Web server

Initial WWW project (1989–1991)

In March 1989, Sir Tim Berners-Lee proposed a new project to his employer CERN, with the goal of easing the exchange of information between scientists by using a hypertext system. The proposal titled "HyperText and CERN", asked for comments and it was read by several people. In October 1990 the proposal was reformulated and enriched (having as co-author Robert Cailliau), and finally, it was approved. ^{[3] [4] [5]}

Between late 1990 and early 1991 the project resulted in Berners-Lee and his developers writing and testing several software libraries along with three programs, which initially ran on NeXTSTEP OS installed on NeXT workstations: ^{[6] [7] [5]}

• a graphical web browser, called WorldWideWeb;
• a portable line mode web browser;
• a web server, later known as CERN httpd.

Those early browsers retrieved web pages written in a simple early form of HTML, from web server(s) using a new basic communication protocol that was named HTTP 0.9.

In August 1991 Tim Berners-Lee announced the birth of WWW technology and encouraged scientists to adopt and develop it. ^[8] Soon after, those programs, along with their source code, were made available to people interested in their usage. ^[6] Although the source code was not formally licensed or placed in the public domain, CERN informally allowed users and developers to experiment and further develop on top of them. Berners-Lee started promoting the adoption and the usage of those programs along with their porting to other operating systems. ^[5]

Fast and wild development (1991–1995)

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Number of active web sites (1991–1996) ^{[9] [10]}

In December 1991, the first web server outside Europe was installed at SLAC (U.S.A.). ^[7] This was a very important event because it started trans-continental web communications between web browsers and web servers.

In 1991–1993, CERN web server program continued to be actively developed by the www group, meanwhile, thanks to the availability of its source code and the public specifications of the HTTP protocol, many other implementations of web servers started to be developed.

In April 1993, CERN issued a public official statement stating that the three components of Web software (the basic line-mode client, the web server and the library of common code), along with their source code, were put in the public domain. ^[11] This statement freed web server developers from any possible legal issue about the development of derivative work based on that source code (a threat that in practice never existed).

At the beginning of 1994, the most notable among new web servers was NCSA httpd which ran on a variety of Unix-based OSs and could serve dynamically generated content by implementing the POST HTTP method and the CGI to communicate with external programs. These capabilities, along with the multimedia features of NCSA's Mosaic browser (also able to manage HTML FORMs in order to send data to a web server) highlighted the potential of web technology for publishing and distributed computing applications.

In the second half of 1994, the development of NCSA httpd stalled to the point that a group of external software developers, webmasters and other professional figures interested in that server, started to write and collect patches thanks to the NCSA httpd source code being available to the public domain. At the beginning of 1995 those patches were all applied to the last release of NCSA source code and, after several tests, the Apache HTTP server project was started. ^{[12] [13]}

At the end of 1994, a new commercial web server, named Netsite, was released with specific features. It was the first one of many other similar products that were developed first by Netscape, then also by Sun Microsystems, and finally by Oracle Corporation.

In mid-1995, the first version of IIS was released, for Windows NT OS, by Microsoft. This marked the entry, in the field of World Wide Web technologies, of a very important commercial developer and vendor that has played and still is playing a key role on both sides (client and server) of the web.

In the second half of 1995, CERN and NCSA web servers started to decline (in global percentage usage) because of the widespread adoption of new web servers which had a much faster development cycle along with more features, more fixes applied, and more performances than the previous ones.

Explosive growth and competition (1996–2014)

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Number of active web sites (1996-2002) ^{[10] [14]}

At the end of 1996, there were already over fifty known (different) web server software programs that were available to everybody who wanted to own an Internet domain name and/or to host websites. ^[15] Many of them lived only shortly and were replaced by other web servers.

The publication of RFCs about protocol versions HTTP/1.0 (1996) and HTTP/1.1 (1997, 1999), forced most web servers to comply (not always completely) with those standards. The use of TCP/IP persistent connections (HTTP/1.1) required web servers both to increase the maximum number of concurrent connections allowed and to improve their level of scalability.

