Function | Heavy-lift launch vehicle |
---|---|
Manufacturer | Lockheed Martin |
Country of origin | United States |
Cost per launch | $432 million (USD) |
Size | |
Height | 50-62 m (164-207 ft) |
Diameter | 3.05 m (10 ft) |
Mass | 943,050 kg (2,079,060 lb) |
Stages | 3-5 |
Capacity | |
Payload to LEO | |
Mass | 21,680 kg(47,790 lb) |
Payload to Polar LEO | |
Mass | 17,600 kg(38,800 lb) |
Payload to GSO | |
Mass | 5,760 kg(12,690 lb) |
Payload to HCO | |
Mass | 5,660 kg(12,470 lb) |
Associated rockets | |
Family | Titan |
Comparable | Atlas V,Delta IV Heavy,Falcon 9 |
Launch history | |
Status | Retired |
Launch sites | SLC-40/41,Cape Canaveral SLC-4E,Vandenberg AFB |
Total launches | 39 [1] (IVA: 22,IVB: 17) |
Success(es) | 35 (IVA: 20,IVB: 15) |
Failure(s) | 4 (IVA: 2,IVB: 2) |
First flight | IV-A: 14 June 1989 IV-B: 23 February 1997 |
Last flight | IV-A: 12 August 1998 IV-B: 19 October 2005 |
Type of passengers/cargo | Lacrosse DSP Milstar Cassini-Huygens |
Boosters (IV-A) –UA1207 | |
No. boosters | 2 |
Powered by | United Technologies UA1207 |
Maximum thrust | 14.234 MN (3,200,000 lbf) |
Specific impulse | 272 seconds (2667 N·s/kg) |
Burn time | 120 seconds |
Propellant | PBAN |
Boosters (IV-B) –SRMU | |
No. boosters | 2 |
Powered by | Hercules USRM [2] |
Maximum thrust | 15.12 MN (3,400,000 lbf) |
Specific impulse | 286 seconds (2805 N·s/kg) |
Burn time | 140 seconds |
Propellant | HTPB |
First stage | |
Powered by | 2 LR87 [3] |
Maximum thrust | 2,440 kN (548,000 lbf) |
Specific impulse | 302 seconds (2962 N·s/kg) |
Burn time | 164 seconds |
Propellant | N2O4 / Aerozine 50 |
Second stage | |
Powered by | 1 LR91 |
Maximum thrust | 467 kN (105,000 lbf) |
Specific impulse | 316 seconds (3100 N·s/kg) |
Burn time | 223 seconds |
Propellant | N2O4 / Aerozine 50 |
Third stage (Optional) –Centaur-T | |
Powered by | 2 RL10 |
Maximum thrust | 147 kN (33,100 lbf) |
Specific impulse | 444 seconds (4354 N·s/kg) |
Burn time | 625 seconds |
Propellant | LH2/LOX |
Titan IV was a family of heavy-lift space launch vehicles developed by Martin Marietta and operated by the United States Air Force from 1989 to 2005. [4] Launches were conducted from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station,Florida [5] and Vandenberg Air Force Base,California. [6]
The Titan IV was the last of the Titan family of rockets,originally developed by the Glenn L. Martin Company in 1958. It was retired in 2005 due to their high cost of operation and concerns over its toxic hypergolic propellants,and replaced with the Atlas V and Delta IV launch vehicles under the EELV program. The final launch (B-30) from Cape Canaveral occurred on 29 April 2005,and the final launch from Vandenberg AFB occurred on 19 October 2005. [7] Lockheed Martin Space Systems built the Titan IVs near Denver,Colorado,under contract to the US government. [1]
Two Titan IV vehicles are currently on display at the National Museum of the United States Air Force in Dayton,Ohio and the Evergreen Aviation and Space Museum in McMinnville,Oregon.
The Titan IV was developed to provide assured capability to launch Space Shuttle–class payloads for the Air Force. The Titan IV could be launched with no upper stage,the Inertial Upper Stage (IUS),or the Centaur upper stage.
