US20050096881A1 - Magnetic crash sensing method - Google Patents
Magnetic crash sensing method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050096881A1 US20050096881A1 US10/946,151 US94615104A US2005096881A1 US 20050096881 A1 US20050096881 A1 US 20050096881A1 US 94615104 A US94615104 A US 94615104A US 2005096881 A1 US2005096881 A1 US 2005096881A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- magnetic circuit
- sensing
- condition
- signal
- responsive
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
- B60R21/013—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
- B60R21/0136—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to actual contact with an obstacle, e.g. to vehicle deformation, bumper displacement or bumper velocity relative to the vehicle
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R2021/0002—Type of accident
- B60R2021/0006—Lateral collision
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
- B60R2021/01122—Prevention of malfunction
- B60R2021/01129—Problems or faults
- B60R2021/01177—Misdeployment, e.g. during assembly, disassembly, accident salvage or recycling
Definitions
- FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic block diagram of a magnetic crash sensor in a vehicle
- FIG. 2 illustrates a flow chart of a magnetic crash sensing algorithm
- FIG. 3 illustrates a plot of a signal from a magnetic sensor of a magnetic crash sensor associated with a front door of a vehicle responsive to a relatively high speed slam of the front door;
- FIG. 4 illustrates a plot of a signal from a magnetic sensor of a magnetic crash sensor associated with a front door of a vehicle responsive to a relatively high speed slam of the front door, for various opening angles of the associated rear door;
- FIG. 5 illustrates a plot of a signal from a magnetic sensor of a magnetic crash sensor associated with a rear door of a vehicle responsive to a relatively high speed slam of the rear door, for various opening angles of the associated front door.
- a first magnetic crash sensor 10 . 1 incorporated in a vehicle 12 comprises at least one first coil 14 at a corresponding at least one first location 16 of the vehicle 12 , and an associated at least one first magnetic sensor 18 at a corresponding at least one second location 20 of the vehicle 12 .
- a first coil 14 is located around an upper hinge 22 . 1 of a front door 24 of the vehicle 12
- the at least one first magnetic sensor 18 comprises a second coil 26 around the striker 28 . 1 of the door latch assembly 30 . 1 of the front door 24 , wherein the striker 28 . 1 is operatively coupled to the B-pillar 32 of the vehicle 12 and the second coil 26 is proximate thereto.
- the at least one first coil 14 is operatively coupled to a first coil driver 34 . 1 , which is in turn operatively coupled to a first oscillator 36 . 1 , wherein an oscillatory signal from the first oscillator 36 . 1 is applied by the first coil driver 34 . 1 to cause an associated current in the at least one first coil 14 , responsive to which the at least one first coil 14 generates a first magnetic field 38 . 1 comprising magnetic flux 40 in an associated first magnetic circuit 42 . 1 comprising the A-pillar 44 , front door 24 , B-pillar 32 , and the body 46 , frame 48 or powertrain 50 of the vehicle 12 .
- the first oscillator 36 is operatively coupled to a first coil driver 34 . 1 , which is in turn operatively coupled to a first oscillator 36 . 1 , wherein an oscillatory signal from the first oscillator 36 . 1 is applied by the first coil driver 34 . 1 to cause an associated current in the at least one first coil 14 , responsive to which
- the oscillation frequency would typically be less than about 100 KHz for a steel structure, e.g. 20 to 30 KHz in one embodiment.
- An oscillation frequency in the audio range e.g.
- the first magnetic field 38 . 1 is responsive to the reluctance of the associated first magnetic circuit 42 . 1 , which is affected by a crash involving the elements thereof and/or the gaps 52 therein.
- the first magnetic field 38 . 1 is sensed by the at least one first magnetic sensor 18 , and the signal therefrom is conditioned by an associated first signal conditioner 54 . 1 , demodulated by a first demodulator 56 . 1 , converted from analog to digital form by a first analog-to-digital converter 58 .
- the first signal conditioner 54 . 1 may incorporate buffering, amplification, high-pass, low-pass, or band-pass filtering,
- the first demodulator 56 . 1 may provide amplitude demodulation, constant sampling relative to the phase of the first oscillator 36 . 1 , or constant sampling relative to the phase of the signal sensed by the first magnetic sensor 18 .
- any envelope detection or phase or frequency demodulation technique could be used to obtain the demodulated signal.
- the particular demodulation method will, for example, depend upon the particular implementation and the cost of the components used to perform this function.
- the analog-to-digital conversion function and the demodulation function are combined a single process.
- the first demodulator 56 . 1 may also provide for amplification, and that the first analog-to-digital converter 58 . 1 would incorporate an associated sampler. Changes to the first magnetic field 38 . 1 at a particular location in the first magnetic circuit 42 . 1 propagate within the associated first magnetic circuit 42 . 1 at the speed of light and are seen throughout the first magnetic circuit 42 . 1 . Accordingly, the first magnetic field 38 . 1 sensed by the at least one first magnetic sensor 18 contains information about the nature of the remainder of the magnetic circuit, including the front door 24 and adjacent A-pillar 44 and B-pillar 32 , any of which could be involved in and affected by a side-impact crash.
- the vehicle 12 further incorporates a second magnetic crash sensor 10 . 2 comprising at least one third coil 64 at a corresponding at least one third location 66 of the vehicle 12 , and an associated at least one second magnetic sensor 68 at a corresponding at least one fourth location 70 of the vehicle 12 .
- a third coil 64 is located around an upper hinge 72 . 1 of a rear door 74 of the vehicle 12
- the at least one second magnetic sensor 68 comprises a fourth coil 76 around the striker 28 . 2 of the door latch assembly 30 . 2 of the rear door 74 , wherein the striker 28 .
- the at least one third coil 64 is operatively coupled to a second coil driver 34 . 2 , which is in turn operatively coupled to a second oscillator 36 . 2 , wherein an oscillatory signal from the second oscillator 36 . 2 is applied by the second coil driver 34 . 2 so as to cause an associated current in the at least one third coil 64 , responsive to which the at least one third coil 64 generates a second magnetic field 38 . 2 comprising magnetic flux 40 in the associated second magnetic circuit 42 .
- the second oscillator 36 . 2 generates a oscillating signal, for example, having either a sinusoidal, square wave, triangular or other waveform shape, or a single frequency or a plurality of frequencies that, for example, are either stepped, continuously swept or simultaneous.
- the frequency is adapted so that the resulting second magnetic field 38 . 2 is conducted through the second magnetic circuit 42 . 2 with sufficient strength so as to provide a useful signal level from the second magnetic sensor 68 , which cooperates therewith.
- the second magnetic field 38 . 2 is responsive to the reluctance of the associated second magnetic circuit 42 .
- the second magnetic field 38 . 2 is sensed by the at least one second magnetic sensor 68 , and a signal therefrom is conditioned by an associated second signal conditioner 54 . 2 , demodulated by a second demodulator 56 . 2 , converted from analog to digital form by a second analog-to-digital converter 58 . 2 and input as a second magnetic sensor signal 80 to the processor 62 , which processes the signal as described more fully hereinbelow.
- the second signal conditioner 54 . 2 may incorporate buffering, amplification, high-pass, low-pass, or band-pass filtering.
- the second demodulator 56 may incorporate buffering, amplification, high-pass, low-pass, or band-pass filtering.
- the second demodulator 56 may provide amplitude demodulation, constant sampling relative to the phase of the second oscillator 36 . 2 , or constant sampling relative to the phase of the signal sensed by the second magnetic sensor 68 .
- any envelope detection or phase or frequency demodulation technique could be used to obtain the demodulated signal.
- the particular demodulation method will, for example, depend upon the particular implementation and the cost of the components used to perform this function.
- the analog-to-digital conversion function and the demodulation function are combined a single process. It should be understood that the second demodulator 56 .
- the second magnetic field 38 . 2 sensed by the at least one second magnetic sensor 68 contains information about the nature of the remainder of the magnetic circuit, including the rear door 74 and adjacent B-pillar 32 and C-pillar 78 , any of which could be involved in and affected by a side-impact crash.
- the first coil 14 could be located around the lower hinge 22 . 2 of the front door 24 ; the at least one first coil 14 , could comprise first coils 14 . 1 , 14 . 2 around the upper 22 . 1 and lower 22 . 2 hinges respectively; the third coil 64 could be located around the lower hinge 22 . 2 of the rear door 74 ; or the at least one third coil 64 , could comprise third coils 64 . 1 , 64 . 2 around the upper 72 . 1 and lower 72 . 2 hinges respectively.
- the first 36 . 1 and second 36 . 2 oscillators could be one and the same, or could be separate, operating at the same or different frequencies with the same type or different types of waveforms.
- magnétique sensor 10 can be used to provide the first 60 or second 80 magnetic sensor signals—for example, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,407,660, 6,433,688, 6,587,048, 6,777,927, which are incorporated herein by reference.
- the magnetic sensor 18 , 68 could comprise a coil located either on the door 24 , 74 , inside the door 24 , 74 , or on the frame 48 near a gap 52 between the door 24 , 74 and the frame 48 .
- Changes in the position of metal surrounding a single coil can be sensed by monitoring a measure of—or one or more measures responsive to—the self-inductance of the coil, for example, when excited with a time varying voltage, e.g. of constant amplitude.
- a single coil can act to both generate and sense and associated magnetic field because current flowing through the coil is responsive to changes in the inductance thereof, whereby the inductance is responsive to both the properties of the coil itself, and to the shape and position of conductive and/or ferromagnetic materials (e.g. metals like steel or aluminum) proximate to the coil that affect the magnetic field associated therewith.
- conductive and/or ferromagnetic materials e.g. metals like steel or aluminum
- the first 36 . 1 and/or second 32 . 2 oscillators may be replaced with pulse sources, whereby the pulse amplitude may be adapted to provide for sufficient signal-to-noise ratio and the pulse width may be adapted to provide for reduced power consumption.
- first 10 . 1 and/or second 10 . 2 magnetic crash sensors need not necessarily incorporate associated first 36 . 1 or second 36 . 2 oscillators, or first 56 . 1 or second 56 . 2 demodulators, but instead the associated first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals could be responsive to magnetostriction signals, magnetic coil pair signals, ferromagnetic shock signals, or other time varying magnetic signals that do not have a carrier from which the information must be extracted prior to analysis.
- the first magnetic sensor signal 60 from the first magnetic crash sensor 10 . 1 for a vehicle 12 with one magnetic crash sensor 10 on a particular side of the vehicle 12 , —or the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals from the first 10 . 1 and second 10 . 2 magnetic crash sensors—for a vehicle 12 with two magnetic crash sensors 10 on a particular side of the vehicle 12 , —are processed, for example, in accordance with a magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 as illustrated by the flow chart of FIG. 2 , which is executed separately for each side of vehicle 12 .
- the processor 62 samples the i th sample of the first 60 or second 80 magnetic sensor signal responsive to the associated magnetic flux 40 at the location of the associated first 18 or second 68 magnetic sensor.
- a sampling rate of about 6 KHz in one embodiment provides for medium-to-high frequency content in the raw sampled signal.
- this signal is designated as Y 0 (i), which corresponds to the sampling of either the first 60 or second 80 magnetic sensor signal, depending upon which is being processed.
- the sampled signal Y 0 (i) is filtered with a first filter to remove noise from the raw magnetic signal, using a relatively lower frequency filter, for example, a running average filter with a sufficiently wide associated time window.
- the filter is adapted to balance between providing for noise reduction, maintaining a relatively fast step response, and providing for relatively fast computation.
- the first filter incorporates a window of about 6 milliseconds, which corresponds to a low-pass cutoff frequency of about 100 Hz.
- a second embodiment of this filter could be a band-pass filter set produce a signal with relatively lower frequency content, for example from 50 Hz to 250 Hz.
- the output of the first filter is a first filtered signal Y 1 (i).
- step ( 206 ) if the core crash detection algorithm ( 214 - 250 ) has been previously entered following step ( 212 ) and not subsequently exited at step ( 252 ), the process continues with step ( 216 ). Otherwise, in step ( 208 ), the opening state of the door is detected from the first filtered signal Y 1 (i), or another similar relatively longer time constant/lower frequency signal derived from the sampled signal Y 0 (i) (e.g. about a 1 Hz low-passed signal). The relatively slow motion of the doors 24 , 74 (or of one of the doors 24 in a two-door vehicle 12 ) can be tracked from the magnitude of the associated first filtered signals Y 1 (i).
- the magnetic flux 40 interacting with the magnetic sensor 18 , 78 associated therewith changes, usually diminishing, in a predictable manner.