Between 1996 and 1999, Netscape Enterprise Server and Microsoft's IIS emerged among the leading commercial options whereas among the freely available and open-source programs Apache HTTP Server held the lead as the preferred server (because of its reliability and its many features).

In those years there was also another commercial, highly innovative and thus notable web server called Zeus (now discontinued) that was known as one of the fastest and most scalable web servers available on market, at least till the first decade of 2000s, despite its low percentage of usage.

Apache resulted in the most used web server from mid-1996 to the end of 2015 when, after a few years of decline, it was surpassed initially by IIS and then by Nginx. Afterward IIS dropped to much lower percentages of usage than Apache (see also market share).

From 2005–2006, Apache started to improve its speed and its scalability level by introducing new performance features (e.g. event MPM and new content cache). ^{[16] [17]} As those new performance improvements initially were marked as experimental, they were not enabled by its users for a long time and so Apache suffered, even more, the competition of commercial servers and, above all, of other open-source servers which meanwhile had already achieved far superior performances (mostly when serving static content) since the beginning of their development and at the time of the Apache decline were able to offer also a long enough list of well tested advanced features.

In fact, a few years after 2000 started, not only other commercial and highly competitive web servers, e.g. LiteSpeed, but also many other open-source programs, often of excellent quality and very high performances, among which should be noted Hiawatha, Cherokee HTTP server, Lighttpd, Nginx and other derived/related products also available with commercial support, emerged.

Around 2007–2008, most popular web browsers increased their previous default limit of 2 persistent connections per host-domain (a limit recommended by RFC-2616) ^[18] to 4, 6 or 8 persistent connections per host-domain, in order to speed up the retrieval of heavy web pages with lots of images, and to mitigate the problem of the shortage of persistent connections dedicated to dynamic objects used for bi-directional notifications of events in web pages. ^[19] Within a year, these changes, on average, nearly tripled the maximum number of persistent connections that web servers had to manage. This trend (of increasing the number of persistent connections) definitely gave a strong impetus to the adoption of reverse proxies in front of slower web servers and it gave also one more chance to the emerging new web servers that could show all their speed and their capability to handle very high numbers of concurrent connections without requiring too many hardware resources (expensive computers with lots of CPUs, RAM and fast disks). ^[20]

New challenges (2015 and later years)

In 2015, RFCs published new protocol version [HTTP/2], and as the implementation of new specifications was not trivial at all, a dilemma arose among developers of less popular web servers (e.g. with a percentage of usage lower than 1% .. 2%), about adding or not adding support for that new protocol version. ^{[21] [22]}

In fact supporting HTTP/2 often required radical changes to their internal implementation due to many factors (practically always required encrypted connections, capability to distinguish between HTTP/1.x and HTTP/2 connections on the same TCP port, binary representation of HTTP messages, message priority, compression of HTTP headers, use of streams also known as TCP/IP sub-connections and related flow-control, etc.) and so a few developers of those web servers opted for not supporting new HTTP/2 version (at least in the near future) also because of these main reasons: ^{[21] [22]}

• protocols HTTP/1.x would have been supported anyway by browsers for a very long time (maybe forever) so that there would be no incompatibility between clients and servers in next future;
• implementing HTTP/2 was considered a task of overwhelming complexity that could open the door to a whole new class of bugs that till 2015 did not exist and so it would have required notable investments in developing and testing the implementation of the new protocol;
• adding HTTP/2 support could always be done in future in case the efforts would be justified.

Instead, developers of most popular web servers, rushed to offer the availability of new protocol, not only because they had the work force and the time to do so, but also because usually their previous implementation of SPDY protocol could be reused as a starting point and because most used web browsers implemented it very quickly for the same reason. Another reason that prompted those developers to act quickly was that webmasters felt the pressure of the ever increasing web traffic and they really wanted to install and to try – as soon as possible – something that could drastically lower the number of TCP/IP connections and speedup accesses to hosted websites. ^[23]

In 2020–2021 the HTTP/2 dynamics about its implementation (by top web servers and popular web browsers) were partly replicated after the publication of advanced drafts of future RFC about HTTP/3 protocol.