The Titan IV was made up of two large solid-fuel rocket boosters and a two-stage liquid-fueled core. The two storable liquid fuel core stages used Aerozine 50 fuel and nitrogen tetroxide oxidizer. These propellants are hypergolic,igniting on contact,and are liquids at room temperature,so no tank insulation is needed. This allowed the launcher to be stored in a ready state for extended periods,but both propellants are extremely toxic.
The Titan IV could be launched from either coast:SLC-40 or 41 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station near Cocoa Beach,Florida and at SLC-4E,at Vandenberg Air Force Base launch sites 55 miles northwest of Santa Barbara California. Launches to polar orbits occurred from Vandenberg,with most other launches taking place at Cape Canaveral.
Titan IV-A flew with steel-cased solid UA1207 rocket motors (SRMs) produced by Chemical Systems Division. [8] [9] [10]
The Titan IV-B evolved from the Titan III family and was similar to the Titan 34D.
While the launcher family had an extremely good reliability record in its first two decades,this changed in the 1980s with the loss of a Titan 34D in 1985 followed by the disastrous explosion of another in 1986 due to a SRM failure. Due to this,the Titan IV-B vehicle was intended to use the new composite-casing Upgraded Solid Rocket Motors. [11] Due to development problems the first few Titan IV-B launches flew with the old-style UA1207 SRMs.
In 1988–89,The Ralph M. Parsons Company designed and built a full-scale steel tower and deflector facility,which was used to test the Titan IV Solid Rocket Motor Upgrade (SRMU). [13] The launch and the effect of the SRMU thrust force on the Titan IV vehicle were modeled. To evaluate the magnitude of the thrust force,the SRMU was connected to the steel tower through load measurement systems and launched in-place. It was the first full-scale test conducted to simulate the effects of the SRMU on the Titan IV vehicle. [14]
In the early 1980s,General Dynamics developed a plan to assemble a lunar landing spacecraft in-orbit under the name Early Lunar Access. A Space Shuttle would lift a lunar lander into orbit and then a Titan IV rocket would launch with a modified Centaur G-Prime stage to rendezvous and dock. The plan required upgrading the Space Shuttle and Titan IV to use lighter aluminium-lithium alloy propellant tanks. [15] The plan never came to fruition,but in the 1990s the Shuttle's External Tank was converted to aluminum-lithium tanks to rendezvous with the highly inclined orbit of the Russian Mir Space Station. [16]
The IV-A (40nA) used boosters with steel casings,the IV-B (40nB) used boosters with composite casings (the SRMU).
Type 401 used a Centaur 3rd stage,type 402 used an IUS 3rd stage. The other 3 types (without 3rd stages) were 403,404,and 405:
The Titan rocket family was established in October 1955 when the Air Force awarded the Glenn L. Martin Company (later Martin-Marietta,now part of Lockheed Martin) a contract to build an intercontinental ballistic missile (SM-68). The resulting Titan I was the nation's first two-stage ICBM and complemented the Atlas ICBM as the second underground,vertically stored,silo-based ICBM. Both stages of the Titan I used liquid oxygen and RP-1 as propellants.
A subsequent version of the Titan family,the Titan II,was a two-stage evolution of the Titan I,but was much more powerful and used different propellants. Designated as LGM-25C,the Titan II was the largest missile developed for the USAF at that time. The Titan II had newly developed engines which used Aerozine 50 and nitrogen tetroxide as fuel and oxidizer in a self-igniting,hypergolic propellant combination,allowing the Titan II to be stored underground ready to launch. Titan II was the first Titan vehicle to be used as a space launcher.
Development of the space launch only Titan III began in 1964,resulting in the Titan IIIA,eventually followed by the Titan IV-A and IV-B.