- the amount that the door 24 is open i.e. degrees of rotation open
- the amount that door 24 , 74 is open on a given side of the vehicle 12 can be estimated by comparing the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals from a particular side of the vehicle 12 with the associated calibration data to determine the associated door state of the associated door 24 , 74 , so to provide for classifying the door state as either fully closed, partially latched, or open.
- first 10 . 1 or second 10 . 2 magnetic crash sensor comprises a coil 14 , 64 located inside the door 24 , 74 of the vehicle 12 , wherein the associated first 60 or second 80 magnetic sensor signal was responsive to the self-inductance of the coil 14 , 64 , and if this coil 14 , 64 was not substantially responsive to the position of the associated door 24 , 74 relative to the frame 48 of the vehicle 12 , then steps ( 208 ) and ( 210 ) of the magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 would be omitted when processing that first 60 or second 80 magnetic sensor signal.
- the interpretation of the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals can be adjusted to avoid inadvertent deployments, alter deployment thresholds, or temporarily disable the safety restraint actuator 82 , in accordance with the vehicle manufacturer's specifications.
- Recognition of the door state of the door 24 , 74 provides for preventing inadvertent actuation of safety restraint actuator(s) 82 responsive to hard door slams or other “abuse events” when the doors 24 , 74 are not fully latched.
- Levels of magnetic flux 40 that cannot be attributed to one of the possible door states can be indicative of a system failure or a change in the properties or geometry of the door 24 , 74 beyond acceptable levels.
- the processor 62 can use an indicator 84 , or an alarm, to alert an occupant of the vehicle of a potential system failure.
- an indicator 84 or an alarm, to alert an occupant of the vehicle of a potential system failure.
- Such recognition is possible within a relatively short period of time—e.g. within seconds—after occurrence and the monitoring for such a failure can occur continuously while the system is active.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a first magnetic sensor signal 60 generated responsive to a front door 24 being slammed shut by a hydraulic robot in accordance with a less than worse case condition, wherein the magnitude of the resulting first magnetic sensor signal 60 approaches an associated crash detection threshold.
- the crash detection algorithm would prevent a safety restraint actuator 82 , e.g. side air bag inflator, associated with that side of the vehicle 12 from actuating, so as to prevent an inadvertent deployment thereof.
- a safety restraint actuator 82 e.g. side air bag inflator
- the responsiveness of the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals to the position of the door 24 , 74 can be used to provide an indication to the driver if the door 24 , 74 were open or not fully closed and could also control the activation of interior vehicle lighting, replacing the conventional door ajar switch. Such a door ajar detection function could also occur when the vehicle 12 was not turned on if the magnetic field were applied at a low duty cycle to conserve power.
- the magnitude of the corresponding first 60 or second 80 magnetic sensor signal responsive to a crash can be substantially greater than that for a fully closed door 24 , 74 , however, if detected, this condition can be compensated by adjusting associated discrimination thresholds so as to avoid an inadvertent deployment of the safety restraint actuator 82 responsive to a significant, non-crash event (also known as an “abuse event”), as described more fully hereinbelow.
- the magnitude of the impact response of a coil 14 , 64 operated in a self-inductance mode and located inside the door 24 , 74 is not substantially affected by latch state of the door 24 , 74 (i.e fully latched or partially latched).
- the first magnetic sensor signal 60 from the first magnetic sensor 18 proximate to the B-pillar 32 is responsive to the angle of the front door 24 and is nearly independent of the angle of the rear door 74 . Accordingly, it is possible to estimate the angle of the front door 24 from the magnitude of the first magnetic sensor signal 60 , particularly the associated first filtered signal Y 1 (i), using calibration data, for example, as illustrated in FIG. 4 .
- the sensitivity of the first magnetic sensor signal 60 is greater for smaller door angles than larger door angles, and for angles less than about 15 degrees, the door angle can be estimated relatively accurately.
- relatively short term signal offsets caused by effects other than door angle, such as temperature or recent mechanical changes to the front door 24 be maintained to less than an equivalent of about ⁇ 1 degree, in order to estimate the associated door state of the front door 24 sufficiently accurately
- Longer term signal offsets caused by effects such as door droop or accumulated damage can be characterized by monitoring the offset over time, and compensated by subtracting the offset from the signal.
- Another way to adjust for changes in door alignment over time is to compare the voltage applied to the at least one first coil 14 with the corresponding resulting current passing therethrough.
- Faraday's Law can be used to derive a relationship between the inductance L of the at least one first coil 14 , which is influenced by the proximity to nearby metal (i.e.
- the measure of coil inductance derived from the known current (I) and voltage (V) in the at least one first coil 14 can provide for adapting the expected response of the first magnetic crash sensor 10 . 1 as a function of door angle.
- the second magnetic sensor signal 80 from the second magnetic sensor 68 proximate to the C-pillar 78 is a strong function of the angle of the rear door 74 and is also a function of the angle of the front door 24 . Accordingly, because the second magnetic sensor signal 80 has significant response to the angle of the front door 24 , the angle and associated door state of the front door 24 is determined first, and then used in the determination of the angle of the rear door 74 . If the door state of the front door 24 is open, e.g. having an angle greater than about three degrees, then the door state of the rear door 74 need not be determined because, in that case, the safety restraint actuator 82 on that side of the vehicle 12 would be disabled anyway.
- the angle of the rear door 74 can be determined from the offset of the second magnetic sensor signal 80 using calibration data, for example as illustrated in FIG. 5 .
- relatively short term signal offsets in the second magnetic sensor signal 80 caused by effects other than door angle, such as temperature or recent mechanical changes to the rear door 74 be maintained to less than an equivalent of about +1 degree, in order to estimate the associated door state of the rear door 74 sufficiently accurately.
- Longer term signal offsets caused by effects such as door droop or accumulated damage can be characterized by monitoring the offset over time, and compensating by subtracting the offset from the signal.
- step ( 210 ) if a front 24 or rear 74 door is detected as being either open or slammed, the core crash detection algorithm ( 214 - 250 ) is not entered, but instead, the process repeats with step ( 202 ).
- a potential adverse affect of a door slam condition can be avoided by delaying the confirmation of a partially latched or closed door state for a brief period of time following the initial detection thereof.
- step ( 212 ) if criteria for commencing the core crash detection algorithm ( 214 - 250 ), i.e. entrance criteria, are satisfied, then the core crash detection algorithm ( 214 - 250 ) is entered commencing with step ( 214 ).
- the first filtered signal Y 1 (i) is compared with one or more previous values thereof for each door 24 , 74 , and if there is a sudden change in the first filtered signal Y 1 (i) for either door 24 , 74 exceeding a minimum rate threshold, and if the magnitude of the first filtered signal Y 1 (i) exceeds a threshold, then the entrance criteria is satisfied.
- the algorithm entrance requirement of a significant and rapid shift in the magnitude of the magnetic flux 40 reaching the magnetic sensor 18 , 68 provides a relatively simple way to reject various forms of AC electrical or mechanical noise.
- the absolute magnitude of the first filtered signal Y 1 (i) for the rear door 74 exceeds a threshold of about 0.6 volts, then the entrance criteria is satisfied.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a single step ( 212 ) at which the entrance criteria is tested, it is anticipated that there may be a plurality of different entrance criteria for associated different portions of the overall magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 , whereby there would be more than one associated step at which it would be determined if the associated entrance criteria satisfied the corresponding criteria necessary to commence that particular portion of the magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 .
- the core crash detection algorithm ( 214 - 250 ) and associated steps ( 202 ) and ( 204 ) continue to be executed in sequence until either the safety restraint actuator 82 is actuated in step ( 248 ), or until the core crash detection algorithm ( 214 - 250 ) exits with step ( 252 ) because of either damped-out values of the associated discrimination metrics or because of a time-out condition.
- step ( 214 ) Upon entrance of the core crash detection algorithm ( 214 - 250 ), in step ( 214 ), associated variables of the magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 are initialized. Then in step ( 216 ), the sampled signal Y 0 (i) is filtered, for example, with a second low-pass filter with a relatively higher cut-off frequency, so as to extract relatively higher frequency information from the raw magnetic signal, for example, by using a running average filter with a relatively narrower associated time window.
- the first filter incorporates a window of about 1.1 millisecond which provides information in the range from DC to 250 Hz.
- the output of the second filter is a second filtered signal Y 2 (i).
- K 1 is set so that the width of the running average window is about 5 milliseconds.
- the AC measure Y AC is a running average of the difference between the raw data and the mid-frequency low-pass filtered data that provides a measure of the fluctuation (AC) content of the magnetic signal, which is related to the door gap velocity, vibration, and crushing energy being transferred to the door 24 , 74 by the crash.
- a third filtered signal Y 3 (i) is generated by band-pass or high-pass filtering the sampled signal Y 0 (i), and the AC measure Y AC is calculated from a running average, or low-pass filtering, of the third filtered signal Y 3 (i).
- the magnitude of a component of the relatively lower frequency first filtered signal Y 1 (i) at the at least one first frequency is greater than the corresponding magnitude of a component of the relatively higher frequency second filtered signal Y 2 (i) or the AC measure Y AC at the same at least one first frequency; and the magnitude of a component of the relatively lower frequency first filtered signal Y 1 (i) at the at least one second frequency is less than the corresponding magnitude of a component of the relatively higher frequency second filtered signal Y 2 (i) or the AC measure Y AC at the same at least one second frequency.
- the frequency ranges of the filters associated with the relatively lower frequency first filtered signal Y 1 (i), and the relatively higher frequency second filtered signal Y 2 (i) or the AC measure Y AC may be separated from one another, or may partially overlap, depending upon the nature of the particular vehicle, as necessary to provide for adequate discrimination of various crash and non-crash events from one another, and as necessary to provide for adequate detection speed.
- data can be collected for a variety of impacts, e.g.
- pole, soft-bumper, ECE cart, FMVSS 214 barrier, and non-crash events, of various severities, and the associated filter types and cut-off frequencies may be adjusted, along with other parameters of the magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 , so as to provide for generating a timely safety restraint actuation signal when necessary, and so as to not generation a safety restraint actuation signal when not necessary.
- step ( 220 ) if the magnitude of the first filtered signal Y 1 (i) exceeds a threshold, in steps ( 222 )-( 226 ) the relatively higher frequency AC measure Y AC is combined, e.g. linearly, with the relatively lower frequency first filtered signal Y 1 (i) to form first crash metric M 1 B or M 1 C , corresponding to the front 24 or rear 74 door respectively. Otherwise, in step ( 228 ), the first crash metric M 1 B or M 1 C is set to the value of the corresponding first filtered signal Y 1 (i). The requirement of step ( 220 ) lessens the possibility of high frequency noise (which is not expected to have significant DC content) falsely enhancing the first crash metric M 1 B or M 1 C during non-crash conditions.
- the coefficients a and b associated with the linear combination are specific to the particular type of vehicle 12 , and would be determined from associated crash and non-crash date associated with “abuse events”.
- the coefficients a and b determine the relative weighting or contribution of the relatively lower frequency first filtered signal Y 1 (i) and the relatively higher frequency AC measure Y AC in the first crash metric M 1 B or M 1 C .
- the value of b might be set greater than that of a so as to relatively emphasize the higher frequency information in the first crash metric M 1 B or M 1 C .
- the coefficients a and b may be constants.
- the sign and or magnitude of coefficients a and b may be a dynamic function of time of the sign or value of the second filtered signal Y 2 (i).
- the transition-smoothing algorithm provides for smoothing the effect of a transition between an inclusion of the AC measure Y AC in the first crash metric M 1 B or M 1 C , in step ( 226 ), and the exclusion thereof in the first crash metric M 1 B or M 1 C , in step ( 228 ). More particularly, the transition smoothing algorithm provides for determining a value for the transition smoothing factor ⁇ in equation (2) a) has a value that is bounded between 0.0 and 1.0; b) is initialized to 0.0; c) is incremented by a factor, for example, between 0.04 and 1.0 (i.e. no smoothing), e.g. 0.09 (i.e. 9%), for each iteration for which the result of step ( 220 ) is affirmative; and d) is decremented by that factor each iteration for which the result of step ( 220 ) is negative.
- a safing criteria is evaluated so as to provide an independent basis for determining whether or not to enable actuation of the associated safety restraint actuator 82 .
- the safing strategy is adapted so as to prevent a single point failure from causing an inadvertent actuation of the associated safety restraint actuator 82 .
- the evaluation of the safing criteria may be performed by an independent processor so as to preclude the prospect of a failure of the processor 62 causing an inadvertent deployment.
- the safing strategy is adapted so the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals are used to safe one another.
