Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 November 1

< October 31	November 2 >

November 1

File:Down Among the Dead Men - Penn Glee Club.ogv

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fails #1 (no free equivalent). Down Among the Dead Men (song) already has a free audio file of a rendition of this song. This file seems to be merely used to demonstrate that the song is part of the repertoire of university glee clubs, but there is no reason a free video couldn't be created of a university glee club performing the song. Colin M (talk) 06:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:We Don't Give a Damn.ogv

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fails #1 (replaceability). No reason a free video of a performance of this song could not be created. Colin M (talk) 07:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure this is a sufficiently robust analysis. The importance of the video as a piece of commentary is a vector of the song and its performance by the Ohio State Marching Band, as indicated in the text of the article in which it appears. Chetsford (talk) 07:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not disputing its importance (NFCC #8). It's a matter of its replaceability (NFCC #1): Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose. Someone could record the Ohio State Marching Band performing this song next week and upload it under a free license. Would such a recording not be a suitable replacement? Colin M (talk) 07:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - I see, I misunderstood. And, yes, you're correct. I'm not sure what I was thinking when I uploaded this -- I think it may have been early in my WP career. Anyway, thanks for noticing this. I certainly have no objection to deletion. Chetsford (talk) 15:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Face summary.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like an infographic taken from a website. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FairfieldCtyWeeklyBox07152007.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of a newspaper, cannot be considered de minimis as the newspaper is the central subject of the photograph. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fanquility.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused album cover, needs evidence uploader is copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Father of All Motherfuckers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused album cover, uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mislabelled non-free file with no obvious value. Father of All Motherfuckers already has cover art in its infobox. Salavat (talk) 14:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Film unit.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Allowed on wiki" is not the same as releasing it under a free license. Logo likely meets the threshold of originality but is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Final Seal.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Complex logo, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Organization in question was founded in 2006, so the logo is not old enough to be in public domain. Also not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FireDaemon Pro Screenshot 314.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot of non-free software. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:First Barney Plush.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See c:COM:TOYS. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fitzgerald TalesOfTheJazzAge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader acknowledges he is not the copyright holder of the book cover. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Tales of the Jazz Age was published in 1922 and this image appears to be the same as the first edition currently in use in the article. However given it isn't a flat 2D image of the cover then copyright might be still in place for the picture itself. Salavat (talk) 14:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fes–Saïss Airport in April 2016.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved -FASTILY 03:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photograph of architecture whose source country does not have freedom of panorama. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Now used. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Madhavapuram Ayyavazhi lotus.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in India. Needs permission from original artist or evidence that the mural is old enough to be in public domain. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:57, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Magneto's guard brian singer.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screen grab from copyrighted film X2: X-Men United. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:57, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RAD & Installer - RAD Studio expert.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot of non-free software. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:57, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rayne-frog2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected:

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the United States. Images are not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:48, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tale Ognenovski’s birthplace in Brusnik, Bitola, Republic of Macedonia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why this is fair use as the source indicates a free license. North Macedonia has freedom of panorama for architecture. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.