Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism/Members

WikiProject Catholicism/Members is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Untitled

i want to join! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shook62 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah me too Thenewzealandfriend (talk) 01:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A question for this group.

Have any of you experienced a current foundation of women religious using the term "Nunnery" to describe their house? I don't mean historically, but rather in current usage. In my experience the term is archaic at best and pejoritive or at least satirical at worst. I would appreciate some feedback on this.--Kjrjr (talk) 02:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The typical term is "convent". I've certainly never seen the word nunnery used by a Catholic community, but then I've not looked very hard. TallNapoleon (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, perhaps it is best that it not be used. It shall lend to ridicule.

--94.37.172.194 (talk) 20:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]