NoFAD1770 and NoFAE0510 effectively improves the EPA yield in N. oceanica.
As previous considered, the pathway of EPA from total lipid to triacylglycerol (TAG) offers the potential to separate the source and sink, thereby providing a greater capacity for the synthesis and accumulation of EPA in microalgae [28]. Moreover, our previous studies have shown that N. oceanica acyl-CoA-dependent diacylglycerol acyltransferase NoDGAT2K (NanDeSyn ID NO05G02840) preferentially incorporates EPA into TAG [33]. Based on this, NoDGAT2K was co-expressed with NoFAD1770 or NoFAE0510 to generate transgenic lines XS519 (harboring NoDGAT2K and NoFAD1770) and XS520 (harboring NoDGAT2K and NoFAE0510). Additionally, NoDGAT2K was stacked with both NoFAD1770 and NoFAE0510 to produce transgenic lines XS521 (Section 4; Figure 5A).
Compared to N. oceanica WT, the NoFAD1770 transcript exhibited 5.8- and 6.3-fold increases in XS519 and XS521, respectively, while no change was observed in XS520. The NoFAE0510 transcript showed 4.4- and 5.6-fold increases in XS520 and XS521, respectively, but remained unchanged in XS519. The NoDGAT2ZK transcript exhibited a 6.8~9.3-fold increase in XS519–XS521 (Figure 5B). Meanwhile, total lipid content increased by 22.9% and 24.1% in XS520 and XS521, respectively, while no significant change was observed in XS519 (Figure 5C). In terms of total EPA yield, no significant change was observed in XS519 and XS520 (likely due to overlapping standard deviations), but it increased by 41.1% in XS521 (Figure 5D). Regarding TAG levels, TAG content increased by 25.2%, 20.8%, and 26.4% in XS519, XS520, and XS521, respectively (Figure 5E). Furthermore, TAG-associated EPA content showed significant increases of 89.5%, 57.3%, and 154.8% in XS519, XS520, and XS521, respectively (Figure 5F). Therefore, EPA in N. oceanica can be enhanced through NoFAD1770–NoFAE0510 stacking, with further accumulation in TAG via the NoDGAT2K pathway.

2.4. Enhancing EPA Storage by Knockout of a Triacylglycerol Lipase in N. oceanica

Although fatty acids can be stored in TAG, they can subsequently be degraded into glycerol and free fatty acids to provide energy via β-oxidation. The initial step of TAG breakdown is generally catalyzed by TAG-lipases (TGLs) [34]. To inhibit TAG degradation and thus enhance EPA accumulation, the TAG-lipase encoding gene NoTGL1990 (NanDeSyn ID NO20G01990) was knocked out using CRISPR/Cas9 in N. oceanica (Section 4). Three CDS-indel lines, XS522-1, XS522-2, and XS522-3, were generated and characterized (Figure 6A). RT-PCR (reverse transcription PCR) results showed that NoTGL1990 transcriptions were present in the WT but absent in XS522 lines (Figure S1a), a finding that was further confirmed by RT-qPCR (Figure S1b). Meanwhile, cell density remained unchanged between the NoTGL1990-knockout lines and N. oceanica WT (Figure 6B), indicating that the NoFAD1770NoFAE0510NoDGAT2K stacking, combined with NoTGL1990 knockout, did not affect the growth of N. oceanica.
Regarding the total lipid level, compared to N. oceanica WT, the total lipid content increased by 14.3–23.9% in the NoTGL1990-knockout lines (Figure 6C). Additionally, the total EPA yield increased by 51.7%, 41.1%, and 38.6% in XS522-1, XS522-2, and XS522-3, respectively, reaching up to 7.8% per DW (Figure 6D). For TAG levels, TAG content improved by 41.1–55.9% in the XS522 lines (Figure 6E). Moreover, TAG-associated EPA content increased by 51.6%, 49.2%, and 65.3% in the NoTGL1990-knockout lines, respectively (Figure 6F). While the EPA contents in the XS522 lines was not significantly higher than in the XS521 line (Figure 5E), the enhanced TAG content and unchanged growth suggest an overall improvement in EPA yield in the XS522 lines. These findings indicate that NoTGL1990 knockout enhances TAG content and TAG-associated EPA, which could further boost total EPA accumulation (Figure 6D). Collectively, through synthetic biology approaches, our study establishes a systematic strategy to enhance EPA production and storage, offering promising potential for utilizing N. oceanica as an EPA-only model to optimize the DHA/EPA ratio.