- signals—e.g. associated current and voltage—from the first 34 . 1 and second 34 . 2 coil drivers are also monitored to verify the operation of the associated first 14 and third 64 coils, e.g. to verify the fidelity and operativeness of the coils and associated signals and to monitor the associated noise level.
- one or more signals—e.g. a measure of current through the at least one first coil 14 and/or the associated voltage thereacross—from the first coil driver 34 . 1 are operatively coupled to at least one associated third demodulator 86 . 1 , the output(s) of which is/are operatively coupled to an associated at least one third analog-to-digital converter 88 .
- the safing criteria are satisfied for a particular magnetic crash sensor 10 . 1 , 10 . 2 if the associated coil driver 34 . 1 , 34 . 2 generates a substantially noise-free signal at the proper amplitude and frequency, and both the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals exhibit substantial nominal signal levels and variation over time.
- the current though the first 14 or third 64 coil is processed to calculate two measures, TXRA and TXRA_ABS, respectively as running averages of the magnitude of this current and the absolute value of the magnitude of this current, wherein the running averages are calculated over a period of, for example, 1 to 7 milliseconds, e.g. 5 milliseconds. If ThresholdRA1 ⁇ TXRA ⁇ ThresholdRA2 and TXRA_ABS ⁇ ThresholdRA3, then the current signal from the corresponding first 14 or third 64 coil is considered to be valid, and the corresponding first 14 or third 64 coil is considered to be operative.
- the safing criteria is considered to be satisfied, and this condition is latched for a period of time, for example, a predetermined period of 30 milliseconds. If the conditions on TXRA or TXRA_ABS later both become unsatisfied, then the safing condition is unlatched substantially immediately thereafter. Otherwise, if any of the other four conditions become unsatisfied, then the safing condition is unlatched after the period of time lapses, unless within that interval, all six safing conditions again become satisfied.
- step ( 232 ) if the vehicle 12 has two (or more) doors, e.g. a front 24 and rear 74 door on a particular side thereof, then in step ( 234 ), steps ( 202 ) through ( 230 ) are performed for each door 24 , 74 using the associated first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals from the corresponding first 18 and second 68 magnetic sensors, so as to determine the first crash metrics M 1 B or M 1 C for each door 24 , 74 .
- a second crash metric M 2 is calculated from the combination, e.g. linear combination, of the first crash metrics M 1 B and M 1 C corresponding to different doors 24 , 74 on the same side of the vehicle 12 .
- the second crash metric M 2 is equal to the first crash metric M 1 B (for purposes of describing a general magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 in the context of a vehicle having an arbitrary number of doors on a side—in a two-door vehicle 12 having only one door 24 on a side, there would be no need to have distinct first M 1 B and second M 2 crash metrics).
- step ( 240 ) the values of the first M 1 B,C and second M 2 crash metric are damped, so that the values of the respective resulting first ⁇ tilde over (M) ⁇ 1 B,C and second ⁇ tilde over (M) ⁇ 2 damped crash metrics are attenuated over time to insignificant levels after the event subsides provided that a side impact crash of sufficient severity to warrant actuation of the safety restraint actuator 82 does not occur, even for events for which there may have been associated metal bending resulting from the crash. Damping provides for facilitating algorithm exit in step ( 250 ) following significant crash events that were not sufficiently severe to warrant actuation of the safety restraint actuator 82 .
- the damping factor ⁇ could include an integral of the AC measure Y AC commencing with algorithm entrance, or the sample number since algorithm entrance multiplied by a constant minus the running average of the AC measure Y AC calculated using a relatively long time window, e.g. greater than 10 milliseconds.
- a threshold e.g. 0.75
- + ⁇ ( i ⁇ 1) (10) M ⁇ 2 ⁇ ( i ) M 2 ⁇ ( i ) ⁇ ⁇ 0 ⁇ ⁇ ( i ) ( 11 ) where ⁇ is a damping modification factor, e.g. having a value of 0.7 for the particular embodiment, and Y 1 B (i) is the value of the first filtered signal Y 1 (i) based on the first magnetic sensor signal 60 .
- the magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 provides for adapting a deployment threshold as a function of the door state that was detected in step ( 208 ). For example, if one of the doors 24 , 74 were partially latched rather than being fully closed, the magnitude of the second damped crash metric ⁇ tilde over (M) ⁇ 2 would likely be greater than if both doors were fully closed, and less than if both doors were partially latched.
- the deployment threshold can be adjusted to accommodate the combination of door states on a particular side of the vehicle 12 , wherein, in one embodiment, the threshold would be lowest for both doors 24 , 74 fully closed, highest for both doors 24 , 74 partially latched, and intermediate thereto if one of the doors is fully closed and the other is partially latched.
- a preset threshold scheme would be used in lieu of step ( 242 ).
- step ( 244 ) the first ⁇ tilde over (M) ⁇ 1 B,C and second ⁇ tilde over (M) ⁇ 2 damped crash metrics and the AC measure Y AC are compared with associated threshold levels (positive and negative), and, in one embodiment, if each metric or measure exceeds it respective threshold for at least a specified minimum number of consecutive iterations, then, in step ( 246 ), if the safing criteria from step ( 230 ) are also simultaneously satisfied, then in step ( 248 ) the appropriate safety restraint actuator(s) 82 is/are deployed.
- neither the satisfaction of the deployment threshold in step ( 244 ) nor the satisfaction of the safing criteria in step ( 246 ) latches TRUE, but instead, both criteria must be simultaneously TRUE in order for the safety restraint actuator(s) 82 to be actuated.
- other logical combinations of the various crash metrics and other measures are used in the actuation decision.
- the actuation decision could be governed by one or more of the various crash metrics and measures, or the satisfaction of the safing criteria could latch TRUE, so that an actuation of the safety restraint actuator(s) 82 would occur when the deployment threshold is satisfied in step ( 244 ) provided that the safing criteria had been satisfied earlier, subsequent to algorithm entrance.
- step ( 250 ) if an exit criteria is satisfied, then the core crash detection algorithm ( 214 - 250 ) is exited in step ( 252 ), and the magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 continues with step ( 202 ), whereupon subsequent entry of step ( 206 ), the algorithm will be indicated as being inactive (i.e. not entered) until the entrance criteria is again satisfied responsive to conditions on the first filtered signal Y 1 (i), which continues to be calculated in step ( 204 ) following the acquisition of the first 18 or second 68 magnetic sensor in step ( 202 ).
- the exit criteria is satisfied if the first filtered signals Y 1 B and Y 1 C , the associated AC measures Y AC B and Y AC C , and the damped crash metric M 3 are less than associated threshold values for a specified number of iterations of the core crash detection algorithm ( 214 - 250 ), or if the time period since algorithm entrance in step ( 212 ) exceeds a time-out threshold.
- the above-described magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 can be embodied in various ways, and can be modified within the scope of the instant invention.
- the first filtered signal Y 1 (i) and the AC measure Y AC could be processed separately, as if each were a separate crash metric. These individual metrics could then be separately damped (step ( 240 )) and used separately to compare against individual deployment thresholds (step ( 244 )). These metrics could alternatively be combined with similar metrics derived from a second magnetic sensor to create two M 2 metrics (following the example in step ( 236 )): a low frequency and a higher frequency M 2 metric. This alternative individual signal processing creates more individual metrics, making the algorithm slightly more complicated, but also providing additional flexibility in setting deployment conditions.
- additional filtered signals might be obtained from the raw data using different window running averages to produce time domain equivalents of high-pass frequency filtering, or other types of filters can be utilized, for example single or multiple pole low-pass or band-pass filters, other digital filters, e.g. FIR or IIR, or Fourier transform filters Several such filtered signals might be combined with each other or with the raw data signal to give measures associated with desired frequency bands. Such additional frequency analysis and derived measures might be necessary for a specific vehicle platform or magnetic system mounting location and method and would be based upon the associated crash data and data from non-crash “abuse events”.
- the magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 provides a method of processing magnetic crash signals from a magnetic crash sensor so as to provide for the rapid, real time determination of both the crash severity and the associated crash type (e.g. pole crash vs. barrier crash) for a particular crash event
- the magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 provides for the actuation of safety restraint actuator(s) 82 at a relatively early time as necessary so as to provide for protecting the occupant from the crash, while also discriminating lower severity crash events (as determined by potential occupant injury) so as to avoid inadvertent or unnecessary actuation of safety restraint actuator(s) 82 , particularly those safety restraint actuator(s) 82 which are not resetable, i.e. reusable for multiple crash events.
- the magnetic crash sensing algorithm 200 also provides for immunity to external electrical and mechanical “abuse events” including those caused by electromagnetic induction, or localized impacts with relatively low mass but high speed objects.
- the associated magnetic crash sensors 10 . 1 , 10 . 2 provide for distributed crash sensing that can be beneficially less sensitive to localized mechanical or electrical disturbances which might otherwise adversely affect a crash sensing system using more localized crash sensors.
- the polarity of the associated magnetic crash sensor signals 60 , 80 provides information that can be used for distinguishing various types of crashes. For example, in one embodiment, measured data suggests that localized impacts that cause significant intrusion into the vehicle will give a positive crash metric polarity while more broad surface impacts will give a negative polarity crash metric. Pole-like impacts might be identified as positive polarity while cart-like impacts would be identified by negative polarity. The door motion and crush will vary between crash types, potentially producing signals of opposite sign that correspond to more or less magnetic signal (magnetic flux 40 ) reaching the receiver sensors than is normally received.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Air Bags (AREA)
- Transmission And Conversion Of Sensor Element Output (AREA)
- Measuring Magnetic Variables (AREA)
- Force Measurement Appropriate To Specific Purposes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The instant application claims the benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/503,906 filed on Sep. 19, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- In the accompanying drawings:
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic block diagram of a magnetic crash sensor in a vehicle; -
FIG. 2 illustrates a flow chart of a magnetic crash sensing algorithm; -
FIG. 3 illustrates a plot of a signal from a magnetic sensor of a magnetic crash sensor associated with a front door of a vehicle responsive to a relatively high speed slam of the front door; -
FIG. 4 illustrates a plot of a signal from a magnetic sensor of a magnetic crash sensor associated with a front door of a vehicle responsive to a relatively high speed slam of the front door, for various opening angles of the associated rear door; and -
FIG. 5 illustrates a plot of a signal from a magnetic sensor of a magnetic crash sensor associated with a rear door of a vehicle responsive to a relatively high speed slam of the rear door, for various opening angles of the associated front door. - Referring to
FIG. 1 , a first magnetic crash sensor 10.1 incorporated in avehicle 12 comprises at least onefirst coil 14 at a corresponding at least onefirst location 16 of thevehicle 12, and an associated at least one firstmagnetic sensor 18 at a corresponding at least onesecond location 20 of thevehicle 12. For example, in the embodiment illustrated inFIG. 1 , afirst coil 14 is located around an upper hinge 22.1 of afront door 24 of thevehicle 12, and the at least one firstmagnetic sensor 18 comprises asecond coil 26 around the striker 28.1 of the door latch assembly 30.1 of thefront door 24, wherein the striker 28.1 is operatively coupled to the B-pillar 32 of thevehicle 12 and thesecond coil 26 is proximate thereto. The at least onefirst coil 14 is operatively coupled to a first coil driver 34.1, which is in turn operatively coupled to a first oscillator 36.1, wherein an oscillatory signal from the first oscillator 36.1 is applied by the first coil driver 34.1 to cause an associated current in the at least onefirst coil 14, responsive to which the at least onefirst coil 14 generates a first magnetic field 38.1 comprisingmagnetic flux 40 in an associated first magnetic circuit 42.1 comprising theA-pillar 44,front door 24, B-pillar 32, and the body 46, frame 48 orpowertrain 50 of thevehicle 12. The first oscillator 36.1 generates an oscillating signal, for example, having either a sinusoidal, square wave, triangular or other waveform shape, of a single frequency, or a plurality of frequencies that, for example, are either stepped, continuously swept or simultaneous. The frequency is adapted so that the resulting first magnetic field 38.1 is conducted through the first magnetic circuit 42.1 with sufficient strength so as to provide a useful signal level from the firstmagnetic sensor 18 that cooperates therewith. For example, the oscillation frequency would typically be less than about 100 KHz for a steel structure, e.g. 20 to 30 KHz in one embodiment. An oscillation frequency in the audio range, e.g. 10 to 20 KHz, can also be used for crash sensing, however, such frequencies may cause an audible hum to be generated by the associated magnetic circuit. The first magnetic field 38.1 is responsive to the reluctance of the associated first magnetic circuit 42.1, which is affected by a crash involving the elements thereof and/or thegaps 52 therein. The first magnetic field 38.1 is sensed by the at least one firstmagnetic sensor 18, and the signal therefrom is conditioned by an associated first signal conditioner 54.1, demodulated by a first demodulator 56.1, converted from analog to digital form by a first analog-to-digital converter 58.1, and input as a firstmagnetic sensor signal 60 to aprocessor 62, which processes the signal as described more fully hereinbelow. The first signal conditioner 54.1 may incorporate buffering, amplification, high-pass, low-pass, or band-pass filtering, The first demodulator 56.1, for example, may provide amplitude demodulation, constant sampling relative to the phase of the first oscillator 36.1, or constant sampling relative to the phase of the signal sensed by the firstmagnetic sensor 18. For example, any envelope detection or phase or frequency demodulation technique could be used to obtain the demodulated signal. Since various demodulation techniques could be used to extract the crash information from the signal from the firstmagnetic sensor 18, the particular demodulation method will, for example, depend upon the particular implementation and the cost of the components used to perform this function. In another embodiment, the analog-to-digital conversion function and the demodulation function are combined a single process. It should be understood that the first demodulator 56.1 may also provide for amplification, and that the first analog-to-digital converter 58.1 would incorporate an associated sampler. Changes to the first magnetic field 38.1 at a particular location in the first magnetic circuit 42.1 propagate within the associated first magnetic circuit 42.1 at the speed of light and are seen throughout the first magnetic circuit 42.1. Accordingly, the first magnetic field 38.1 sensed by the at least one firstmagnetic sensor 18 contains information about the nature of the remainder of the magnetic circuit, including thefront door 24 andadjacent A-pillar 44 and B-pillar 32, any of which could be involved in and affected by a side-impact crash. - In the embodiment illustrated in
FIG. 1 , thevehicle 12 further incorporates a second magnetic crash sensor 10.2 comprising at least one third coil 64 at a corresponding at least onethird location 66 of thevehicle 12, and an associated at least one secondmagnetic sensor 68 at a corresponding at least onefourth location 70 of thevehicle 12. For example, in the embodiment illustrated inFIG. 1 , a third coil 64 is located around an upper hinge 72.1 of arear door 74 of thevehicle 12, and the at least one secondmagnetic sensor 68 comprises afourth coil 76 around the striker 28.2 of the door latch assembly 30.2 of therear door 74, wherein the striker 28.2 is operatively coupled to the C-pillar 78 of thevehicle 12 and thefourth coil 76 is proximate thereto. The at least one third coil 64 is operatively coupled to a second coil driver 34.2, which is in turn operatively coupled to a second oscillator 36.2, wherein an oscillatory signal from the second oscillator 36.2 is applied by the second coil driver 34.2 so as to cause an associated current in the at least one third coil 64, responsive to which the at least one third coil 64 generates a second magnetic field 38.2 comprisingmagnetic flux 40 in the associated second magnetic circuit 42.2 comprising the B-pillar 32,rear door 74, C-pillar 78, and the body 46, frame 48 orpowertrain 50 of thevehicle 12. The second oscillator 36.2 generates a oscillating signal, for example, having either a sinusoidal, square wave, triangular or other waveform shape, or a single frequency or a plurality of frequencies that, for example, are either stepped, continuously swept or simultaneous. The frequency is adapted so that the resulting second magnetic field 38.2 is conducted through the second magnetic circuit 42.2 with sufficient strength so as to provide a useful signal level from the secondmagnetic sensor 68, which cooperates therewith. The second magnetic field 38.2 is responsive to the reluctance of the associated second magnetic circuit 42.2, which is affected by a crash involving the elements thereof and/or thegaps 52 therein. The second magnetic field 38.2 is sensed by the at least one secondmagnetic sensor 68, and a signal therefrom is conditioned by an associated second signal conditioner 54.2, demodulated by a second demodulator 56.2, converted from analog to digital form by a second analog-to-digital converter 58.2 and input as a secondmagnetic sensor signal 80 to theprocessor 62, which processes the signal as described more fully hereinbelow. The second signal conditioner 54.2 may incorporate buffering, amplification, high-pass, low-pass, or band-pass filtering. The second demodulator 56.2, for example, may provide amplitude demodulation, constant sampling relative to the phase of the second oscillator 36.2, or constant sampling relative to the phase of the signal sensed by the secondmagnetic sensor 68. For example, any envelope detection or phase or frequency demodulation technique could be used to obtain the demodulated signal. Since various demodulation techniques could be used to extract the crash information from the signal from the secondmagnetic sensor 68, the particular demodulation method will, for example, depend upon the particular implementation and the cost of the components used to perform this function. In another embodiment, the analog-to-digital conversion function and the demodulation function are combined a single process. It should be understood that the second demodulator 56.2 may also provide for amplification, and that the second analog-to-digital converter 58.2 would incorporate an associated sampler. Changes to the second magnetic field 38.2 at a particular location in the second magnetic circuit 42.2 propagate within the associated second magnetic circuit 42.2 at the speed of light and are seen throughout the second magnetic circuit 42.2. Accordingly, the second magnetic field 38.2 sensed by the at least one secondmagnetic sensor 68 contains information about the nature of the remainder of the magnetic circuit, including therear door 74 and adjacent B-pillar 32 and C-pillar 78, any of which could be involved in and affected by a side-impact crash. - Alternatively, as suggested by
FIG. 1 , thefirst coil 14 could be located around the lower hinge 22.2 of thefront door 24; the at least onefirst coil 14, could comprise first coils 14.1, 14.2 around the upper 22.1 and lower 22.2 hinges respectively; the third coil 64 could be located around the lower hinge 22.2 of therear door 74; or the at least one third coil 64, could comprise third coils 64.1, 64.2 around the upper 72.1 and lower 72.2 hinges respectively. Furthermore, the first 36.1 and second 36.2 oscillators could be one and the same, or could be separate, operating at the same or different frequencies with the same type or different types of waveforms. Other arrangements of themagnetic sensor 10 can be used to provide the first 60 or second 80 magnetic sensor signals—for example, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,407,660, 6,433,688, 6,587,048, 6,777,927, which are incorporated herein by reference. - For example, in another embodiment, the
magnetic sensor door door gap 52 between thedoor - As another example, in yet another embodiment, the first 36.1 and/or second 32.2 oscillators may be replaced with pulse sources, whereby the pulse amplitude may be adapted to provide for sufficient signal-to-noise ratio and the pulse width may be adapted to provide for reduced power consumption.
- As yet another example, in yet another embodiment, the first 10.1 and/or second 10.2 magnetic crash sensors need not necessarily incorporate associated first 36.1 or second 36.2 oscillators, or first 56.1 or second 56.2 demodulators, but instead the associated first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals could be responsive to magnetostriction signals, magnetic coil pair signals, ferromagnetic shock signals, or other time varying magnetic signals that do not have a carrier from which the information must be extracted prior to analysis.
- The first
magnetic sensor signal 60 from the first magnetic crash sensor 10.1—for avehicle 12 with onemagnetic crash sensor 10 on a particular side of thevehicle 12, —or the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals from the first 10.1 and second 10.2 magnetic crash sensors—for avehicle 12 with twomagnetic crash sensors 10 on a particular side of thevehicle 12, —are processed, for example, in accordance with a magneticcrash sensing algorithm 200 as illustrated by the flow chart ofFIG. 2 , which is executed separately for each side ofvehicle 12. - Referring to
FIG. 2 , beginning with step (202), theprocessor 62 samples the ith sample of the first 60 or second 80 magnetic sensor signal responsive to the associatedmagnetic flux 40 at the location of the associated first 18 or second 68 magnetic sensor. For example, a sampling rate of about 6 KHz in one embodiment provides for medium-to-high frequency content in the raw sampled signal. For purposes of illustration, this signal is designated as Y0(i), which corresponds to the sampling of either the first 60 or second 80 magnetic sensor signal, depending upon which is being processed. - Then, in step (204) the sampled signal Y0(i) is filtered with a first filter to remove noise from the raw magnetic signal, using a relatively lower frequency filter, for example, a running average filter with a sufficiently wide associated time window. The filter is adapted to balance between providing for noise reduction, maintaining a relatively fast step response, and providing for relatively fast computation. For example, in one embodiment, the first filter incorporates a window of about 6 milliseconds, which corresponds to a low-pass cutoff frequency of about 100 Hz. A second embodiment of this filter could be a band-pass filter set produce a signal with relatively lower frequency content, for example from 50 Hz to 250 Hz. The output of the first filter is a first filtered signal Y1(i).
- Then, in step (206), if the core crash detection algorithm (214-250) has been previously entered following step (212) and not subsequently exited at step (252), the process continues with step (216). Otherwise, in step (208), the opening state of the door is detected from the first filtered signal Y1(i), or another similar relatively longer time constant/lower frequency signal derived from the sampled signal Y0(i) (e.g. about a 1 Hz low-passed signal). The relatively slow motion of the
doors 24, 74 (or of one of thedoors 24 in a two-door vehicle 12) can be tracked from the magnitude of the associated first filtered signals Y1(i). As adoor magnetic flux 40 interacting with themagnetic sensor door vehicle 12, the amount that thedoor 24 is open (i.e. degrees of rotation open) may be determined by comparison with calibration data comprising predetermined signal magnitudes known as a function of door angle. For a four-door vehicle 12, the amount thatdoor vehicle 12 can be estimated by comparing the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals from a particular side of thevehicle 12 with the associated calibration data to determine the associated door state of the associateddoor coil 14, 64 located inside thedoor vehicle 12, wherein the associated first 60 or second 80 magnetic sensor signal was responsive to the self-inductance of thecoil 14, 64, and if thiscoil 14, 64 was not substantially responsive to the position of the associateddoor vehicle 12, then steps (208) and (210) of the magneticcrash sensing algorithm 200 would be omitted when processing that first 60 or second 80 magnetic sensor signal. - Generally, for each combination of these possible door states, the interpretation of the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals can be adjusted to avoid inadvertent deployments, alter deployment thresholds, or temporarily disable the
safety restraint actuator 82, in accordance with the vehicle manufacturer's specifications. Recognition of the door state of thedoor doors magnetic flux 40 that cannot be attributed to one of the possible door states can be indicative of a system failure or a change in the properties or geometry of thedoor magnetic flux 40, theprocessor 62 can use anindicator 84, or an alarm, to alert an occupant of the vehicle of a potential system failure. Such recognition is possible within a relatively short period of time—e.g. within seconds—after occurrence and the monitoring for such a failure can occur continuously while the system is active. - Generally, if a