Common features

Although web server programs differ in how they are implemented, most of them offer the following common features.

These are basic features that most web servers usually have.

• Static content serving: to be able to serve static content (web files) to clients via HTTP protocol.
• HTTP: support for one or more versions of HTTP protocol in order to send versions of HTTP responses compatible with versions of client HTTP requests, e.g. HTTP/1.0, HTTP/1.1 (eventually also with encrypted connections HTTPS), plus, if available, HTTP/2, HTTP/3.
• Logging: usually web servers have also the capability of logging some information, about client requests and server responses, to log files for security and statistical purposes.

A few other more advanced and popular features (only a very short selection) are the following ones.

• Dynamic content serving: to be able to serve dynamic content (generated on the fly) to clients via HTTP protocol.
• Virtual hosting: to be able to serve many websites (domain names) using only one IP address.
• Authorization: to be able to allow, to forbid or to authorize access to portions of website paths (web resources).
• Content cache: to be able to cache static and/or dynamic content in order to speed up server responses;
• Large file support: to be able to serve files whose size is greater than 2 GB on 32 bit OS.
• Bandwidth throttling: to limit the speed of content responses in order to not saturate the network and to be able to serve more clients;
• Rewrite engine: to map parts of clean URLs (found in client requests) to their real names.
• Custom error pages: support for customized HTTP error messages.

Common tasks

A web server program, when it is running, usually performs several general tasks, (e.g.): ^[1]

• starts, optionally reads and applies settings found in its configuration file(s) or elsewhere, optionally opens log file, starts listening to client connections / requests;
• optionally tries to adapt its general behavior according to its settings and its current operating conditions;
• manages client connection(s) (accepting new ones or closing the existing ones as required);
• receives client requests (by reading HTTP messages):
  • reads and verify each HTTP request message;
  • usually performs URL normalization;
  • usually performs URL mapping (which may default to URL path translation);
  • usually performs URL path translation along with various security checks;
• executes or refuses requested HTTP method:
  • optionally manages URL authorizations;
  • optionally manages URL redirections;
  • optionally manages requests for static resources (file contents):
    • optionally manages directory index files;
    • optionally manages regular files;
  • optionally manages requests for dynamic resources :
    • optionally manages directory listings;
    • optionally manages program or module processing, checking the availability, the start and eventually the stop of the execution of external programs used to generate dynamic content;
    • optionally manages the communications with external programs / internal modules used to generate dynamic content;
• replies to client requests sending proper HTTP responses (e.g. requested resources or error messages) eventually verifying or adding HTTP headers to those sent by dynamic programs / modules;
• optionally logs (partially or totally) client requests and/or its responses to an external user log file or to a system log file by syslog, usually using common log format;
• optionally logs process messages about detected anomalies or other notable events (e.g. in client requests or in its internal functioning) using syslog or some other system facilities; these log messages usually have a debug, warning, error, alert level which can be filtered (not logged) depending on some settings, see also severity level;
• optionally generates statistics about web traffic managed and/or its performances;
• other custom tasks.

Read request message

Web server programs are able: ^{[24] [25] [26]}

• to read an HTTP request message;
• to interpret it;
• to verify its syntax;
• to identify known HTTP headers and to extract their values from them.

Once an HTTP request message has been decoded and verified, its values can be used to determine whether that request can be satisfied or not. This requires many other steps, including security checks .

URL mapping

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(June 2023)

Main article: URL mapping

"URL mapping is the process by which a URL is analyzed to figure out what resource it is referring to, so that that resource can be returned to the requesting client. This process is performed with every request that is made to a web server, with some of the requests being served with a file, such as an HTML document, or a gif image, others with the results of running a CGI program, and others by some other process, such as a built-in module handler, a PHP document, or a Java servlet." ^{[27] [ needs update ]}

In practice, web server programs that implement advanced features, beyond the simple static content serving (e.g. URL rewrite engine, dynamic content serving), usually have to figure out how that URL has to be handled, e.g. as a:

• URL redirection, a redirection to another URL;
• static request of file content;
• dynamic request of:
  • directory listing of files or other sub-directories contained in that directory;
  • other types of dynamic request in order to identify the program / module processor able to handle that kind of URL path and to pass to it other URL parts, i.e. usually path-info and query string variables.