3. Discussion

Marine microalgae, which do not require freshwater, are typically rich in high-value compounds. Synthetic biology has gained popularity in the marine microalgae industry due to its strong relevance and high efficiency. Although genome resources for marine microalgae are developing rapidly, the lack of information regarding gene expression levels and gene functions has significantly hindered the advancement of synthetic biology in this field. Due to its high EPA content and large-scale potential, N. oceanica is considered an excellent platform for synthetic biology. To expand the industrial applications of N. oceanica, a systematic and diverse set of well-characterized expression elements is necessary for the assembly of complex biological functions or entire metabolic pathways. Prior to this study, Nannochloropsis promoters were predicted using densely connected convolutional neural networks [35]. However, promoter characterizations in terms of transcription, expression, and function remain limited. In this study, a total of 10,333 genes were isolated from N. oceanica data, and the top 15 HTGs were identified as endogenous RCPs (Figure 2A,B), which are expected to be valuable for future biosynthetic studies in Nannochloropsis.
High light intensity has been shown to significantly influence gene expression in microalgae, driving adaptations that enhance photosynthetic efficiency and mitigate photo-oxidative damage [36]. Genes encoding components of the photosynthetic machinery, such as LHC proteins and photosystem reaction center proteins, are upregulated to improve light absorption and energy transfer [37]. At the same time, genes involved in non-photochemical quenching mechanisms, including xanthophyll cycle-related enzymes, are highly expressed to dissipate excess light energy and prevent photo-inhibition [38]. Stress-responsive genes, such as those coding for reactive oxygen species scavenging enzymes like superoxide dismutase and catalase, are also elevated to maintain cellular redox balance under high light stress [39]. Additionally, transcription factors, including bZIP and MYB family proteins, are upregulated to coordinate light-responsive pathways [40]. These changes reflect a well-coordinated effort to enhance photosynthetic capacity, protect cellular structures, and maintain metabolic homeostasis under high light conditions. In this study, eleven HTGs, including NO08G03500, NO03G03480, NO02G01740, NO12G02640, NO05G01620, NO09G00440, NO10G01510, NO21G02150, NO03G03690, NO20G00500, and NO16G01490, were annotated to encode LHC proteins (Figure 2A). Understanding these HTGs is crucial for optimizing microalgae for applications in multiple biotechnological fields.
In diatoms such as Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana, EPA is primarily synthetized via the omega-3 pathway. In contrast, EPA biosynthesis in N. oceanica occurs through the omega-6 pathway. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that FAD overexpression may not always effective in improving EPA production in N. oceanica, as some FADs may not function properly with the N. oceanica omega-6 pathway. This “ineffective” situation has also found in diatoms. Consequently, systematic screening of functional modules is essential for advancing EPA-synthesizing biology in microalgae. In this study, two FADs (NoFAD0120 and NoFAD1770) and two FAEs (NoFAE0510 and NoFAE0440) were isolated and characterized in N. oceanica. Compared to N. oceanica WT, overexpression of NoFAD1770 and NoFAE0510 resulted in 47.7% and 40.6% increases in EPA yields (Figure 4D). Therefore, NoFAD1770 and NoFAE0510 are identified as key EPA-synthesizing modules in the N. oceanica omega-6 pathway.
TAG is stored in lipid droplets and has the potential to accumulate at a high level in microalgae. Moreover, abiotic stress conditions, such as nitrogen starvation and high light, can triggered a drastic increase in TAG content in microalgae. Therefore, TAG-EPA storage becomes critical under stress. However, in N. oceanica, EPA is primarily stored in polar lipids rather than TAG. Thus, channeling EPA into TAG may represent a promising strategy to overcome the storage limitations for EPA. Prior to this study, inefficient channeling of EPA into TAG had been observed in N. oceanica. Co-expression of a Chlamydomonas-derived diacylglycerol acyltransferase gene, CrDGTT1, along with an elongase gene Δ0-ELO1, was shown to significantly increase TAG-EPA content [28]. Additionally, it was reported that knockout of the TAG lipase gene NoTGL1 resulted in a two-fold increase in TAG content in N. oceanica [34]. To further enhance EPA storage in TAG, we not only overexpressed the eicosapentaenoyl-CoA-preferred diacylglycerol acyltransferase gene NoDGAT2K to promote TAG-EPA incorporation, but also knocked out the TAG lipase gene NoTGL1990 to inhibit TAG-EPA degradation. As a result, TAG-associated EPA content increased by up to 65.3% in the NoTGL1990 knockout lines compared to N. oceanica WT (Figure 6F).
Although this study has successfully improved the accumulation of EPA in N. oceanica, there remains much work to be done before the N. oceanica EPA chassis can be fully established. To date, more than 20 desaturase/elongase coding genes have been annotated in the N. oceanica genome [31], but the EPA-synthesizing functions of these genes have not been systematically explored. In addition to desaturase and elongase, a range of enzymes, such as isomerases, oxidases, TAG synthases, and lipases, play crucial roles in EPA metabolism, and their functions also need to be identified. For efficient and cost-effective characterization of such a large number of gene candidates, the development of current genetic toolkits is essential. For instance, CRISPR-Cas9 technology has already been applied for gene knockout and overexpression in microalgae [41], providing a foundation for subsequent analysis of EPA metabolism and its high-yield production in N. oceanica. Furthermore, the development of other technologies, such as microalgal collection, EPA extraction, and EPA purification, will also be crucial for the commercialization of microalgal EPA. Collectively, in this study, we (i) identified robust promoters and terminators; (ii) characterized key FADs, FAEs, DGATs, and TGLs; and (iii) integrated these elements and functional genes to demonstrate a biosynthetic strategy for engineering EPA in N. oceanica. This study holds significant promise for advancing the production of PUFA in microalgae and even in crops.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Strains and Culture Conditions

