JPH04311523A - Production of high carbon steel wire rod having high strength the excellent in wire drawability - Google Patents
Production of high carbon steel wire rod having high strength the excellent in wire drawabilityInfo
- Publication number
- JPH04311523A JPH04311523A JP7618891A JP7618891A JPH04311523A JP H04311523 A JPH04311523 A JP H04311523A JP 7618891 A JP7618891 A JP 7618891A JP 7618891 A JP7618891 A JP 7618891A JP H04311523 A JPH04311523 A JP H04311523A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- wire
- slab
- steel
- high strength
- wire rod
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 229910000677 High-carbon steel Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims description 9
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 229910001567 cementite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 17
- KSOKAHYVTMZFBJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron;methane Chemical compound C.[Fe].[Fe].[Fe] KSOKAHYVTMZFBJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 17
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 27
- 238000009749 continuous casting Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000005204 segregation Methods 0.000 description 31
- 238000005491 wire drawing Methods 0.000 description 14
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229910001562 pearlite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 238000004453 electron probe microanalysis Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 4
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron Substances [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005261 decarburization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910000859 α-Fe Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910001566 austenite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000012733 comparative method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 2
- SZVJSHCCFOBDDC-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(II,III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]O[Fe]=O SZVJSHCCFOBDDC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011819 refractory material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000006104 solid solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005482 strain hardening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005728 strengthening Methods 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012369 In process control Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000446313 Lamella Species 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005275 alloying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000008602 contraction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012467 final product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009931 harmful effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010965 in-process control Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005461 lubrication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000734 martensite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000001247 metal acetylides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000004767 nitrides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001376 precipitating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010791 quenching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000171 quenching effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002893 slag Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002791 soaking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005496 tempering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013585 weight reducing agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004804 winding Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】0001
【産業上の利用分野】本発明はワイヤロープ、PC鋼線
、ばね、スチールコードなどの高強度鋼線の製造に供せ
られる高強度鋼線材の製造法に係り、特に連続鋳造によ
る優れた高強度鋼線材の製造法に関するものである。[Industrial Application Field] The present invention relates to a method for producing high-strength steel wire rods used in the production of high-strength steel wires such as wire ropes, prestressed steel wires, springs, and steel cords. This invention relates to a method for manufacturing high-strength steel wire.
【0002】0002
【従来の技術】高炭素鋼線材は各種のパテンティング、
すなわち、圧延熱利用の直接パテンティング、鉛パテン
ティング、空気パテンティングの後、伸線加工等の冷間
加工を施され、その後、ブルーイング処理あるいは焼入
焼戻処理工程を経てワイヤ、ロープ、PC鋼線、ばね、
スチールコード等の高強度鋼線の製造に供される。[Prior art] High carbon steel wire rods are subject to various patenting,
That is, after direct patenting using rolling heat, lead patenting, and air patenting, cold working such as wire drawing is performed, and then blueing or quenching and tempering processes are performed to create wire, rope, PC steel wire, spring,
Used for manufacturing high-strength steel wire such as steel cord.
【0003】高炭素鋼線材の強化手段としては特公昭5
5−460や特公昭55−9044などに公表されてい
るように、合金元素を添加することによりパーライトの
ラメラ間隔を微細化するか、あるいはパーライトを構成
するフェライトを固溶強化する方法が一般に行われてい
る。一方、伸線加工性を向上させるための手段としては
、特公昭47−51684、特開昭52−12611等
に示されているように、炭化物あるいは窒化物を微細析
出させることによりパテンティング時のオーステナイト
粒を微細化することが広く行われている。[0003] As a means of strengthening high carbon steel wire rods, the
As disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 5-460 and Japanese Patent Publication No. 55-9044, methods are generally carried out to refine the lamella spacing of pearlite by adding alloying elements, or to solid solution strengthen the ferrite that constitutes pearlite. It is being said. On the other hand, as a means to improve wire drawability, as shown in Japanese Patent Publication No. 47-51684 and Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 52-12611, it is possible to improve wire drawability by finely precipitating carbides or nitrides during patenting. Refining austenite grains is widely practiced.
