Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 November 9

< November 8	November 10 >

November 9

File:USS Gage h98721.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 01:57, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:USS Gage (APA-168) at anchor in San Francisco Bay, California (USA), circa 1945-46 (NH 98721).jpeg on Commons. ✗plicit 01:08, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as already at Commons and no local copy needed. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PALAZZOVFM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim as an uncropped version of this image could be found on Facebook prior to the upload to Wikipedia. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The image also has a notable black gradient. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 04:41, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Orphaned, low-quality image with dubious licensing. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Suspected copyvio. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Phrozen crew.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A non-free screenshot of a website that no longer exists. The subject of the image has no parent article covering it, it's only part of a long list of groups, with the entry mentioning this group a grand total of one sentence. The fair use rationale states "To identify the subject of the article through their logo on their website", but the group in question isn't the subject of the article, it's just one in a very long list. The group itself isn't notable enough for its own article, this image adds nothing useful to the list and the fair use rationale is faulty. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The fair use rationale is not faulty in any way. This is just another ploy by EnPassant, who is WP:FORUMSHOPPING, including at ANI: [1] Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:56, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see where it is being used for "identification and critical commentary relating to the website in question" as required . I also don't see why it is being used in List of warez groups; it's the only image in the entire long list article and the other 31 groups in that list article do not have any images, much less screenshots. The rationale that the screenshot is being used "To identify the subject of the article through their logo on their website" in false because Phrozen Crew is not the subject of the article and in fact there are only 22 words of text about Phrozen Crew in the entire 3,700-word article. Softlavender (talk) 07:27, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-free images in lists cannot be said to meet NFCC8. Stifle (talk) 09:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cleary fails NFCC8 because it adds no understanding to the one sentence (!!) in this article which is about this group. Black Kite (talk) 13:26, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above, clearly doesn't meet NFCC8 as it's not the subject of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFCC #8, it does not add significantly to the list article, as it illustrates ONLY a single item on the list. If it were illustrating an article about the website itself, or in an article where discussion of the appearance of the Website itself formed a significant portion of the text; where the website's appearance was specifically discussed and where the illustration was demonstrating features that were discussed in the text, NFCC8 would be met. This clearly does not meet those standards. --Jayron 32 15:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:USS Sagamore 1861a.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 11:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:USS Sagamore 1861b.jpg on Commons. ✗plicit 07:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as already at Commons and no local copy needed. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:USSDeweyCrest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 11:56, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:USS Dewey COA.png on Commons. ✗plicit 07:26, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as already at Commons and no local copy needed. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Victory tc5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image, orphaned, derivative work. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 14:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no apparent usefulness. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 22:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Perry2022.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1, as there is a freely useable image of the mascot: File:Perry and Emma Lou.png (which could be cropped to just include the mascot). Also, fails WP:NFCC#8 as it's being used in an article about the 2022 Commonwealth Games, not the article about the mascot itself Perry (mascot)- although it fails NFCC1 in that article too, as a free image exists Joseph2302 (talk) 16:20, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am ready to request for its deletion, if required.--Hongqilim (talk) 16:58, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Borobi2018.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1, as there is a freely useable image of the mascot: File:Borobi mascot of the 2018 Commonwealth Games at Surfers Paradise, Queensland 01.jpg. Also, fails WP:NFCC#8 as it's being used in an article about the 2018 Commonwealth Games, not the article about the mascot itself Borobi- although it fails NFCC1 in that article too, as a free image exists Joseph2302 (talk) 16:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As failing NFCC#1. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 22:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PussyfootTheWayThatYouDoIt.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Current usage in Pussyfoot article not clearly justified. Using it in "The Way That You Do It" article wouldn't help either IMO. May likely fail WP:NFCC#8 in any way. George Ho (talk) 22:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GoldfrappSatinChic.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Usage in Goldfrapp not well justified. Uncertain whether it belongs in Supernature (Goldfrapp album) and/or Satin Boys, Flaming Chic. Default to favoring deletion and deciding that it may fail WP:NFCC#8 until I stand corrected. George Ho (talk) 23:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GoldfrappOohLaLa.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep in Ooh La La (Goldfrapp song) only. ✗plicit 23:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure why it's used in Supernature (Goldfrapp album), which isn't entirely about one entire song. It may or may not belong in Ooh La La (Goldfrapp song); I'm undecided. I wonder whether the song would still be understood without the sample. George Ho (talk) 23:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in "Ooh La La": I have moved the sample into the body and added a description of the composition. The sound of the "clattering" keyboard in the song is hard to describe using words alone, so I think the sample would help readers understand what it sounds like. Its use in the album's article is marginal, as the many people know what electric guitars sound like.

ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in song article since there is enough critical commentary there to justify its inclusion. Aspects (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GoldfrappLetItTakeYou.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Usage in Supernature (Goldfrapp album) not well justified and may likely fail WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 23:18, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.