Escherichia coli strain transetta (DE3) was grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm. N. oceanica IMET1 was cultivated in modified f/2 liquid medium containing 35 g/L sea salt, 1000 mg/L NaNO3, 66.6 mg/L NaH2PO4·H2O, 3.65 mg/L FeCl3·6H2O, 4.37 mg/L Na2EDTA·2H2O, 0.0196 mg/L CuSO4·5H2O, 0.0126 mg/L Na2MoO4·2H2O, 0.044 mg/L ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.0109 mg/L CoCl2·6H2O, 0.036 mg/L MnCl2·4H2O, 5 µg/L VB12, 5 µg/L biotin, and 0.1 mg/L thiamine HCl [42]. Cells were cultivated in liquid cultures under continuous light (approximately 50 ± 5 µmol photons m−2 s−1) at 25 °C. For nitrogen starvation, N. oceanica cells were harvested by centrifugation (3500× g for 5 min) and then resuspended in N− medium (modified f/2 medium without NaNO3) for another 72 h. For high light induction, N. oceanica cells were cultivated under continuous light (approximately 200 ± 10 µmol photons m−2 s−1) for another 24 h. Cell growth was determined based on cell density using a Counterstar IC 1000.
To characterize the transgenic lines, mid-logarithmic-phase algal cells (OD750 of 2.6) were collected for validating successful transformants through PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing. Positive lines were then cultured for further measurements. For phenotyping, the transgenic lines, along with the WT control, were grown to an OD750 of 4.5 ± 0.5 over five days. Subsequently, lipid content, TAG content, and fatty acid composition were measured.

4.2. Identification of Promoters and Terminators in N. oceanica IMET1

To identify candidate constitutive promoters in N. oceanica IMET1, transcription profiles were analyzed under normal condition, nitrogen starvation, and high light induction. Total RNA from these conditions was extracted using Trizol reagents (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For mRNA-Seq, the poly (A)-containing mRNA molecules were purified using Sera-mag Magnetic Oligo (dT) Beads (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and fragmented into 200 to 300 bp pieces by incubation in RNA Fragmentation Reagent (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The fragmented mRNA was then purified away from the fragmentation buffer using Agencourt® RNAClean beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The purified, fragmented mRNA was converted into double-stranded cDNA using the SuperScript Double-Stranded cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen) with random hexamers for priming. Strand-nonspecific transcriptome libraries were prepared using the NEBNext® mRNA Library Prep Reagent Set (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and sequenced for 2 × 90 bp runs (paired-end, PE) using the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform. The raw data were deposited in NCBI GEO with the reference series number GSE42508. These filtered Illumina reads were aligned to the N. oceanica reference genome with TopHat (version 2.0.4, allowing no more than two segment mismatches) [43]. Reads mapped to more than one location were excluded.
For each of the mRNA-Seq datasets under each experimental condition, gene expression was measured as the numbers of aligned reads to annotated genes using Cufflinks (version 2.0.4) and normalized to FPKM values. Predicted genes with expression values (FPKM) less than 10 were filtered out. To identify robust constitutive promoters, gene expression was quantified and normalized by the counterpart of α-tubulin (NO12G02410, FPKM = 1909 ± 324). Then, approximately 3500 genes were ranked by FPKM fold changes, and the top 35 genes were selected for further promoter characterization. The promoter and terminator sequences were identified and defined in NanDeSyn, following the previous description.
To further validate the mRNA-Seq results, RNA extracted from the same cultures used for mRNA-Seq was subjected to cDNA synthesis using the PrimeScript® RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Kyoto, Japan). RT-qPCR was performed using standard methods (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) as previously described [44]. Ct values were determined for triplicate independent technical experiments, each performed on triplicate biological cultures. The primer pairs used for RT-qPCR analyses are listed in Table S1. The sizes of amplification products ranged from 100 to 300 bp.

