US20110086653A1 - Reuse pattern network scheduling using interference levels - Google Patents
Reuse pattern network scheduling using interference levels Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110086653A1 US20110086653A1 US12/969,971 US96997110A US2011086653A1 US 20110086653 A1 US20110086653 A1 US 20110086653A1 US 96997110 A US96997110 A US 96997110A US 2011086653 A1 US2011086653 A1 US 2011086653A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- reuse
- stations
- station
- network
- interference
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 46
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 24
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 10
- 238000004353 relayed correlation spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007618 network scheduling algorithm Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W16/00—Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
- H04W16/02—Resource partitioning among network components, e.g. reuse partitioning
Definitions
- Wireless communication networks have become increasingly popular and generally include a base station that provides service to a cell area located around the base station. Subscriber stations, including mobile stations (such as cell phones, etc.), are able to communicate with the base station when they are within the service area (such as the cell area) of the base station.
- Interference among stations in the same or different cells of the network can cause significant problems.
- the use of relay stations in the network can complicate interference problems.
- Various embodiments of the present invention provide a method and apparatus which (a) maps interference levels occurring at one or more stations in a wireless network; and (b) generates a reuse set, based on the mapping, of stations, included in said one or more stations, capable of sharing a transmission resource.
- Various embodiments of the present invention provide a method and apparatus which (a) maps interference levels occurring in one or more stations in an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.16 system, each station of said one or more stations being a base station or a relay station; and (b) generates a reuse pattern, based on the mapping, including one or more reuse sets of stations, included in said one or more stations, capable of sharing a transmission resource.
- IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
- FIG. 1 is an illustration of an example of a wireless network topology involving a base station, a network management entity (such as a base station controller) and three relay stations operating in an OFDMA network under the IEEE 802.16j standard.
- a network management entity such as a base station controller
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating the method of mapping interference levels occurring at one or more stations in a wireless network and generating a reuse set, according to embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating the method of generating a reuse set, according to embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the method of generating one or a plurality of reuse sets and a reuse pattern used to update a network schedule, according to embodiments of the present invention.
- relay stations can be employed for providing enhanced transmission capabilities by acting as intermediaries between mobile stations operating in the network and the base station.
- a mobile station that is incapable of connecting directly to a base station within its cell service area may still connect indirectly to the base station by first communicating with a relay station that does have a direct link, or possibly an indirect link through additional relay stations, to the base station.
- a network entity schedule algorithm can be defined that reduces the intranet interference between different stations (either base stations or relay stations) operating within the wireless network (e.g., an OFDMA network) while at the same time maximizes the spatial reuse of the radio resource, thereby optimizing CINR degradation and thus allowing higher coding rates to be used on the impacted links.
- FIG. 1 is an illustrative example of a wireless network topology involving a base station and three relay stations operating in an OFDMA network.
- the network cell includes a base station (BS) 10 , a first relay station (RS 1 ) 20 , a second relay station (RS 2 ) 21 , a third relay station (RS 3 ) 22 and a network management entity 30 .
- This example topology is intended to show a single possibility of a network cell, and embodiments of the present invention are not limited to any particular topology. For example, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to a network with the specific number of base and/or relay stations in the specific configuration shown in FIG. 1 .
- RS 1 20 can communicate directly with BS 10 via the transmission link between BS 10 and RS 1 20 , or indirectly via the transmission link from BS 10 to RS 2 21 and then through the transmission link from RS 2 21 to RS 1 20 .
- Various embodiments of the present invention assume a fixed reuse pattern. That is, the base stations and relay stations are assumed to be in fixed positions and each transmitter (either a base station or a relay station) transmits with a fixed power assigned by network management entity 30 .
- the present invention is not limited to a fixed reuse pattern.
- each base station and relay station generates its own transmission schedule.
- the present invention is not limited to each base and relay station generating its own transmission schedule.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a method of mapping interference levels occurring at one or more stations in a wireless network and generating a reuse set, according to embodiments of the present invention. Referring now to FIG. 2 , at operation 110 , interference levels occurring at one or more stations in a wireless network are mapped.
- network management entity 30 (see FIG. 1 ) produces a mapped interference matrix based, for example, on noise plus interference measurements performed by different stations (e.g., base station 10 ) positioned within a cluster of cells subject to the interference mapping. That is, the interference matrix includes the noise plus interference generated by each station upon each other station.
- a mapping interference mode is, for example, a maintenance type of operation, in which an implementation-specific network interference mapping pattern is transmitted from a station using, for example, fixed power.
- each relay station within the cluster of cells subject to the interference mapping transmits within the same uplink (UL) frame, a specific UL interference pattern based, for example, on a specific UL sounding sequence.
- UL uplink
- all stations within the cluster of cells execute, for example, burst noise power measurements on the received UL interference patterns.
- the present invention is not limited to any particular UL interference pattern based on any specific UL sounding sequence, or to stations executing any particular burst noise power measurements.
- the burst power measurements executed by the stations are implementation specific and could include, for example, Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) measurements or, for example, Signal to Interference Plus Noise Ration (SINR) measurements. These burst power measurements are, for example, proportional with the interference path between stations sending and receiving the UL interference patterns.
- RSSI Received Signal Strength Indication
- SINR Signal to Interference Plus Noise Ration
- the network interference mapping pattern is scheduled, for example, periodically by network management entity 30 .
- Each base station e.g. base station BS 10
- Each base station then, for example, averages the burst power measurements from each station and transmit the averaged measurements to network management entity 30 to generate the interference matrix.
- the present invention is not limited to periodic scheduling of network interference mapping, or to any particular types of calculations.
- NI ij represents the noise (N) plus interference (I) caused by station “i” upon station “j”.
- the effect is not necessarily symmetrical due to the potential different transmission powers of the stations, although it is assumed that each transmitter transmits with a fixed power.
- This example shows a square Y ⁇ Y matrix, but the matrix could also be an Y ⁇ M matrix.