One or more configuration files of web server may specify the mapping of parts of URL path (e.g. initial parts of file path, filename extension and other path components) to a specific URL handler (file, directory, external program or internal module). ^[28]

When a web server implements one or more of the above-mentioned advanced features then the path part of a valid URL may not always match an existing file system path under website directory tree (a file or a directory in file system) because it can refer to a virtual name of an internal or external module processor for dynamic requests.

http://www.example.com/path/file.html

GET /path/file.html HTTP/1.1 Host: www.example.com Connection: keep-alive

/home/www/www.example.com/path/file.html

http://www.example.com/directory1/directory2/

GET /directory1/directory2 HTTP/1.1 Host: www.example.com Connection: keep-alive

/home/www/www.example.com/directory1/directory2/

http://www.example.com/cgi-bin/forum.php?action=view&orderby=thread&date=2021-10-15

GET /cgi-bin/forum.php?action=view&ordeby=thread&date=2021-10-15 HTTP/1.1 Host: www.example.com Connection: keep-alive

/home/www/www.example.com/cgi-bin/forum.php

Manage request message

Once a request has been read, interpreted, and verified, it has to be managed depending on its method, its URL, and its parameters, which may include values of HTTP headers.

In practice, the web server has to handle the request by using one of these response paths: ^[28]

• if something in request was not acceptable (in status line or message headers), web server already sent an error response;
• if request has a method (e.g. OPTIONS) that can be satisfied by general code of web server then a successful response is sent;
• if URL requires authorization then an authorization error message is sent;
• if URL maps to a redirection then a redirect message is sent;
• if URL maps to a dynamic resource (a virtual path or a directory listing) then its handler (an internal module or an external program) is called and request parameters (query string and path info) are passed to it in order to allow it to reply to that request;
• if URL maps to a static resource (usually a file on file system) then the internal static handler is called to send that file;
• if request method is not known or if there is some other unacceptable condition (e.g. resource not found, internal server error, etc.) then an error response is sent.

Serve static content

If a web server program is capable of serving static content and it has been configured to do so, then it is able to send file content whenever a request message has a valid URL path matching (after URL mapping, URL translation and URL redirection) that of an existing file under the root directory of a website and file has attributes which match those required by internal rules of web server program. ^[28]

That kind of content is called static because usually it is not changed by the web server when it is sent to clients and because it remains the same until it is modified (file modification) by some program.

NOTE: when serving static content only, a web server program usually does not change file contents of served websites (as they are only read and never written) and so it suffices to support only these HTTP methods:

• OPTIONS
• HEAD
• GET

Response of static file content can be sped up by a file cache .

Directory index files

Main article: Web server directory index

If a web server program receives a client request message with an URL whose path matches one of an existing directory and that directory is accessible and serving directory index file(s) is enabled then a web server program may try to serve the first of known (or configured) static index file names (a regular file) found in that directory; if no index file is found or other conditions are not met then an error message is returned.

Most used names for static index files are: index.html, index.htm and Default.htm.

Regular files

If a web server program receives a client request message with an URL whose path matches the file name of an existing file and that file is accessible by web server program and its attributes match internal rules of web server program, then web server program can send that file to client.

Usually, for security reasons, most web server programs are pre-configured to serve only regular files or to avoid to use special file types like device files, along with symbolic links or hard links to them. The aim is to avoid undesirable side effects when serving static web resources. ^[30]

Serve dynamic content

If a web server program is capable of serving dynamic content and it has been configured to do so, then it is able to communicate with the proper internal module or external program (associated with the requested URL path) in order to pass to it the parameters of the client request. After that, the web server program reads from it its data response (that it has generated, often on the fly) and then it resends it to the client program who made the request.^{[ citation needed ]}

NOTE: when serving static and dynamic content, a web server program usually has to support also the following HTTP method in order to be able to safely receive data from client(s) and so to be able to host also websites with interactive form(s) that may send large data sets (e.g. lots of data entry or file uploads) to web server / external programs / modules:

• POST

In order to be able to communicate with its internal modules and/or external programs, a web server program must have implemented one or more of the many available gateway interface(s) (see also Web Server Gateway Interfaces used for dynamic content).