4.3. Vector Construction and N. oceanica Transformation

To construct the backbone for the N. oceanica IMET1 overexpression vectors, the identified promoters/terminators from NO08G03500, NO03G03480, and NO22G01450 were amplified using genomic DNA with sequence-specific primers (Table S1). The selected promoter and terminator regions were then inserted into pXJ450 plasmid (which harbors the zeocin-resistant gene, BleR) at the KpnI and BamHI sites, respectively. The resulting plasmids were named pXY510 (containing the promoter/terminator of NO08G03500), pXY511 (containing the promoter/terminator of NO03G03480), and pXY512 (containing the promoter/terminator of NO22G01450) (Figure 4A).
Furthermore, N. oceanica cDNA was used as the PCR templates (all primers used are listed in Table S1). PCR products were then sequenced to obtain the full length protein-coding sequences of NoFAD0120, NoFAD1770, NoFAE0510, NoFAE0440, and NoDGAT2K (NanDeSyn ID NO06G00120, NO26G01770, NO29G00510, NO16G00440, and NO05G02840). NoDGAT2K was inserted into pXY512 to form pXY513. NoFAD0120 and NoFAD1770 were inserted into pXY510 to form pXY514 and pXY515, while NoFAE0510 and NoFAE0440 were inserted into pXY511 to form pXY516 and pXY517, respectively. To further construct the stacking plasmids, the expressing cassettes of PNO08G03500-NoFAD1770-TNO08G03500 or PNO22G01450-NoDGAT2K-TNO22G01450 were amplified and subcloned into pXY513 to form pXY518 or pXY519. Meanwhile, the expressing cassettes of PNO22G01450-NoDGAT2K-TNO22G01450 were amplified and inserted into pXY516 or pXY518 to produce pXY520 or pXY521, respectively (Figure 5A).
To construct the CRISPR/Cas9 vectors for the NoTGL1990 (NanDeSyn ID NO20G01990) knockout, two DNA fragments containing the hammerhead ribozyme and the NoTGL1990 gRNA target sequence (Table S1) were designed and annealed to form a primer dimer. The targeted sequence, ‘GACGTTTGACGCTATCCGAG’ (213–232 bp), was used with a PAM sequence of ‘AGG’. The primer dimer was then ligated to the BspQI-digested pNOC-ARS-CRISPR-v2 vector (which harbors a hygromycin-resistant gene, HygR) [45] to form the knockout vector pXY522. This vector expresses Cas9 and gRNA through the bidirectional Ribi promoter, using the CS and LDSP terminators, respectively.
Nuclear transformation of N. oceanica was performed for linearized overexpression vectors or the circular Cas9 vector using the high-voltage (11,000 V/cm) electroporation method. The transformants of pXY514–pXY521 were screened by zeocin (Invitrogen, 5 mg/L), while the counterpart of pXY522 was screened by hygromycin (Solarbio, 300 mg/L). Mid-logarithmic-phase algal cells (OD750 = 2.6) were collected for validate the successful transformants via PCR amplification (Table S1). For NoTGL1990-CRISPR/Cas9 transformation in XS021, twelve PCR-positive monoclones were identified via Sanger sequencing, and ten lines were validated as positive knockout lines (Table S1). Among these lines, three knockout types were identified: ‘GACGTTTGACGCT----GAG’ (XS022-1), ‘GACGTTTGACGC-----GAG’ (XS022-2), and ‘GACGTTTGACGCTATCCCCGAG’ (XS022-3) (Figure 6A).

4.4. Lipid Isolation and EPA Quantification via TLC and GC-MS

Total lipids were extracted from dried samples using chloroform/methanol (2:1 [v/v]) with a 100 mM internal control of tri13:0 TAG. The lipids were then separated on a silica TLC plate using a solvent mixture consisting of petroleum ether, ethyl ether, and acetic acid (70:30:1, by volume). To quantify the amount of TAG accumulated in N. oceanica WT and transgenic lines, TAG bands were scraped from the TLC plate. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were prepared by acid-catalyzed transmethylation of the TAG bands and analyzed by GC-MS [46]. Mixed analytical standards of FAMEs and pentadecane were used as external and internal standards, respectively. The amounts of TAGs and the profiles of TAG-associated EPA were calculated based on the GC-MS results. The chemicals used as standards were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

The amino acid sequences of validated FADs and FAEs were aligned with the ClustalW v2.1 in MEGA4.1 [47]. The alignments were curated with GBlock [48] to remove poorly aligned positions. The curated alignment was then used to construct a phylogenetic tree using the neighbor joining (NJ) method in MEGA4.1, with the tree being tested by bootstrapping with 1000 replicates. The tree was drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic relationships. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method, with units representing the number of amino acid substitutions per site. All positions containing alignment gaps and missing data were eliminated only in pairwise sequence comparisons (using the pairwise deletion option).

4.6. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism 5 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). The p-values were calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A p-value of less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/md22120570/s1, Supplemental Figure S1 (Figure S1). NoTGL1990 transcription levels in N. oceanica wild-type and NoTGL1990-knockout XS522 lines by RT-PCR (a) and RT-qPCR (b); Table S1: Nucleotide sequences of the primers used in this study; Supplemental Dataset S1: FPKM values of N. oceanica IMET1 transcriptomes under normal condition (N+ NL), nitrogen starvation (N− NL) and high light (N+ HL). All experiments were in triplicate; Supplemental Dataset S2: Nucleotide sequences of promoters and terminators in top three HTGs and α-tubulin of N. oceanica IMET1.

Author Contributions

Y.X., C.M. and M.D. designed research; S.W., T.X. and H.D. constructed the plasmids; X.C., X.H. and S.L. generated and screened transgenic lines of N. oceanica; C.M. and M.D. conducted the GC-MS assay; Y.X. analyzed data and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Marine Resource Utilization in South China Sea (DC2300001799), Start-Up Funds of Hainan University (RZ2300002678), and the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0902500).

Data Availability Statement

The coding sequences of genes, promoters, and terminators as well as the transcriptomic data are deposited in NanDeSyn (https://nandesyn.single-cell.cn, accessed on 22 September 2024).