- INT [ NI 1 , 1 NI 1 , 2 NI 1 , 3 NI 2 , 1 NI 2 , 2 NI 2 , 3 NI 3 , 1 NI 3 , 2 NI 3 , 3 ]
- the present invention is not limited to this specific manner of mapping the interference levels, and other manners of mapping the interference levels can be implemented. More specifically, the present invention is not limited to the mapping the interference levels by estimation of the interference matrix as described above, and in U.S. Provisional Application No.
- a reuse set of stations capable of sharing a transmission resource is generated based on the mapping operation 110 .
- Specific operations of generating the reuse set are described in detail with reference to FIG. 3 described below.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method of generating a reuse set, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the one or more stations within the wireless network are sorted, for example, by network management entity 30 in, for example, increasing order based on their respective interference levels mapped by operation 110 (see FIG. 2 ) described above.
- the present invention is not limited to sorting in an increasing order, and other variations of a sorting procedure can be implemented.
- the sorting is not limited to being performed by network management entity 30 , and could be performed by other entities in the network.
- the process moves to operation 220 , where network management entity 30 determines, for example, the station with the lowest interference level (i.e., the smallest NI ij ), based on the mapping operation 110 , and this station is added to the reuse set.
- the present invention is not limited to determining the station with the lowest interference level, and other variations can be implemented, based on the sorting procedure implemented in operation 210 .
- the determination is not limited to being performed by network management entity 30 , and could be performed by other entities in the network.
- the process moves to operation 230 , in which it is determined, using the sorting procedure 210 , whether the station with the next lowest interference level is unassigned to a reuse set and whether the cumulative interference level within the reuse set currently being generated would be below a threshold interference level for all the stations already in the reuse set and for the station under consideration for being added to the reuse set if the station with the next lowest interference level is added to the reuse set currently being generated.
- the threshold interference level is a predetermined level set by, for example, the network management entity 30 (see FIG. 1 ).
- the threshold interference level is, for example, fixed and is determined, for example, by simulations based on an effective coding rate calculated by averaging transmission rates to mobile stations by the base and/or relay stations.
- the threshold interference level reflects, for example, the maximal total interference that a downlink transmitter (a base station or a relay station) can tolerate is allowed to cause to other cells sharing the same spectrum.
- the network management entity 30 is capable of determining, for example, the maximal transmission power used by each base and relay station.
- the present invention is not limited to the predetermined level of the threshold interference level being set by the network management entity 30 or to being fixed or to being determined based on any particular simulation.
- the process moves to operation 250 , where it is checked if every station has been either assigned to a reuse set (including previous constructed reuse sets and the current one), or is not eligible to the current reuse set. If both conditions are not met, the process returns to operation 230 , where the next station in the sorted list of stations, with a next lowest interference level, is checked to determine whether it is already assigned to a reuse set or the cumulative interference level within the reuse set currently being generated would be below a threshold interference level if the current station being checked is added to the reuse set currently being generated.
- the process moves to operation 260 in which the station being checked is, for example, added to the reuse set currently being generated. From operation 260 , the process moves to operation 250 , where it is determined, for example, whether all stations are assigned to a reuse set.
- the process including operations 230 , 250 and 260 is reiterated, for example, until all stations have been either assigned to a reuse set or determined not eligible to any reuse sets constructed as determined by operation 250 .
- operation 250 determines that, for example, all stations are assigned
- the process of constructing a reuse set ends.
- the process may repeat and generate a reuse set each time, until all stations have been assigned to some reuse set.
- each generated reuse set includes as many stations (relay and/or base stations) as possible, while still having a cumulative interference level below the threshold interference level.
- each generated reuse set includes the maximum number of stations while tolerating the cumulative interference when transmitting with a predetermined effective coding rate and transmission power.
- each generated reuse set includes one or more stations which are capable of sharing a transmission resource, including a frequency or a timeslot, or a combination of both.
- FIG. 3 is only one example of a process to generate a reuse set, and many variations are possible.
- the present invention is not limited to the specific example in FIG. 3 .
- the present invention is not limited to including each of the specific operations in FIG. 3 .
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the method of generating one or a plurality of reuse sets and a reuse pattern used to update a network schedule, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- operation 310 represents the generation of one or a plurality of reuse sets using the reuse set generation operation described above (see FIG. 3 ).
- any empty reuse sets i.e., reuse sets including no base stations or relay stations.
- the process moves to operation 330 , in which, for example, the remaining reuse sets are grouped to form a reuse pattern, including one or a plurality of reuse sets.
- the process moves to operation 340 , where, for example, the network management entity 30 or a base station 10 (see FIG. 1 ) generates a network schedule including the radio resources that base station and relay stations in each respective reuse set is allowed to use for its downlink access.
- the bandwidth can be efficiently allocated using, for example, the reuse pattern by assigning resources to individual reuse sets including a maximum number of base stations and relay stations, while, for example, maintaining a cumulative interference level below the predetermined threshold interference level.
- each station generates its own transmission schedule using the radio resource assigned to it by, for example, network management entity 30 or a base station 10 .
- the process moves to operation 350 , where network management entity 30 or the base station 10 waits, for example, for a predetermined period of time before updating the network schedule.
- the base station may update the network interference matrix by having the transmission stations estimate the interference from other transmission stations, and collect and update the network load and/or congestion information. Because the computations at network management entity 30 or the base station 10 are intensive, the update may take place, for example, over tens of frames.
- the network schedule can be set to update every ten seconds.
- the present invention is not limited to any particular period of time before updating the network schedule.
- the process moves to operation 360 , where the network schedule is updated after a predetermined period of time in order to assure that the network schedule optimally allocates transmission resources, based on the reuse pattern.
- FIG. 4 is only one example of a process to generate one or a plurality of reuse sets and a reuse pattern.
- the present invention is not limited to the specific example in FIG. 4 .
- the present invention is not limited to including each of the specific operations in FIG. 4 .
- Various embodiments of the present invention provide a method and apparatus which (a) maps interference levels occurring at one or more stations in a wireless network; and (b) generates a reuse set, based on the mapping, of stations, included in said one or more stations, capable of sharing a transmission resource.
