Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/Draven hay

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. not notable --Peterdownunder (talk) 21:36, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draven hay

Draven hay (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Enfcer has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Originally listed as a QD A4. There is a claim of notability which is "is currently one of the youngest "Overwatch" centered Esports prodigies alive'. This defeats A4 requirements, and mandates it be taken here for discussion. Enfcer (talk) 22:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

The person we are talking about was born in 2004, and is 14 or 15 years of age now. The article does not have any sources at all, and features formulations such as "...one of the youngest (..) Esports prodigies alive to this date." which are simply unencyclopedic. If I look around at Google, I find a Youtube channel without content, and a number of video games called "Draven", and the SEWP article in first position. In short: There is no indication that this person exists, or that he is good at video gaming/E-Sports. Given that the article itself has no references either, I see no option but to delete this (We could probably QD under 'hoax'), but since we are already doing an RfD, let's discuss the matter. To sum it up: delete, either because there are no sources (A4), or because it is probably a hoax (A6). If the person really exists, and the date of birth is accurate, we also need to think about protecting children (which would probably result in delelting the article).--Eptalon (talk) 16:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Delete as not notable. So badly formed that it might reasonably be deleted on several grounds. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Eptalon. As noted there are a variety of reasons to delete. Desertborn (talk) 13:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Eptalon. -- Deborahjay (talk) 19:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable (per Eptalon). Also, it's an article about a living person but it does not have any source. Although we don't have en:WP:BLPPROD here, this still remains to be an issue with the article. Ahmad^talk 20:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:39, 26 December 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.