The three standard and historical gateway interfaces are the following ones.

CGI

An external CGI program is run by web server program for each dynamic request, then web server program reads from it the generated data response and then resends it to client.

SCGI

An external SCGI program (it usually is a process) is started once by web server program or by some other program / process and then it waits for network connections; every time there is a new request for it, web server program makes a new network connection to it in order to send request parameters and to read its data response, then network connection is closed.

FastCGI

An external FastCGI program (it usually is a process) is started once by web server program or by some other program / process and then it waits for a network connection which is established permanently by web server; through that connection are sent the request parameters and read data responses.

Directory listings

Main article: Web server directory index

A web server program may be capable to manage the dynamic generation (on the fly) of a directory index list of files and sub-directories. ^[31]

If a web server program is configured to do so and a requested URL path matches an existing directory and its access is allowed and no static index file is found under that directory then a web page (usually in HTML format), containing the list of files and/or subdirectories of above mentioned directory, is dynamically generated (on the fly). If it cannot be generated an error is returned.

Some web server programs allow the customization of directory listings by allowing the usage of a web page template (an HTML document containing placeholders, e.g. $(FILE_NAME), $(FILE_SIZE), etc., that are replaced with the field values of each file entry found in directory by web server), e.g. index.tpl or the usage of HTML and embedded source code that is interpreted and executed on the fly, e.g. index.asp, and / or by supporting the usage of dynamic index programs such as CGIs, SCGIs, FCGIs, e.g. index.cgi, index.php, index.fcgi.

Usage of dynamically generated directory listings is usually avoided or limited to a few selected directories of a website because that generation takes much more OS resources than sending a static index page.

The main usage of directory listings is to allow the download of files (usually when their names, sizes, modification date-times or file attributes may change randomly / frequently) as they are, without requiring to provide further information to requesting user. ^[32]

Program or module processing

An external program or an internal module (processing unit) can execute some sort of application function that may be used to get data from or to store data to one or more data repositories, e.g.:^{[ citation needed ]}

• files (file system);
• databases (DBs);
• other sources located in local computer or in other computers.

A processing unit can return any kind of web content, also by using data retrieved from a data repository, e.g.:^{[ citation needed ]}

• a document (e.g. HTML, XML, etc.);
• an image;
• a video;
• structured data, e.g. that may be used to update one or more values displayed by a dynamic page (DHTML) of a web interface and that maybe was requested by an XMLHttpRequest API (see also: dynamic page).

In practice whenever there is content that may vary, depending on one or more parameters contained in client request or in configuration settings, then, usually, it is generated dynamically.

Send response message

Web server programs are able to send response messages as replies to client request messages. ^[24]

An error response message may be sent because a request message could not be successfully read or decoded or analyzed or executed. ^[25]

NOTE: the following sections are reported only as examples to help to understand what a web server, more or less, does; these sections are by any means neither exhaustive nor complete.

Content cache

In order to speed up web server responses by lowering average HTTP response times and hardware resources used, many popular web servers implement one or more content caches, each one specialized in a content category. ^{[38] [39]}

Content is usually cached by its origin, e.g.:

• static content:
  • file cache;
• dynamic content:
  • dynamic cache (module / program output).

Kernel-mode and user-mode web servers

A web server software can be either incorporated into the OS and executed in kernel space, or it can be executed in user space (like other regular applications).

Web servers that run in kernel mode (usually called kernel space web servers) can have direct access to kernel resources and so they can be, in theory, faster than those running in user mode; anyway there are disadvantages in running a web server in kernel mode, e.g.: difficulties in developing (debugging) software whereas run-time critical errors may lead to serious problems in OS kernel.