- various embodiments of the present invention are applicable for use within an IEEE 802.16 system, where each of the one or more stations is a base station or a relay station.
- Various embodiments of the present invention provide a method and apparatus in which generating a reuse set includes (a) sorting one or more stations in increasing order based on their respective mapped interference levels; (b) beginning with a station, among the one or more stations, with the smallest interference level, adding the station to the reuse set; (c) adding an additional station with a next lowest interference level to the reuse set, as long as a cumulative interference level for every station within the reuse set is below a threshold interference level and the additional station is not already assigned to another reuse set; and (d) repeatedly adding an additional station, as described above, until each of the one or more stations is included in a reuse set.
- Various embodiments of the present invention provide a method and apparatus which (a) generates a reuse pattern comprising one or a plurality of reuse sets; and (b) updates a network schedule, by a network management entity, based on the reuse pattern, to increase bandwidth efficiency.
- Various embodiments of the present invention provide a system for generating a reuse group based on interference levels in an IEEE 802.16 network.
- the system (a) maps interference levels, occurring at one or more stations, each of said one or more stations being a base station or a relay station; and (b) generates a reuse pattern, based on the mapped interference levels, including one or more reuse sets of stations, included in said one or more stations, capable of sharing a transmission resource.
- the stations within each reuse set, the stations are listed in increasing order based on their respective interference levels, and an additional station is added to a reuse set, as long as the cumulative interference level within the reuse set is below a threshold interference level and the additional station is not already listed in another reuse set.
- the system removes empty reuse sets.
- the system also generates a network schedule, by a network management entity, based on the reuse pattern to increase bandwidth efficiency in the network.
- Various embodiments of the present invention are applicable to IEEE 802.16 networks, which includes amendments or extensions to IEEE 802.16.
- the present invention is not limited to IEEE 802.16 networks, and is applicable to other types of networks.
- various embodiments of the present invention are applicable to OFDMA networks.
- the present invention is not limited to OFDMA networks, and is applicable to other types of networks.
- Various embodiments of the present invention are described herein with respect to “mobile” stations that communicate with base stations and relay stations in a network.
- the present invention is not limited to networks with “mobile” stations. Instead, a network might have many different types of stations, typically referred to a “subscriber” stations, which communicate with base and/or relay stations.
- a “mobile” station is one type of “subscriber” station.
- the above described methods, apparatuses and systems can, for example, mitigate the intranet interference between different stations (either base stations or relay stations) operating within the wireless network (e.g., an OFDMA network), thereby optimizing CINR degradation and thus allowing higher coding rates to be used on the impacted links, and cause a related improvement on the spectral efficiency per link, considering the improvement in the related bandwidth efficiency.
- the wireless network e.g., an OFDMA network
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Interference levels occurring at one or more stations are mapped, and a reuse pattern is generated, based on the mapped interference levels, including one or more reuse sets of stations capable of sharing a transmission resource. The stations within each reuse set are listed in increasing order based on their respective interference levels, and an additional station is added to a reuse set, as long as the cumulative interference level within the reuse set is below a threshold interference level and the additional station is not already listed in another reuse set. A network schedule is updated based on the reuse pattern to increase bandwidth efficiency in the network.
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/777,385, filed Jul. 13, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Moreover, this application is based on, and claims the benefit of, U.S. Provisional Application titled “REUSE PATTERN NETWORK SCHEDULING ALGORITHM FOR OFDMA NETWORKS USING RELAY STATIONS”, U.S. Ser. No. 60/864,498, filed Nov. 6, 2006, inventors Chenxi Zhu, Dorin Viorel, Jagan Seshadri, Jonathan Agre and Wei-Peng Chen, Attorney Docket No. 1974.1009P, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- Wireless communication networks have become increasingly popular and generally include a base station that provides service to a cell area located around the base station. Subscriber stations, including mobile stations (such as cell phones, etc.), are able to communicate with the base station when they are within the service area (such as the cell area) of the base station.
- Interference among stations in the same or different cells of the network can cause significant problems. The use of relay stations in the network can complicate interference problems.
- Various embodiments of the present invention provide a method and apparatus which (a) maps interference levels occurring at one or more stations in a wireless network; and (b) generates a reuse set, based on the mapping, of stations, included in said one or more stations, capable of sharing a transmission resource.
- Various embodiments of the present invention provide a method and apparatus which (a) maps interference levels occurring in one or more stations in an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.16 system, each station of said one or more stations being a base station or a relay station; and (b) generates a reuse pattern, based on the mapping, including one or more reuse sets of stations, included in said one or more stations, capable of sharing a transmission resource.
- The above embodiments of the present invention are simply examples, and all embodiments of the present invention are not limited to these examples or to including all the features described in the Summary of the Invention section of this application.
- Additional features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and, in part, will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention.
-
FIG. 1 is an illustration of an example of a wireless network topology involving a base station, a network management entity (such as a base station controller) and three relay stations operating in an OFDMA network under the IEEE 802.16j standard. -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating the method of mapping interference levels occurring at one or more stations in a wireless network and generating a reuse set, according to embodiments of the present invention. -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating the method of generating a reuse set, according to embodiments of the present invention. -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the method of generating one or a plurality of reuse sets and a reuse pattern used to update a network schedule, according to embodiments of the present invention. - Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
- In wireless communication networks, due to such effects as shadowing arising from blockage by buildings and other obstructions between transmission/reception antennas, there exist dead zones in which communication with the base station is not possible, despite being within the service area. To combat this problem, in a wireless network, such as for example, an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) network, relay stations can be employed for providing enhanced transmission capabilities by acting as intermediaries between mobile stations operating in the network and the base station. In this manner, a mobile station that is incapable of connecting directly to a base station within its cell service area may still connect indirectly to the base station by first communicating with a relay station that does have a direct link, or possibly an indirect link through additional relay stations, to the base station.
- A problem arises, however, in that greater levels of interference are produced in the network with the addition of base and relay stations. Spatial reuse of the spectrum in the network is required to increase the spectrum efficiency and total capacity of the network, subject to the requirement the interference caused by concurrent transmissions needs to be carefully managed. Since the increased intranet interference degrades the carrier to interference-plus-noise ration (CINR) for the impacted links, properly scheduling the concurrent transmissions to mitigate the interference levels impacts directly the quality of service (QoS) on these links.
