Page:Life and Times of Frederick Douglass (1882).djvu/27

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

INTRODUCTION. 19

death. All this came under the observation of Douglass and is a part of the education he received while under the yoke of bondage. He was there in the midst of this confusion, ignor- ance, and brutality. Little did the overseer on this plantation think that he had in his gang a man of superior order and undaunted spirit, whose mind, far above the minds of the grovelling creatures about him, was at that very time plotting schemes for his liberty; nor did the thought ever enter the mind of Col. Lloyd, the rich slaveholder, that he had upon his estate one who was destined to assail the system of slavery with more power and effect than any other person.

Douglass’ fame will rest mainly, no doubt, upon his oratory. His powers in this direction are very great and in some re- spects unparalleled by our living speakers. His oratory is his own and apparently formed after the model of no single per- son. It is not after the Edmund Burke style, which has been so closely followed by Everett, Sumner, and others, and which has resulted in giving us splendid and highly embellished essays rather than natural and not overwrought speeches. If his oratory must be classified, it should be placed somewhere between the Fox and Henry Clay schools. Like Clay, Doug- lass’ greatest effect is upon his immediate hearers, those who see him. and feel his presence, and like Clay a good part of his oratorical fame will be tradition. The most striking feature of Douglass’ oratory is his fire, not the quick and flashy kind, but the steady and intense kind. Years ago on the anti-slav- ery platform, in some sudden and unbidden outburst of passion and indignation he has been known to awe-inspire his listen- ers as though A‘tna were there.

If oratory consists of the power to move men by spoken words, Douglass is a complete orator. He can make men laugh or cry, at his will. He has power of statement, logic, withering denunciation, pathos, humor, and inimitable wit. Daniel Webster with his immense intellectuality had no humor, not a particle. It does not appear that he could even see the point of a joke. Douglass is brim full of humor at