Acknowledgments

We thank Qintao Wang and Chen Shen in CAS-QIBEBT for the experimental guidance. We thank the Operations Research Community-QIBEBT for the inspiring discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Djuricic, I.; Calder, P.C. Pros and cons of long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in cardiovascular health. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2023, 63, 383–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Avallone, R.; Vitale, G.; Bertolotti, M. Omega-3 fatty acids and neurodegenerative diseases: New evidence in clinical trials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chiu, C.C.; Su, K.P.; Cheng, T.C.; Liu, H.C.; Chang, C.J.; Dewey, M.E.; Huang, S.Y.; Stewart, R. The effects of omega-3 fatty acids monotherapy in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A preliminary randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2008, 32, 1538–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Phillips, M.A.; Childs, C.E.; Calder, P.C.; Rogers, P.J. No effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on cognition and mood in individuals with cognitive impairment and probable Alzheimer’s disease: A randomised controlled trial. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 24600–24613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Deckelbaum, R.J.; Calder, P.C. Editorial: Is it time to separate EPA from DHA when using omega-3 fatty acids to protect heart and brain? Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2020, 23, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, L.; Hu, Q.; Wu, H.; Wang, X.; Gao, C.; Chen, G.; Gong, Z.; Yao, P. Dietary DHA/EPA ratio changes fatty acid composition and attenuates diet-induced accumulation of lipid in the liver of ApoE−/− mice. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2018, 2018, 6256802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vitlov Uljevic, M.; Starcevic, K.; Masek, T.; Bocina, I.; Restovic, I.; Kevic, N.; Filipovic, N.; Vukojevic, K.; Grobe, M.; Kretzschmar, G.; et al. Dietary DHA/EPA supplementation ameliorates diabetic nephropathy by protecting from distal tubular cell damage. Cell Tissue Res. 2019, 378, 301–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.P.; Brown, R.E.; Zhang, P.C.; Zhao, Y.T.; Ju, X.H.; Song, C. DHA, EPA and their combination at various ratios differently modulated Aβ25-35-induced neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2018, 136, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Buyukuslu, N.; Ovali, S.; Altuntas, S.L.; Batirel, S.; Yigit, P.; Garipagaoglu, M. Supplementation of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) / Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in a ratio of 1/1.3 during the last trimester of pregnancy results in EPA accumulation in cord blood. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2017, 125, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nicholls, S.J.; Nelson, A.J. The fish-oil paradox. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2020, 31, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Worm, B.; Orofino, S.; Burns, E.S.; D’Costa, N.G.; Manir Feitosa, L.; Palomares, M.L.D.; Schiller, L.; Bradley, D. Global shark fishing mortality still rising despite widespread regulatory change. Science 2024, 383, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dasilva, G.; Munoz, S.; Lois, S.; Medina, I. Non-targeted LC-MS/MS assay for screening over 100 lipid mediators from ARA, EPA, and DHA in biological samples based on mass spectral fragmentations. Molecules 2019, 24, 2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jovanovic, S.; Dietrich, D.; Becker, J.; Kohlstedt, M.; Wittmann, C. Microbial production of polyunsaturated fatty acids—High-value ingredients for aquafeed, superfoods, and pharmaceuticals. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 69, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Saini, R.K.; Prasad, P.; Sreedhar, R.V.; Akhilender Naidu, K.; Shang, X.; Keum, Y.S. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs): Emerging plant and microbial sources, oxidative stability, bioavailability, and health benefits—A review. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jakhwal, P.; Kumar Biswas, J.; Tiwari, A.; Kwon, E.E.; Bhatnagar, A. Genetic and non-genetic tailoring of microalgae for the enhanced production of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)—A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 344, 126250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, X.; Huang, C.; Xu, Z.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z.; Yu, X. The strategies to reduce cost and improve productivity in DHA production by Aurantiochytrium sp.: From biochemical to genetic respects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 9433–9447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chi, G.; Xu, Y.; Cao, X.; Li, Z.; Cao, M.; Chisti, Y.; He, N. Production of polyunsaturated fatty acids by Schizochytrium (Aurantiochytrium) spp. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 55, 107897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ye, Y.; Liu, M.; Yu, L.; Sun, H.; Liu, J. Nannochloropsis as an emerging algal chassis for light-driven synthesis of lipids and high-value products. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, X.N.; Chen, T.P.; Yang, B.; Liu, J.; Chen, F. Lipid production from Nannochloropsis. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Safafar, H.; Hass, M.Z.; Moller, P.; Holdt, S.L.; Jacobsen, C. High-EPA biomass from Nannochloropsis salina cultivated in a flat-panel photo-bioreactor on a process water-enriched growth medium. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koh, H.G.; Jeon, S.; Kim, M.; Chang, Y.K.; Park, K.; Park, S.H.; Kang, N.K. Optimization and mechanism analysis of photosynthetic EPA production in Nannochloropsis salina: Evaluating the effect of temperature and nitrogen concentrations. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 211, 108729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chua, E.T.; Schenk, P.M. A biorefinery for Nannochloropsis: Induction, harvesting, and extraction of EPA-rich oil and high-value protein. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 1416–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sharma, K.; Schenk, P.M. Rapid induction of omega-3 fatty acids (EPA) in Nannochloropsis sp. by UV-C radiation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 112, 1243–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Poliner, E.; Busch, A.W.U.; Newton, L.; Kim, Y.U.; Clark, R.; Gonzalez-Martinez, S.C.; Farre, E.M.; Montgomery, B.L.; Jeong, B.R. Aureochromes maintain polyunsaturated fatty acid content in Nannochloropsis oceanica. Plant Physiol. 2022, 189, 906–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dolch, L.J.; Rak, C.; Perin, G.; Tourcier, G.; Broughton, R.; Leterrier, M.; Morosinotto, T.; Tellier, F.; Faure, J.D.; Falconet, D.; et al. A palmitic acid elongase affects eicosapentaenoic acid and plastidial monogalactosyldiacylglycerol levels in Nannochloropsis. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 742–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Poliner, E.; Farre, E.M.; Benning, C. Advanced genetic tools enable synthetic biology in the oleaginous microalgae Nannochloropsis sp. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 1383–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, Y. Biochemistry and biotechnology of lipid accumulation in the microalga Nannochloropsis oceanica. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 11500–11509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, J.; Liu, M.; Pan, Y.; Shi, Y.; Hu, H. Metabolic engineering of the oleaginous alga Nannochloropsis for enriching eicosapentaenoic acid in triacylglycerol by combined pulling and pushing strategies. Metab. Eng. 2022, 69, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, M.; Zheng, J.; Yu, L.; Shao, S.; Zhou, W.; Liu, J. Engineering Nannochloropsis oceanica for concurrent production of canthaxanthin and eicosapentaenoic acid. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 413, 131525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Poliner, E.; Pulman, J.A.; Zienkiewicz, K.; Childs, K.; Benning, C.; Farre, E.M. A toolkit for Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779 enables gene stacking and genetic engineering of the eicosapentaenoic acid pathway for enhanced long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid production. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gong, Y.; Kang, N.K.; Kim, Y.U.; Wang, Z.; Wei, L.; Xin, Y.; Shen, C.; Wang, Q.; You, W.; Lim, J.M.; et al. The NanDeSyn database for Nannochloropsis systems and synthetic biology. Plant J. 2020, 104, 1736–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xin, Y.; Wu, S.; Miao, C.; Xu, T.; Lu, Y. Towards lipid from microalgae: Products, biosynthesis, and genetic engineering. Life 2024, 14, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xin, Y.; Shen, C.; She, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, C.; Wei, L.; Yoon, K.; Han, D.; Hu, Q.; Xu, J. Biosynthesis of triacylglycerol molecules with a tailored PUFA profile in industrial microalgae. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 474–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nobusawa, T.; Yamakawa-Ayukawa, K.; Saito, F.; Nomura, S.; Takami, A.; Ohta, H. A homolog of Arabidopsis SDP1 lipase in Nannochloropsis is involved in degradation of de novo-synthesized triacylglycerols in the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2019, 1864, 1185–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wei, P.J.; Pang, Z.Z.; Jiang, L.J.; Tan, D.Y.; Su, Y.S.; Zheng, C.H. Promoter prediction in nannochloropsis based on densely connected convolutional neural networks. Methods 2022, 204, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dou, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, F.; Chen, L.; Zhang, W. Chassis engineering for high light tolerance in microalgae and cyanobacteria. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2024, 1–19, Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xie, Y.; Xiong, X.; Chen, S. Challenges and potential in increasing lutein content in microalgae. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lacour, T.; Babin, M.; Lavaud, J. Diversity in xanthophyll cycle pigments content and related nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) among microalgae: Implications for growth strategy and ecology. J. Phycol. 2020, 56, 245–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kang, Y.; Xu, L.; Dong, J.; Yuan, X.; Ye, J.; Fan, Y.; Liu, B.; Xie, J.; Ji, X. Programmed microalgae-gel promotes chronic wound healing in diabetes. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, C.; Wang, K.; Ning, J.; Luo, Q.; Yang, Y.; Huang, D.; Li, H. Transcription factors from Haematococcus pluvialis involved in the regulation of astaxanthin biosynthesis under high light-sodium acetate stress. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 650178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wei, L.