door safety restraint actuator 82 cannot operate properly to protect an associated occupant, and therefore typically should be disabled until thedoor door coil 14, 64 operated in a self-inductance mode were located inside thedoor 24, 74). For example,FIG. 3 illustrates a firstmagnetic sensor signal 60 generated responsive to afront door 24 being slammed shut by a hydraulic robot in accordance with a less than worse case condition, wherein the magnitude of the resulting firstmagnetic sensor signal 60 approaches an associated crash detection threshold. Accordingly, in one embodiment, if eitherdoor vehicle 12, then the crash detection algorithm would prevent asafety restraint actuator 82, e.g. side air bag inflator, associated with that side of thevehicle 12 from actuating, so as to prevent an inadvertent deployment thereof. The responsiveness of the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals to the position of thedoor door vehicle 12 was not turned on if the magnetic field were applied at a low duty cycle to conserve power. - If the
door door safety restraint actuator 82 responsive to a significant, non-crash event (also known as an “abuse event”), as described more fully hereinbelow. The magnitude of the impact response of acoil 14, 64 operated in a self-inductance mode and located inside thedoor door 24, 74 (i.e fully latched or partially latched). - Referring to
FIG. 4 , the firstmagnetic sensor signal 60 from the firstmagnetic sensor 18 proximate to the B-pillar 32 is responsive to the angle of thefront door 24 and is nearly independent of the angle of therear door 74. Accordingly, it is possible to estimate the angle of thefront door 24 from the magnitude of the firstmagnetic sensor signal 60, particularly the associated first filtered signal Y1(i), using calibration data, for example, as illustrated inFIG. 4 . The sensitivity of the firstmagnetic sensor signal 60 is greater for smaller door angles than larger door angles, and for angles less than about 15 degrees, the door angle can be estimated relatively accurately. It is preferable that relatively short term signal offsets caused by effects other than door angle, such as temperature or recent mechanical changes to thefront door 24, be maintained to less than an equivalent of about ±1 degree, in order to estimate the associated door state of thefront door 24 sufficiently accurately Longer term signal offsets caused by effects such as door droop or accumulated damage can be characterized by monitoring the offset over time, and compensated by subtracting the offset from the signal. Another way to adjust for changes in door alignment over time is to compare the voltage applied to the at least onefirst coil 14 with the corresponding resulting current passing therethrough. Faraday's Law can be used to derive a relationship between the inductance L of the at least onefirst coil 14, which is influenced by the proximity to nearby metal (i.e. the local gap between thedoor 24 and thefirst location 16 of the at least one first coil 14), and the voltage (V) across and current (I) through the at least one first coil 14 (i.e. V=L*dI/dt). The measure of coil inductance derived from the known current (I) and voltage (V) in the at least onefirst coil 14 can provide for adapting the expected response of the first magnetic crash sensor 10.1 as a function of door angle. - Referring to
FIG. 5 , the secondmagnetic sensor signal 80 from the secondmagnetic sensor 68 proximate to the C-pillar 78 is a strong function of the angle of therear door 74 and is also a function of the angle of thefront door 24. Accordingly, because the secondmagnetic sensor signal 80 has significant response to the angle of thefront door 24, the angle and associated door state of thefront door 24 is determined first, and then used in the determination of the angle of therear door 74. If the door state of thefront door 24 is open, e.g. having an angle greater than about three degrees, then the door state of therear door 74 need not be determined because, in that case, thesafety restraint actuator 82 on that side of thevehicle 12 would be disabled anyway. If the door state of thefront door 24 is either fully closed or partially latched, then the angle of therear door 74 can be determined from the offset of the secondmagnetic sensor signal 80 using calibration data, for example as illustrated inFIG. 5 . As with thefront door 24, it is preferable that relatively short term signal offsets in the secondmagnetic sensor signal 80 caused by effects other than door angle, such as temperature or recent mechanical changes to therear door 74, be maintained to less than an equivalent of about +1 degree, in order to estimate the associated door state of therear door 74 sufficiently accurately. Longer term signal offsets caused by effects such as door droop or accumulated damage can be characterized by monitoring the offset over time, and compensating by subtracting the offset from the signal. - Returning to
FIG. 2 , following the estimation in step (208) of the door state of the front 24 and rear 74 doors, in step (210), if a front 24 or rear 74 door is detected as being either open or slammed, the core crash detection algorithm (214-250) is not entered, but instead, the process repeats with step (202). For example, in one embodiment, a potential adverse affect of a door slam condition can be avoided by delaying the confirmation of a partially latched or closed door state for a brief period of time following the initial detection thereof. - Otherwise, if the front 24 and rear 74 doors are either partially latched or fully closed, then in step (212), if criteria for commencing the core crash detection algorithm (214-250), i.e. entrance criteria, are satisfied, then the core crash detection algorithm (214-250) is entered commencing with step (214). For example, the first filtered signal Y1(i) is compared with one or more previous values thereof for each
door door magnetic flux 40 reaching themagnetic sensor rear door 74 exceeds a threshold of about 0.6 volts, then the entrance criteria is satisfied. Although the magneticcrash sensing algorithm 200 ofFIG. 2 illustrates a single step (212) at which the entrance criteria is tested, it is anticipated that there may be a plurality of different entrance criteria for associated different portions of the overall magneticcrash sensing algorithm 200, whereby there would be more than one associated step at which it would be determined if the associated entrance criteria satisfied the corresponding criteria necessary to commence that particular portion of the magneticcrash sensing algorithm 200. Upon entrance, the core crash detection algorithm (214-250) and associated steps (202) and (204) continue to be executed in sequence until either thesafety restraint actuator 82 is actuated in step (248), or until the core crash detection algorithm (214-250) exits with step (252) because of either damped-out values of the associated discrimination metrics or because of a time-out condition. - Upon entrance of the core crash detection algorithm (214-250), in step (214), associated variables of the magnetic
crash sensing algorithm 200 are initialized. Then in step (216), the sampled signal Y0(i) is filtered, for example, with a second low-pass filter with a relatively higher cut-off frequency, so as to extract relatively higher frequency information from the raw magnetic signal, for example, by using a running average filter with a relatively narrower associated time window. For example, in one embodiment, the first filter incorporates a window of about 1.1 millisecond which provides information in the range from DC to 250 Hz. The output of the second filter is a second filtered signal Y2(i). - Then, in step (218), an AC measure YAC is calculated so as to provide a measure of mid-to-high frequency information from the magnetic signal on the impact side of the
vehicle 12, for example, by calculating a running average of the difference between the sampled signal Y0(i) and the second filtered signal Y2(i), as follows:
For example, in one embodiment, K1 is set so that the width of the running average window is about 5 milliseconds. Measurements have shown that an integration of the AC content of the magnetic signal is, in general, related to, e.g. proportional to, the impact energy or crash severity. The AC measure YAC is a running average of the difference between the raw data and the mid-frequency low-pass filtered data that provides a measure of the fluctuation (AC) content of the magnetic signal, which is related to the door gap velocity, vibration, and crushing energy being transferred to thedoor - Stated in another way, for at least one first frequency less than at least one second frequency, the magnitude of a component of the relatively lower frequency first filtered signal Y1(i) at the at least one first frequency is greater than the corresponding magnitude of a component of the relatively higher frequency second filtered signal Y2(i) or the AC measure YAC at the same at least one first frequency; and the magnitude of a component of the relatively lower frequency first filtered signal Y1(i) at the at least one second frequency is less than the corresponding magnitude of a component of the relatively higher frequency second filtered signal Y2(i) or the AC measure YAC at the same at least one second frequency. Depending upon the particular application, the frequency ranges of the filters associated with the relatively lower frequency first filtered signal Y1(i), and the relatively higher frequency second filtered signal Y2(i) or the AC measure YAC, may be separated from one another, or may partially overlap, depending upon the nature of the particular vehicle, as necessary to provide for adequate discrimination of various crash and non-crash events from one another, and as necessary to provide for adequate detection speed. For example, data can be collected for a variety of impacts, e.g. pole, soft-bumper, ECE cart,
FMVSS 214 barrier, and non-crash events, of various severities, and the associated filter types and cut-off frequencies may be adjusted, along with other parameters of the magneticcrash sensing algorithm 200, so as to provide for generating a timely safety restraint actuation signal when necessary, and so as to not generation a safety restraint actuation signal when not necessary. - Then, from step (220), if the magnitude of the first filtered signal Y1(i) exceeds a threshold, in steps (222)-(226) the relatively higher frequency AC measure YAC is combined, e.g. linearly, with the relatively lower frequency first filtered signal Y1(i) to form first crash metric M1 B or M1 C, corresponding to the front 24 or rear 74 door respectively. Otherwise, in step (228), the first crash metric M1 B or M1 C is set to the value of the corresponding first filtered signal Y1(i). The requirement of step (220) lessens the possibility of high frequency noise (which is not expected to have significant DC content) falsely enhancing the first crash metric M1 B or M1 C during non-crash conditions.
- More particularly, in step (222), the values of coefficients a and b are determined. These coefficients are used in step (226) to calculate the first crash metric M1 B or M1 C as follows:
M 1 B,C =a·Y 1 +β·b·Y AC (2)
where β is a transition-smoothing factor determined in step (224) in accordance with a transition-smoothing algorithm. The coefficients a and b associated with the linear combination are specific to the particular type ofvehicle 12, and would be determined from associated crash and non-crash date associated with “abuse events”. The coefficients a and b determine the relative weighting or contribution of the relatively lower frequency first filtered signal Y1(i) and the relatively higher frequency AC measure YAC in the first crash metric M1 B or M1 C. For example, for a particular vehicle application, if the higher frequency components of the sampled signal Y0(i) provide a more reliable and repeatable indication of crash severity, the value of b might be set greater than that of a so as to relatively emphasize the higher frequency information in the first crash metric M1 B or M1 C. In one embodiment, the coefficients a and b may be constants. In other embodiments, the sign and or magnitude of coefficients a and b may be a dynamic function of time of the sign or value of the second filtered signal Y2(i). - For example, in one embodiment of steps (220)-(228), if the magnitude of the first filtered signal Y1(i) associated with the
rear door 74 is less than or equal to a threshold, then in step (226), the first crash metric M1 B or M1 C is set equal to the corresponding first filtered signal Y1(i). Otherwise, in step (222), a=1 and b=1 for thefront door 24, and a=1 and b=−1 for therear door 74, wherein the threshold level is the same as for the entrance criteria of step (212). Stated in another way,
If |Y 1 C |≦DC_Threshold (3.0)
Then M 1 B =Y 1 B and M 1 C =Y 1 C (3.1)
Otherwise (4.0)
M 1 B =Y 1 B +Y AC B and M 1 C =Y 1 C −Y AC C (4.1) - In accordance with another embodiment, additional conditions are provided as follows:
If Y 1 C<ThresholdC OR Y 1 B<ThresholdB (5.0)
Then Equations (3.0-3.1) and (4.0-4.1) (5.1)
Otherwise If Y 1 C>ThresholdC Then (6.0)
If Y 1 C ≦DC _Threshold Then Equation(4.1) (6.1)
Otherwise If Y 1 C ≦−DC _Threshold
Then M 1 B =Y 1 B −Y AC B and M 1 C =Y 1 C +Y AC C (6.2)
Otherwise Equation(3.1) (6.3)
wherein, in one embodiment, ThresholdB is about −2.3 volts and ThresholdC is between −1 and +1 volt. - In step (224), the transition-smoothing algorithm provides for smoothing the effect of a transition between an inclusion of the AC measure YAC in the first crash metric M1 B or M1 C, in step (226), and the exclusion thereof in the first crash metric M1 B or M1 C, in step (228). More particularly, the transition smoothing algorithm provides for determining a value for the transition smoothing factor β in equation (2) a) has a value that is bounded between 0.0 and 1.0; b) is initialized to 0.0; c) is incremented by a factor, for example, between 0.04 and 1.0 (i.e. no smoothing), e.g. 0.09 (i.e. 9%), for each iteration for which the result of step (220) is affirmative; and d) is decremented by that factor each iteration for which the result of step (220) is negative.
- Then, in step (230), a safing criteria is evaluated so as to provide an independent basis for determining whether or not to enable actuation of the associated
safety restraint actuator 82. Although the particular safing strategy would depend upon the requirements of the vehicle manufacturer, in accordance with one embodiment, the safing strategy is adapted so as to prevent a single point failure from causing an inadvertent actuation of the associatedsafety restraint actuator 82. The evaluation of the safing criteria may be performed by an independent processor so as to preclude the prospect of a failure of theprocessor 62 causing an inadvertent deployment. In accordance with one embodiment, the safing strategy is adapted so the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals are used to safe one another. - Furthermore, signals—e.g. associated current and voltage—from the first 34.1 and second 34.2 coil drivers are also monitored to verify the operation of the associated first 14 and third 64 coils, e.g. to verify the fidelity and operativeness of the coils and associated signals and to monitor the associated noise level. For example, referring to
FIG. 1 , one or more signals—e.g. a measure of current through the at least onefirst coil 14 and/or the associated voltage thereacross—from the first coil driver 34.1 are operatively coupled to at least one associated third demodulator 86.1, the output(s) of which is/are operatively coupled to an associated at least one third analog-to-digital converter 88.1, the output(s) of which is/are operatively coupled to theprocessor 62, so as to provide the signals necessary to verify the operation of the at least onefirst coil 14. Similarly one or more signals—e.g. a measure of current through the at least one third coil 64 and/or the associated voltage thereacross—from the second coil driver 34.2 are operatively coupled to at least one associated fourth demodulator 86.2, the output(s) of which is/are operatively coupled to an associated at least one fourth analog-to-digital converter 88.2, the output(s) of which is/are operatively coupled to theprocessor 62, so as to provide the signals necessary to verify the operation of the at least one third coil 64. - In accordance with one embodiment, the safing criteria are satisfied for a particular magnetic crash sensor 10.1, 10.2 if the associated coil driver 34.1, 34.2 generates a substantially noise-free signal at the proper amplitude and frequency, and both the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals exhibit substantial nominal signal levels and variation over time.