- Therefore, a network entity schedule algorithm can be defined that reduces the intranet interference between different stations (either base stations or relay stations) operating within the wireless network (e.g., an OFDMA network) while at the same time maximizes the spatial reuse of the radio resource, thereby optimizing CINR degradation and thus allowing higher coding rates to be used on the impacted links.
-
FIG. 1 is an illustrative example of a wireless network topology involving a base station and three relay stations operating in an OFDMA network. The network cell includes a base station (BS) 10, a first relay station (RS1) 20, a second relay station (RS2) 21, a third relay station (RS3) 22 and anetwork management entity 30. This example topology is intended to show a single possibility of a network cell, and embodiments of the present invention are not limited to any particular topology. For example, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to a network with the specific number of base and/or relay stations in the specific configuration shown inFIG. 1 . - In the specific example in
FIG. 1 ,RS1 20 can communicate directly withBS 10 via the transmission link betweenBS 10 andRS1 20, or indirectly via the transmission link fromBS 10 toRS2 21 and then through the transmission link fromRS2 21 toRS1 20. - Various embodiments of the present invention assume a fixed reuse pattern. That is, the base stations and relay stations are assumed to be in fixed positions and each transmitter (either a base station or a relay station) transmits with a fixed power assigned by
network management entity 30. However, the present invention is not limited to a fixed reuse pattern. - As the algorithms described herein are computationally demanding, various embodiments of the present invention are intended for use in networks where, for example, each base station and relay station generates its own transmission schedule. However, the present invention is not limited to each base and relay station generating its own transmission schedule.
-
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a method of mapping interference levels occurring at one or more stations in a wireless network and generating a reuse set, according to embodiments of the present invention. Referring now toFIG. 2 , atoperation 110, interference levels occurring at one or more stations in a wireless network are mapped. - For example, network management entity 30 (see
FIG. 1 ) produces a mapped interference matrix based, for example, on noise plus interference measurements performed by different stations (e.g., base station 10) positioned within a cluster of cells subject to the interference mapping. That is, the interference matrix includes the noise plus interference generated by each station upon each other station. - A mapping interference mode is, for example, a maintenance type of operation, in which an implementation-specific network interference mapping pattern is transmitted from a station using, for example, fixed power. As an example, each relay station within the cluster of cells subject to the interference mapping transmits within the same uplink (UL) frame, a specific UL interference pattern based, for example, on a specific UL sounding sequence. Upon receiving the UL interference patterns, all stations within the cluster of cells execute, for example, burst noise power measurements on the received UL interference patterns. Of course, the present invention is not limited to any particular UL interference pattern based on any specific UL sounding sequence, or to stations executing any particular burst noise power measurements.
- For example, the burst power measurements executed by the stations are implementation specific and could include, for example, Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) measurements or, for example, Signal to Interference Plus Noise Ration (SINR) measurements. These burst power measurements are, for example, proportional with the interference path between stations sending and receiving the UL interference patterns. Of course, the present invention is not limited to any particular measurements being included in the executed burst power measurements.
- According to various embodiments of the present invention, the network interference mapping pattern is scheduled, for example, periodically by
network management entity 30. Each base station (e.g. base station BS 10) then, for example, averages the burst power measurements from each station and transmit the averaged measurements tonetwork management entity 30 to generate the interference matrix. However, the present invention is not limited to periodic scheduling of network interference mapping, or to any particular types of calculations. - An example interference matrix (INT) shown below maps the noise plus interference caused by each station upon each other station in the wireless network. As shown in this example, NIij represents the noise (N) plus interference (I) caused by station “i” upon station “j”. The effect is not necessarily symmetrical due to the potential different transmission powers of the stations, although it is assumed that each transmitter transmits with a fixed power. This example shows a square Y×Y matrix, but the matrix could also be an Y×M matrix.
-
- The above-described mapping the interference levels by estimation of the interference matrix is described, for example, in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/864,491, titled “INTERFERENCE MAPPING PROCEDURE FOR OFDMA NETWORKS USING RELAY STATIONS”, inventors Chenxi Zhu, Dorin Viorel, Jagan Seshadri, Jonathan Agre and Wei-Peng Chen, filed Nov. 6, 2006, attorney docket number 1974.1007P, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/891,096, titled “INTERFERENCE MAPPING PROCEDURE FOR OFDMA NETWORKS USING RELAY STATIONS”, inventors Chenxi Zhu, Dorin Viorel, Jagan Seshadri, Jonathan Agre and Wei-Peng Chen, filed Feb. 22, 2007, attorney docket number 1974.1020P, and U.S. utility patent application titled “INTERFERENCE MEASURING AND MAPPING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WIRELESS NETWORKS USING RELAY STATIONS”, U.S. Ser. No. 11/777,566, inventors Chenxi Zhu, Dorin Viorel, Jagan Seshadri, Jonathan Agre and Wei-Peng Chen, attorney docket number 1974.1020, filed Jul. 13, 2007, and which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. However, the present invention is not limited to this specific manner of mapping the interference levels, and other manners of mapping the interference levels can be implemented. More specifically, the present invention is not limited to the mapping the interference levels by estimation of the interference matrix as described above, and in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/864,491, titled “INTERFERENCE MAPPING PROCEDURE FOR OFDMA NETWORKS USING RELAY STATIONS”, inventors Chenxi Zhu, Dorin Viorel, Jagan Seshadri, Jonathan Agre and Wei-Peng Chen, filed Nov. 6, 2006, attorney docket number 1974.1007P, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/891,096, titled “INTERFERENCE MAPPING PROCEDURE FOR OFDMA NETWORKS USING RELAY STATIONS”, inventors Chenxi Zhu, Dorin Viorel, Jagan Seshadri, Jonathan Agre and Wei-Peng Chen, filed Feb. 22, 2007, attorney docket number 1974.1020P, and U.S. utility patent application titled “INTERFERENCE MEASURING AND MAPPING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WIRELESS NETWORKS USING RELAY STATIONS”, U.S. Ser. No. 11/777,566, inventors Chenxi Zhu, Dorin Viorel, Jagan Seshadri, Jonathan Agre and Wei-Peng Chen, attorney docket number 1974.1020, filed Jul. 13, 2007. Accordingly, the present invention is not limited to any particular manner of mapping interference levels in
operation 110. - From
operation 110, the process moves tooperation 120, where a reuse set of stations capable of sharing a transmission resource is generated based on themapping operation 110. Specific operations of generating the reuse set are described in detail with reference toFIG. 3 described below. -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method of generating a reuse set, according to an embodiment of the present invention. Referring now toFIG. 3 , inoperation 210, the one or more stations within the wireless network are sorted, for example, bynetwork management entity 30 in, for example, increasing order based on their respective interference levels mapped by operation 110 (seeFIG. 2 ) described above. The present invention is not limited to sorting in an increasing order, and other variations of a sorting procedure can be implemented. In addition, the sorting is not limited to being performed bynetwork management entity 30, and could be performed by other entities in the network. - From