By the mid-1980s the United States government worried that the Space Shuttle,designed to launch all American payloads and replace all unmanned rockets,would not be reliable enough for military and classified missions. In 1984 Under Secretary of the Air Force and Director of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Pete Aldridge decided to purchase Complementary Expendable Launch Vehicles (CELV) for ten NRO payloads;the name came from the government's expectation that the rockets would "complement" the shuttle. Later renamed Titan IV, [18] the rocket would only carry three military payloads [19] paired with Centaur stages and fly exclusively from LC-41 at Cape Canaveral. However,the Challenger accident in 1986 caused a renewed dependence on expendable launch systems,with the Titan IV program significantly expanded. At the time of its introduction,the Titan IV was the largest and most capable expendable launch vehicle used by the USAF. [20]
The post-Challenger program added Titan IV versions with the Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) or no upper stages,increased the number of flights,and converted LC-40 at the Cape for Titan IV launches. As of 1991,almost forty total Titan IV launches were scheduled and a new,improved SRM (solid rocket motor) casing using lightweight composite materials was introduced.
In 1990,the Titan IV Selected Acquisition Report estimated the total cost for the acquisition of 65 Titan IV vehicles over a period of 16 years to US$18.3 billion (inflation-adjusted US$ 42.7 billion in 2024). [21]
In October 1997,a Titan IV-B rocket launched Cassini–Huygens ,a pair of probes sent to Saturn. It was the only use of a Titan IV for a non-Department of Defense launch. Huygens landed on Titan on January 14,2005. Cassini remained in orbit around Saturn. The Cassini Mission ended on September 15,2017,when the spacecraft was sent into Saturn's atmosphere to burn up.
While an improvement over the shuttle,the Titan IV was expensive and unreliable. [18] By the 1990s,there were also growing safety concerns over its toxic propellants. The Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program resulted in the development of the Atlas V,Delta IV,and Delta IV Heavy launch vehicles,which replaced Titan IV and a number of other legacy launch systems. The new EELVs eliminated the use of hypergolic propellants,reduced costs,and were much more versatile than the legacy vehicles.
In 2014,the National Museum of the United States Air Force in Dayton,Ohio,began a project to restore a Titan IV-B rocket. This effort was successful,with the display opening June 8,2016. [22] The only other surviving Titan IV components are at the Wings Over the Rockies Air and Space Museum in Denver,Colorado which has two Titan Stage 1 engines,one Titan Stage 2 engine,and the interstage ‘skirt’on outdoor display; [23] and at the Evergreen Aviation and Space Museum in McMinnville,Oregon,including the core stages and parts of the solid rocket motor assembly. [24]
Date / Time (UTC) | Launch Site | S/N | Type | Payload | Outcome | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 June 1989 13:18 | CCAFS LC-41 | K-1 | 402A / IUS | USA-39 (DSP-14) | Success | An engine bell burn-through left only a narrow margin for success. |
8 June 1990 05:21 | CCAFS LC-41 | K-4 | 405A | USA-60 (NOSS) USA-61 (NOSS) USA-62 (NOSS) USA-59 Satellite Launch Dispenser Communications (SLDCOM) | Success | |
13 November 1990 00:37 | CCAFS LC-41 | K-6 | 402A / IUS | USA-65 (DSP-15) | Success | |
8 March 1991 12:03 | VAFB LC-4E | K-5 | 403A | USA-69 (Lacrosse) | Success | |
8 November 1991 07:07 | VAFB LC-4E | K-8 | 403A | USA-74 (NOSS) USA-76 (NOSS) USA-77 (NOSS) USA-72 SLDCOM | Success | |
28 November 1992 21:34 | VAFB LC-4E | K-3 | 404A | USA-86 (KH-11) | Success | |