Web servers that run in user-mode have to ask the system for permission to use more memory or more CPU resources. Not only do these requests to the kernel take time, but they might not always be satisfied because the system reserves resources for its own usage and has the responsibility to share hardware resources with all the other running applications. Executing in user mode can also mean using more buffer/data copies (between user-space and kernel-space) which can lead to a decrease in the performance of a user-mode web server.

Nowadays almost all web server software is executed in user mode (because many of the aforementioned small disadvantages have been overcome by faster hardware, new OS versions, much faster OS system calls and new optimized web server software). See also comparison of web server software to discover which of them run in kernel mode or in user mode (also referred as kernel space or user space).

Performance metrics

For web server software, main key performance metrics (measured under vary operating conditions) usually are at least the following ones (i.e.): ^[48]

• number of requests per second (RPS, similar to QPS , depending on HTTP version and configuration, type of HTTP requests and other operating conditions);
• number of connections per second (CPS), is the number of connections per second accepted by web server (useful when using HTTP/1.0 or HTTP/1.1 with a very low limit of requests / responses per connection, i.e. 1 .. 20);
• network latency + response time for each new client request; usually benchmark tool shows how many requests have been satisfied within a scale of time laps (e.g. within 1ms, 3ms, 5ms, 10ms, 20ms, 30ms, 40ms) and / or the shortest, the average and the longest response time;
• throughput of responses, in bytes per second.

Among the operating conditions, the number (1 .. n) of concurrent client connections used during a test is an important parameter because it allows to correlate the concurrency level supported by web server with results of the tested performance metrics.

Software efficiency

The specific web server software design and model adopted (e.g.):

• single process or multi-process;
• single thread (no thread) or multi-thread for each process;
• usage of coroutines or not;

... and other programming techniques, such as (e.g.):

• minimization of possible CPU cache misses;
• minimization of possible CPU branch mispredictions in critical paths for speed;
• minimization of the number of system calls used to perform a certain function / task;
• other tricks;

... used to implement a web server program, can bias a lot the performances and in particular the scalability level that can be achieved under heavy load or when using high end hardware (many CPUs, disks and lots of RAM).

In practice some web server software models may require more OS resources (specially more CPUs and more RAM) than others to be able to work well and so to achieve target performances.

Operating conditions

There are many operating conditions that can affect the performances of a web server; performance values may vary depending on (i.e.):

• the settings of web server (including the fact that log file is or is not enabled, etc.);
• the HTTP version used by client requests;
• the average HTTP request type (method, length of HTTP headers and optional body);
• whether the requested content is static or dynamic;
• whether the content is cached or not cached (by server and/or by client);
• whether the content is compressed on the fly (when transferred), pre-compressed (i.e. when a file resource is stored on disk already compressed so that web server can send that file directly to the network with the only indication that its content is compressed) or not compressed at all;
• whether the connections are or are not encrypted;
• the average network speed between web server and its clients;
• the number of active TCP connections;
• the number of active processes managed by web server (including external CGI, SCGI, FCGI programs);
• the hardware and software limitations or settings of the OS of the computer(s) on which the web server runs;
• other minor conditions.

Benchmarking

Performances of a web server are typically benchmarked by using one or more of the available automated load testing tools.

Causes of overload

At any time web servers can be overloaded due to one or more of the following causes (e.g.).

