Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion

Votes for deletion Shortcuts: WV:VFD vfd This page lists articles, files and templates that are nominated for deletion. Any Wikivoyager can make a nomination or comment on any nomination. Nominations or comments should follow a rationale based on our deletion policy. If our deletion policy leads towards a merge or redirect, then coordinate this on the discussion page of the article. The purpose of this page is limited to the interpretation and application of our deletion policy. You can discuss what our deletion policies should be on the deletion policy discussion page. Nominating Add a {{vfd}} tag to the top of the article, file or template being proposed for deletion, so that people viewing it will be aware. Place the tag at the very top, before everything else, except the page banner. Do note though, if you're tagging a template for deletion, use <noinclude>{{vfd}}</noinclude> instead of {{vfd}} alone. Add a link to the article, file or template at the end of the list below, along with the reason why it is being listed for deletion. Sign your recommendation using four tildes ("~~~~"). If you're nominating a file for deletion, make sure it's actually located on the English Wikivoyage and not on Wikimedia Commons. The basic format for a deletion nomination is: ===[[Chicken]]=== Not a valid travel article topic. ~~~~ Commenting All Wikivoyagers are invited to comment on articles, files or templates listed for deletion. The format for comments is: ===[[Chicken]]=== * '''Delete'''. Not a valid travel article topic. TravelNut 25:25, 31 Feb 2525 (UTC) * '''Keep'''. There is a town in [[Alaska]] called Chicken. ~~~~ When leaving comments you may elect to delete, keep, or redirect the article. If you recommend redirection, you may suggest where it should be redirected to. Any attempt to merge content from an article to some other destination must retain the edit history to comply with the attribution (CC BY-SA) requirements of the free license, so it may be possible to merge and redirect but not to merge and delete. Sign your comment using four tildes ("~~~~"). Deleting, or not If, after 14 days of discussion, the consensus is to delete, an administrator may delete it. If, after 14 days of discussion, the consensus is to redirect or merge, any Wikivoyager may do it. If you make a redirect, please check for any resulting broken redirects or double redirects. If, after 14 days of discussion, the consensus is to keep, any Wikivoyager may remove any VFD notices from that page, and archive the deletion discussion. If there is no consensus after 14 days, allow a further 7 days for discussion. If, after the additional 7 days, there is no consensus, the page should be kept – any Wikivoyager may remove any VFD notices from that page, and archive the deletion discussion. If, after the additional 7 days, there is a consensus, implement it in line with the first three points above. When deleting an article, check "What links here". Either remove the newly-broken links from the articles or point them somewhere else. Inbound redirects to a deleted page should either be deleted or redirected elsewhere. When deleting a template, either replace it wherever it's been transcluded, especially if it served a formatting function. You can do this by adding "subst:" before the template name (especially if the use is in article space, you may then want to clean away unnecessary HTML or CSS code, which would make the wikitext confusing). Once that's done, you can delete the template without affecting individual uses of it. Otherwise, remove the template from all pages that use the template. However, do not delete the template first – this breaks links and will cause a swathe of red links, requiring a lot of cleanups. Archiving After you keep/redirect/merge/delete the article, file or template, move the deletion discussion to the Archives page for the appropriate month. The root archives page has a directory. Note that it's the month in which the action was taken, rather than when the nomination was first posted, that should be used for the archived discussion; that way, recourse to the deletion log can lead subsequent readers right to the discussion (at least for the pages that were deleted). When archiving, always make it clear to other editors what the outcome of the discussion was. First, describe the outcome in the edit summary when you remove the discussion, with something like "archive as kept". Then add a line for the result to the discussion on the archive page. If the nominated article, file or template was not deleted, then the nomination should be mentioned on its talk page. Generally this is done by providing a link to the deletion discussion on the talk page. One should also indicate the result on the talk page. If the discussion is short, an alternative is to place an (identical duplicate) copy of the discussion on the talk page. See also: Deletion log Votes for deletion/Archives - the VFD archives index page Votes for undeletion Category:Vfd - A page that collects every image and article that is currently tagged with the vfd template.

August 2024

Mongolian sites: Halkh River, Taikhar Rock, Tujiin Nars, Tsonjiin chuluu, Uvs province to merge

Recently created by Temuulen kh (talk · contribs), Enkhriimaa.b7 (talk · contribs), Https.nmio (talk · contribs), Tsekkk (talk · contribs), and Nomio erdene (talk · contribs) respectively, these have all appeared in the past several weeks, had almost no subsequent edits, and seem to be locations that could be merged into another part of the breadcrumbs for Mongolia (note that none of them are actually in this navigation scheme at the moment). Thoughts? Additionally, does anyone know why a bunch of users who had never edited before appeared here on August 8, made semi-long articles about Mongolian locations in just a single edit, and then disappeared? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Are you proposing to merge these? That doesn't require a thread on Vfd. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

I think that's probably the best outcome, but deleting versus redirecting is a valid discussion in general to have and I'm not an expert on Mongolia, so I am not certain where they should go or what is the most choice information. I don't see the value in these orphan articles that are almost certainly abandoned and not part of the standard navigation existing as they are indefinitely, but I also think there is probably useful information that shouldn't be outright deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

The answer to your question, by the way, is that these folks were making AI articles, just about exclusively on non-article topics, and one admitted it. I would delete all of these articles as non-articles and consider whether to merge/redirect the term "Uvs province" after deletion. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh sheesh. :/ Then yes, delete if for no other reason than copyright concerns. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

• +1 for delete per Justin and Koavf. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 05:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

+1 per Ikan. A09 (talk) 08:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

• delete per Justin and Koavf. Ground Zero (talk) 09:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
• delete See also Wikivoyage:User_ban_nominations/Archive#h-MON-20240806093100 & Wikivoyage:Vandalism in progress#Mongolia Pashley (talk) 09:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)