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, B. A CRISPR/dCas9-based transcription activation system developed in marine microalga Nannochloropsis oceanica. Aquaculture 2021, 546, 737064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jia, J.; Han, D.; Gerken, H.G.; Li, Y.; Sommerfeld, M.; Hu, Q.; Xu, J. Molecular mechanisms for photosynthetic carbon partitioning into storage neutral lipids in Nannochloropsis oceanica under nitrogen-depletion conditions. Algal Res. 2015, 7, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Trapnell, C.; Pachter, L.; Salzberg, S.L. TopHat: Discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1105–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Guenin, S.; Mauriat, M.; Pelloux, J.; Van Wuytswinkel, O.; Bellini, C.; Gutierrez, L. Normalization of qRT-PCR data: The necessity of adopting a systematic, experimental conditions-specific, validation of references. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Poliner, E.; Takeuchi, T.; Du, Z.Y.; Benning, C.; Farre, E.M. Nontransgenic marker-free gene disruption by an episomal CRISPR system in the oleaginous microalga, Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779. ACS Synth. Biol. 2018, 7, 962–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, Q.; Chieu, H.K.; Low, C.P.; Zhang, S.; Heng, C.K.; Yang, H. Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells deficient in triacylglycerols synthesis undergo apoptosis upon entry into the stationary phase. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 47145–47155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tamura, K.; Dudley, J.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1596–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Castresana, J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17, 540–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mechanistic model of EPA metabolism in Nannochloropsis. Not all intermediates or reactions are displayed. Arrows indicate catalytic steps in the pathway. DGAT, diacylglycerol acyltransferase; FAS, fatty acid synthase; FAE, fatty acid elongase; TAG: triacylglycerol; TGL, TAG-lipase. The solid arrows indicate reactions occurring within the same subcellular organelle, while the dotted arrows represent reactions and transport events between different subcellular organelles. The overexpression and knockout enzymes in this study are marked by red and blue letters, respectively.
Figure 1. Mechanistic model of EPA metabolism in Nannochloropsis. Not all intermediates or reactions are displayed. Arrows indicate catalytic steps in the pathway. DGAT, diacylglycerol acyltransferase; FAS, fatty acid synthase; FAE, fatty acid elongase; TAG: triacylglycerol; TGL, TAG-lipase. The solid arrows indicate reactions occurring within the same subcellular organelle, while the dotted arrows represent reactions and transport events between different subcellular organelles. The overexpression and knockout enzymes in this study are marked by red and blue letters, respectively.
Marinedrugs 22 00570 g001
Figure 2. Identification of robust constitutive promoters in N. oceanica IMET1. (A) Transcriptomic response of N. oceanica under normal (N+ NL), nitrogen-starvation (N− NL), and high light (N+ HL) conditions. Fold change was calculated as log2(FPKM(Gx)/FPKM (α-tubulin, NO12G02410)) (FPKM = the normalized abundance of transcript; Gx = gene candidates). (B) RT-qPCR validation of transcript level for top 15 genes in (A). Gene ID was isolated from NanDeSyn (https://nandesyn.single-cell.cn, accessed on 22 September 2024). Values shown as mean ± SD (in triplicates). * significant change (p < 0.01) versus α-tubulin.
Figure 2. Identification of robust constitutive promoters in N. oceanica IMET1. (A) Transcriptomic response of N. oceanica under normal (N+ NL), nitrogen-starvation (N− NL), and high light (N+ HL) conditions. Fold change was calculated as log2(FPKM(Gx)/FPKM (α-tubulin, NO12G02410)) (FPKM = the normalized abundance of transcript; Gx = gene candidates). (B) RT-qPCR validation of transcript level for top 15 genes in (A). Gene ID was isolated from NanDeSyn (https://nandesyn.single-cell.cn, accessed on 22 September 2024). Values shown as mean ± SD (in triplicates). * significant change (p < 0.01) versus α-tubulin.
Marinedrugs 22 00570 g002
Figure 3. Cladograms of selected protein sequences of desaturases (A) and elongases (B) from higher plants, fungi, microalgae, and animals. Neighbor joining (NJ) was used for tree construction. Cladogram was plotted based on actual branch length. GenBank accession numbers are provided in brackets. Numbers beside the branch: bootstrap value for NJ. -, <50. Red arrow, NoFADs (A) or NoFAEs (B).
Figure 3. Cladograms of selected protein sequences of desaturases (A) and elongases (B) from higher plants, fungi, microalgae, and animals. Neighbor joining (NJ) was used for tree construction. Cladogram was plotted based on actual branch length. GenBank accession numbers are provided in brackets. Numbers beside the branch: bootstrap value for NJ. -, <50. Red arrow, NoFADs (A) or NoFAEs (B).
Marinedrugs 22 00570 g003
Figure 4. Homologous overexpression of desaturases and elongases in N. oceanica IMET1. (A) Genetic manipulation lines with overexpression of desaturases (NoFADs) or elongases (NoFAEs). (B) Transcript level of NoFAD0120, NoFAD1770, NoFAE0510, and NoFAE0440 in N. oceanica wild-type and overexpression lines. (C,D) Lipid content (C) and EPA yield (D) of the NoFAD or NoFAE overexpression lines in N. oceanica. NoFAD0120, NO06G00120; NoFAD1770, NO26G01770; NoFAE0510, NO29G00510; NoFAE0440, NO16G00440; P1/T1, promoter/terminator from NO08G03500; P2/T2, promoter/terminator from NO03G03480. Gene ID was isolated from NanDeSyn (https://nandesyn.single-cell.cn, accessed on 22 September 2024). Values shown as mean ± SD (in triplicates). *, significant change (p < 0.01) versus wild type.