2 August 1993 19:59 | VAFB LC-4E | K-11 | 403A | NOSS x3 SLDCOM | Failure | SRM exploded at T+101s due to damage caused during maintenance on ground. |
7 February 1994 21:47 | CCAFS LC-40 | K-10 | 401A / Centaur | USA-99 (Milstar-1) | Success | |
3 May 1994 15:55 | CCAFS LC-41 | K-7 | 401A / Centaur | USA-103 (Trumpet) | Success | |
27 August 1994 08:58 | CCAFS LC-41 | K-9 | 401A / Centaur | USA-105 (Mercury) | Success | |
22 December 1994 22:19 | CCAFS LC-40 | K-14 | 402A / IUS | USA-107 (DSP-17) | Success | |
14 May 1995 13:45 | CCAFS LC-40 | K-23 | 401A / Centaur | USA-110 (Orion) | Success | |
10 July 1995 12:38 | CCAFS LC-41 | K-19 | 401A / Centaur | USA-112 (Trumpet) | Success | |
6 November 1995 05:15 | CCAFS LC-40 | K-21 | 401A / Centaur | USA-115 (Milstar-2) | Success | |
5 December 1995 21:18 | VAFB LC-4E | K-15 | 404A | USA-116 (KH-11) | Success | |
24 April 1996 23:37 | CCAFS LC-41 | K-16 | 401A / Centaur | USA-118 (Mercury) | Success | |
12 May 1996 21:32 | VAFB LC-4E | K-22 | 403A | USA-120 (NOSS) USA-121 (NOSS) USA-122 (NOSS) USA-119 (SLDCOM) USA-123 Tethers in Space Physics Satellite (TiPS) USA-124 (TiPS) | Success | |
3 July 1996 00:30 | CCAFS LC-40 | K-2 | 405A | USA-125 (SDS) | Success | |
20 December 1996 18:04 | VAFB LC-4E | K-13 | 404A | USA-129 (KH-11) | Success | NROL-2 |
23 February 1997 20:20 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-24 | 402B / IUS | USA-130 (DSP-18) | Success | |
15 October 1997 08:43 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-33 | 401B / Centaur | Cassini Huygens | Success | |
24 October 1997 02:32 | VAFB LC-4E | A-18 | 403A | USA-133 (Lacrosse) | Success | NROL-3 |
8 November 1997 02:05 | CCAFS LC-41 | A-17 | 401A / Centaur | USA-136 (Trumpet) | Success | NROL-4 |
9 May 1998 01:38 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-25 | 401B / Centaur | USA-139 (Orion) | Success | NROL-6 |
12 August 1998 11:30 | CCAFS LC-41 | A-20 | 401A / Centaur | NROL-7 (Mercury) | Failure | Guidance system short-circuited at T+40s due to frayed wire, vehicle lost control and destroyed by range safety. |
9 April 1999 17:01 | CCAFS LC-41 | B-27 | 402B / IUS | USA-142 (DSP-19) | Failure | Spacecraft failed to separate from IUS stage. |
30 April 1999 16:30 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-32 | 401B / Centaur | USA-143 (Milstar-3) | Failure | Centaur software database error caused loss of attitude control, insertion burns done incorrectly. Satellite deployed into useless orbit. |
22 May 1999 09:36 | VAFB LC-4E | B-12 | 404B | USA-144 (Misty) | Success | NROL-8 |
8 May 2000 16:01 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-29 | 402B / IUS | USA-149 (DSP-20) | Success | |
17 August 2000 23:45 | VAFB LC-4E | B-28 | 403B | USA-152 (Lacrosse) | Success | NROL-11 |
27 February 2001 21:20 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-41 | 401B / Centaur | USA-157 (Milstar-4) | Success | |
6 August 2001 07:28 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-31 | 402B / IUS | USA-159 (DSP-21) | Success | |
5 October 2001 21:21 | VAFB LC-4E | B-34 | 404B | USA-161 (KH-11) | Success | NROL-14 |
16 January 2002 00:30 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-38 | 401B / Centaur | USA-164 (Milstar-5) | Success | |
8 April 2003 13:43 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-35 | 401B / Centaur | USA-169 (Milstar-6) | Success | |
9 September 2003 04:29 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-36 | 401B / Centaur | USA-171 (Orion) | Success | NROL-19 |
14 February 2004 18:50 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-39 | 402B / IUS | USA-176 (DSP-22) | Success | |
30 April 2005 00:50 | CCAFS LC-40 | B-30 | 405B | USA-182 (Lacrosse) | Success | NROL-16 |
19 October 2005 18:05 | VAFB LC-4E | B-26 | 404B | USA-186 (KH-11) | Success | NROL-20 |
The Titan IV experienced four catastrophic launch failures.
On August 2, 1993, Titan IV K-11 lifted from SLC-4E carrying a NOSS SIGNIT satellite. Unusually for DoD launches, the Air Force invited civilian press to cover the launch, which became more of a story than intended when the booster exploded 101 seconds after liftoff. Investigation found that one of the two SRMs had burned through, resulting in the destruction of the vehicle in a similar manner as the earlier 34D-9 failure. An investigation found that an improper repair job was the cause of the accident. [25]
After Titan 34D-9, extensive measures had been put in place to ensure proper SRM operating condition, including X-raying the motor segments during prelaunch checks. The SRMs that went onto K-11 had originally been shipped to Cape Canaveral, where X-rays revealed anomalies in the solid propellant mixture in one segment. The defective area was removed by a pie-shaped cut in the propellant block. However, most of CSD's qualified personnel had left the program by this point and so the repair crew in question did not know the proper procedure. After replacement, they neglected to seal the area where the cut in the propellant block had been made. Post repair X-rays were enough for CC personnel to disqualify the SRMs from flight, but the SRMs were then shipped to Vandenberg and approved anyway. The result was a near-repeat of 34D-9; a gap was left between the propellant and SRM casing and another burn-through occurred during launch.
1998 saw the failure of Titan K-17 with a Navy ELINT Mercury (satellite) from Cape Canaveral around 40 seconds into the flight. K-17 was several years old and the last Titan IV-A to be launched. The post-accident investigation showed that the booster had dozens of damaged or chafed wires and should never have been launched in that operating condition, but the Air Force had put extreme pressure on launch crews to meet program deadlines. The Titan's fuselage was filled with numerous sharp metal protrusions that made it nearly impossible to install, adjust, or remove wiring without it getting damaged. Quality control at Lockheed's Denver plant, where Titan vehicles were assembled, was described as "awful".
The proximal cause of the failure was an electrical short that caused a momentary power dropout to the guidance computer at T+39 seconds. After power was restored, the computer sent a spurious pitch down and yaw to the right command. At T+40 seconds, the Titan was traveling at near supersonic speed and could not handle this action without suffering a structural failure. The sudden pitch downward and resulting aerodynamic stress caused one of the SRMs to separate. The ISDS (Inadvertent Separation Destruct System) automatically triggered, rupturing the SRM and taking the rest of the launch vehicle with it. At T+45 seconds, the Range Safety Officer sent the destruct command to ensure any remaining large pieces of the booster were broken up. [26]
An extensive recovery effort was launched, both to diagnose the cause of the accident and recover debris from the classified satellite. All of the debris from the Titan had impacted offshore, between three and five miles downrange, and at least 30% of the booster was recovered from the sea floor. Debris continued to wash ashore for days afterward, and the salvage operation continued until October 15.
The Air Force had pushed for a "launch on demand" program for DOD payloads, something that was almost impossible to pull off especially given the lengthy preparation and processing time needed for a Titan IV launch (at least 60 days). Shortly before retiring in 1994, General Chuck Horner referred to the Titan program as "a nightmare". The 1998-99 schedule had called for four launches in less than 12 months. The first of these was Titan K-25 which successfully orbited an Orion SIGNIT satellite on May 9, 1998. The second was the K-17 failure, and the third was the K-32 failure.
After a delay caused by the investigation of the previous failure, the 9 April 1999 launch of K-32 carried a DSP early warning satellite. The IUS second stage failed to separate, leaving the payload in a useless orbit. Investigation into this failure found that wiring harnesses in the IUS had been wrapped too tightly with electrical tape so that a plug failed to disconnect properly and prevented the two IUS stages from separating.
The fourth launch was K-26 on April 30, 1999, carrying a Milstar communications satellite. During the Centaur coast phase flight, the roll control thrusters fired open-loop until the RCS fuel was depleted, causing the upper stage and payload to rotate rapidly. On restart, the Centaur cartwheeled out of control and left its payload in a useless orbit. This failure was found to be the result of an incorrectly programmed equation in the guidance computer. The error caused the roll rate gyro data to be ignored by the flight computer. [27]
A solid-propellant rocket or solid rocket is a rocket with a rocket engine that uses solid propellants (fuel/oxidizer). The earliest rockets were solid-fuel rockets powered by gunpowder; The inception of gunpowder rockets in warfare can be credited to the ancient Chinese, and in the 13th century, the Mongols played a pivotal role in facilitating their westward adoption.
Titan was a family of United States expendable rockets used between 1959 and 2005. The Titan I and Titan II were part of the US Air Force's intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) fleet until 1987. The space launch vehicle versions contributed the majority of the 368 Titan launches, including all the Project Gemini crewed flights of the mid-1960s. Titan vehicles were also used to lift US military payloads as well as civilian agency reconnaissance satellites and to send interplanetary scientific probes throughout the Solar System.
The SM-65 Atlas was the first operational intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) developed by the United States and the first member of the Atlas rocket family. It was built for the U.S. Air Force by the Convair Division of General Dynamics at an assembly plant located in Kearny Mesa, San Diego.
Delta II was an expendable launch system, originally designed and built by McDonnell Douglas, and sometimes known as the Thorad Delta 1. Delta II was part of the Delta rocket family, derived directly from the Delta 3000, and entered service in 1989. There were two main variants, the Delta 6000 and Delta 7000, with the latter also having "Light" and "Heavy" subvariants. During its career, Delta II flew several notable payloads, including 24 Global Positioning System (GPS) Block II satellites, several dozen NASA payloads, and 60 Iridium communication satellites. The rocket flew its final mission, ICESat-2, on 15 September 2018, earning the launch vehicle a streak of 100 successful missions in a row, with the last failure being GPS IIR-1 in 1997. In the late 1990s, Delta II was developed further into the unsuccessful Delta III, which was in turn developed into the more capable and successful Delta IV, though the latter shares little heritage with the original Thor and Delta rockets.
The Delta rocket family was a versatile range of American rocket-powered expendable launch systems that provided space launch capability in the United States from 1960 to 2024. Japan also launched license-built derivatives from 1975 to 1992. More than 300 Delta rockets were launched with a 95% success rate. The series was phased out in favor of the Vulcan Centaur, with the Delta IV Heavy rocket's last launch occurring on April 9, 2024.
Delta IV was a group of five expendable launch systems in the Delta rocket family. It flew 45 missions from 2002 to 2024. Originally designed by Boeing's Defense, Space and Security division for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program, the Delta IV became a United Launch Alliance (ULA) product in 2006. The Delta IV was primarily a launch vehicle for United States Air Force (USAF) military payloads, but was also used to launch a number of United States government non-military payloads and a single commercial satellite.
The Saturn I was a rocket designed as the United States' first medium lift launch vehicle for up to 20,000-pound (9,100 kg) low Earth orbit payloads. Its development was taken over from the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) in 1958 by the newly formed civilian NASA. Its design proved sound and flexible. It was successful in initiating the development of liquid hydrogen-fueled rocket propulsion, launching the Pegasus satellites, and flight verification of the Apollo command and service module launch phase aerodynamics. Ten Saturn I rockets were flown before it was replaced by the heavy lift derivative Saturn IB, which used a larger, higher total impulse second stage and an improved guidance and control system. It also led the way to development of the super-heavy lift Saturn V which carried the first men to landings on the Moon in the Apollo program.
Titan IIIB was the collective name for a number of derivatives of the Titan II ICBM and Titan III launch vehicle, modified by the addition of an Agena upper stage. It consisted of five separate rockets. The Titan-3B Agena-D was a basic Titan IIIA with an Agena D upper stage. The Titan 23B was a basic Titan II with an Agena upper stage, and the Titan 24B was the same concept, but using the slightly enlarged Titan IIIM rocket as the base. The Titan 33B was a Titan 23B with the Agena enclosed in an enlarged fairing, in order to allow larger payloads to be launched. The final member of the Titan IIIB family was the Titan 34B which was a Titan 24B with the larger fairing used on the Titan 33B.
