User:JWSchmidt/quiz

Question 1.       Can we find an alternative to Template:ABCD since it has a problem When there is lots of text for one or more of the four answers?
A.       Maybe. That is wishy-washy. See Wikiversity:Be bold Yes: B positive No: C negative B.       Yes Are you sure? Yes. Then go back to the First question and use the code. If you have doubts... ...then use on of these options: Review: User:JWSchmidt/quiz2 Ask a question: User talk:JWSchmidt/quiz C.       No. There is always a problem if the text for choices A-D are too long because it must fit into the "NavHead". You are too pessimistic. There is always a solution! We can use a wider box; this one is set to 60% of the page. Review: Documentation at Wikipedia Pep talk: Original example from Wikipedia D.       None of the above. The question stinks! Then complain to the author at User talk:JWSchmidt. Then fix it yourself... View template Edit template
Related discussion: Colloquium

Question 2.       Does using 90% give more space for when there is lots of text for one or more of the four answers?
A. Maybe. That is wishy-washy. See Wikiversity:Be bold Yes: B positive No: C negative B. Yes, because while this very long string of text would not have fit in with just 60% of the window, it does fit in with 90%. Are you sure? Yes. Then go to the template, copy the code, and start making your own quiz/test questions in this format. If you have doubts... ...then use on of these options: Review: User:JWSchmidt/quiz2/question2 Ask a question: User talk:JWSchmidt/quiz C. No. There is always a problem if the text for choices A-D are too long because it must fit into the "NavHead". You are too pessimistic. There is always a solution! We did use a wider box; this one is set to 90% of the page. Review: First question (uses 60%) Other template: Original example from Wikipedia (uses 60%) D. None of the above. The question stinks! Then complain to the author at User talk:JWSchmidt. Then fix it yourself... View template for question two Edit template for question two
Related discussion: Colloquium