Figure 4. Homologous overexpression of desaturases and elongases in N. oceanica IMET1. (A) Genetic manipulation lines with overexpression of desaturases (NoFADs) or elongases (NoFAEs). (B) Transcript level of NoFAD0120, NoFAD1770, NoFAE0510, and NoFAE0440 in N. oceanica wild-type and overexpression lines. (C,D) Lipid content (C) and EPA yield (D) of the NoFAD or NoFAE overexpression lines in N. oceanica. NoFAD0120, NO06G00120; NoFAD1770, NO26G01770; NoFAE0510, NO29G00510; NoFAE0440, NO16G00440; P1/T1, promoter/terminator from NO08G03500; P2/T2, promoter/terminator from NO03G03480. Gene ID was isolated from NanDeSyn (https://nandesyn.single-cell.cn, accessed on 22 September 2024). Values shown as mean ± SD (in triplicates). *, significant change (p < 0.01) versus wild type.
Marinedrugs 22 00570 g004
Figure 5. Gene stacking for EPA production in N. oceanica IMET1. (A) Gene-stacking lines harboring NoFAD1770-, NoFAE0510-, and/or NoDGAT2K-overexpression cassettes. (B) Transcript level of NoFAD1770, NoFAE0510, and NoDGAT2K in N. oceanica wild-type and gene-stacking lines, as measured by RT-qPCR. Transcription level of the above genes was normalized to that of Actin, the internal control. (CF) Lipid content (C), EPA yield (D), TAG content (E), and TAG-associated EPA content (F) of the gene-stacking lines and wild type. NoFAD1770, NO26G01770; NoFAE0510, NO29G00510; NoDGAT2K, NO05G02840; P1/T1, promoter/terminator from NO08G03500; P2/T2, promoter/terminator from NO03G03480; P3/T3, promoter/terminator from NO22G01450. Gene ID was isolated from NanDeSyn (https://nandesyn.single-cell.cn, accessed on 22 September 2024). Values shown as mean ± SD (in triplicates). *, significant change (p < 0.01) versus wild type.
Figure 5. Gene stacking for EPA production in N. oceanica IMET1. (A) Gene-stacking lines harboring NoFAD1770-, NoFAE0510-, and/or NoDGAT2K-overexpression cassettes. (B) Transcript level of NoFAD1770, NoFAE0510, and NoDGAT2K in N. oceanica wild-type and gene-stacking lines, as measured by RT-qPCR. Transcription level of the above genes was normalized to that of Actin, the internal control. (CF) Lipid content (C), EPA yield (D), TAG content (E), and TAG-associated EPA content (F) of the gene-stacking lines and wild type. NoFAD1770, NO26G01770; NoFAE0510, NO29G00510; NoDGAT2K, NO05G02840; P1/T1, promoter/terminator from NO08G03500; P2/T2, promoter/terminator from NO03G03480; P3/T3, promoter/terminator from NO22G01450. Gene ID was isolated from NanDeSyn (https://nandesyn.single-cell.cn, accessed on 22 September 2024). Values shown as mean ± SD (in triplicates). *, significant change (p < 0.01) versus wild type.
Marinedrugs 22 00570 g005
Figure 6. TAG-lipase knockout for EPA storage in TAG of N. oceanica IMET1. (A) Genome sequences of the editing sites in the NoTGL1990-knockout lines and wild type (WT). Sequences of the generated NoTGL1990-CRISPR/Cas9 lines confirmed the mutants as knockout lines with ‘ATCC’ deleted in XS022-1, ‘TATCC’ deleted in XS022-2, and two cytosines inserted in XS022-3. (B) Growth kinetics of the NoTGL1990-knockout lines and WT. (CF) Comparison of the lipid content (C), EPA yield (D), TAG content (E), and TAG-associated EPA content (F) between NoTGL1990-knockout lines and WT. Values shown as mean ± SD (in triplicates). *, significant change (p < 0.01) versus wild type.
Figure 6. TAG-lipase knockout for EPA storage in TAG of N. oceanica IMET1. (A) Genome sequences of the editing sites in the NoTGL1990-knockout lines and wild type (WT). Sequences of the generated NoTGL1990-CRISPR/Cas9 lines confirmed the mutants as knockout lines with ‘ATCC’ deleted in XS022-1, ‘TATCC’ deleted in XS022-2, and two cytosines inserted in XS022-3. (B) Growth kinetics of the NoTGL1990-knockout lines and WT. (CF) Comparison of the lipid content (C), EPA yield (D), TAG content (E), and TAG-associated EPA content (F) between NoTGL1990-knockout lines and WT. Values shown as mean ± SD (in triplicates). *, significant change (p < 0.01) versus wild type.
Marinedrugs 22 00570 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miao, C.; Du, M.; Du, H.; Xu, T.; Wu, S.; Huang, X.; Chen, X.; Lei, S.; Xin, Y. Enhanced Eicosapentaenoic Acid Production via Synthetic Biological Strategy in Nannochloropsis oceanica. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/md22120570

AMA Style

Miao C, Du M, Du H, Xu T, Wu S, Huang X, Chen X, Lei S, Xin Y. Enhanced Eicosapentaenoic Acid Production via Synthetic Biological Strategy in Nannochloropsis oceanica. Marine Drugs. 2024; 22(12):570. https://doi.org/10.3390/md22120570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miao, Congcong, Mingting Du, Hongchao Du, Tao Xu, Shan Wu, Xingwei Huang, Xitao Chen, Suxiang Lei, and Yi Xin. 2024. "Enhanced Eicosapentaenoic Acid Production via Synthetic Biological Strategy in Nannochloropsis oceanica" Marine Drugs 22, no. 12: 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/md22120570

APA Style

Miao, C., Du, M., Du, H., Xu, T., Wu, S., Huang, X., Chen, X., Lei, S., & Xin, Y. (2024). Enhanced Eicosapentaenoic Acid Production via Synthetic Biological Strategy in Nannochloropsis oceanica. Marine Drugs, 22(12), 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/md22120570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop