Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 22
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/Myanmar (BGF) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/Myanmar (BGF) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused military rank templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, they're in use now at Border Guard Forces. --rchard2scout (talk) 07:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Subst and delete as those are used only there. Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Subst and delete as single-use. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Nomination rationale is no longer valid, NPASR if there is a different reason why this template should be deleted. Primefac (talk) 16:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
All redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for now, used in 6 articles. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Brescia Metro color and related rail templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Brescia Metro color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:S-line/Brescia Metro right/1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:S-line/Brescia Metro left/1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Brescia Metro style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Brescia Metro stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Brescia Metro lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Brescia Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:S-line/Ahmedabad Metro right/1 and related rail templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:04, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Template:S-line/Ahmedabad Metro right/1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:S-line/Ahmedabad Metro left/1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Ahmedabad Metro stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Ahmedabad Metro lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Ahmedabad Metro color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Ahmedabad Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Only three totals links in this navbox, the other 20 links are redlinks. No objection to recreation if many of the redlinks become blue, but the template has been around for eight years with no progress on article creation. Additionally, template is redundant, as all of the blue links are also found at Template:USFL. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I don't expect red links to become blue anytime soon. Shankargb (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:06, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Only four totals links in this navbox (one is a redirect to a section of an article already linked), the other 13 links are redlinks. No objection to recreation if many of the redlinks become blue, but the template has been around for eight years with no progress on article creation. Additionally, template is redundant, as all of the blue links are also found at Template:USFL. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:42, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Only three totals links in this navbox, the other 16 links are redlinks. No objection to recreation if many of the redlinks become blue, but the template has been around for eight years with no progress on article creation. Additionally, template is redundant, as all of the blue links are also found at Template:USFL. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I don't expect red links to become blue anytime soon. Shankargb (talk) 10:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).