PMG

Re: Pomoc

Witam. Zadań, w których można pomóc, to tutaj nie brakuje, szkoda tylko, że angażuje się tak mało osób z pl. Wiele dużych prostych zadań typu wstawianie "P107 (P107)" mógłby wykonać bot (teoretycznie niektóre można zgłaszać przez "Array Properties" i mam nadzieję, że to w końcu jakiś bot zrobi), ręcznie zwykle szkoda na nie czasu. Skupiłbym się na wstawianiu istotnych właściwości, z którymi bot nie dałby sobie rady, a które wykorzystywane będą w infoboksach. Pozostają jeszcze niezałatwione/błędne interwiki - widziałem, że widziałeś zadanie, które wstawiłem ostawnio w WP:ZdB. Jeśli chcesz, to możesz zająć się również tłumaczeniem dokumentacji Wikidanych - przetłumaczyłem chyba kilkaset pozycji, ale jeszcze sporo zostało (oczywiście ważna jest spójność w nazewnictwie, więc na początek to dodatkowa trudność). Dzięki za głos w tutejszym PUA. Chrumps (talk) 22:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Widzę, że z USS Woolsey zorientowałeś się, co było nie tak i poprawiłeś :) zwięzłe opisy, małe litery na początku tam gdzie trzeba, nieźle Ci idzie. Jeśli chodzi o P107, to bywa kłopotliwe, niektórzy chcą, żeby w ogóle z tego zrezygnować, bo nie zawsze jest jednoznaczne [1]. Wg mnie do konkretnego okrętu najlepiej pasuje work (Q386724), bo to praca twórcza podlegająca prawu autorskiemu. Natomiast w przypadku np. Tucker-class destroyer (Q2114492) skłaniałbym się ku term (Q1969448). Mogę się oczywiście mylić, więc jest jeszcze Property_talk:P107 i Wikidata:Project_chat. Myślę, że przy okrętach P107 nie jest na tyle istotne, żeby zawracać sobie nim głowę, a bot mógłby ją dodać masowo np. na postawie instance of (P31): Tucker-class destroyer (Q2114492). Chrumps (talk) 20:03, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Bot

Are you running software to work for you? If so, please register as a bot. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 20:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

P107 (P107)

Hello PMG, I was wondering if you could possible stop adding the main type property to items as it is now starting to flood the abuse filter logs. I am only leaving a short note since you are not a bot and thus should have read the warning giving on saving. John F. Lewis (talk) 21:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Blocked

Hi PMG, per GerardM's message I have blocked you for operating like a bot by high speed editing. This is no a block which should be viewed a negative, rather preventative to the community. Feel free to explain why you are editing so fast below and I will be more than willing to unblock. For this, please do not use the {{Unblock}} template. Thanks, John F. Lewis (talk) 21:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello

As I wrote on GerardM I am for sure not runnin any indepenedent software. Everything is controlled by hand. I can use my current task (what I was doing before block) as a example . I am adding to pl:Kategoria:Oficerowie piechoty II RP (something like "military officers of infantry of Second Republic of Poland" if my English is correct).

So typically every article from this category should have:

• sex or gender (P21) (I am checking every page if person was male of female)
• country of citizenship (P27) - every officer who get in Second Republic of Poland military rank needs to be Polish
• military branch (P241) - Infantry of Second Polish Republic (Q11816462)
• occupation (P106) - if you are soldier you don`t need to be your job. But if you are officer for sure it need to be you job. And Second Republic was very strict about this.
• P107 (P107) - you need to be a person to be officer.

After I open all ~75 articles in seperate tabs I am checking article if is correct. I am also checking male/female to not mix this. Then I go to wikidata using gadget what show link to wikidata, and then Using User:Goldzahn/wikidata useful.js I am filling this specific data to every entry.

I didn`t know that I shouldn`t add "main type property " to entries. I will stop adding this, but can you explain me why we shouln`t add this? Some link to discussion?

Its not first time when somebody think that I am bot. But all edits from my account are made by myself and I am taking responsibility for this. But I am thinking that I am very experienced editor with more than 200k edits outside of wikidata so I really know how to edit fast and effective. As you can check here on pl.wiki I many times edit using floodflag. If this can be helpfull I can edit from this flag on wikidata. On pl.wiki many people know how fast I can edit - so you can ask wikidata admins: User:Karol007 or User:Rzuwig that I don`t use bots. PMG (talk) 21:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Explanation is fine. We are not able to give you flooder at the moment, so if you could edit possibly once a minute I'll be more than happy to unblock you now. John F. Lewis (talk) 21:39, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok - not a problem. So I will focus on Wikidata:Basketball task force to better describe example basketballer.PMG (talk) 21:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Well, you edit pretty fast then :) As I am satisfied with the explanation and John has told me he is satisfied too, I have unblocked you. However, I'd prefer if you wait for a bureaucrat to add the flood flag to your account before resuming with your tasks. About main type, an RfC was recently closed with consensus to delete P107 and replace it with a new still-to-be-defined property. This is the RfC: Wikidata:Requests for comment/Primary sorting property. Cheers. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 21:40, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Well - I am quite proud of this how I can make every percent of power of Firefox to contribute to Wikimedia :). If I will be under flood flag I want to continue to describe people from Poland on Wikidata. Thank you for info about RfC - I will stop adding this thing. For at least next week I want to edit wikidata with full power - I broke my leg and I don`t have anything intresting except computer in my home so I want to be usefull. PMG (talk) 21:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

It's good to have contributors like you :) I hope you don't feel discouraged for the block. We are still awaiting for a crat to add the flood flag to you, so I'll let you know when it's done. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 22:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey. I saw your comment at John's talk and want to clarify some things: You can edit as usual, just a bit slower until we get you the flood flag. I will see if we can get you the flag today (all of our crats have dissapeared as of late). Therefore, you can safely ignore the "1 edit per minute" comment. Cheers. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 17:38, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I undestand situation now. I will wait. PMG (talk) 18:07, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Actually, after consulting a bit more, I think you can resume editing as you normally do. I am sure it must be annoying not being able to edit, so feel free to do it. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 18:19, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

What?

You are literally spamming Wikidata's recent changes feed. Really? ElliottBelardo (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't understand your screenshot. Also, there is no policy against editing quickly. Legoktm (talk) 06:42, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

100 000

Zauważyłem, że masz tutaj 100 000 edycji. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 14:58, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Gdybym miał otrzymywać blokady za to, że edytuję częściej niż raz na minutę, na angielskiej, polskiej, rosyjskiej i francuskiej miałbym po kilkadziesiąt blokad. Właśnie zbliżam się do swojej 200 000-tnej edycji w projekcie globalnym i byłem ciekaw ile Ty masz edycji (ponad 300 000). Przyjmij więc moje gratulacje. Jutro planuję dokonać ową edycję, a ponieważ zbliżam się też do 44 444 edycji na pl-wiki, chcę to połączyć. Zastanawiam się jaki dać artykuł (na pl-wiki). Jeżeli go zgłoszą to usunięcia popsują mi całą zabawę. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 17:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

gross tonnage (P1093)

Just created gross tonnage (P1093). --Tobias1984 (talk) 09:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

P1124 (P1124)

Just created P1124 (P1124). --Tobias1984 (talk) 14:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

English | español | français | العربية | Nederlands | русский | +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades... (our gift is better than the one at Commons or Meta)

You have your gun; now here's your badge: {{User admin}}/{{#babel:admin}} and {{Admin topicon}}. Enjoy!

PMG, congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Wikidata. Please take a moment to read the Wikidata:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Wikidata:Project chat, Wikidata:Requests for comment, and Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings, or modifications of protected pages.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikidata-admin @ irc.freenode.net. If you need access, you can flag someone down at @ irc.freenode.net. You may find Wikidata:Guide to Adminship to be useful reading. You may also want to consider adding yourself to meta:Template:Wikidata/Ambassadors, and to any similar page on your home wiki if one exists. (Check Wikipedia:Wikidata/Wikidatans (Q14964498).)

Please also add/update the languages you speak to your listing at Wikidata:List of administrators. You may also like to add your username to this list if you would not like that items you delete at RfD get marked as deleted automatically. Again, welcome to the admin corps!

-- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 04:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Congrats! --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 12:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Merge-project requiring language skills

Dear Wikidatan,

Even though Wikidata phase 1 (replacing interlanguage by Wikidata) is officially finished, there are still a lot a duplicate items that should be merged. Projects to list possible duplicates (and therefore possible mergers) have been started by users such as Pasleim with User:Pasleim/projectmerge and Ivan A. Krestinin with User:Ivan A. Krestinin/To merge. Those bot-generated lists do however contain quite some false positives and therefore still need a human eye to decide whether to merge or not.

Since you are an administrator on Wikidata with knowledge of the Polish language, User:Ivan A. Krestinin/To merge/plwiki might benefit from your help. As said, it lists couples of WD items that might possibly be merged. If you are already involved in these projects or not interested, I am sincerely sorry for bothering you.

With kind regards, FakirNL (talk) 00:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Re: Pomnik Wikipedii

Hej, ciężko będzie... dodałem tylko donated by (P1028), ale bez źródła, bo ma być spoza wiki. Z czasem może jeszcze się parę pojawić, np. Freebase ID (P646). Pozdrawiam, Chrumps ► 18:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Prośba

Nie mogę usunąć linku w Q1786347. Klikam edit i nic się nie dzieje (strona nie reaguje). Chciałem przesunąć link do niemieckiego hasła (Vier-Elemente-Lehre) do Q188520. Pozdrawiam. Tomasz Raburski (talk) 10:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

native label (P1705)

native label (P1705) is ready. --Tobias1984 (talk) 15:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Admin inactivity

Hi! Unfortunately, since you have not made 5 administrator actions over the last six months, your administrator privileges were removed for inactivity. Thank you for your contributions to Wikidata! --Rschen7754 00:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop

Edits similar to [2] are not correct. Please stop. --Izno (talk) 20:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

can you explain me why are you thinking that this edits are incorrect? PMG (talk) 20:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

You should be able to defend your edits without asking me why you think you should stop. The names of ships do not include the part you are including, which is closer to disambiguation than not. Additionally, you are editing too fast. Please stop that as well, or request a flood flag. --Izno (talk) 20:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

You just reverted my change in USS Boxer (Q2342422). Are you really telling me that en:USS Boxer (CV-21) didn't have CV-21 in name? Really? And there is no difference between him and en:USS Boxer (LHD-4)? Your edits shoud defend themselfs. You reverted my edits that were fixing incorrect names. I expect to YOU explain why are you putting incorrect names back. PMG (talk) 20:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes, CV-21 is not part of its name, and it is you who is introducing incorrect names. As I said, please stop. --Izno (talk) 20:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

właściwości polskich słowników

Ponieważ głosowałeś przy tej właściwości zwracam się do Ciebie z prośbą o spojrzenie równie przychylnym wzrokiem na Wikidata:Property proposal/WSO Online ID. Z góry dziękuję i pozdrawiam, KaMan (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Ponownie zwracam się z podobną prośbą, tym razem chodzi o głosowanie Wikidata:Property proposal/WSJP ID. Z góry dziękuję za głos i pozdrawiam, KaMan (talk) 12:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Dziękuję za oddany głos. Jest tylko mały problem, czy możesz dodać przed podpisem {{s}} tak jak pozostali głosujący? Bez tego nie wiadomo czy głos jest za, czy przeciw i ktoś się może przyczepić przy podliczaniu wyników głosowania :) Z góry dzięki i pozdrawiam, KaMan (talk) 09:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Kolejna prośba o wsparcie głosem, tym razem tutaj: Wikidata:Property proposal/Dobry słownik ID :) KaMan (talk) 11:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

To znowu ja z prośbą o wsparcie. Tym razem chodzi o dwa słowniki historycznego polskiego: ten Wikidata:Property proposal/SPXVI ID i ten Wikidata:Property proposal/SJPXVII ID. Z góry dziękuję, dzięki Twoim głosom język polski ma najlepiej przygotowaną bazę słownikową we właściwościach. :) KaMan (talk) 12:35, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

To znowu ja z prośbą o wsparcie. Tym razem jednak nie chodzi o właściwość słownikową, a o właściwość do wprowadzania przykładów użycia. Przyda się każdy "support" więc jeżeli uważasz że dodawanie przykładów użycia do słów ma sens to proszę o głos na Wikidata:Property proposal/usage example. Z góry dziękuję :) KaMan (talk) 16:33, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Michał Bohusz Szyszko

Zrobiłam łączenie elementów Wikidata dla tego autora, ale coś poszło nie tak, wydaje mi się, że bardziej poprawnie by było, gdyby to zostało pod rekordem "Michał Bohusz-Szyszko". Czy mógłbyś to jakoś naprawić? Z góry bardzo dziękuję, Wieralee (talk) 18:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Wrong merge

Sorry to announce you failed a merge in 2016 :/ https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q11723357&diff=367840511&oldid=321786059 Javeline (Q11723357) was about an ancient weapon, not a destroyer, according to the Google knowlegde graph.

Not sure how to resolve this, but it seems the best thing to do could be to move back the destroyer to Q22662041 ? maybe Help:Split an item could help. Or Help:Merge#UnmergingSp. We’re lucky there is no use of this item in statements.lit a author  TomT0m / talk page 14:53, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

@TomT0m: I created javeline (Q115694869) and excluded it from destroyer. There is internal link to en.wiki to Javelin, but I will not edit this on fr.wiki, because I have fr-0. PMG (talk) 12:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

@PMG I also moved the google knowlegde graph Id statement as it seems to refer to the weapon. author  TomT0m / talk page 13:12, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Call for participation in a task-based online experiment

Dear PMG,

I hope you are doing well,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I am working on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender model that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our model based on your previous edits.

Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published in a research venue.

The experiment should take no more than 15 minutes, and it will be held next week.

If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfA1wfdBfCRlcG3WhDyc-V8lzgPNx3fDFCNXkyn4CSwahXZ_A/viewform?usp=sf_link

Then, I will contact you with the link to start the study.

For more information about my project, please read this post: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Kholoudsaa

In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards Kholoudsaa (talk) 16:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Recreation of deleted item

I have deleted Q124035308 because it appears to be a recreation of deleted items Q123700744 . This means that we have already made a decision that this entity does not satisfy our notability criteria. Please do not recreate deleted items, as they are likely to be deleted again immediately, and your account may be blocked. To appeal this decision, see Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion. Fralambert (talk) 18:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Sorry - that was a mistake from my side, I fully agree that it should be deleted. Too fast fingers, and then I didnt know how to delete it. PMG (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Notability of Commons categories

I noticed you have created a number of items representing Commons categories that only have Commons sitelinks. These types of items are not notable. See Wikidata:Notability criterion 1, exception 4. I have nominated one tranche of these items at Wikidata:Requests for deletions#Bulk deletion request: Commons only categories and will probably be nominating more in the future. William Graham (talk) 15:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Can you please suggest how they should be look like? Like Q124044996 (with category combines topics (P971)) or Q124044921 (with facet of (P1269)) PMG (talk) 18:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)