Common Reporting Standard

Last updated

The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) is an information standard for the Automatic Exchange Of Information (AEOI) regarding financial accounts on a global level, between tax authorities, which the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) developed in 2014.

Contents

Its purpose is to combat tax evasion. The idea was based on the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) implementation agreements and its legal basis is the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (MCAA). 120 countries have signed the agreement to implement, and the MCAA remains open for more countries to adopt. [1] First reporting occurred in 2017, with many of the rest starting in 2018.

History

Until 2014, the parties to most treaties for sharing asset, income and tax information internationally had shared it upon request, which was not effective in preventing tax evasion. [2]

2014 declaration

In May 2014, forty-seven countries tentatively agreed on a "common reporting standard", formally referred to as the Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information: an agreement to share information on their residents' assets and income automatically in conformation with the standard. [3] Endorsing countries included all 38 OECD countries, as well as Argentina, Brazil, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and South Africa. [3]

In September 2014, the G-20 major economies, at their meeting in Cairns, Australia, issued a G20 Common Reporting Standard implementation plan. [4]

The new system was intended to transfer all relevant information automatically and systematically. The agreement has informally been referred to as GATCA (the global version of FATCA)", [2] but "CRS is not just an extension of FATCA". [5]

Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement, 2014-present

As of October 2014, 51 countries had signed up to the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement (MCAA), to automatically exchange information based on Article 6 of the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters [6] The agreement specifies the details of what information will be exchanged and when, as set out in the Standard. [7]

As of July 2015, 53 jurisdictions had signed the agreement to automatically exchange information; [8] As of July 2016 83 jurisdictions had signed the agreement. [7]

All European Union (EU) countries, China, India, Hong Kong, Russia and 109 countries altogether have agreed[ when? ] to become signatories. [9] Yet many countries will not participate in the automatic information exchange. [10] Many of those that have not signed are small countries. In April 2016, shortly after the release of the controversial Panama papers, Panama adopted the Multilateral Competent Authorities Agreement (MCAA) [11] and signed the MCAA in Paris in January 2018 joining the CRS MCAA as the 98th jurisdiction. [12] In the United States, a different cross-border tax compliance approach is promoted through the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).[ citation needed ] The U.S. receives information relating to US citizens' accounts from many countries due to the compliance requirements of the FATCA. The United States, in many cases, will reciprocate by sharing banking data with countries for accounts which their citizens hold in the U.S., but not automatically, as is required by the U.S. in FATCA. [13]

In 2023, the Common Reporting Standard and the related MCAA became part of the International Standards for Automatic Exchange of Information in Tax Matters. [14] That new agreement primarily reflects the agreement by the OECD of a new exchange of information standard applicable to crypto-assets, the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework, commonly referred to as CARF. However, the OECD members also agreed a substantial number of changes to the CRS regime itself, designed to improve compliance.

Information exchanged

The information and its exchange format are governed by a detailed standard, whose details are listed in a 44-page long document. [15]

Each participating country will annually automatically exchange with the other country the below information in the case of Jurisdiction A with respect to each Jurisdiction B reportable account, and in the case of Jurisdiction B with respect to each Jurisdiction A reportable account: [16]

  1. Name, address, Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) and date and place of birth of each Reportable Person.
  2. Account number
  3. Name and identifying number of the reporting financial institution;
  4. Account balance or value as of the end of the relevant calendar year (or other appropriate reporting period) or at its closure, if the account was closed.
  5. Distributions made to the account (dividends, interest, gross proceeds/redemptions, other)

Information collection

Like FATCA, the Standard requires all financial institutions operating in a country to apply specified due diligence procedures to customers to determine the customers' country or countries of tax residence. Financial institutions typically include all banks and asset managers, as well as certain insurance companies. Those financial institutions then report information to their domestic tax authority annually in advance of 30 September, for onward exchange with other jurisdictions.

The key compliance tool used by the Standard is the 'self-certification' of tax residence, which is required to be completed by all individuals and most entities who open an 'in scope' financial account. Financial accounts are generally in scope where they represent assets of the individual or entity - such as banks accounts, investments in bonds or equities, or investments into collective investment vehicles. Loans, credit cards and other financial products are not in scope for reporting. [17]

As a result, most individuals opening bank accounts in participating countries will be asked for the tax residence and, if they are not resident in the country in which they are opening the account, their Taxpayer Identification Number. [18]

The Standard allows some discretion for each national authority to determine the due diligence approach, but only within minimum standards determined by the OECD: "The term "reportable account" means a [Jurisdiction A] reportable account or a [Jurisdiction B] reportable account, depending on the context, provided it has been identified as such pursuant to due diligence procedures, consistent with the Annex, in place in [Jurisdiction A] or [Jurisdiction B]." [16]

The OECD conducts peer reviews of jurisdictions to ensure compliance with the Standard and requires jurisdictions with deficiencies to correct domestic laws or guidance to bring their approach into line with the OECD's minimum standards. [19]

CRS Reporting Errors

Compliance with the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) can be challenging for financial institutions, resulting in common reporting errors that may incur penalties. [20] Key categories of CRS errors include:

1. Incomplete or Incorrect Account Holder Information

Frequent errors include missing Tax Identification Numbers (TINs), incomplete dates of birth, and outdated account holder details. Regular data review and implementing procedures to solicit missing information are essential for accuracy. [21] [22]

2. Incorrect Entity Classification

Misclassifying account holders, such as passive NFEs as active NFEs, disrupts compliance. Detailed, consistent classification protocols and quality control checks are recommended to mitigate these issues. [23] [24]

3. Errors in Data Formatting

Data formatting issues, including XML schema errors, invalid characters, and incorrect date formats, often lead to report rejections. Using XML validation tools and enforcing standards for character encoding and date formats can minimize these errors. [25] [26]

4. Threshold and Exemption Misinterpretations

Misunderstandings regarding reporting thresholds and applicable exemptions often result in non-compliance. Regular audits, comprehensive staff training, and automated checks are crucial to ensure accurate interpretation and application of CRS requirements.

Participants

The European Union adopted the CRS on 1 January 2016 after amending the Directive on Administrative Cooperation in the field taxation (Directive 2011/16). First reports were submitted by September 2017 and subsequently exchanged between jurisdictions.

As of June 2017, the following countries committed to start reporting in 2017:

Anguilla, Argentina, Barbados, Belgium, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Bulgaria, Cayman Islands, Colombia, Croatia, Curaçao, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar,Georgia Greece, Greenland, Guernsey, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Isle of Man, Italy, Jersey, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Montserrat, Netherlands, Niue, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Seychelles, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Trinidad and Tobago, Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom [27]

Starting to report in 2018:

Albania, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Australia, Austria, The Bahamas, Bahrain, Belize, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, China, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Dominica, Ghana, Grenada, Hong Kong (China), Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Marshall Islands, Macao (China), Malaysia, Mauritius, Monaco, Nauru, New Zealand, Pakistan, Panama, Qatar, Russia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Samoa, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sint Maarten, Turkey, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, Uruguay, Vanuatu [27]

Starting to report in 2024: Ukraine. [28]

The OECD maintains a full list of participants, which includes details of primary legislation, guidance and other relevant information. [29]

Non-CRS countries participating in global transparency for tax purposes

Of the 154 countries which have signed on the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, [30] the following countries have not signed on to the CRS: [31]

(Incomplete list as of June 2017) Armenia, Azerbaijan, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Gabon, Guatemala, Guyana, Jamaica, Kenya, Kingdom of Lesotho, Liberia, Maldives, Mauritania, Moldova, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, North Macedonia, Senegal, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, United States. [31]

Non-participating countries

(List as of June 2019) 59 countries have not signed the CRS Standard yet: [32] [33] [34] Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Bangladesh, Belarus, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Burundi, Central African Republic, Comoros, Congo, Cuba, East Timor, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Honduras, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kiribati, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Libya, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, North Korea, Palau, São Tomé and Príncipe, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Syria, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Tonga, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Uzbekistan, Vatican City State, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

Reactions

Private sector

In 2016, a legal expert complained that "The CRS has a much more ambitious scope, however, and modelling the standard on the FATCA rules has created problems for implementing it in Europe". [35] And a "private sector advocacy group representing financial services and law firms" went even further seeing a "showdown" between the two regimes. [36] In developed countries, the introduction of the CRS has raised professional concerns about the protection of privacy rights for clients of certain legal entities, such as trusts, where protection of sensitive financial information from public disclosure safeguards the beneficiaries against potential financial exploitation and ensures discretion in personal and family matters. [37]

Developing countries

Transparency groups have reacted in various ways, some of them criticising how developing countries were (not) considered and involved. [38] Collecting and providing information can be so costly and difficult for developing countries obviating participation in the scheme. Instead of offering a period of non-reciprocity, where developing countries could simply receive financial data, the only mention of non-reciprocity agreements is catering to tax havens who do not receive information from other jurisdictions since they would have no use for it (such jurisdictions are still required to provide information under CRS). [38]

Loopholes

While tax havens will have to provide some information, they can use a number of loopholes (unequal standards for how information is shared e.g.) and also elect not to receive any info in return. [38] The Financial Transparency Coalition criticised the access cost of $73 to download OECD’s report itself, being "a perfect illustration of why this process needs to include low income countries from the start". [38]

The OECD conducts peer reviews to check compliance by each jurisdiction, as well as reviewing compliance to identify risks in compliance and loopholes. It opened a website for whistle-blowers to anonymously report CRS violations including for pensions, insurance, and citizenship-for-sale tools. The OECD has investigated and labeled specifically as "low-risk" an investment tool in Hong Kong called ORS (Occupational Retirement Scheme) which is classified as a "non-reporting financial institutions" and can be used to bypass CRS as it does not need reporting under CRS guidelines and can be used to effectively be like a shell company. [39]

The OECD has also published Model Mandatory Disclosure Rules for CRS Avoidance Arrangements and Opaque Offshore Structures. [40] These rules require intermediaries, like tax advisors, law firms and others to report to their domestic tax authority if they advise on ways to circumvent reporting under the CRS. As of January 2023, 17 jurisdictions have committed to implementing these rules, [41] although all 27 EU Member States and the UK have already implemented these rules as part of an amendment to the Directive on Administrative Co-operation in the field of Taxation (2011/16).

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of the Cayman Islands</span>

The economy of the Cayman Islands, a British overseas territory located in the western Caribbean Sea, is mainly fueled by the tourism sector and by the financial services sector, together representing 50–60 percent of the country's gross domestic product (GDP). The Cayman Islands Investment Bureau, a government agency, has been established with the mandate of promoting investment and economic development in the territory. Because of the territory's strong economy and it being a popular banking destination for wealthy individuals and businesses, it is often dubbed the ‘financial capital’ of the Caribbean.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banking in Switzerland</span>

Banking in Switzerland dates to the early 18th century through Switzerland's merchant trade and over the centuries has grown into a complex and regulated international industry. Banking is seen as emblematic of Switzerland and the country has been one of the largest offshore financial centers and tax havens in the world since the mid-20th century, with a long history of banking secrecy and client confidentiality reaching back to the early 1700s. Starting as a way to protect wealthy European banking interests, Swiss banking secrecy was codified in 1934 with the passage of a landmark federal law, the Federal Act on Banks and Savings Banks. These laws were used to protect assets of persons being persecuted by Nazi authorities but have also been used by people and institutions seeking to illegally evade taxes, hide assets, or to commit other financial crime.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Offshore bank</span> Bank located outside the country of residence of the depositor

An offshore bank is a bank that is operated and regulated under international banking license, which usually prohibits the bank from establishing any business activities in the jurisdiction of establishment. Due to less regulation and transparency, accounts with offshore banks were often used to hide undeclared income. Since the 1980s, jurisdictions that provide financial services to nonresidents on a big scale can be referred to as offshore financial centres. OFCs often also levy little or no corporation tax and/or personal income and high direct taxes such as duty, making the cost of living high.

International taxation is the study or determination of tax on a person or business subject to the tax laws of different countries, or the international aspects of an individual country's tax laws as the case may be. Governments usually limit the scope of their income taxation in some manner territorially or provide for offsets to taxation relating to extraterritorial income. The manner of limitation generally takes the form of a territorial, residence-based, or exclusionary system. Some governments have attempted to mitigate the differing limitations of each of these three broad systems by enacting a hybrid system with characteristics of two or more.

An international business company or international business corporation (IBC) is an offshore company formed under the laws of some jurisdictions as a tax neutral company which is usually limited in terms of the activities it may conduct in, but not necessarily from, the jurisdiction in which it is incorporated. While not taxable in the country of incorporation, an IBC or its owners, if resident in a country having “controlled foreign corporation” rules for instance, can be taxable in other jurisdictions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republicans Overseas</span> US Republican Party organization for US citizens abroad

Republicans Overseas (RO) is a political organization created in 2013 for United States citizens who are living outside of the United States. RO is recognized by the Republican National Committee (RNC), and by other affiliated groups, such as College Republicans. It operates in the majority of countries around the world where there are large numbers of United States citizen residents. Similar to political action committees (PAC) and Super Pacs; RO is a 527 political organization that operates as a corporation with specific interests of repealing the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and of generally representing Republicans living overseas.

Taxation in the British Virgin Islands is relatively simple by comparative standards; photocopies of all of the tax laws of the British Virgin Islands (BVI) would together amount to about 200 pages of paper.

Exchange of Information is an umbrella term which refers to international co-operation in the field of taxation through the exchange of information on taxpayers between tax authorities.

A tax haven is a term, often used pejoratively, to describe a place with very low tax rates for non-domiciled investors, even if the official rates may be higher.

Private placement life insurance is a form of cash value universal life insurance that is offered privately, rather than through a public offering. It is typically only available to wealthy clients. A 2024 US Senate report alleged that the insurance mechanism in practice functions as a tool for tax avoidance, specifically for inheritance taxes, and was at the time being used to shelter up to $40 billion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Offshore financial centre</span> Corporate-focused tax havens

An offshore financial centre (OFC) is defined as a "country or jurisdiction that provides financial services to nonresidents on a scale that is incommensurate with the size and the financing of its domestic economy."

The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes was founded in 2000 and restructured in September 2009. It consists of OECD member countries as well as other jurisdictions that have agreed to implement tax related transparency and information exchange. The forum works under the auspices of the OECD and G20. Its mission is to "implement the international standard through two phases of peer review process". It addresses tax evasion, tax havens, offshore financial centres, tax information exchange agreements, double taxation and money laundering.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act</span> 2010 U.S. tax law

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) is a 2010 U.S. federal law requiring all non-U.S. foreign financial institutions (FFIs) to search their records for customers with indicia of a connection to the U.S., including indications in records of birth or prior residency in the U.S., or the like, and to report such assets and identities of such persons to the United States Department of the Treasury. FATCA also requires such persons to report their non-U.S. financial assets annually to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on form 8938, which is in addition to the older and further redundant requirement to report them annually to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) on form 114. Like U.S. income tax law, FATCA applies to U.S. residents and also to U.S. citizens and green card holders residing in other countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Act on Banks and Savings Banks</span> 1934 Swiss law

The Swiss Banking Act or Federal Act on Banks and Savings Banks is a Swiss federal law and act-of-parliament that operates as the supreme law governing banking in Switzerland. Although the federal law has only been amended seven times, it has been revised multiple times to limit and expand its banking secrecy provisions since its ratification. The banking secrecy provisions in the Federal Act are additionally enforced through multiple civil codes in the federal Swiss Civil Code and locally through cantonal law. In December 2017, the Swiss parliament launched a standing initiative and expressed an interest in formally embedding banking secrecy within the Swiss Federal Constitution rendering it a federally-protected constitutional right.

The FATCA agreement is an international agreement signed between Canada and the United States that allows the implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act in Canada. It is one of 30 intergovernmental agreements the US has concluded with other countries to implement the FATCA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Base erosion and profit shifting</span> Multinational tax avoidance tools

Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) refers to corporate tax planning strategies used by multinationals to "shift" profits from higher-tax jurisdictions to lower-tax jurisdictions or no-tax locations where there is little or no economic activity, thus "eroding" the "tax-base" of the higher-tax jurisdictions using deductible payments such as interest or royalties. For the government, the tax base is a company's income or profit. Tax is levied as a percentage on this income/profit. When that income / profit is transferred to a tax haven, the tax base is eroded and the company does not pay taxes to the country that is generating the income. As a result, tax revenues are reduced and the country is disadvantaged. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) define BEPS strategies as "exploiting gaps and mismatches in tax rules". While some of the tactics are illegal, the majority are not. Because businesses that operate across borders can utilize BEPS to obtain a competitive edge over domestic businesses, it affects the righteousness and integrity of tax systems. Furthermore, it lessens deliberate compliance, when taxpayers notice multinationals legally avoiding corporate income taxes. Because developing nations rely more heavily on corporate income tax, they are disproportionately affected by BEPS.

The Republic of Panama is one of the oldest and best-known tax havens in the Caribbean, as well as one of the most established in the region. Panama has had a reputation for tax avoidance since the early 20th century, and Panama has been cited repeatedly in recent years as a jurisdiction which does not cooperate with international tax transparency initiatives.

International tax planning also known as international tax structures or expanded worldwide planning (EWP), is an element of international taxation created to implement directives from several tax authorities following the 2008 worldwide recession.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Directive on Administrative Co-operation in the field of Taxation (2011/16)</span> EU tax and data collection

The Directive on Administrative Co-operation in the field of taxation is a Directive which sets rules for the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) which apply to members of the European Union (EU).

The Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework is a global initiative led by the OECD Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes which is intended to promoted the automatic exchange of information between countries to tackle emerging tax evasion risks related to cryptocurrency and digital assets.

References

  1. ↑ "CRS MCAA Signatories - 16 May 2023" (PDF).
  2. 1 2 DBFS Consultants: "OECD's CRS is like a Global FATCA" www.dbfs.co.uk, DBFS Financial Consultancy Services, n.d. (subscription required)
  3. 1 2 47 Countries Endorse OECD’s GATCA profwilliambyrnes.com, 10 May 2014.
  4. ↑ Common Reporting Standard Implementation Plan Archived 26 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine g20australia.org, September 2014
  5. ↑ DBFS Consultants: timeline and structure of FATCA and CRS www.dbfs.co.uk, DBFS Financial Consultancy Services, March 2015.
  6. ↑ China, Hong Kong committed to global alliance to end banking secrecy scmp.com, South China Morning Post, 30 October 2014.
  7. 1 2 "Automatic Exchange of Information on Financial Accounts". The Banks.eu, 21 November 2016.
  8. ↑ Automatic Exchange of Information OECD , n.d.
  9. ↑ The United Arab Emirates become the 109th jurisdiction to join the most powerful multilateral treaty against offshore tax evasion and avoidance OECD press release, 21 April 2017.
  10. ↑ Countries Which Will Not Automatically Exchange Account Information TheBanks.eu, an independent Internet project about banking services in European countries and their dependent territories to help potential investors to find a bank satisfying their requirements, 8 January 2015.
  11. ↑ "Panama agrees to adopt global tax reporting standards". Deutsche Welle. 15 April 2016. Retrieved 17 April 2016.
  12. ↑ "Panama joins international tax co-operation efforts to end bank secrecy". OECD. 15 January 2018. Retrieved 24 May 2018.
  13. ↑ "U.S. Treasury FATCA Resource Center". U.S. Treasury Department.
  14. ↑ "International Standards for Automatic Exchange of Information in Tax Matters".
  15. ↑ "Common Reporting Standard (CRS) User Guide and Schema". Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  16. 1 2 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2014. Retrieved 13 May 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) OECD
  17. ↑ "See Section VIII.C of the Standard, and related guidance".
  18. ↑ "See for example, the guide from the UK's tax authority. Many jurisdictions' tax authorities have published similar guides" (PDF).
  19. ↑ "OECD Peer Review of the Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information Report 2022".
  20. ↑
  21. ↑ KPMG. (2024, May). Hong Kong: List of common errors in AEOI reporting published. Retrieved from
  22. ↑ Taina Technology. Hong Kong: Common AEOI reporting errors. Retrieved from
  23. ↑ KPMG. (2024, May). Hong Kong: List of common errors in AEOI reporting published. Retrieved from
  24. ↑ Taina Technology. Hong Kong: Common AEOI reporting errors. Retrieved from
  25. ↑ Taina Technology. Improving CRS compliance in Taiwanese financial institutions. Retrieved from
  26. ↑ Taina Technology. Common reporting errors. Retrieved from
  27. 1 2 "CRS implementation by jurisdiction - 2017". OECD. 20 June 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
  28. ↑ "On the entry into force of the Multilateral Agreement of Competent Authorities on the Automatic Exchange of Information on Financial Accounts" (in Ukrainian). State Tax Service of Ukraine. 24 September 2024.
  29. ↑ "AEOI standard's implementation status by jurisdiction". 29 September 2023.
  30. ↑ The 142 members of the Global Forum are: OECD, n.d. retrieved 28 June 2017
  31. 1 2 "CRS by jurisdiction - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development". www.oecd.org.
  32. ↑ "AEOI: Status of Commitments" (PDF).
  33. ↑ "Jurisdictions participating in the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters" (PDF).
  34. ↑ "Signatories of the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on automatic exchange of financial account information and intended first information exchange date" (PDF).
  35. ↑ Noseda, Filippo (15 February 2016). "Comment:Privacy v transparency - Withers' Noseda on incoming OECD tax rules opening a new battle front". legalbusiness.co.uk. Archived from the original (blog) on 16 February 2016. Retrieved 16 February 2016.
  36. ↑ Burggraf, Helen (7 March 2016). "US and OECD showdown seen looming over CRS". internationalinvestment.net/. Retrieved 26 March 2016.
  37. ↑ "AIA & Rechtsschutz: Magna Charta des Finanzplatzes am Ende? – Inside Paradeplatz" (in German). 1 July 2015. Retrieved 6 August 2024.
  38. 1 2 3 4 Boland-Rudder, Hamish (23 July 2014). "OECD's plan to end bank secrecy blasted by activists". The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. Retrieved 24 July 2014.
  39. ↑ "How becoming a Hong Kong pensioner can save you tax". The Economist. May 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
  40. ↑ "Model Mandatory Disclosure Rules for CRS Avoidance Arrangements and Opaque Offshore Structures".
  41. ↑ "SIGNATORIES OF THE MULTILATERAL COMPETENT AUTHORITY AGREEMENT ON THE AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE REGARDING CRS AVOIDANCE ARRANGEMENTS AND OPAQUE OFFSHORE STRUCTURES" (PDF).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.