- In accordance with another embodiment, the current though the first 14 or third 64 coil is processed to calculate two measures, TXRA and TXRA_ABS, respectively as running averages of the magnitude of this current and the absolute value of the magnitude of this current, wherein the running averages are calculated over a period of, for example, 1 to 7 milliseconds, e.g. 5 milliseconds. If ThresholdRA1<TXRA<ThresholdRA2 and TXRA_ABS<ThresholdRA3, then the current signal from the corresponding first 14 or third 64 coil is considered to be valid, and the corresponding first 14 or third 64 coil is considered to be operative. Also, substantially simultaneously, if |Y1|>Threshold_Y1 B,C and |YAC|>Threshold_YAC B,C for both the first 60 and second 80 magnetic sensor signals, then the safing criteria is considered to be satisfied, and this condition is latched for a period of time, for example, a predetermined period of 30 milliseconds. If the conditions on TXRA or TXRA_ABS later both become unsatisfied, then the safing condition is unlatched substantially immediately thereafter. Otherwise, if any of the other four conditions become unsatisfied, then the safing condition is unlatched after the period of time lapses, unless within that interval, all six safing conditions again become satisfied.
- Then, in step (232), if the
vehicle 12 has two (or more) doors, e.g. a front 24 and rear 74 door on a particular side thereof, then in step (234), steps (202) through (230) are performed for eachdoor door - Then, in step (236), if the
vehicle 12 has two (or more) doors, a second crash metric M2 is calculated from the combination, e.g. linear combination, of the first crash metrics M1 B and M1 C corresponding todifferent doors vehicle 12. For example, in one embodiment, the second crash metric M2 is given by:
M 2 =c·M 1 B +d·M 1 C (7)
where c and d are coefficients that are specific to a particular type ofvehicle 12. For example, in one embodiment, c=−1 and d=1. If the vehicle has only onedoor 24, then, from step (232), in step (238), the second crash metric M2 is equal to the first crash metric M1 B (for purposes of describing a general magneticcrash sensing algorithm 200 in the context of a vehicle having an arbitrary number of doors on a side—in a two-door vehicle 12 having only onedoor 24 on a side, there would be no need to have distinct first M1 B and second M2 crash metrics). - Then, from either step (236) or (238), in step (240), the values of the first M1 B,C and second M2 crash metric are damped, so that the values of the respective resulting first {tilde over (M)}1 B,C and second {tilde over (M)}2 damped crash metrics are attenuated over time to insignificant levels after the event subsides provided that a side impact crash of sufficient severity to warrant actuation of the
safety restraint actuator 82 does not occur, even for events for which there may have been associated metal bending resulting from the crash. Damping provides for facilitating algorithm exit in step (250) following significant crash events that were not sufficiently severe to warrant actuation of thesafety restraint actuator 82. - For example, in one embodiment, a damping factor α would be given by the summation of the absolute value of the first filtered signal Y1(i) commencing with algorithm entrance, and a corresponding crash metric M would be given by the product of that damping factor α times the first filtered signal Y1(i), as follows:
where C1 and C2 are constants. - As another example, in another embodiment, the damping factor α could include an integral of the AC measure YAC commencing with algorithm entrance, or the sample number since algorithm entrance multiplied by a constant minus the running average of the AC measure YAC calculated using a relatively long time window, e.g. greater than 10 milliseconds.
- As yet another example, following algorithm entrance, the damping process commences if the absolute value of the first filtered signal Y1 C(i) from the second
magnetic sensor signal 80 associated with therear door 74 exceeds a threshold, e.g. 0.75, at which time a summation value σ(0) is initialized to an initial value σ0, for example, σ0=300. Then, for each subsequent iteration, the second damped crash metric {tilde over (M)}2 is calculated as follows:
σ(i)=γ·|Y 1 B(i)|+σ(i−1) (10)
where γ is a damping modification factor, e.g. having a value of 0.7 for the particular embodiment, and Y1 B(i) is the value of the first filtered signal Y1(i) based on the firstmagnetic sensor signal 60. - Then, in step (242), the magnetic
crash sensing algorithm 200 provides for adapting a deployment threshold as a function of the door state that was detected in step (208). For example, if one of thedoors vehicle 12, wherein, in one embodiment, the threshold would be lowest for bothdoors doors coil 14, 64 operated in a self-inductance mode and located inside thedoor - Then, in step (244), the first {tilde over (M)}1 B,C and second {tilde over (M)}2 damped crash metrics and the AC measure YAC are compared with associated threshold levels (positive and negative), and, in one embodiment, if each metric or measure exceeds it respective threshold for at least a specified minimum number of consecutive iterations, then, in step (246), if the safing criteria from step (230) are also simultaneously satisfied, then in step (248) the appropriate safety restraint actuator(s) 82 is/are deployed. In one embodiment, neither the satisfaction of the deployment threshold in step (244) nor the satisfaction of the safing criteria in step (246) latches TRUE, but instead, both criteria must be simultaneously TRUE in order for the safety restraint actuator(s) 82 to be actuated. In another embodiment, other logical combinations of the various crash metrics and other measures are used in the actuation decision. For example, in another embodiment, the actuation decision could be governed by one or more of the various crash metrics and measures, or the satisfaction of the safing criteria could latch TRUE, so that an actuation of the safety restraint actuator(s) 82 would occur when the deployment threshold is satisfied in step (244) provided that the safing criteria had been satisfied earlier, subsequent to algorithm entrance.
- Otherwise, from either step (244) or step (246), in step (250), if an exit criteria is satisfied, then the core crash detection algorithm (214-250) is exited in step (252), and the magnetic
crash sensing algorithm 200 continues with step (202), whereupon subsequent entry of step (206), the algorithm will be indicated as being inactive (i.e. not entered) until the entrance criteria is again satisfied responsive to conditions on the first filtered signal Y1(i), which continues to be calculated in step (204) following the acquisition of the first 18 or second 68 magnetic sensor in step (202). For example, in accordance with one embodiment, the exit criteria is satisfied if the first filtered signals Y1 B and Y1 C, the associated AC measures YAC B and YAC C, and the damped crash metric M3 are less than associated threshold values for a specified number of iterations of the core crash detection algorithm (214-250), or if the time period since algorithm entrance in step (212) exceeds a time-out threshold. - The above-described magnetic
crash sensing algorithm 200 can be embodied in various ways, and can be modified within the scope of the instant invention. - For example, the first filtered signal Y1(i) and the AC measure YAC could be processed separately, as if each were a separate crash metric. These individual metrics could then be separately damped (step (240)) and used separately to compare against individual deployment thresholds (step (244)). These metrics could alternatively be combined with similar metrics derived from a second magnetic sensor to create two M2 metrics (following the example in step (236)): a low frequency and a higher frequency M2 metric. This alternative individual signal processing creates more individual metrics, making the algorithm slightly more complicated, but also providing additional flexibility in setting deployment conditions.
- As another example, additional filtered signals might be obtained from the raw data using different window running averages to produce time domain equivalents of high-pass frequency filtering, or other types of filters can be utilized, for example single or multiple pole low-pass or band-pass filters, other digital filters, e.g. FIR or IIR, or Fourier transform filters Several such filtered signals might be combined with each other or with the raw data signal to give measures associated with desired frequency bands. Such additional frequency analysis and derived measures might be necessary for a specific vehicle platform or magnetic system mounting location and method and would be based upon the associated crash data and data from non-crash “abuse events”.
- The magnetic
crash sensing algorithm 200 provides a method of processing magnetic crash signals from a magnetic crash sensor so as to provide for the rapid, real time determination of both the crash severity and the associated crash type (e.g. pole crash vs. barrier crash) for a particular crash event The magneticcrash sensing algorithm 200 provides for the actuation of safety restraint actuator(s) 82 at a relatively early time as necessary so as to provide for protecting the occupant from the crash, while also discriminating lower severity crash events (as determined by potential occupant injury) so as to avoid inadvertent or unnecessary actuation of safety restraint actuator(s) 82, particularly those safety restraint actuator(s) 82 which are not resetable, i.e. reusable for multiple crash events. The magneticcrash sensing algorithm 200 also provides for immunity to external electrical and mechanical “abuse events” including those caused by electromagnetic induction, or localized impacts with relatively low mass but high speed objects. The associated magnetic crash sensors 10.1, 10.2 provide for distributed crash sensing that can be beneficially less sensitive to localized mechanical or electrical disturbances which might otherwise adversely affect a crash sensing system using more localized crash sensors. - The polarity of the associated magnetic crash sensor signals 60, 80 provides information that can be used for distinguishing various types of crashes. For example, in one embodiment, measured data suggests that localized impacts that cause significant intrusion into the vehicle will give a positive crash metric polarity while more broad surface impacts will give a negative polarity crash metric. Pole-like impacts might be identified as positive polarity while cart-like impacts would be identified by negative polarity. The door motion and crush will vary between crash types, potentially producing signals of opposite sign that correspond to more or less magnetic signal (magnetic flux 40) reaching the receiver sensors than is normally received.
- While specific embodiments have been described in detail, those with ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. For example, although the magnetic
crash sensing algorithm 200 has been described herein in the context of side impact crash detection, a similar algorithm could be used to detect impacts anywhere on the vehicle using appropriate associated magnetic crash sensor hardware. Accordingly, the particular arrangements disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention, which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims and any and all equivalents thereof.
Claims (29)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/946,151 US7113874B2 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2004-09-20 | Magnetic crash sensing method |
US11/535,481 US7463987B2 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2006-09-26 | Magnetic sensing system and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US50390603P | 2003-09-19 | 2003-09-19 | |
US10/946,151 US7113874B2 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2004-09-20 | Magnetic crash sensing method |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/905,219 Continuation-In-Part US7212895B2 (en) | 1999-08-26 | 2004-12-21 | Magnetic sensor |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/535,481 Continuation-In-Part US7463987B2 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2006-09-26 | Magnetic sensing system and method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050096881A1 true US20050096881A1 (en) | 2005-05-05 |
US7113874B2 US7113874B2 (en) | 2006-09-26 |
Family
ID=34375415
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/946,151 Expired - Fee Related US7113874B2 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2004-09-20 | Magnetic crash sensing method |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7113874B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1663732A2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2007510134A (en) |
CN (1) | CN1852818A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005028253A2 (en) |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050093540A1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2005-05-05 | Merrick William D. | Magnetic crash sensor |
US20050143944A1 (en) * | 2003-12-21 | 2005-06-30 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US7113874B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2006-09-26 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic crash sensing method |
US20080106273A1 (en) * | 2003-12-21 | 2008-05-08 | Bauer Scott E | Signal processing system and method |
US20080109190A1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2008-05-08 | Bauer Scott E | Signal processing system and method |
US20080109189A1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2008-05-08 | Bauer Scott E | Signal processing system and method |
US20110244811A1 (en) * | 2010-04-06 | 2011-10-06 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Demodulator and Method for Demodulating a Modulated Carrier Signal |
US8625727B2 (en) | 2010-04-02 | 2014-01-07 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Demodulator and method for demodulating a carrier signal |
US20150001837A1 (en) * | 2013-06-27 | 2015-01-01 | Zodiac Cabin Controls Gmbh | Airbag control unit |
US20160072556A1 (en) * | 2014-09-08 | 2016-03-10 | Broadcom Corporation | Feedback-Based Adaptive Load Modulation (ALM) for a Near Field Communication (NFC) Device |
US20210031714A1 (en) * | 2019-07-30 | 2021-02-04 | Zf Friedrichshafen Ag | Enhanced discrimination method and apparatus for controlling an actuatable protection device |
Families Citing this family (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8180585B2 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2012-05-15 | Tk Holdings, Inc. | Magnetic crash sensor |
US20070188168A1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2007-08-16 | Stanley James G | Magnetic sensor |
US20080109177A1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2008-05-08 | Cech Leonard S | Magnetic crash sensor |
US7514917B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2009-04-07 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic crash sensor |
US7772839B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2010-08-10 | Tk Holdings, Inc. | Eddy current magnetic crash sensor |
US7839143B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2010-11-23 | Tk Holdings Inc. | Eddy current magnetic crash sensor |
US7463987B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2008-12-09 | Takata Holdings, Inc. | Magnetic sensing system and method |
US7839142B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2010-11-23 | Tk Holdings, Inc. | Magnetic crash sensor |
DE102005015003A1 (en) * | 2005-04-01 | 2006-10-05 | Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh | vehicle sensor |
EP1915585A2 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2008-04-30 | Automotive Systems Laboratory Inc. | Magnetic crash sensor |
JP4483925B2 (en) | 2007-10-04 | 2010-06-16 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Collision determination device and occupant protection device |
JP2009184384A (en) * | 2008-02-01 | 2009-08-20 | Takata Corp | Lateral collision detector, occupant restraint system, and vehicle |
CN105023442B (en) * | 2015-08-17 | 2017-11-24 | 杨威 | A kind of non-contact vehicle induction installation based on geomagnetism detecting |
Citations (70)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1813746A (en) * | 1927-02-23 | 1931-07-07 | Magnetic Analysis Corp | Method of and apparatus for magnetic testing |
US2552722A (en) * | 1948-08-09 | 1951-05-15 | Pennsylvania Res Corp | Electromagnetic accelerometer |
US3659197A (en) * | 1970-05-11 | 1972-04-25 | Gen Electric | Apparatus for electrically testing a coil including a primary coil and core, a pick-up coil, and limited supply of high voltage d.c. for energizing the primary coil |
US3945459A (en) * | 1972-07-26 | 1976-03-23 | Nippon Soken, Inc. | Collision sensing system for vehicles |
US4087782A (en) * | 1973-12-07 | 1978-05-02 | Nippon Soken, Inc. | Collision detecting system |
US4178979A (en) * | 1976-07-13 | 1979-12-18 | Institut De Recherches De La Siderurgie Francaise | Method of and apparatus for electromagnetic mixing of metal during continuous casting |
US4206451A (en) * | 1975-11-05 | 1980-06-03 | Honeywell Inc. | Intrusion detection system |
US4446741A (en) * | 1981-06-01 | 1984-05-08 | Prvni Brnenska Strojirna, Narodni Podnik | Vibration transducer |
US4531091A (en) * | 1982-03-29 | 1985-07-23 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Transportation | Magnetic inspection of reinforcing steel using sensor array |
US4561314A (en) * | 1983-10-27 | 1985-12-31 | General Electric Company | Magnetoelastic force/pressure sensor |
US4630229A (en) * | 1982-02-23 | 1986-12-16 | Intercontrole Societe Anonyme | Circuit for the fast calculation of the discrete Fourier transform of a signal |
US4651093A (en) * | 1983-02-08 | 1987-03-17 | Commissariat A L'energie Atomique | Multiple coil eddy current probe equipped with a coil balancing device |
US4802368A (en) * | 1986-12-15 | 1989-02-07 | Asea Aktiebolag | Magnetoelastic force transducer |
US4823621A (en) * | 1987-04-30 | 1989-04-25 | Asea Brown Boveri Ab | Magetoelastic force transducer |
US4855677A (en) * | 1988-03-11 | 1989-08-08 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Multiple coil eddy current probe and method of flaw detection |
US4866418A (en) * | 1987-08-26 | 1989-09-12 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Arrangement for automatic release of occupant protecting devices in the event of accident |
US4893077A (en) * | 1987-05-28 | 1990-01-09 | Auchterlonie Richard C | Absolute position sensor having multi-layer windings of different pitches providing respective indications of phase proportional to displacement |
US5007295A (en) * | 1990-01-03 | 1991-04-16 | Asea Brown Boveri Ab | Magnetoelastic force transducer |
US5041769A (en) * | 1988-06-29 | 1991-08-20 | Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd. | DC motor apparatus with an index signal output |
US5068608A (en) * | 1989-10-30 | 1991-11-26 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Multiple coil eddy current probe system and method for determining the length of a discontinuity |
US5134371A (en) * | 1989-01-18 | 1992-07-28 | Nippondenso Co., Ltd. | Magnetic detection device using an oscillator whose detection element is a magnetoresitance effective element |
US5144846A (en) * | 1988-07-21 | 1992-09-08 | Sensortech, L.P. | Minimal structure magnetostrictive stress and torque sensor |
US5177370A (en) * | 1990-11-19 | 1993-01-05 | Meister Jack B | Impact sensor for vehicle safety restraint system |
US5182513A (en) * | 1991-04-06 | 1993-01-26 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for a multi-channel multi-frequency data acquisition system for nondestructive eddy current inspection testing |
US5359286A (en) * | 1990-11-14 | 1994-10-25 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Sensor including hall element, movable magnetic body and permanent magnet for automatically triggering safety devices in motor vehicles |
US5399968A (en) * | 1992-01-31 | 1995-03-21 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Eddy current probe having body of high permeability supporting drive coil and plural sensors |
US5437197A (en) * | 1993-08-20 | 1995-08-01 | The Board Of Governors Of Wayne State University | Magnetostrictive sensor structures |
US5559431A (en) * | 1993-10-08 | 1996-09-24 | Micro-Epsilon Messtechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method of calibrating a sensor |
US5580084A (en) * | 1995-09-12 | 1996-12-03 | Artistic Analytical Methods, Inc. | System and method for controlling vehicle safety device |
US5610583A (en) * | 1991-03-15 | 1997-03-11 | Stellar Systems, Inc. | Intrusion warning system |
US5636863A (en) * | 1994-04-26 | 1997-06-10 | Eaton Corporation | Vehicle steering column control system |
US5646613A (en) * | 1996-05-20 | 1997-07-08 | Cho; Myungeun | System for minimizing automobile collision damage |
US5707076A (en) * | 1995-08-16 | 1998-01-13 | Toyoda Gosei Co., Ltd. | Air bag device |
US5739757A (en) * | 1997-01-30 | 1998-04-14 | Breed Automotive Technology, Inc. | Vehicle passenger weight sensor |
US5747696A (en) * | 1996-10-28 | 1998-05-05 | Temic Bayern-Chemie Airbag Gmbh | Method of non-invasively monitoring pressure of a compressed gas in a closed container |
US5767766A (en) * | 1995-09-01 | 1998-06-16 | Southwest Research Institute | Apparatus and method for monitoring vehicular impacts using magnetostrictive sensors |
US5783871A (en) * | 1996-09-24 | 1998-07-21 | Trw Inc. | Apparatus and method for sensing a rearward facing child seat |
US5793200A (en) * | 1992-10-29 | 1998-08-11 | Rolls-Royce And Associates Limited | Position responsive magnetic sensing elements for sensing the position of a member at a remote site |
US5793206A (en) * | 1995-08-25 | 1998-08-11 | Jentek Sensors, Inc. | Meandering winding test circuit |
US5892443A (en) * | 1997-01-25 | 1999-04-06 | Kiekert Ag | Vehicle door lock with a latch system and a locking system and electronic control |
US5895439A (en) * | 1996-10-15 | 1999-04-20 | Southwest Research Institute | Method for generating and displaying complex data derived from non-destructive evaluation scanning |
US5940003A (en) * | 1997-03-27 | 1999-08-17 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Magnetic field sensor for a keyless access system for motor vehicles |
US6005392A (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 1999-12-21 | Institut Dr. Friedrich Foerster Pruefgeraetebau Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method for the operation and for the evaluation of signals from an eddy current probe and device for performing the method |
US6018980A (en) * | 1997-04-21 | 2000-02-01 | Nec Home Electronics, Ltd. | Method and device for determining deformation of a vehicle side part |
US6039345A (en) * | 1998-01-16 | 2000-03-21 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | System and method for sensing vehicle door edge movement |
US6060969A (en) * | 1997-08-21 | 2000-05-09 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Contactless proximity switch |
US6203060B1 (en) * | 1997-01-17 | 2001-03-20 | Automotive Systems Lab | System and method for sensing vehicle door edge movement |
US6252393B1 (en) * | 1998-06-23 | 2001-06-26 | General Electric Company | System and method for normalizing and calibrating a sensor array |
US6288536B1 (en) * | 1996-08-03 | 2001-09-11 | Microepsilon Messtechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg | Eddy current sensor |
US6288537B1 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2001-09-11 | General Electric Company | Eddy current probe with foil sensor mounted on flexible probe tip and method of use |
US6317048B1 (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2001-11-13 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic field sensor |
US6329910B1 (en) * | 1999-03-01 | 2001-12-11 | Breed Automotive Technology, Inc. | Vehicle impact detection apparatus and method |
US20020003421A1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2002-01-10 | Kayoko Kawata | Method and apparatus for evaluation of eddy current testing signal |
US6407660B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2002-06-18 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6433688B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2002-08-13 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US20020126004A1 (en) * | 2001-02-27 | 2002-09-12 | Tony Gioutsos | Active magnetostrictive sensor for automotive horn or occupant weight sensor |
US6469499B2 (en) * | 2001-02-06 | 2002-10-22 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for low power position sensing systems |
US6552662B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2003-04-22 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6583616B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2003-06-24 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6587048B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2003-07-01 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6586926B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2003-07-01 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6631776B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2003-10-14 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US20040056652A1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2004-03-25 | Bomya Timothy J. | Magnetic sensor |
US20040075429A1 (en) * | 2002-01-17 | 2004-04-22 | Marktec Corporation | Eddy current testing probe |
US20040130315A1 (en) * | 2003-01-03 | 2004-07-08 | Honeywell International Inc. | Multiple output magnetic sensor |
US6777927B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2004-08-17 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6812697B2 (en) * | 2002-09-24 | 2004-11-02 | General Electric Company | Molded eddy current array probe |
US20050007108A1 (en) * | 2003-07-11 | 2005-01-13 | Teodor Dogaru | Probes and methods for detecting defects in metallic structures |
US20050093540A1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2005-05-05 | Merrick William D. | Magnetic crash sensor |
US20050143944A1 (en) * | 2003-12-21 | 2005-06-30 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS56157802A (en) | 1980-05-09 | 1981-12-05 | Kawasaki Steel Corp | Shape detector |
FR2660751B1 (en) | 1990-04-06 | 1993-12-31 | Gec Alsthom Sa | SENSOR FOR MEASURING THE TRANSVERSAL RELATIVE DISPLACEMENT OF A CONDUCTIVE PART OF AN ELONGATED SHAPE. |
JPH05273226A (en) * | 1991-03-25 | 1993-10-22 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Shock detecting apparatus |
JP2545012B2 (en) * | 1991-04-08 | 1996-10-16 | 株式会社カンセイ | Vehicle occupant protection device |
JP3125365B2 (en) * | 1991-10-14 | 2001-01-15 | 日本電気株式会社 | Vehicle collision determination device |
DE4300653A1 (en) * | 1992-01-24 | 1993-07-29 | Volkswagen Ag | Collision sensor for triggering vehicle occupant safety device - contains vehicle wall inductive buckling sensor, without direct or indirect time measurement |
JPH0672282A (en) * | 1992-08-28 | 1994-03-15 | Tokai Rika Co Ltd | Emergency deciding device of vehicle |
DE19724628A1 (en) * | 1996-06-27 | 1998-01-02 | Volkswagen Ag | Occupant airbag for motor vehicle |
DE19927402B4 (en) * | 1999-06-16 | 2005-06-09 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Vehicle impact detection sensor |
WO2001015106A1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2001-03-01 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
JP2007510134A (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2007-04-19 | オートモーティブ システムズ ラボラトリー インコーポレーテッド | Magnetic collision detection method |
-
2004
- 2004-09-20 JP JP2006527115A patent/JP2007510134A/en active Pending
- 2004-09-20 EP EP04784594A patent/EP1663732A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2004-09-20 US US10/946,151 patent/US7113874B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-09-20 CN CNA2004800268039A patent/CN1852818A/en active Pending
- 2004-09-20 WO PCT/US2004/030776 patent/WO2005028253A2/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (74)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1813746A (en) * | 1927-02-23 | 1931-07-07 | Magnetic Analysis Corp | Method of and apparatus for magnetic testing |
US2552722A (en) * | 1948-08-09 | 1951-05-15 | Pennsylvania Res Corp | Electromagnetic accelerometer |
US3659197A (en) * | 1970-05-11 | 1972-04-25 | Gen Electric | Apparatus for electrically testing a coil including a primary coil and core, a pick-up coil, and limited supply of high voltage d.c. for energizing the primary coil |
US3945459A (en) * | 1972-07-26 | 1976-03-23 | Nippon Soken, Inc. | Collision sensing system for vehicles |
US4087782A (en) * | 1973-12-07 | 1978-05-02 | Nippon Soken, Inc. | Collision detecting system |
US4206451A (en) * | 1975-11-05 | 1980-06-03 | Honeywell Inc. | Intrusion detection system |
US4178979A (en) * | 1976-07-13 | 1979-12-18 | Institut De Recherches De La Siderurgie Francaise | Method of and apparatus for electromagnetic mixing of metal during continuous casting |
US4446741A (en) * | 1981-06-01 | 1984-05-08 | Prvni Brnenska Strojirna, Narodni Podnik | Vibration transducer |
US4630229A (en) * | 1982-02-23 | 1986-12-16 | Intercontrole Societe Anonyme | Circuit for the fast calculation of the discrete Fourier transform of a signal |
US4531091A (en) * | 1982-03-29 | 1985-07-23 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Transportation | Magnetic inspection of reinforcing steel using sensor array |
US4651093A (en) * | 1983-02-08 | 1987-03-17 | Commissariat A L'energie Atomique | Multiple coil eddy current probe equipped with a coil balancing device |
US4561314A (en) * | 1983-10-27 | 1985-12-31 | General Electric Company | Magnetoelastic force/pressure sensor |
US4802368A (en) * | 1986-12-15 | 1989-02-07 | Asea Aktiebolag | Magnetoelastic force transducer |
US4823621A (en) * | 1987-04-30 | 1989-04-25 | Asea Brown Boveri Ab | Magetoelastic force transducer |
US4893077A (en) * | 1987-05-28 | 1990-01-09 | Auchterlonie Richard C | Absolute position sensor having multi-layer windings of different pitches providing respective indications of phase proportional to displacement |
US4866418A (en) * | 1987-08-26 | 1989-09-12 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Arrangement for automatic release of occupant protecting devices in the event of accident |
US4855677A (en) * | 1988-03-11 | 1989-08-08 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Multiple coil eddy current probe and method of flaw detection |
US5041769A (en) * | 1988-06-29 | 1991-08-20 | Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd. | DC motor apparatus with an index signal output |
US5144846A (en) * | 1988-07-21 | 1992-09-08 | Sensortech, L.P. | Minimal structure magnetostrictive stress and torque sensor |
US5134371A (en) * | 1989-01-18 | 1992-07-28 | Nippondenso Co., Ltd. | Magnetic detection device using an oscillator whose detection element is a magnetoresitance effective element |
US5068608A (en) * | 1989-10-30 | 1991-11-26 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Multiple coil eddy current probe system and method for determining the length of a discontinuity |
US5007295A (en) * | 1990-01-03 | 1991-04-16 | Asea Brown Boveri Ab | Magnetoelastic force transducer |
US5359286A (en) * | 1990-11-14 | 1994-10-25 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Sensor including hall element, movable magnetic body and permanent magnet for automatically triggering safety devices in motor vehicles |
US5177370A (en) * | 1990-11-19 | 1993-01-05 | Meister Jack B | Impact sensor for vehicle safety restraint system |
US5610583A (en) * | 1991-03-15 | 1997-03-11 | Stellar Systems, Inc. | Intrusion warning system |
US5182513A (en) * | 1991-04-06 | 1993-01-26 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for a multi-channel multi-frequency data acquisition system for nondestructive eddy current inspection testing |
US5399968A (en) * | 1992-01-31 | 1995-03-21 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Eddy current probe having body of high permeability supporting drive coil and plural sensors |
US5793200A (en) * | 1992-10-29 | 1998-08-11 | Rolls-Royce And Associates Limited | Position responsive magnetic sensing elements for sensing the position of a member at a remote site |
US5437197A (en) * | 1993-08-20 | 1995-08-01 | The Board Of Governors Of Wayne State University | Magnetostrictive sensor structures |
US5559431A (en) * | 1993-10-08 | 1996-09-24 | Micro-Epsilon Messtechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method of calibrating a sensor |
US5636863A (en) * | 1994-04-26 | 1997-06-10 | Eaton Corporation | Vehicle steering column control system |
US5707076A (en) * | 1995-08-16 | 1998-01-13 | Toyoda Gosei Co., Ltd. | Air bag device |
US6351120B2 (en) * | 1995-08-25 | 2002-02-26 | Jentek Sensors, Inc. | Test circuit on flexible membrane with adhesive |
US5966011A (en) * | 1995-08-25 | 1999-10-12 | Jentek Sensors, Inc. | Apparatus for measuring bulk materials and surface conditions for flat and curved parts |
US5793206A (en) * | 1995-08-25 | 1998-08-11 | Jentek Sensors, Inc. | Meandering winding test circuit |
US5767766A (en) * | 1995-09-01 | 1998-06-16 | Southwest Research Institute | Apparatus and method for monitoring vehicular impacts using magnetostrictive sensors |
USRE36427E (en) * | 1995-09-12 | 1999-12-07 | Breed Automotive Technology, Inc. | System and method for controlling vehicle safety drive |
US5580084A (en) * | 1995-09-12 | 1996-12-03 | Artistic Analytical Methods, Inc. | System and method for controlling vehicle safety device |
US5646613A (en) * | 1996-05-20 | 1997-07-08 | Cho; Myungeun | System for minimizing automobile collision damage |
US6288536B1 (en) * | 1996-08-03 | 2001-09-11 | Microepsilon Messtechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg | Eddy current sensor |
US5783871A (en) * | 1996-09-24 | 1998-07-21 | Trw Inc. | Apparatus and method for sensing a rearward facing child seat |
US5895439A (en) * | 1996-10-15 | 1999-04-20 | Southwest Research Institute | Method for generating and displaying complex data derived from non-destructive evaluation scanning |
US5747696A (en) * | 1996-10-28 | 1998-05-05 | Temic Bayern-Chemie Airbag Gmbh | Method of non-invasively monitoring pressure of a compressed gas in a closed container |
US6005392A (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 1999-12-21 | Institut Dr. Friedrich Foerster Pruefgeraetebau Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method for the operation and for the evaluation of signals from an eddy current probe and device for performing the method |
US6203060B1 (en) * | 1997-01-17 | 2001-03-20 | Automotive Systems Lab | System and method for sensing vehicle door edge movement |
US5892443A (en) * | 1997-01-25 | 1999-04-06 | Kiekert Ag | Vehicle door lock with a latch system and a locking system and electronic control |
US5739757A (en) * | 1997-01-30 | 1998-04-14 | Breed Automotive Technology, Inc. | Vehicle passenger weight sensor |
US5940003A (en) * | 1997-03-27 | 1999-08-17 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Magnetic field sensor for a keyless access system for motor vehicles |
US6018980A (en) * | 1997-04-21 | 2000-02-01 | Nec Home Electronics, Ltd. | Method and device for determining deformation of a vehicle side part |
US6060969A (en) * | 1997-08-21 | 2000-05-09 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Contactless proximity switch |
US6039345A (en) * | 1998-01-16 | 2000-03-21 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | System and method for sensing vehicle door edge movement |
US6252393B1 (en) * | 1998-06-23 | 2001-06-26 | General Electric Company | System and method for normalizing and calibrating a sensor array |
US6329910B1 (en) * | 1999-03-01 | 2001-12-11 | Breed Automotive Technology, Inc. | Vehicle impact detection apparatus and method |
US6586926B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2003-07-01 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6777927B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2004-08-17 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US20040056652A1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2004-03-25 | Bomya Timothy J. | Magnetic sensor |
US6407660B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2002-06-18 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6433688B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2002-08-13 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6631776B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2003-10-14 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6587048B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2003-07-01 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6552662B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2003-04-22 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6583616B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2003-06-24 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US6317048B1 (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2001-11-13 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic field sensor |
US6288537B1 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2001-09-11 | General Electric Company | Eddy current probe with foil sensor mounted on flexible probe tip and method of use |
US20020003421A1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2002-01-10 | Kayoko Kawata | Method and apparatus for evaluation of eddy current testing signal |
US6469499B2 (en) * | 2001-02-06 | 2002-10-22 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for low power position sensing systems |
US20020126004A1 (en) * | 2001-02-27 | 2002-09-12 | Tony Gioutsos | Active magnetostrictive sensor for automotive horn or occupant weight sensor |
US20040061617A1 (en) * | 2001-02-27 | 2004-04-01 | Tony Gioutsos | Active magnetostrictive sensor for automotive horn or occupant weight sensor |
US20040075429A1 (en) * | 2002-01-17 | 2004-04-22 | Marktec Corporation | Eddy current testing probe |
US6812697B2 (en) * | 2002-09-24 | 2004-11-02 | General Electric Company | Molded eddy current array probe |
US20040130315A1 (en) * | 2003-01-03 | 2004-07-08 | Honeywell International Inc. | Multiple output magnetic sensor |
US20050007108A1 (en) * | 2003-07-11 | 2005-01-13 | Teodor Dogaru | Probes and methods for detecting defects in metallic structures |
US20050093540A1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2005-05-05 | Merrick William D. | Magnetic crash sensor |
US20050143944A1 (en) * | 2003-12-21 | 2005-06-30 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
Cited By (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080109189A1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2008-05-08 | Bauer Scott E | Signal processing system and method |
US7664612B2 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2010-02-16 | T K Holdings, Inc. | Signal processing system and method |
US7113874B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2006-09-26 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic crash sensing method |
US7209844B2 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2007-04-24 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic crash sensor |
US7570068B2 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2009-08-04 | Tk Holdings, Inc. | Signal processing system and method |
US20050093540A1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2005-05-05 | Merrick William D. | Magnetic crash sensor |
US20080109190A1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2008-05-08 | Bauer Scott E | Signal processing system and method |
US7564249B2 (en) | 2003-12-21 | 2009-07-21 | Tk Holdings, Inc. | Signal processing system and method |
US20080106273A1 (en) * | 2003-12-21 | 2008-05-08 | Bauer Scott E | Signal processing system and method |
US7212895B2 (en) | 2003-12-21 | 2007-05-01 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US20050143944A1 (en) * | 2003-12-21 | 2005-06-30 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Magnetic sensor |
US8625727B2 (en) | 2010-04-02 | 2014-01-07 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Demodulator and method for demodulating a carrier signal |
US20110244811A1 (en) * | 2010-04-06 | 2011-10-06 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Demodulator and Method for Demodulating a Modulated Carrier Signal |
US8792846B2 (en) * | 2010-04-06 | 2014-07-29 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Demodulator and method for demodulating a modulated carrier signal |
US20150001837A1 (en) * | 2013-06-27 | 2015-01-01 | Zodiac Cabin Controls Gmbh | Airbag control unit |
US9283912B2 (en) * | 2013-06-27 | 2016-03-15 | Zodiac Cabin Controls Gmbh | Airbag control unit |
US20160072556A1 (en) * | 2014-09-08 | 2016-03-10 | Broadcom Corporation | Feedback-Based Adaptive Load Modulation (ALM) for a Near Field Communication (NFC) Device |
US9590701B2 (en) * | 2014-09-08 | 2017-03-07 | Broadcom Corporation | Feedback-based adaptive load modulation (ALM) for a near field communication (NFC) device |
US20210031714A1 (en) * | 2019-07-30 | 2021-02-04 | Zf Friedrichshafen Ag | Enhanced discrimination method and apparatus for controlling an actuatable protection device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN1852818A (en) | 2006-10-25 |
WO2005028253A2 (en) | 2005-03-31 |
JP2007510134A (en) | 2007-04-19 |
EP1663732A2 (en) | 2006-06-07 |
WO2005028253A3 (en) | 2005-11-24 |
US7113874B2 (en) | 2006-09-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7113874B2 (en) | Magnetic crash sensing method | |
US7463987B2 (en) | Magnetic sensing system and method | |
JP2007510134A5 (en) | ||
US7190161B2 (en) | Magnetic sensor | |
EP1208549B1 (en) | Magnetic sensor | |
KR101517311B1 (en) | Method for generating an operating message upon occurrence of an operating event | |
US7516004B2 (en) | Vehicular passenger protection system against lateral collision | |
US5758301A (en) | Vehicle crash detection for implementation with low cost microprocessor | |
US6433688B1 (en) | Magnetic sensor | |
EP1206763B1 (en) | Magnetic sensor | |
US20070188168A1 (en) | Magnetic sensor | |
WO1997033776A1 (en) | A crash detector responsive to a side impact | |
JP5321879B2 (en) | Vehicle door opening and closing device | |
US8406959B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for controlling an actuatable restraint device using a side pressure sensor | |
WO1996006758A1 (en) | System and method for adjusting crash-discrimination measures | |
US7295909B2 (en) | Method for the detection of an impact | |
JP2010210500A (en) | Intrusion detecting apparatus and intrusion detection method | |
US20030030557A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for detecting intrusion and non-intrusion events | |
JP3361294B2 (en) | Vehicle door monitoring device | |
CN115538886B (en) | Anti-pinch control method and device for vehicle window and vehicle | |
EP2093109B1 (en) | Pedestrian collision detection apparatus and pedestrian protection system | |
JP2988361B2 (en) | Vehicle intrusion detection device | |
JP3290161B2 (en) | Security alarm | |
JP3314651B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining side collision of vehicle | |
JP7293952B2 (en) | VEHICLE OPERATION DETECTION DEVICE AND OPENING/CLOSING BODY CONTROL DEVICE |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS LABORATORY, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WATSON, WILLIAM TODD;CECH, LEONARD S.;RICE, DEBRA A.;REEL/FRAME:016204/0601;SIGNING DATES FROM 20041210 TO 20041214 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20100926 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: TK HOLDINGS INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNORS:AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS LABORATORY, INC.;TK HOLDINGS INC.;REEL/FRAME:033851/0787 Effective date: 20060922 |