Buckley et al., 2010 - Google Patents

Can mechanism inform species' distribution models?

Buckley et al., 2010

View PDF
Document ID
11058965914917462039
Author
Buckley L
Urban M
Angilletta M
Crozier L
Rissler L
Sears M
Publication year
Publication venue
Ecology letters

External Links

Snippet

Ecology Letters (2010) 13: 1041–1054 Abstract Two major approaches address the need to predict species distributions in response to environmental changes. Correlative models estimate parameters phenomenologically by relating current distributions to environmental …
Continue reading at citeseerx.ist.psu.edu (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
    • G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0202—Market predictions or demand forecasting
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Buckley et al. Can mechanism inform species’ distribution models?
Briscoe et al. Forecasting species range dynamics with process‐explicit models: matching methods to applications
Briscoe et al. Unpacking the mechanisms captured by a correlative species distribution model to improve predictions of climate refugia
Zimmermann et al. Climatic extremes improve predictions of spatial patterns of tree species
Buechling et al. Climate and competition effects on tree growth in Rocky Mountain forests
Bush et al. Incorporating evolutionary adaptation in species distribution modelling reduces projected vulnerability to climate change
Brown et al. Ecological integrity assessment as a metric of biodiversity: are we measuring what we say we are?
Kearney Metabolic theory, life history and the distribution of a terrestrial ectotherm
Prugh An evaluation of patch connectivity measures
MacKenzie et al. Fish production and climate: sprat in the Baltic Sea
Keith et al. Detecting extinction risk from climate change by IUCN Red List criteria
Kharouba et al. Historically calibrated predictions of butterfly species' range shift using global change as a pseudo‐experiment
Dennis et al. Indexing butterfly abundance whilst accounting for missing counts and variability in seasonal pattern
Santika Assessing the effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models using simulated data
Venier et al. Climate and satellite‐derived land cover for predicting breeding bird distribution in the Great Lakes Basin
Oswald et al. Physiological effects of climate on distributions of endothermic species
Caetano et al. Time of activity is a better predictor of the distribution of a tropical lizard than pure environmental temperatures
Rüger et al. Testing metabolic theory with models of tree growth that include light competition
Touhami et al. Screening parameters in the Pasture Simulation model using the Morris method
Lyons et al. Vanishing islands in the sky? A comparison of correlation‐and mechanism‐based forecasts of range dynamics for montane salamanders under climate change
McLean et al. High intra-specific variation in avian body condition responses to climate limits generalisation across species
Ibáñez et al. Moving forward in global‐change ecology: Capitalizing on natural variability
Welsh Jr et al. Woodland salamanders as metrics of forest ecosystem recovery: a case study from California's redwoods
Baselga et al. Do community‐level models describe community variation effectively?
Wann et al. Assessing lek attendance of male greater sage‐grouse using fine‐resolution GPS data: Implications for population monitoring of lek mating grouse