This set of scripts aims to help in migrating multiple repositories into a single monorepository. They cover a range of strategies depending if history needs to be kept or not, there is also a helper for the merge process depending on the features supported by the remote host repository.

The expectation is that some clean up might be on on the incoming repository so the import process is iterative and can be done locally avoiding destructive side effects on the source and target while working on any necessary cleanup or tests.

Migrating a repository is intended to take place in roughly 3 steps:

1. Do non destructive and dry-run migrations of the source repository
2. Review migration results
3. Re-run a fresh migration (if needed) and apply the changes to the remote targed

Note: the source remote repository is not modified.

1. ./import-repo.sh – Automates 3 migration strategies to import package repos
2. ./merge-import.sh – Handles the final push when hooks are disabled (with pull/rebase if master has newer changes)

The preparation includes reviewing the repository to migrate, selecting a migration strategy and doing some clean up if needed.

First find out which branch is the trunk/latest branch, on older repositories there can be surprises where a release branch is a head of main or develop is behind main. Avoid surprises by carefuly choosing which branch to migrate.

Second review the history. Are there a lot of commits? Are the commit messages meaningful? Is the history worth migrating or is the squash stratagy good enough to only get the code?

Third comes the cleanup:

• Remove large files (accidental commits of binaries in the history e.g.)
• Remove/flatten sub-modules (including in history)

Optionally depending on the size of the repository and desire to migrate history, more clean up can be done to test history linearization or manualy clean up poor commits ("Fix", "Fix Fix").

Once the prep is done it's time to run the migration scripts, this is non permanant and can be restarted (or done as a dry-run at first if desired).

It's important to take a look at the migration results, make sure the files are in the expected location and the commit log looks as expected.

This is highly dependent on how the remote repository works. With Github as a remote, it can be as simple as open a PR and merge.

Depending on the migration strategy and merge options (squash or not) it makes sense to tweak settings on the repository. For Github while we normally only allow squash merge, for migrations we temporarily enabled merge commits to retain history and disabled the option again after migrating.

Our initial migrations happened using Phabricator as a remote repository/code host it's similar to Sapling SCM. The structure was exotic in that:

• repo-staging.git stored all the working branches,
• repo.git stored only the trunk branch,
• heavy pre-push/pre-merge restrictions were enforced on the server.

Rebasing on a migration branch usually lead to a mess. Therefore our proces on that setup was to block all merges to trunk for all but the 1-2 contributors migrating. Disable the restrictions for pushing to trunk. Pull the latest code and run a fresh migration, then merge. This was possible with minimal down time (5-15 minutes) and was done outside peak hours.

Note: it's worth considering the impact on your CI/CD system. Github typically treats a merge (even with history) as 1 build the merge commit. Phabricator however, with it's focus on linear history treated each commit merged to trunk as new and could accidentally lead to a build for each commit in the migrated history. Depending on the setup it is important to disable build webhooks during migration. And only re-enable them after the code hosting service has finished processing the commits.

The import and merge scripts need to be run back to back in order for this variant to work properly. If a rebase is needed because of a new commit, git will attempt to re-apply all the commits and declare any conflicts as needing to be resolved again.

Example using the "Retain all commits (patch file variant)" strategy:

# Define migration config in environment:
export ISSUE_NUMBER="JIRA-####"                          # i.e. JIRA-1234 (used for branch names)
export SOURCE_BRANCH=develop                             # Optional, defaults to main
export SOURCE_REPO_PATH=/path/to/project_name            # Absolute path to source repository
export TARGET_REPO_PATH=/path/to/project_name            # Absolute path to target repository
export TARGET_PATH=pathinrepo/subpath/project_name/      # Path inside repository
export TARGET_TRUNK_BRANCH=develop                       # Optional defaults to main

# This will create a migration/project_name branch on the destination repository
git-migration/import-repo.sh $SOURCE_REPO_PATH $TARGET_PATH
# Check info and confirm
# Select 2 – patch migration strategy

# If you need to start again and want to delete the branches locally
git branch -D migration/project_name
# if pushed for review on remote as well
git push origin --delete migration/project_name

# !!! DANGER ZONE !!!
# depending on your workflow this might require elevated priviliges or disabling hooks
git-migration/merge-import.sh migration/project_name

The following are helpful to locate large files before a migration:

• ./git-check-filesizes.sh – Checks for files/blobs too large to import
  • To run with a custom size MAX_SIZE_KB=15625 ./git-check-filesizes.sh <repo_path> (default: 1024kb)
• ./git-find-blob.pm – Helper to identify which commits these file-blobs are from.
  • Uses the blobs detected by the above script: ./git-find-blob.pm <repo_path> <blob>

To remove large files bfg-repo-cleaner with java -jar bfg.jar --strip-blobs-bigger-than 1024K $SOURCE_REPO_PATH is an effective option if a simple cleanup is possible. If you need to remove some but keep others and bfg isn't advanced enough you can look into git-filter-branch.

If there are sub-modules in the repository or in the git history, this will cause most git hosts to throw file size errors in case file size restrictions are in place. In order to fix this, the sub-modules will need to be removed from the repository and its history. An automated way of going about this is with git-filter-branch. The command would go through the entire history commit by commit and remove any mention of sub-modules in the repository.

In order to anticipate this kind of problem, the git log can be searched in advance for the use of sub-modules using git log -p | grep --after-context=3 Subproject

If any sub-modules are found the following snippet should help you get rid of them.

export SUBMOD_PATH='path/to/submodules'

git filter-branch -f --prune-empty --tree-filter '
if [[ -n "$(git submodule--helper list)" ]]; then
    git submodule deinit -f $SUBMOD_PATH
    git rm -rf $SUBMOD_PATH && rm -rf $SUBMOD_PATH && git rm -rf .git/modules/$SUBMOD_PATH
    fi
find . -name .gitmodules -delete' HEAD