• Excess legitimate web traffic. Thousands or even millions of clients connecting to the website in a short amount of time, e.g., Slashdot effect.
• Distributed Denial of Service attacks. A denial-of-service attack (DoS attack) or distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS attack) is an attempt to make a computer or network resource unavailable to its intended users.
• Computer worms that sometimes cause abnormal traffic because of millions of infected computers (not coordinated among them).
• XSS worms can cause high traffic because of millions of infected browsers or web servers.
• Internet bots Traffic not filtered/limited on large websites with very few network resources (e.g. bandwidth) and/or hardware resources (CPUs, RAM, disks).
• Internet (network) slowdowns (e.g. due to packet losses) so that client requests are served more slowly and the number of connections increases so much that server limits are reached.
• Web servers, serving dynamic content, waiting for slow responses coming from back-end computer(s) (e.g. databases), maybe because of too many queries mixed with too many inserts or updates of DB data; in these cases web servers have to wait for back-end data responses before replying to HTTP clients but during these waits too many new client connections / requests arrive and so they become overloaded.
• Web servers (computers) partial unavailability. This can happen because of required or urgent maintenance or upgrade, hardware or software failures such as back-end (e.g. database) failures; in these cases the remaining web servers may get too much traffic and become overloaded.

Symptoms of overload

The symptoms of an overloaded web server are usually the following ones (e.g.).

• Requests are served with (possibly long) delays (from 1 second to a few hundred seconds).
• The web server returns an HTTP error code, such as 500, 502, ^{[49] [50]} 503, ^[51] 504, ^[52] 408, or even an intermittent 404.
• The web server refuses or resets (interrupts) TCP connections before it returns any content.
• In very rare cases, the web server returns only a part of the requested content. This behavior can be considered a bug, even if it usually arises as a symptom of overload.

Anti-overload techniques

To partially overcome above average load limits and to prevent overload, most popular websites use common techniques like the following ones (e.g.).

• Tuning OS parameters for hardware capabilities and usage.
• Tuning web server(s) parameters to improve their security and performances.
• Deploying web cache techniques (not only for static contents but, whenever possible, for dynamic contents too).
• Managing network traffic, by using:
  • Firewalls to block unwanted traffic coming from bad IP sources or having bad patterns;
  • HTTP traffic managers to drop, redirect or rewrite requests having bad HTTP patterns;
  • Bandwidth management and traffic shaping, in order to smooth down peaks in network usage.
• Using different domain names, IP addresses and computers to serve different kinds (static and dynamic) of content; the aim is to separate big or huge files (download.*) (that domain might be replaced also by a CDN) from small and medium-sized files (static.*) and from main dynamic site (maybe where some contents are stored in a backend database) (www.*); the idea is to be able to efficiently serve big or huge (over 10 – 1000 MB) files (maybe throttling downloads) and to fully cache small and medium-sized files, without affecting performances of dynamic site under heavy load, by using different settings for each (group) of web server computers, e.g.:
  • https://download.example.com
  • https://static.example.com
  • https://www.example.com
• Using many web servers (computers) that are grouped together behind a load balancer so that they act or are seen as one big web server.
• Adding more hardware resources (i.e. RAM, fast disks) to each computer.
• Using more efficient computer programs for web servers (see also: software efficiency).
• Using the most efficient Web Server Gateway Interface to process dynamic requests (spawning one or more external programs every time a dynamic page is retrieved, kills performances).
• Using other programming techniques and workarounds, especially if dynamic content is involved, to speed up the HTTP responses (i.e. by avoiding dynamic calls to retrieve objects, such as style sheets, images and scripts), that never change or change very rarely, by copying that content to static files once and then keeping them synchronized with dynamic content).
• Using latest efficient versions of HTTP (e.g. beyond using common HTTP/1.1 also by enabling HTTP/2 and maybe HTTP/3 too, whenever available web server software has reliable support for the latter two protocols) in order to reduce a lot the number of TCP/IP connections started by each client and the size of data exchanged (because of more compact HTTP headers representation and maybe data compression).

Caveats about using HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 protocols

Even if newer HTTP (2 and 3) protocols usually generate less network traffic for each request / response data, they may require more OS resources (i.e. RAM and CPU) used by web server software (because of encrypted data, lots of stream buffers and other implementation details); besides this, HTTP/2 and maybe HTTP/3 too, depending also on settings of web server and client program, may not be the best options for data upload of big or huge files at very high speed because their data streams are optimized for concurrency of requests and so, in many cases, using HTTP/1.1 TCP/IP connections may lead to better results / higher upload speeds (your mileage may vary). ^{[53] [54]}