Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ischyros7

Ischyros7

Ischyros7 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

09 July 2024

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

Hadis.Askari (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Edits by this user and the possible puppeteer on types of wrist pain are similar and overlap when Ischyros7 met resistance for edits on Golfer's elbow and stopped editing. Now at carpal tunnel syndrome, Hadis.Askari makes similar edits and claims without using sources that the syndrome is not an injury (as also claimed at golfer's elbow). Zefr (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vanjagenije - thanks for your review of this case.

1. Possible sockmaster history shows specific arguments on topics related to elbow and wrist pain, with other editors and myself disputing and reverting them. Particularly on Golfer's elbow, two sockmaster diffs are here and here.
2. Puppet Hadis.Askari continued the dispute with similar language here and here, among others continuing on the same topics as Ischyros7, here.
3. When Ischyros7 met resistance on the elbow-wrist pain disputes, editing discontinued in May and was resumed similarly by Hadis.Askari on related topics. There was overlap of edits on the two accounts in April-May, but Hadis.Askari continued alone through July. Zefr (talk) 04:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Additional information needed - @Zefr: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:

At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - Please, compare those two. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CU says Possible. Geolocations are not far apart; there's no temporal overlap in the data that's visible in the CU window; there's no overlap on IP ranges. Could be two people (who may or may not know each other and who live fairly close together), could be one person using different accounts from different locations. Behavioural evidence needs evaluation Girth Summit _(blether) 21:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I think that behavioral evidence is not strong enough. Closing without action Vanjagenije (talk) 23:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]