Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Antidote

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Antidote}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


Mehmeda

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 22:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Mehmeda (talk · contribs) was blocked by Runcorn (talk · contribs) who believes Mehmeda's contributions indicate that Mehmeda is a sock of indefblocked vandal Antidote (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks confirmedsuspected). I'm reviewing Mehmeda's unblock request and believe a checkuser might validate Runcorn's block; otherwise community block review will have to take place at WP:AN. More case history can be found at Mehmeda's talk. Sandstein 22:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: merged from Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mehmeda. -- lucasbfr talk 23:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Additional information needed Both accounts last edited in 2006 and are too old to be checked. Do you know any confirmed sockpupet account that has edited in the last month? -- lucasbfr talk 23:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Try usedup (talk · contribs). IPs may be in the ranges 141.211.*.* or 141.213.*.* --Runcorn 23:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Two things to make clear that haven't been made clear before. Lucasbfr is asking for a confirmed sockpuppet of Antidote that has edited within the last month, not a suspected sockpuppet. You'd need to confirm that usedup (talk · contribs) is a sockpuppet of Antidote before you can confirm I am one through somebody else. Secondly, this isn't a community ban, so if this does move to WP:AN, you couldn't call it that. Only Runcorn blocked this username. Hi, this is User:Mehmeda. I'm allowed to comment on these proceedings given most people are blocked AFTER this type of evidence and not before. See USER TALK:Mehmeda for details.
Also this isn't a case letter F because User:Antidote wasn't community banned. Actually maybe he was, but you would need to provide a diff of the community ban. The account was only blocked by User:Runcorn [1] not by a community consensus of any sort. Mehmeda2 00:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, the last RFCU says that Antidote's IP range is bellsouth, so why are people checking the Midwestern 141. ranges? There was already a IP range block enforced by User:Runcorn that blocked a huge amount of people from editing wikipedia (the 141. range covers up to 5 universities) and for no other reason than "sockpuppet." Maybe you should get more proof before range blocking legitimate users again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.94.128.106 (talk • contribs)

no Declined--Mackensen (talk) 20:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Antidote

[edit]

User has started doing exactly the same things complained about in a previous RFC here Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Antidote, removing people from Jewish lists, removing Jewish categories from peoples articles or information that says they were Jewish, edit warring on population numbers, and using hostile edit summaries. Arniep 13:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: All these IP's are Bell South. The use of Bell South IPs is also noted in the above-referenced RFC. Thatcher131 14:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Likely. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 08:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate somewhat? Have any of these exact ips used by one or both of these accounts, if so, how many? Arniep 22:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: "Responses will be cursory in nature in order to comply with Wikipedia privacy policy; supporting data is not provided." Essjay (Talk • Connect) 08:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.


If you are creating a new request about this user, don't forget to edit this section and add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Antidote}}
The previous request (shown above), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (it will still appear here).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Antidote&oldid=1146650648"