Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/73.16.107.72/Archive

73.16.107.72

73.16.107.72 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

11 April 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Themanhascome (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

IP-User 73.16.107.72 was blocked. When he made a block bypass, the range was blocked: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive997#User:2601:191:8402:5f89:252d:bf9e:6a07:fc26

He changed the range, but was blocked again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive999#2601:143:4200:700_range

On March 29, the block was over and the activity of the Themanhascome soon began with the same POV in the article Taras Bulba-Borovets. Nicoljaus (talk) 22:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I am not a sockpuppet as the user Nicoljaus claims. My IP address was blocked, for reasons I am unaware of, however when the block expired I created a username. He claims that I have been "blocked numerous times" however Nicoljaus is incorrect. Themanhascome (talk) 22:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Clerk declined - CheckUser evidence cannot be used connect registered accounts to IP addresses. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:21, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I beg your pardon, Sir Sputnik but what actions are now on my part? Themanhascome had previously stated that he had nothing to do with mentioned IP-accounts and that he hadn't been blocked previously. He immediately unleashed a war of edits and violated 3RR, and pretends that he simply did not know the rules of Wikipedia in this regard.--Nicoljaus (talk) 10:46, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've misunderstood. I've declined only the request for CheckUser evidence. The behavioural evidence you've presented will still be evaluated in due course. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the quick response. I was worried because on the project page the status of the request was indicated simply as "declined" (red color), without any clarification.--Nicoljaus (talk) 18:53, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No comment with respect to IP address(es) I'm not going to block someone over creating an account after an IP block expired and they claim that they're someone different. I doubt an actual sock would admit that they had a range blocked. If they are behaving disruptively themselves, take it to ANI. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]