【0004】近年、線材の製造プロセスが鋼塊法から連
続鋳造法に転換するにともない、上述の組織因子に加え
て線材の中心偏析が高炭素鋼線材の伸線加工性に支配的
な影響をおよぼすことが明らかとなりつつある。このた
め、例えば、線材断面のマクロエッチング像ないしはサ
ルファープリントにもとずいて中心偏析を定性的に評価
するか、あるいは、線材の中心部と半径の1/2部の硬
度差を測定するか、あるいは、ビレットの中心部と対角
線長さの1/4部の化学成分差を測定するか、いずれか
の方法により中心偏析を評価し、その結果にもとずいて
鋳造条件の改善を行うと同時に、検査工程で高度の加工
に耐え得る高強度線材を選別していた。[0004] In recent years, as the manufacturing process for wire rods has changed from the steel ingot method to the continuous casting method, in addition to the above-mentioned microstructural factors, the center segregation of the wire rods has become a dominant influence on the wire drawability of high carbon steel wire rods. It is becoming clear that For this reason, for example, it is necessary to qualitatively evaluate center segregation based on a macro-etched image or sulfur print of the cross section of the wire, or to measure the difference in hardness between the center of the wire and 1/2 of the radius. Alternatively, you can measure the chemical composition difference between the center and 1/4 of the diagonal length of the billet, or evaluate center segregation using either method, and improve the casting conditions based on the results. In the inspection process, high-strength wire rods that can withstand advanced processing were selected.
【0005】[0005]
【従来技術の問題点】このような従来の問題点は、線材
の中心偏析評価方法や評価基準が曖昧であったため、中
心偏析部の早期破壊に起因する伸線中の断線、あるいは
最終製品の延性不足などの品質事故が多く、このため、
工程管理上のトラブルや歩留りの低下を招いていたのみ
ならず、中心偏析改善のための必要かつ十分な鋳造技術
の開発を実行することが困難であったことである。[Problems with the prior art] The problem with the conventional technology is that the method and criteria for evaluating the center segregation of wire rods are ambiguous, resulting in wire breakage during wire drawing due to early destruction of the center segregation area, or wire breakage in the final product. There are many quality accidents such as insufficient ductility, and for this reason,
This not only caused problems in process control and decreased yield, but also made it difficult to develop necessary and sufficient casting technology to improve center segregation.
【0006】さらに、中心偏析の評価方法や評価基準が
特定の製造設備、あるいは製造プロセスに立脚した経験
的な面があったために、線材の製品工程や製造設備が異
なった場合には技術の移転が困難であり、普遍性を持っ
た技術とはなり得ていなかった。Furthermore, because the evaluation method and evaluation criteria for center segregation are empirically based on specific manufacturing equipment or manufacturing processes, technology transfer may be difficult if the wire rod product process or manufacturing equipment is different. was difficult, and the technology had not become universal.
【0007】[0007]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】前述の状況に鑑み、本
発明は、中心偏析に起因する加工性の劣化が小さい高炭
素高強度鋼線材を歩留まり良く製造する方法を提供する
ことを目的とする。[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] In view of the above-mentioned circumstances, an object of the present invention is to provide a method for producing high-carbon, high-strength steel wire rods with high yield, with little deterioration in workability caused by center segregation. .
【0008】[0008]
【課題を解決するための手段】すなわち、重量比でC:
0.80〜1.1%、Si:0.1〜1.0%、Mn:
0.3〜0.8%、Al:0.003%以下、Cr:0
.1〜0.3%を含有し、残部がFeおよび不可避的不
純物からなる鋳片を用いて、1250〜1300℃の温
度範囲に3時間〜18時間保持した鋳片を分塊圧延にて
鋼片とした後、鋼片加熱温度1050から1100℃の
温度で加熱した後、圧延後の捲取温度を800℃〜93
0℃で行い、その後の冷却速度を10〜40℃/秒で冷
却することにより、線材圧延状態のままで初析セメンタ
イトの生成がないことを特徴とする、高強度で伸線加工
性の優れた高炭素鋼線材の製造法である。[Means for solving the problem] That is, in terms of weight ratio, C:
0.80-1.1%, Si: 0.1-1.0%, Mn:
0.3 to 0.8%, Al: 0.003% or less, Cr: 0
.. Using a slab containing 1 to 0.3% Fe and the remainder consisting of Fe and unavoidable impurities, the slab is kept at a temperature range of 1250 to 1300°C for 3 to 18 hours and then processed into a steel slab by blooming rolling. After heating the steel billet at a temperature of 1050 to 1100°C, the rolling temperature after rolling was set to 800°C to 93°C.
By cooling at 0°C and then cooling at a cooling rate of 10 to 40°C/sec, the wire rod has high strength and excellent wire drawability, with no formation of pro-eutectoid cementite in the rolled state. This is a method for producing high carbon steel wire rods.
【0009】本発明者らは従来の中心偏析評価基準の曖
昧さを払拭するため、極力定性的な判断基準を取りやめ
、定量化して中心偏析度合いを求める努力を行った結果
、線材の中心偏析部をEPMA分析し、偏析ピークプロ
ファイルの最高高さおよび偏析帯の幅について研究した
結果、偏析形態が各種製造工程の変化に対応して現われ
ることを見い出した。例えば、モールド内の電磁撹拌、
鋳片の軽圧下、加熱炉温度の影響など基本的に中心偏析
になんらかの影響を与える製造因子との対応関係が明確
に判断できるようになった。In order to eliminate the ambiguity of the conventional center segregation evaluation criteria, the present inventors abandoned qualitative criteria as much as possible and made efforts to quantify the degree of center segregation, and as a result, the center segregation part of the wire rod As a result of performing EPMA analysis on and studying the maximum height of the segregation peak profile and the width of the segregation zone, it was found that the segregation morphology appears in response to changes in various manufacturing processes. For example, electromagnetic stirring inside the mold,
It is now possible to clearly determine the relationship between manufacturing factors that basically have some influence on center segregation, such as the light reduction of slabs and the influence of heating furnace temperature.
【0010】こうした基礎的な検討結果をもとに、高炭
素鋼線材の製造において大きな障害となっていた中心偏
析部に生成する初析セメンタイトを熱延ままの線材にて
生成を防止するためには鋳片に生成する中心偏析部のC
濃度を1.1%以下にすることが有効であるとの知見を
得た。また、本発明の場合のようにCの多い高炭素の場
合、通常、平均組成の1.3〜1.6倍の偏析度を有し
ている。したがって、前述したようにC濃度を1.1%
以下に抑えるのはC量が大きいほど、より困難となるこ
とが判る。現状の鋳造技術を前提にした場合、本発明者
らは鋳片段階の中心偏析をこの目標値以下にするために
は鋳片加熱によるC拡散を用いることが不可欠であると
の結論を得た。以下に本発明の限定理由について述べる
。[0010] Based on these basic study results, in order to prevent the formation of pro-eutectoid cementite in the central segregation area, which has been a major obstacle in the production of high carbon steel wire rods, in hot-rolled wire rods. is the C of the center segregation area that forms in the slab.
It has been found that it is effective to reduce the concentration to 1.1% or less. Further, in the case of high carbon containing a large amount of C as in the case of the present invention, the degree of segregation is usually 1.3 to 1.6 times the average composition. Therefore, as mentioned above, the C concentration is 1.1%.
It can be seen that the larger the amount of C, the more difficult it becomes to suppress the amount below. Based on the current casting technology, the present inventors concluded that it is essential to use C diffusion by heating the slab in order to reduce the center segregation at the slab stage to below this target value. . The reasons for the limitations of the present invention will be described below.
【0011】[0011]
【作用】以下に本発明の限定理由について説明する。C
は鋼の高強度化のため、0.8%以上とするが、1.1
%を越えると粒界セメンタイトが発生して伸線加工性が
急激に低下するため上限を1.1%とした。Siは鋼の
脱酸と非金属介在物の軟質化のために0.1%以上加え
る。また、Siはパーライトを構成するフェライトの固
溶強化作用が強いため添加量は大きい方が好ましいが1
%を越えると表面脱炭が多くなるため1%を上限とした
。Mnは鋼の脱酸元素として、また、焼入れ性を改善し
て線材断面内に均一なパーライトを生成させる効果があ
るため、0.3%以上加えるが過剰添加の場合、中心偏
析部にミクロマルテンサイトが生成しやすくなるため、
上限を0.8%とした。[Operation] The reasons for the limitations of the present invention will be explained below. C
is set at 0.8% or more to increase the strength of steel, but 1.1
%, grain boundary cementite will occur and wire drawability will drop sharply, so the upper limit was set at 1.1%. Si is added in an amount of 0.1% or more to deoxidize the steel and soften nonmetallic inclusions. In addition, since Si has a strong solid solution strengthening effect on ferrite that constitutes pearlite, it is preferable to add a large amount of Si.
%, surface decarburization increases, so the upper limit was set at 1%. Mn acts as a deoxidizing element for steel, and also has the effect of improving hardenability and producing uniform pearlite within the cross section of the wire. Therefore, Mn is added in an amount of 0.3% or more, but if it is added in excess, it will cause micromarten in the center segregation area. It will be easier to generate a site,
The upper limit was set at 0.8%.
【0012】Alは通常脱酸元素として用いられるが本
発明の場合、SiおよびMnで脱酸を行うため必要とし
ない。むしろAlによって生成する硬質な非金属介在物
によって伸線中に、断線を生じやすくなる。特に細径の
場合にこの傾向が顕著である。このため、0.003%
以下とした。これを満足するためには、製造段階で耐火
物、スラグなどからの進入経路をなくす必要がある。[0012] Al is normally used as a deoxidizing element, but in the case of the present invention, it is not necessary because deoxidation is carried out with Si and Mn. Rather, hard nonmetallic inclusions generated by Al tend to cause wire breakage during wire drawing. This tendency is particularly noticeable when the diameter is small. Therefore, 0.003%
The following was made. In order to satisfy this requirement, it is necessary to eliminate entry routes from refractories, slag, etc. during the manufacturing stage.
【0013】次にCrについて述べる。本発明のように
C量が多い場合、オーステナイト結晶粒界に生成する初
析セメンタイトが伸線加工などの冷間加工段階で断線す
るなどの問題を引き起こす。Crはこのようなセメンタ
イトの異常部の出現を抑制し、さらにパーライトを微細
にする効果を持っている。しかし、多量の添加はパテン
ティングなどの熱処理後のフェライト中の転位密度を増
加させるため伸線加工後のワイヤの延性を著しく害する
ことになる。したがって、Crは前述の効果が現われる
下限を0.1%とし、上限はワイヤ延性の観点から0.
3%とした。Next, Cr will be described. When the amount of C is large as in the present invention, problems such as pro-eutectoid cementite generated at austenite grain boundaries cause wire breakage during cold working stages such as wire drawing. Cr has the effect of suppressing the appearance of such abnormal parts of cementite and further making pearlite finer. However, addition of a large amount increases the dislocation density in the ferrite after heat treatment such as patenting, which significantly impairs the ductility of the wire after wire drawing. Therefore, the lower limit of Cr at which the above effect appears is 0.1%, and the upper limit is 0.1% from the viewpoint of wire ductility.
It was set at 3%.
【0014】次に鋳片の加熱温度に関して述べる。本発
明者らは鋳片中心偏析部のC拡散による中心偏析改善効
果を系統的に把握するため、鋳造ままの鋳片中心偏析の
EPMA分析を行い、最大偏析度(濃化部のC濃度/平
均C濃度)が約1.6であることを知った。本発明にお
いて鋳片加熱はこのような濃化したCを拡散によって減
少させるためには鋳片加熱および線材加熱の両面の熱源
を有効に用いることが必要となる。近年、CC化が進み
鋳片をダイレクトに圧延につなぐ方法が取られつつある
が本発明のようにC量が増加した高炭素鋼の場合、この
方法では初析セメンタイトの生成防止が困難となること
が判明した。本発明者らによると少なくとも鋳片段階で
1.1%まで中心偏析部のC濃度を減少させ、その後の
線材加熱で1.05%まで減少させることが有効である
ことが判った。いずれにせよ、これらを満足させるため
にはCC−DR(連続鋳造と圧延を直結する工程)では
上記の目標値を満足できない。Next, the heating temperature of the slab will be described. In order to systematically understand the effect of improving center segregation due to C diffusion in the center segregation area of the slab, the present inventors conducted EPMA analysis of the center segregation of the as-cast slab, and determined that the maximum segregation degree (C concentration in the enriched area/ The average C concentration) was found to be approximately 1.6. In the present invention, in order to reduce such concentrated C by diffusion, it is necessary to effectively use both heat sources of slab heating and wire heating. In recent years, with the advancement of CC, a method of directly connecting slabs to rolling is being adopted, but in the case of high carbon steel with an increased amount of C as in the present invention, it is difficult to prevent the formation of pro-eutectoid cementite with this method. It has been found. According to the present inventors, it has been found that it is effective to reduce the C concentration in the center segregation part to at least 1.1% at the slab stage, and then reduce it to 1.05% by heating the wire thereafter. In any case, in order to satisfy these requirements, CC-DR (a process that directly connects continuous casting and rolling) cannot satisfy the above target values.
【0015】加熱温度の下限を1250℃としたのは、
この温度以下では拡散に要する時間が膨大となるためで
ある。本発明の場合、加熱温度が高い方が望ましいが1
300℃を越える温度は耐火物の寿命ならびに鋳片表面
の溶着および脱炭が著しく生じるために経済性、表面品
質の観点から製造困難となるため、上限を1300℃と
した。[0015] The lower limit of the heating temperature was set at 1250°C because
This is because below this temperature, the time required for diffusion becomes enormous. In the case of the present invention, it is desirable that the heating temperature is higher;
Temperatures exceeding 300°C will reduce the lifespan of the refractories and cause significant welding and decarburization on the surface of the slab, making it difficult to manufacture from the viewpoints of economy and surface quality, so the upper limit was set at 1300°C.
【0016】加熱時間の限定理由は対象とする中心偏析
の粒径によって異なるがC拡散効果が目標値を満足する
ために必要な最低時間として3時間が必要である。C拡
散の観点から時間は長いほど有利となるが18時間以上
の加熱は初析セメンタイト防止の観点からその効果が飽
和するとともに熱エネルギーの浪費につながることによ
る。The reason for limiting the heating time varies depending on the grain size of the target central segregation, but 3 hours is the minimum time necessary for the C diffusion effect to satisfy the target value. From the viewpoint of C diffusion, the longer the time, the more advantageous it is, but heating for more than 18 hours saturates the effect from the viewpoint of preventing pro-eutectoid cementite, and leads to waste of thermal energy.
【0017】鋼片加熱温度の下限を1050℃としたの
はこの温度以下では拡散に要する時間が長くなり、生産
性を大きく損なうためである。上限は表面の脱炭が大き
くなるため、1100℃とした。圧延後の捲取温度を8
00℃としたのはこれ以下の温度ではメカニカルデスケ
ール性を著しく害するためである。上限を930℃とし
たのはこれ以上の温度では生成するスケールの厚みが大
きくなるため、冷却段階で地鉄とスケールの熱収縮差に
よりスケールにひび割れを生じ、このひび割れ部を介し
て酸素が供給されるため、地鉄とスケール界面に薄いマ
グネタイトが生成する。このため、メカニカルデスケー
ル後の鋼線表面にマグネタイトが残留し、伸線加工時の
潤滑が不良となるためである。線材圧延後の冷却速度の
下限を10℃/秒にしたのは、これ以下の場合は線材圧
延後に初析セメンタイトが生成することによる。上限を
40℃/秒にしたのはこれ以上ではマルテンサイトの生
成が顕著となり、伸線中の断線を招くためである。The lower limit of the heating temperature of the steel billet is set at 1050° C. because below this temperature, the time required for diffusion becomes longer, which significantly impairs productivity. The upper limit was set at 1100°C because surface decarburization would be large. The winding temperature after rolling is 8
The temperature was set at 00°C because mechanical descaling properties would be significantly impaired at temperatures below this temperature. The reason why the upper limit was set at 930℃ is that at temperatures higher than this, the thickness of the scale that forms increases, so during the cooling stage, the difference in thermal contraction between the base steel and the scale causes cracks in the scale, and oxygen is supplied through these cracks. As a result, thin magnetite is formed at the interface between the base iron and the scale. This is because magnetite remains on the surface of the steel wire after mechanical descaling, resulting in poor lubrication during wire drawing. The reason why the lower limit of the cooling rate after wire rod rolling is set to 10° C./sec is that if the cooling rate is lower than this, pro-eutectoid cementite will be formed after wire rod rolling. The reason why the upper limit is set to 40° C./sec is that if the temperature exceeds this value, the formation of martensite becomes noticeable, leading to wire breakage during wire drawing.
【0018】[0018]
【実施例】表1に実施例を示す。表1に示す水準1〜4
が本発明法であり、水準5〜8は鋳片および線材加熱方
法が従来の工程のものを示す。また、水準9はC量が本
発明法より越えているものを示し、水準10は鋳片加熱
時間が水準2よりも短いものを比較法として示している
。[Example] Table 1 shows examples. Levels 1 to 4 shown in Table 1
is the method of the present invention, and levels 5 to 8 indicate those in which the slab and wire heating method is a conventional process. Further, level 9 indicates a method in which the amount of C exceeds that of the method of the present invention, and level 10 indicates a comparative method in which the slab heating time is shorter than that of level 2.
【0019】本発明法はすべて250トン転炉で溶製し
、連続鋳造にて300×500mmの鋳片にした後、鋳
片を均熱炉に装入してC拡散処理を実施して中心偏析を
軽減し、鋼片加熱を行って、5.5mmの線材とした。
一方、従来法は連続鋳造後に復熱炉を経由したのち、線
材圧延を実施して5.5mmの線材とした。以下に評価
の方法について簡単に述べる。[0019] In the method of the present invention, all the products are melted in a 250-ton converter, and after being continuously cast into slabs of 300 x 500 mm, the slabs are charged into a soaking furnace and subjected to C diffusion treatment. Segregation was reduced and the steel billet was heated to obtain a 5.5 mm wire rod. On the other hand, in the conventional method, after passing through a recuperation furnace after continuous casting, wire rod rolling was performed to obtain a 5.5 mm wire rod. The evaluation method is briefly described below.
【0020】[0020]
【表1】[Table 1]
【0021】線材の機械的性質はJISZ2241の規
定に準じて実施した。中心偏析部のC濃度は線材の中心
偏析部を横断する方向でEPMAによる線分析を実施し
て中心偏析部の最大濃化部の値を測定した。伸線加工性
の評価方法は30°のアプローチ角度を有する特殊なダ
イスを用いた。この方法により中心偏析部に強力な引張
応力を作用せしめ、中心偏析部に生成する初析セメンタ
イトの有害性を促進させて評価した。伸線限界は前述の
30°ダイスにより伸線中に断線させ、断線が発生した
時点のダイス入り側鋼線の線径から真歪を求めた。これ
を伸線可能限界歪と定義し、(1)に示す。[0021] The mechanical properties of the wire rod were tested in accordance with the provisions of JIS Z2241. The C concentration in the central segregation area was determined by performing line analysis using EPMA in a direction across the central segregation area of the wire, and measuring the value at the maximum concentration area of the central segregation area. A special die having an approach angle of 30° was used to evaluate the wire drawability. Using this method, a strong tensile stress was applied to the center segregated area, and the harmful effects of pro-eutectoid cementite generated in the center segregated area were promoted and evaluated. The wire drawing limit was determined by breaking the wire during wire drawing using the aforementioned 30° die, and determining the true strain from the wire diameter of the steel wire on the side entering the die at the time the wire breakage occurred. This is defined as the limit strain that allows wire drawing, and is shown in (1).
【0022】
伸線可能限界歪=2 ln(d0/d1) ………
(1)d0=伸線初期線径 d1=断
線したダイスの入り側鋼線径を示す。 この値が大き
いほど優れた伸線加工性を有することを意味する。また
、本発明は熱延ままの線材で初析セメンタイトの生成の
ないものを供給することを目的としているので伸線前の
鉛パテンティング(LP)処理は省略し熱延ままの線材
を酸洗したのちボンデ・ボンダーリュウーベ処理を実施
して伸線加工に供試した。[0022] Limit strain for wire drawing = 2 ln (d0/d1) ......
(1) d0 = Initial drawing wire diameter d1 = Indicates the diameter of the steel wire on the entry side of the broken die. The larger this value is, the better the wire drawability is. In addition, since the present invention aims to supply a wire rod as hot-rolled without the formation of pro-eutectoid cementite, the lead patenting (LP) treatment before wire drawing is omitted and the wire rod as hot-rolled is pickled. Afterwards, it was subjected to Bonde-Bonderlueube treatment and subjected to wire drawing.
【0023】表1の結果からわかるように本発明鋼の場
合、C量が高いにも拘らずミクロ組織観察結果から線材
中心偏析部に初析セメンタイトが全く観察されていない
ことがわかる。一方、本発明で用いた鋼を従来の工程で
処理させたものが水準5〜8であるが、この水準には初
析セメンタイトが観察されており、本発明法の鋳片段階
のC拡散効果が顕著に現われている。このことは、同じ
く表1に示すようにEPMAで線測定したC濃度にも現
われ、本発明法の方が中心偏析部のC濃度が低くなって
いることに対応している。As can be seen from the results in Table 1, in the case of the steel of the present invention, despite the high C content, it can be seen from the microstructural observation that no pro-eutectoid cementite is observed in the segregated area at the center of the wire. On the other hand, the steel used in the present invention treated by the conventional process has levels 5 to 8, but pro-eutectoid cementite is observed at these levels, and the C diffusion effect at the slab stage of the present invention is clearly visible. This also appears in the C concentration measured by EPMA as shown in Table 1, and corresponds to the fact that the C concentration in the center segregation area is lower in the method of the present invention.
【0024】次に、伸線加工性について述べる。本発明
法の水準1〜4のものは従来法の水準5〜8との比較に
おいて、伸線可能限界歪が高い値を示し、良好な伸線加
工性能を有していることがわかる。一方、比較法の水準
9は本発明法のC量より高いため、鋳片段階のC拡散を
本発明法発明に規定する最長時間で処理を行っても初析
セメンタイトの生成は防止できないことを示す。この場
合、鋳片加熱温度を30時間以上とれば初析セメンタイ
トの生成は防止できるが、いずれにせよ非工業生産性の
範疇で実現性に乏しい。また、水準10は本発明法に規
定する鋳片加熱時間が短い場合を示すもので、この場合
も初析セメンタイトの生成を防止できない。水準11は
水準3よりも線材圧延後の冷却速度が遅いため、初析セ
メンタイトの生成が観察されたものである。Next, wire drawability will be described. It can be seen that the wire drawable limit strains of Levels 1 to 4 of the method of the present invention are higher than those of Levels 5 to 8 of the conventional method, and have good wire drawing performance. On the other hand, level 9 of the comparative method is higher than the amount of C in the method of the present invention, which indicates that the formation of pro-eutectoid cementite cannot be prevented even if C diffusion at the slab stage is carried out for the maximum time stipulated in the method of the present invention. show. In this case, the formation of pro-eutectoid cementite can be prevented by keeping the slab heating temperature for 30 hours or more, but in any case, this is in the category of non-industrial productivity and is not practical. Further, level 10 indicates a case where the slab heating time prescribed in the method of the present invention is short, and in this case as well, the formation of pro-eutectoid cementite cannot be prevented. In level 11, the cooling rate after wire rod rolling was slower than in level 3, so the formation of pro-eutectoid cementite was observed.
【0025】以上述べたように、C量が高い領域で伸線
加工性の良好な高強度化を実現させるためには本発明法
による製造法でなければならないことがわかる。As described above, it can be seen that in order to achieve high strength with good wire drawability in a region where the amount of C is high, the manufacturing method according to the present invention must be used.
【0026】[0026]
【発明の効果】本発明法により伸線加工性の良好な高炭
素鋼線材の製造が可能となり、工業的にはワイヤロープ
、バネ、スチールコードなどの高張力化が実現できるた
め、前述の各分野における軽量化および省力化に大きく
貢献する材料を安定して供給することが可能となった。[Effects of the Invention] The method of the present invention makes it possible to manufacture high-carbon steel wire rods with good wire drawability, and industrially it is possible to achieve high tensile strength in wire ropes, springs, steel cords, etc. It has become possible to stably supply materials that greatly contribute to weight reduction and labor saving in the field.
Claims (1)
.0%、Mn:0.3〜0.8%、 Al:
0.003%以下、Cr:0.1〜0.3% を含有し、残部がFeおよび不可避的不純物からなる鋳
片を用いて、1250〜1300℃の温度範囲に3時間
〜18時間保持した鋳片を分塊圧延にて鋼片とした後、
鋼片加熱温度1050〜1100℃の温度で加熱した後
、圧延後の捲取温度を800℃〜930℃で行い、その
後の冷却速度を10〜40℃/秒で冷却することにより
、線材圧延状態のままで初析セメンタイトの生成がない
ことを特徴とする、高強度で伸線加工性の優れた高炭素
鋼線材の製造法。Claim 1: Weight ratio: C: 0.80-1.1%, Si: 0.1-1
.. 0%, Mn: 0.3-0.8%, Al:
Using a slab containing 0.003% or less, Cr: 0.1-0.3%, and the remainder consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, it was maintained at a temperature range of 1250-1300°C for 3 to 18 hours. After making slabs into steel slabs by blooming rolling,
After heating the steel billet at a temperature of 1050 to 1100°C, the coiling temperature after rolling is 800°C to 930°C, and the subsequent cooling rate is 10 to 40°C/sec, so that the wire rod is in a rolled state. A method for producing a high carbon steel wire rod with high strength and excellent wire drawability, which is characterized by no formation of pro-eutectoid cementite.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP3076188A JP2575544B2 (en) | 1991-04-09 | 1991-04-09 | Manufacturing method of high-strength, high-carbon steel wire rod with excellent drawability |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP3076188A JP2575544B2 (en) | 1991-04-09 | 1991-04-09 | Manufacturing method of high-strength, high-carbon steel wire rod with excellent drawability |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH04311523A true JPH04311523A (en) | 1992-11-04 |
JP2575544B2 JP2575544B2 (en) | 1997-01-29 |
Family
ID=13598156
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP3076188A Expired - Fee Related JP2575544B2 (en) | 1991-04-09 | 1991-04-09 | Manufacturing method of high-strength, high-carbon steel wire rod with excellent drawability |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP2575544B2 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100241303B1 (en) * | 1995-12-26 | 2000-03-02 | 이구택 | The manufacturing method for high carbon steel wire rod |
KR100435471B1 (en) * | 1999-12-24 | 2004-06-10 | 주식회사 포스코 | A method for manufacturing cold forming steel wire rod for spring |
CN103882313A (en) * | 2012-12-21 | 2014-06-25 | 鞍钢股份有限公司 | Wire rod for ultrahigh-strength fine cutting steel wire and production method thereof |
CN105316581A (en) * | 2014-06-23 | 2016-02-10 | 鞍钢股份有限公司 | Wire rod for 90-grade ultrahigh-strength rubber tube steel wire and production method thereof |
WO2021007915A1 (en) * | 2019-06-26 | 2021-01-21 | 江苏省沙钢钢铁研究院有限公司 | Superfine extra-high-strength steel wire, steel wire rod, and production method of the steel wire rod |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR101676109B1 (en) * | 2014-11-20 | 2016-11-15 | 주식회사 포스코 | Wire rod having good drawability and high strength, steel wire having high strength and manufacturing method of wire rod |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5376917A (en) * | 1976-12-21 | 1978-07-07 | Nippon Steel Corp | Hot rolled high carbon steel wire rod with good drawability and manufacture thereof |
JPS62238327A (en) * | 1986-04-08 | 1987-10-19 | Nippon Steel Corp | Manufacture of high strength steel wire rod superior in workability |
JPS6462424A (en) * | 1987-08-31 | 1989-03-08 | Toa Steel Co Ltd | Production of high-strength steel wire rod |
JPH02263951A (en) * | 1988-12-28 | 1990-10-26 | Nippon Steel Corp | Manufacture of high strength high ductility steel wire rod and high strength high ductility extra thin steel wire |
-
1991
- 1991-04-09 JP JP3076188A patent/JP2575544B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5376917A (en) * | 1976-12-21 | 1978-07-07 | Nippon Steel Corp | Hot rolled high carbon steel wire rod with good drawability and manufacture thereof |
JPS62238327A (en) * | 1986-04-08 | 1987-10-19 | Nippon Steel Corp | Manufacture of high strength steel wire rod superior in workability |
JPS6462424A (en) * | 1987-08-31 | 1989-03-08 | Toa Steel Co Ltd | Production of high-strength steel wire rod |
JPH02263951A (en) * | 1988-12-28 | 1990-10-26 | Nippon Steel Corp | Manufacture of high strength high ductility steel wire rod and high strength high ductility extra thin steel wire |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100241303B1 (en) * | 1995-12-26 | 2000-03-02 | 이구택 | The manufacturing method for high carbon steel wire rod |
KR100435471B1 (en) * | 1999-12-24 | 2004-06-10 | 주식회사 포스코 | A method for manufacturing cold forming steel wire rod for spring |
CN103882313A (en) * | 2012-12-21 | 2014-06-25 | 鞍钢股份有限公司 | Wire rod for ultrahigh-strength fine cutting steel wire and production method thereof |
CN105316581A (en) * | 2014-06-23 | 2016-02-10 | 鞍钢股份有限公司 | Wire rod for 90-grade ultrahigh-strength rubber tube steel wire and production method thereof |
WO2021007915A1 (en) * | 2019-06-26 | 2021-01-21 | 江苏省沙钢钢铁研究院有限公司 | Superfine extra-high-strength steel wire, steel wire rod, and production method of the steel wire rod |
JP2022544646A (en) * | 2019-06-26 | 2022-10-20 | インスティテュート オブ リサーチ オブ アイロン アンド スティール,ジィァンスー プロビンス/シャー-スティール カンパニー リミテッド | Ultra-thin, ultra-high-strength steel wire, wire rod, and method for manufacturing wire rod |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2575544B2 (en) | 1997-01-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6547890B2 (en) | Steel wire rod for cold forging and method for producing the same | |
US5565044A (en) | Thermal refiningless hot-rolled steel and method of making same | |
JP7226548B2 (en) | wire | |
KR20150119378A (en) | High-strength steel wire material exhibiting excellent cold-drawing properties, and high-strength steel wire | |
JP3601388B2 (en) | Method of manufacturing steel wire and steel for steel wire | |
JPS62256950A (en) | High-strength steel wire rod excellent in wiredrawability | |
KR100430068B1 (en) | Direct patenting high strength wire rod and method for producing the same | |
JP2575544B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of high-strength, high-carbon steel wire rod with excellent drawability | |
JP3536684B2 (en) | Steel wire with excellent wire drawing workability | |
JP3456455B2 (en) | Steel wire rod, steel wire, and method for producing them | |
JP3153618B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of hypereutectoid steel wire | |
JP3965010B2 (en) | High-strength direct patenting wire and method for producing the same | |
US5650027A (en) | High-carbon steel wire rod and wire excellent in drawability and methods of producing the same | |
JP3548419B2 (en) | High strength steel wire | |
KR100336852B1 (en) | Method for manufacturing high strength hyper-eutectoid steel for elongation | |
JP4392093B2 (en) | High-strength direct patenting wire and method for producing the same | |
KR100742821B1 (en) | A wire rod for steel cord, and method for manufacturing the same | |
US5658402A (en) | High-carbon steel wire rod and wire excellent in drawability and methods of producing the same | |
JP3474544B2 (en) | Linear or rod-shaped steel with reduced deformation resistance at room temperature and in the heating area | |
JPH02274810A (en) | Production of high tensile untempered bolt | |
JP2927823B2 (en) | Method of manufacturing hot-rolled material for high carbon steel wire rod with high workability | |
JPH11302784A (en) | High strength steel wire | |
KR102364426B1 (en) | Wire rod with improved drawability and manufacturing method | |
JP2742967B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of bainite wire rod | |
JPH05192744A (en) | Manufacture of bar steel excellent in drawing workability |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 19960910 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |