Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 November 5

November 5

File:IPhone Calculator.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Guettarda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:07, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

File:IPhone Calculator.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Carrot official (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Flickrwashing, there's no way a screenshot of an iOS default app is freely licensed. Might be a case for fair use, but would need a rationale for that. AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 00:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I didn't think about that when I uploaded the file. Carrot official (talk) 01:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fondation Vasarely, Aix-en-Provence.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. As the English Wikipedia servers are located in the United States, this image can be hosted locally due to freedom of panorama in that country. {{FoP-USonly|France}} will be added to the file's description page. ℯxplicit 01:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Fondation Vasarely, Aix-en-Provence.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Puramyun31 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

derivative of non-free content; there is no FOP for buildings in France FASTILY 00:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Per nomination. The building design is protected by law. --Mhhossein ^talk 11:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bob Quinn, 1946, South Australia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Bob Quinn, 1946, South Australia.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image has a restored copyright as it was published after 1 January 1946 in Australia (URAA date), and is therefore not in the public domain in the US. This image cannot be claimed under fair use per failing NFCC#8, i.e. it's not used as the primary form of identification in Bob Quinn (Australian footballer). Flickerd (talk) 13:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Fails NFCC#8 Neil S. Walker (talk) 19:23, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CFBT Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. ℯxplicit 01:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

File:CFBT Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ziasong (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

logo of notable organization, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 19:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

• Relicense to non-free logo. Salavat (talk) 11:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joy Mini Pig.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Joy Mini Pig.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 120mm (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

tagged as OTRS permission insufficient for nearly a year; after reviewing the ticket, I suspect it is unlikely permission will be confirmed FASTILY 19:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete fails NFCC#1 (n.b. I am unable to review the OTRS ticket but have no reason to question Fastily's assessment.) Neil S. Walker (talk) 19:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dedekind Cut - Successor (Side B).ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Dedekind Cut - Successor (Side B).ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Davykamanzi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

tagged as OTRS permission insufficient for nearly a year; after reviewing the ticket, I suspect it is unlikely permission will be confirmed FASTILY 19:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per Fastily. Neil S. Walker (talk) 19:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Harold and Maude (1971 film) video cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Harold and Maude (1971 film) video cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Elonka (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There are two media images used in the article Harold and Maude, the film poster and this VHS cover. The film poster is used in the infobox and the VHS cover is used in the Plot section of the article against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself. The rationale from the VHS cover is "The image is being used to suggest something of the film's genre and style, as well as to show a scene which identifies the two major stars of the film at that stage in their lives, which is important as one of the main themes of the film, was the age difference between the two main characters." The VHS cover fails WP:NFCC#3a in that the of film poster already is used in the article for means of identification and the everything from the VHS cover's rationale is also expressed in the film poster, although drawn, shows the film's genre and style, identifies the two stars and shows the age difference between the characters. It also fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no commentary about the cover thereby doing nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film. Aspects (talk) 22:38, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per Aspects. The film poster in the infobox is sufficient to serve as the primary means of identification, and multiple non-free images without vital critical context in the article that cannot otherwise be conveyed is simply overkill. Neil S. Walker (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.