The Titan IIIC was an expendable launch system used by the United States Air Force from 1965 until 1982. It was the first Titan booster to feature large solid rocket motors and was planned to be used as a launcher for the Dyna-Soar, though the spaceplane was cancelled before it could fly. The majority of the launcher's payloads were DoD satellites, for military communications and early warning, though one flight (ATS-6) was performed by NASA. The Titan IIIC was launched exclusively from Cape Canaveral while its sibling, the Titan IIID, was launched only from Vandenberg AFB.
Atlas II was a member of the Atlas family of launch vehicles, which evolved from the successful Atlas missile program of the 1950s. The Atlas II was a direct evolution of the Atlas I, featuring longer first-stage tanks, higher-performing engines, and the option for strap-on solid rocket boosters. It was designed to launch payloads into low Earth orbit, geosynchronous transfer orbit or geosynchronous orbit. Sixty-three launches of the Atlas II, IIA and IIAS models were carried out between 1991 and 2004; all sixty-three launches were successes, making the Atlas II a highly reliable space launch system. The Atlas line was continued by the Atlas III, used between 2000 and 2005, and the Atlas V, which is still in use as of 2024.
The Atlas-Centaur was a United States expendable launch vehicle derived from the SM-65 Atlas D missile. The vehicle featured a Centaur upper stage, the first such stage to use high-performance liquid hydrogen as fuel. Launches were conducted from Launch Complex 36 at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS) in Florida. After a strenuous flight test program, Atlas-Centaur went on to launch several crucial spaceflight missions for the United States, including Surveyor 1, and Pioneer 10/11. The vehicle would be continuously developed and improved into the 1990s, with the last direct descendant being the highly successful Atlas II.
The Minotaur is a family of United States solid-fuel launch vehicles repurposed from retired Minuteman and Peacekeeper model intercontinental ballistic missiles. Built by Northrop Grumman under the Space Force's Rocket Systems Launch Program, these vehicles are used for various space and test launch missions.
United Launch Alliance, LLC (ULA) is an American launch service provider formed in December 2006 as a joint venture between Lockheed Martin Space and Boeing Defense, Space & Security. The company designs, assembles, sells and launches rockets, but the company subcontracts out the production of rocket engines and solid rocket boosters.
The Inertial Upper Stage (IUS), originally designated the Interim Upper Stage, was a two-stage, solid-fueled space launch system developed by Boeing for the United States Air Force beginning in 1976 for raising payloads from low Earth orbit to higher orbits or interplanetary trajectories following launch aboard a Titan 34D or Titan IV rocket as its upper stage, or from the payload bay of the Space Shuttle as a space tug.
Atlas is a family of US missiles and space launch vehicles that originated with the SM-65 Atlas. The Atlas intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) program was initiated in the late 1950s under the Convair Division of General Dynamics. Atlas was a liquid propellant rocket burning RP-1 kerosene fuel with liquid oxygen in three engines configured in an unusual "stage-and-a-half" or "parallel staging" design: two outboard booster engines were jettisoned along with supporting structures during ascent, while the center sustainer engine, propellant tanks and other structural elements remained connected through propellant depletion and engine shutdown.
The Titan 34D was a United States expendable launch vehicle used to launch a number of satellites for military applications.
The Atlas SLV-3, or SLV-3 Atlas was an American expendable launch system derived from the SM-65 Atlas / SM-65D Atlas missile. It was a member of the Atlas family of rockets.
The Delta 3000 series was an American expendable launch system which was used to conduct 38 orbital launches between 1975 and 1989. It was a member of the Delta family of rockets. Several variants existed, which were differentiated by a four digit numerical code.
The 6555th Aerospace Test Group is an inactive United States Air Force unit. It was last assigned to the Eastern Space and Missile Center and stationed at Patrick Air Force Base, Florida. It was inactivated on 1 October 1990.
The Star is a family of US solid-propellant rocket motors originally developed by Thiokol and used by many space propulsion and launch vehicle stages. They are used almost exclusively as an upper stage, often as an apogee kick motor. The number designations refer to the approximate diameter of the fuel casing in inches.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)