operation 210, the process moves tooperation 220, wherenetwork management entity 30 determines, for example, the station with the lowest interference level (i.e., the smallest NIij), based on themapping operation 110, and this station is added to the reuse set. The present invention is not limited to determining the station with the lowest interference level, and other variations can be implemented, based on the sorting procedure implemented inoperation 210. In addition, the determination is not limited to being performed bynetwork management entity 30, and could be performed by other entities in the network. - From
operation 220, the process moves tooperation 230, in which it is determined, using thesorting procedure 210, whether the station with the next lowest interference level is unassigned to a reuse set and whether the cumulative interference level within the reuse set currently being generated would be below a threshold interference level for all the stations already in the reuse set and for the station under consideration for being added to the reuse set if the station with the next lowest interference level is added to the reuse set currently being generated. - The threshold interference level is a predetermined level set by, for example, the network management entity 30 (see
FIG. 1 ). The threshold interference level is, for example, fixed and is determined, for example, by simulations based on an effective coding rate calculated by averaging transmission rates to mobile stations by the base and/or relay stations. The threshold interference level reflects, for example, the maximal total interference that a downlink transmitter (a base station or a relay station) can tolerate is allowed to cause to other cells sharing the same spectrum. Thenetwork management entity 30 is capable of determining, for example, the maximal transmission power used by each base and relay station. However, the present invention is not limited to the predetermined level of the threshold interference level being set by thenetwork management entity 30 or to being fixed or to being determined based on any particular simulation. - If both of the conditions checked in
operation 230 are not met, the process moves tooperation 250, where it is checked if every station has been either assigned to a reuse set (including previous constructed reuse sets and the current one), or is not eligible to the current reuse set. If both conditions are not met, the process returns tooperation 230, where the next station in the sorted list of stations, with a next lowest interference level, is checked to determine whether it is already assigned to a reuse set or the cumulative interference level within the reuse set currently being generated would be below a threshold interference level if the current station being checked is added to the reuse set currently being generated. - If both of the conditions checked in
operation 230 are satisfied, the process moves tooperation 260 in which the station being checked is, for example, added to the reuse set currently being generated. Fromoperation 260, the process moves tooperation 250, where it is determined, for example, whether all stations are assigned to a reuse set. - The
process including operations operation 250. Whenoperation 250 determines that, for example, all stations are assigned, the process of constructing a reuse set ends. The process may repeat and generate a reuse set each time, until all stations have been assigned to some reuse set. - The process illustrated in
FIG. 3 assures that each generated reuse set includes as many stations (relay and/or base stations) as possible, while still having a cumulative interference level below the threshold interference level. Thus, each generated reuse set includes the maximum number of stations while tolerating the cumulative interference when transmitting with a predetermined effective coding rate and transmission power. As a result, each generated reuse set includes one or more stations which are capable of sharing a transmission resource, including a frequency or a timeslot, or a combination of both. - Of course, the process in
FIG. 3 is only one example of a process to generate a reuse set, and many variations are possible. The present invention is not limited to the specific example inFIG. 3 . For example, the present invention is not limited to including each of the specific operations inFIG. 3 . Moreover, there are many variations of the specific operations inFIG. 3 that can be implemented. -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the method of generating one or a plurality of reuse sets and a reuse pattern used to update a network schedule, according to an embodiment of the present invention. Referring now toFIG. 4 ,operation 310 represents the generation of one or a plurality of reuse sets using the reuse set generation operation described above (seeFIG. 3 ). - From
operation 310, the process moves tooperation 320, in which, for example, any empty reuse sets (i.e., reuse sets including no base stations or relay stations) are removed. - From
operation 320, the process moves tooperation 330, in which, for example, the remaining reuse sets are grouped to form a reuse pattern, including one or a plurality of reuse sets. - From
operation 330, the process moves tooperation 340, where, for example, thenetwork management entity 30 or a base station 10 (seeFIG. 1 ) generates a network schedule including the radio resources that base station and relay stations in each respective reuse set is allowed to use for its downlink access. The bandwidth can be efficiently allocated using, for example, the reuse pattern by assigning resources to individual reuse sets including a maximum number of base stations and relay stations, while, for example, maintaining a cumulative interference level below the predetermined threshold interference level. As an example, each station generates its own transmission schedule using the radio resource assigned to it by, for example,network management entity 30 or abase station 10. - From
operation 340, the process moves tooperation 350, wherenetwork management entity 30 or thebase station 10 waits, for example, for a predetermined period of time before updating the network schedule. The base station may update the network interference matrix by having the transmission stations estimate the interference from other transmission stations, and collect and update the network load and/or congestion information. Because the computations atnetwork management entity 30 or thebase station 10 are intensive, the update may take place, for example, over tens of frames. For example, the network schedule can be set to update every ten seconds. However, the present invention is not limited to any particular period of time before updating the network schedule. - From
operation 350, the process moves tooperation 360, where the network schedule is updated after a predetermined period of time in order to assure that the network schedule optimally allocates transmission resources, based on the reuse pattern. - Of course, the process in
FIG. 4 is only one example of a process to generate one or a plurality of reuse sets and a reuse pattern. The present invention is not limited to the specific example inFIG. 4 . For example, the present invention is not limited to including each of the specific operations inFIG. 4 . Moreover, there are many variations of the specific operations inFIG. 4 that can be implemented. - Various embodiments of the present invention provide a method and apparatus which (a) maps interference levels occurring at one or more stations in a wireless network; and (b) generates a reuse set, based on the mapping, of stations, included in said one or more stations, capable of sharing a transmission resource. Although not limited to any particular type of wireless network, various embodiments of the present invention are applicable for use within an IEEE 802.16 system, where each of the one or more stations is a base station or a relay station.
- Various embodiments of the present invention provide a method and apparatus in which generating a reuse set includes (a) sorting one or more stations in increasing order based on their respective mapped interference levels; (b) beginning with a station, among the one or more stations, with the smallest interference level, adding the station to the reuse set; (c) adding an additional station with a next lowest interference level to the reuse set, as long as a cumulative interference level for every station within the reuse set is below a threshold interference level and the additional station is not already assigned to another reuse set; and (d) repeatedly adding an additional station, as described above, until each of the one or more stations is included in a reuse set.
- Various embodiments of the present invention provide a method and apparatus which (a) generates a reuse pattern comprising one or a plurality of reuse sets; and (b) updates a network schedule, by a network management entity, based on the reuse pattern, to increase bandwidth efficiency.
- Various embodiments of the present invention provide a system for generating a reuse group based on interference levels in an IEEE 802.16 network. In various embodiments of the present invention, the system (a) maps interference levels, occurring at one or more stations, each of said one or more stations being a base station or a relay station; and (b) generates a reuse pattern, based on the mapped interference levels, including one or more reuse sets of stations, included in said one or more stations, capable of sharing a transmission resource. In various embodiments of the present invention, within each reuse set, the stations are listed in increasing order based on their respective interference levels, and an additional station is added to a reuse set, as long as the cumulative interference level within the reuse set is below a threshold interference level and the additional station is not already listed in another reuse set. In various embodiments of the present invention, the system removes empty reuse sets. In various embodiments of the present invention, the system also generates a network schedule, by a network management entity, based on the reuse pattern to increase bandwidth efficiency in the network.
- Various embodiments of the present invention are applicable to IEEE 802.16 networks, which includes amendments or extensions to IEEE 802.16. However, the present invention is not limited to IEEE 802.16 networks, and is applicable to other types of networks.
- Similarly, various embodiments of the present invention are applicable to OFDMA networks. However, the present invention is not limited to OFDMA networks, and is applicable to other types of networks.
- Various embodiments of the present invention are described herein with respect to “mobile” stations that communicate with base stations and relay stations in a network. However, the present invention is not limited to networks with “mobile” stations. Instead, a network might have many different types of stations, typically referred to a “subscriber” stations, which communicate with base and/or relay stations. A “mobile” station is one type of “subscriber” station.
- According to embodiments of the present invention, the above described methods, apparatuses and systems can, for example, mitigate the intranet interference between different stations (either base stations or relay stations) operating within the wireless network (e.g., an OFDMA network), thereby optimizing CINR degradation and thus allowing higher coding rates to be used on the impacted links, and cause a related improvement on the spectral efficiency per link, considering the improvement in the related bandwidth efficiency.
- U.S. utility application titled “REUSE PATTERN NETWORK SCHEDULING USING LOAD LEVELS”, U.S. Ser. No. 11/777,494, inventors Chenxi Zhu, Wei-Peng Chen, Jonathan Agre, Dorin Viorel and Jagan Seshadri, filed Jul. 13, 2007, attorney docket number 1974.1019, and U.S. Provisional Application titled “Load-Based MMR Network Scheduling Algorithm With Frequency Reuse”, U.S. Application Ser. No. 60/884,464, filed Jan. 11, 2007, inventors Chenxi Zhu, Dorin Viorel, Jagan Seshadri, Jonathan Agre and Wei-Peng Chen, Attorney Docket No. 1974.1019P, and which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
- Although a few preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes may be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the claims and their equivalents.
Claims (7)
1. A method comprising:
generating, by an entity in a wireless network, a reuse set capable of sharing a transmission resource, wherein said generating comprises:
beginning with a respective station of a plurality of stations in the network with a smallest interference level, adding the respective station to the reuse set, and
adding an additional station of the plurality of stations with a next lowest interference level to the reuse set, as long as a cumulative interference level within the reuse set is below a threshold interference level and the additional station is not already assigned to another reuse set.
2. The method as in claim 1 , wherein the network is an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.16 system, and each of the plurality of stations is a base station or a relay station.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
generating a plurality of reuse sets; and
removing empty reuse sets that include no stations.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
generating a reuse pattern comprising one or a plurality of reuse sets; and
generating a network schedule, by a network management entity, based on the reuse pattern, to increase bandwidth efficiency.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of stations includes at least one relay station.
6. An apparatus comprising:
means for generating a reuse set capable of sharing a transmission resource, wherein the means for generating comprises:
means, beginning with a respective station of a plurality of stations in the network with a smallest interference level, for adding the respective station to the reuse set, and
means for adding an additional station of the plurality of stations with a next lowest interference level to the reuse set, as long as a cumulative interference level within the reuse set is below a threshold interference level and the additional station is not already assigned to another reuse set.
7. A system for generating a reuse group on interference levels in an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.16 network, comprising:
means for generating a reuse pattern capable of sharing a transmission resource, wherein the means for generating comprises:
means for adding an additional station to a respective reuse set, as long as a cumulative interference level within the respective reuse set is below a threshold interference level and the additional station is not already assigned to another reuse set.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/969,971 US20110086653A1 (en) | 2006-11-06 | 2010-12-16 | Reuse pattern network scheduling using interference levels |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US86449806P | 2006-11-06 | 2006-11-06 | |
US11/777,385 US7877097B2 (en) | 2006-11-06 | 2007-07-13 | Reuse pattern network scheduling using interference levels |
US12/969,971 US20110086653A1 (en) | 2006-11-06 | 2010-12-16 | Reuse pattern network scheduling using interference levels |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/777,385 Continuation US7877097B2 (en) | 2006-11-06 | 2007-07-13 | Reuse pattern network scheduling using interference levels |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110086653A1 true US20110086653A1 (en) | 2011-04-14 |
Family
ID=39360302
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/777,385 Expired - Fee Related US7877097B2 (en) | 2006-11-06 | 2007-07-13 | Reuse pattern network scheduling using interference levels |
US12/969,971 Abandoned US20110086653A1 (en) | 2006-11-06 | 2010-12-16 | Reuse pattern network scheduling using interference levels |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/777,385 Expired - Fee Related US7877097B2 (en) | 2006-11-06 | 2007-07-13 | Reuse pattern network scheduling using interference levels |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7877097B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1942689A3 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5223300B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110312267A1 (en) * | 2009-02-02 | 2011-12-22 | Ajou University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation | Apparatus and method for relaying multiple links in a communication system |
Families Citing this family (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2616262C (en) * | 2005-07-19 | 2013-07-02 | Pacific Consolidated Industries, Llc | Mobile nitrogen generation device |
US20080171551A1 (en) * | 2007-01-11 | 2008-07-17 | Fujitsu Limited | Reuse pattern network scheduling using load levels |
US8861356B2 (en) * | 2007-03-13 | 2014-10-14 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Method and apparatus for prioritized information delivery with network coding over time-varying network topologies |
US20090075686A1 (en) * | 2007-09-19 | 2009-03-19 | Gomadam Krishna S | Method and apparatus for wideband transmission based on multi-user mimo and two-way training |
US8325840B2 (en) * | 2008-02-25 | 2012-12-04 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Tree position adaptive soft output M-algorithm receiver structures |
US8279954B2 (en) * | 2008-03-06 | 2012-10-02 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Adaptive forward-backward soft output M-algorithm receiver structures |
US8565329B2 (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2013-10-22 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Soft output M-algorithm receiver structures with generalized survivor selection criteria for MIMO systems |
US8229443B2 (en) * | 2008-08-13 | 2012-07-24 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Method of combined user and coordination pattern scheduling over varying antenna and base-station coordination patterns in a multi-cell environment |
US8451951B2 (en) * | 2008-08-15 | 2013-05-28 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Channel classification and rate adaptation for SU-MIMO systems |
US8705484B2 (en) * | 2008-08-15 | 2014-04-22 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Method for varying transmit power patterns in a multi-cell environment |
US8542640B2 (en) * | 2008-08-28 | 2013-09-24 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Inter-cell approach to operating wireless beam-forming and user selection/scheduling in multi-cell environments based on limited signaling between patterns of subsets of cells |
US8855221B2 (en) * | 2008-09-15 | 2014-10-07 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Method and apparatus for iterative receiver structures for OFDM/MIMO systems with bit interleaved coded modulation |
US8717914B2 (en) * | 2009-04-29 | 2014-05-06 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method for controlling interference |
US9048977B2 (en) * | 2009-05-05 | 2015-06-02 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Receiver terminal driven joint encoder and decoder mode adaptation for SU-MIMO systems |
US8514961B2 (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2013-08-20 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Method and apparatus for distributed space-time coding in wireless radio networks |
US20110228700A1 (en) * | 2010-03-16 | 2011-09-22 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Subframe Allocation for In-Band Relay Nodes |
US8744506B2 (en) * | 2010-06-17 | 2014-06-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Device discovery on white space frequencies |
US20170086169A1 (en) * | 2015-09-22 | 2017-03-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Dynamic assignment of stations to multi-user group identifiers |
JPWO2021039587A1 (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2021-03-04 |
Citations (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5551064A (en) * | 1994-07-27 | 1996-08-27 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for communication unit frequency assignment |
US20020075967A1 (en) * | 2000-10-31 | 2002-06-20 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Method of obtaining a transmission gain function |
US20020196804A1 (en) * | 2001-06-22 | 2002-12-26 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Radio communications system, radio communications method, radio relay, and radio terminal |
US20030002460A1 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-02 | Sean English | Communication system employing multiple handoff criteria |
US20030073441A1 (en) * | 2001-08-10 | 2003-04-17 | Imad Fattouch | Method of and apparatus for creating constraint matrices |
US6718184B1 (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2004-04-06 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and system for adaptive signal processing for an antenna array |
US20040136445A1 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2004-07-15 | Olson Eric S. | Method and apparatus for interference suppression with efficient matrix inversion in a DS-CDMA system |
US20050069024A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Rake-based CDMA receivers for multiple receiver antennas |
US20050096061A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2005-05-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Layered reuse for a wireless communication system |
US20050096062A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2005-05-05 | Ji Tingfang | Restrictive reuse for a wireless communication system |
US20060019701A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-01-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Restrictive reuse set management |
US7006823B2 (en) * | 2000-08-11 | 2006-02-28 | Nokio Corporation | Apparatus and method of measuring interference |
US20060045117A1 (en) * | 2004-09-01 | 2006-03-02 | Qi Emily H | Adaptive MAC architecture for wireless networks |
US7068977B1 (en) * | 2002-10-11 | 2006-06-27 | Navini Networks, Inc. | Method and system for interference assessment and reduction in a wireless communication system |
US20060159004A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-07-20 | Ji Tingfang | Restrictive reuse set management algorithm for equal grade of service on FL transmission |
US20070207769A1 (en) * | 2005-12-27 | 2007-09-06 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Method and device for reporting information related to interference components received by a first telecommunication device to a second telecommunication device |
US7327812B2 (en) * | 2003-03-27 | 2008-02-05 | Docomo Communications Laboratories Europe Gmbh | Apparatus and method for estimating a plurality of channels |
US20080165727A1 (en) * | 2006-09-18 | 2008-07-10 | Nokia Corporation | Resource management techniques for wireless networks |
US7633894B2 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2009-12-15 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Scheduling methods for wireless networks |
US7643429B2 (en) * | 2006-11-06 | 2010-01-05 | Fujitsu Limited | Interference measuring and mapping method and apparatus for wireless networks using relay stations |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2006246002A (en) * | 2005-03-03 | 2006-09-14 | Kddi Corp | Host station in multi-hop cellular system, and wireless resource reuse method thereof |
-
2007
- 2007-07-13 US US11/777,385 patent/US7877097B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2007-10-09 EP EP07118158A patent/EP1942689A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2007-11-05 JP JP2007287376A patent/JP5223300B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-12-16 US US12/969,971 patent/US20110086653A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5551064A (en) * | 1994-07-27 | 1996-08-27 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for communication unit frequency assignment |
US7006823B2 (en) * | 2000-08-11 | 2006-02-28 | Nokio Corporation | Apparatus and method of measuring interference |
US6718184B1 (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2004-04-06 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and system for adaptive signal processing for an antenna array |
US20020075967A1 (en) * | 2000-10-31 | 2002-06-20 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Method of obtaining a transmission gain function |
US20020196804A1 (en) * | 2001-06-22 | 2002-12-26 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Radio communications system, radio communications method, radio relay, and radio terminal |
US20030002460A1 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-02 | Sean English | Communication system employing multiple handoff criteria |
US20030073441A1 (en) * | 2001-08-10 | 2003-04-17 | Imad Fattouch | Method of and apparatus for creating constraint matrices |
US7633894B2 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2009-12-15 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Scheduling methods for wireless networks |
US7068977B1 (en) * | 2002-10-11 | 2006-06-27 | Navini Networks, Inc. | Method and system for interference assessment and reduction in a wireless communication system |
US20040136445A1 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2004-07-15 | Olson Eric S. | Method and apparatus for interference suppression with efficient matrix inversion in a DS-CDMA system |
US7327812B2 (en) * | 2003-03-27 | 2008-02-05 | Docomo Communications Laboratories Europe Gmbh | Apparatus and method for estimating a plurality of channels |
US20050069024A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Rake-based CDMA receivers for multiple receiver antennas |
US20050096062A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2005-05-05 | Ji Tingfang | Restrictive reuse for a wireless communication system |
US20050096061A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2005-05-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Layered reuse for a wireless communication system |
US20060019701A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-01-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Restrictive reuse set management |
US20060159004A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-07-20 | Ji Tingfang | Restrictive reuse set management algorithm for equal grade of service on FL transmission |
US20060045117A1 (en) * | 2004-09-01 | 2006-03-02 | Qi Emily H | Adaptive MAC architecture for wireless networks |
US20070207769A1 (en) * | 2005-12-27 | 2007-09-06 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Method and device for reporting information related to interference components received by a first telecommunication device to a second telecommunication device |
US20080165727A1 (en) * | 2006-09-18 | 2008-07-10 | Nokia Corporation | Resource management techniques for wireless networks |
US7643429B2 (en) * | 2006-11-06 | 2010-01-05 | Fujitsu Limited | Interference measuring and mapping method and apparatus for wireless networks using relay stations |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110312267A1 (en) * | 2009-02-02 | 2011-12-22 | Ajou University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation | Apparatus and method for relaying multiple links in a communication system |
US9071994B2 (en) * | 2009-02-02 | 2015-06-30 | Ajou University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation | Apparatus and method for relaying multiple links in a communication system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20080108359A1 (en) | 2008-05-08 |
US7877097B2 (en) | 2011-01-25 |
EP1942689A3 (en) | 2009-01-28 |
EP1942689A2 (en) | 2008-07-09 |
JP2008118661A (en) | 2008-05-22 |
JP5223300B2 (en) | 2013-06-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7877097B2 (en) | Reuse pattern network scheduling using interference levels | |
US20080171551A1 (en) | Reuse pattern network scheduling using load levels | |
US7983172B2 (en) | Interference measuring and mapping method and apparatus for wireless networks using relay stations | |
US8570955B2 (en) | Method of grouping and mapping transmission stations in a wireless network | |
Oyman et al. | Multihop relaying for broadband wireless mesh networks: From theory to practice | |
Cao et al. | A tractable algorithm for fair and efficient uplink scheduling of multi-hop wimax mesh networks | |
US8280396B2 (en) | Overload control method for a wireless cellular network | |
US9877325B2 (en) | System and method for joint scheduling in dual-carrier wireless backhaul networks | |
CN101772972B (en) | OFDMA uplink interference impact recovery in LTE system | |
EP1956761B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for joint scheduling to increase frequency efficiency and fairness in a distributed antenna system using frequency reuse and common power control | |
US20080240054A1 (en) | Relay scheduling in wireless networks | |
EP1926339B1 (en) | Method and system for assigning radio resources in cellular system using wired relay stations | |
US9144029B2 (en) | System and method for downlink power optimization in a partitioned wireless backhaul network with out-of-neighborhood utility evaluation | |
Abrardo et al. | Network coding schemes for device-to-device communications based relaying for cellular coverage extension | |
Capone et al. | Joint routing and scheduling optimization in wireless mesh networks with directional antennas | |
Gupta et al. | Resource allocation for self-backhauled networks with half-duplex small cells | |
US20110007702A1 (en) | Channel selection in an ad hoc wireless network | |
EP3501223B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for allocating radio resources | |
Razlighi et al. | On distributed dynamic-TDD schemes for base stations with decoupled uplink-downlink transmissions | |
CN101820684B (en) | The method of adjustment of resource measurement | |
Behzad et al. | Distributed power controlled medium access control for ad-hoc wireless networks | |
e Silva et al. | Interference mitigation using band selection for network-assisted D2D communications | |
Lee et al. | A multi-hop user admission algorithm for fixed relay stations with limited capabilities in OFDMA cellular networks | |
Rahman et al. | Opportunistic nonorthogonal packet scheduling in fixed broadband wireless access networks | |
Ghimire et al. | Self-organised interference mitigation in wireless networks using busy bursts |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |