Gzen92

Archives

Archives 2014-2015.
Archives 2016.
Archives 2017.
Archives 2018-2020.

Commons galleries removed from sitelinks

Hi! Could you check if Special:Contributions/Gzen92 are incorrect? My impression was that linking Commons galleries to items as sitelinks was correct, but I may be wrong. Thank you very much, --Epìdosis 10:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

@Epìdosis: You're right that linking to Commons galleries with sitelinks is correct. Looking through the edits by @Gzen92:, though, it looks like they are removing links to redirected galleries. Which isn't terrible - but isn't particularly good either. The ideal case would be that the redirects are deleted on Commons... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, yes only redirects. And the redirected page is already linked to a wikidata element. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 06:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Crochets dans les libellés

Bonjour, j’ai vu que ton bot avait créé des éléments sur des tableaux depuis Palissy avec un libellé entre crochets (par exemple Q29114011). C’est normal et voulu ou est-ce qu’il faut corriger quand on en croise ? Runi Gerardsen (talk) 14:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Bonjour @Runi Gerardsen:. J'ai vérifié (voir ici), c'est le libellé qui apparaît sur le site du ministère de la Culture. Pourquoi, je ne sais pas, mais je pense que l'on peut enlever ces accolades.

J'aurais bien listé tous les titres de ce genre, mais je ne retrouve plus sur Internet le fichier dont je m'étais servi il y a cinq ans.

Cordialement, Gzen92 (talk) 16:40, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Je ne pense pas qu’il y en ait beaucoup, les trois que j’ai repérés étaient tous liés à Zuber & Cie (Q227544), peut-être un copié-collé mal fait chez eux une fois. De toute façon s’il y en a d’autres je tomberai dessus tôt ou tard puisque j’intègre commune par commune les fiches de l’Inventaire et que je contrôle au passage ce qui existe déjà. Runi Gerardsen (talk) 20:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

A consistent, repeated error

It looks like wherever the Palissy database indicates Matériaux et techniques d'interventions: "Grès" you have interpreted this as

⟨ FOO ⟩ made from material (P186) ⟨ stoneware (Q830894)    ⟩

This is wrong. "Grès" is stoneware (Q830894); sandstone (Q13085) is a ceramic material that is sometimes referred to in French as grès artificial, but is not the same thing.

Dalles funéraires (Q29228326) is a good example, as is Angle sculpture (possibly a corbel), Musée Lapidaire de Carcassonne. (Q29228302).

Unless you have some strong reason to think I'm mistaken, I'd suggest that your bot once again scrape whatever was drawn from that database and correct this.

Please let me know whether you agree or if you think I've got this wrong. And if you agree with me, this should certainly be remedied. - Jmabel (talk) 07:48, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

@Jmabel: hello, yes I think you are right. Gzen92 (talk) 07:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Can you use a bot approach to remedy this? - Jmabel (talk) 07:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

@Jmabel: 645 cases, I correct.

#MH sans identifiant
SELECT DISTINCT ?item ?itemLabel WHERE {
	{?item wdt:P481 [] }
    {?item wdt:P186 wd:Q830894}
}

Try it!

You have been blocked

Creating hundreds of junk redirects and evidently trying to game Wikidata URIs is completely inappropriate. Please respond here and acknowledge that you know that this is wrongheaded and that you won't continue this nonsense. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Koavf: I understand, but I didn't think it would take on such proportions. Yes, lately I tried to get a rounded number. And I made redirects to not leave empty elements. A few years ago, it was to test my bot, there too I did not leave any empty elements (redirection). Sorry again, I'm stopping this ridiculous quest. Gzen92 (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Unblocked. Merci. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:24, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. @Koavf: can you unlock the bot too please, i need it? Gzen92 (talk) 17:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Assuming it won't be running ridiculous tasks like before, oui. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Of course, thank you. Gzen92 (talk) 08:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Arrondi localisation

Bonjour, en quoi est-il plus logique d'arrondir les coordonnées géographiques à la 1/100e de secondes plutôt que de les laisser à une précision à 1e-6 comme je les saisis ? Du coup la précision est donnée avec un résultat peu intuitif de 2.777e-5... Une coordonnée en degrés décimaux n'est-elle pas plus intuitive que des degrés minutes, secondes et 1/100e de secondes ? Cordialement, FHd (talk) 19:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Bonjour @FHd: ça fait pas loin de 10 ans que le bot fait ce genre de modifications, alors je n'ai pas retrouvé le pourquoi du comment (ni la discussion qui aurait pu en être la cause).

En examinant les deux cas (avant/après), je trouve plus logique d'utiliser une précision en centième de seconde d'angle (1/60/60/100 = 2,777...e-6) qui est le rendu affiché (xx°yy'zz.ww). Pour une précision en fraction d'angle (10e-6 en l'occurrence) je m'attendrais plus à un affichage du genre xx,yyyyyy°. Qu'en penses-tu ? Je peux facilement désactiver ces modifications géographiques si besoin. N'étant plus que ponctuellement sur ce wiki, je te laisse la décision finale. Cordialement, Gzen92 (talk) 11:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)