Jump to content

Wikipedia:Changing username/Unfulfilled/2010/January

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Janine25 → Elevatore293

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: You could always change your password? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Changing your username will not necessarily keep people out of your account. Changing your password is the most effective way to keep them out. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:52, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ershad Zaman → Esheeta

[edit]

Shiafishman → {{{new}}}

[edit]

 Not done Per below. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shiafishman → {{{new}}}

[edit]

 Not done Please file a request with a target username. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repolles18 → Mastermind

[edit]

 Not done. WJBscribe (talk) 14:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CGDC → RoxieMM

[edit]

 Clerk note: Moved from WP:CHU/U. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:33, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment user has already created a new account User:Roxiethedalles. Katr67 (talk) 23:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

garwse → garwes

[edit]

NWSMG → NINER320

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: Is that in all caps or not? You've indicated lowercase on your talk page. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:37, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - no reply. WJBscribe (talk) 13:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jolo Buki Original → August Dominus

[edit]

August Dominus is better: barely amount, new, no more difficult words, atractive, easy to remembering, an Croatian Wikipedia I change name, I will and in this...

--Jolo Buki Original (talk) 19:43, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Your account has been blocked on two other Wikpedias. Is this rename an attempt to avoid scrutiny? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, I am on only two Wikipedias: Croatian and English, I abjure of other Wikipedias (German, French, Serbian, Serbo-Croatian). I had more names an Serbian Wikipedia, no advantage any.

--Jolo Buki Original (talk) 20:45, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And new name no have any relation with my personal name (current have).

--Jolo Buki Original (talk) 20:48, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...

--Jolo Buki Original (talk) 18:36, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...

--Jolo Buki Original (talk) 21:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing? –Juliancolton | Talk 22:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think he's commenting on how it's not done yet. Crats: This could probably go through. (X! · talk)  · @716  ·  16:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Bureaucrat note: I can't yet approve this request. The hr: account has first call on the SUL. If this user has control of hr:, they should make a note there (in English) while logged in that they agree to this and then come back here and post the diff. --Dweller (talk) 17:01, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done. As Dweller says, the hr: account has first call on the SUL and Jolo Buki states above that he is only active on "Croatian and English" Wikipedias. WJBscribe (talk) 13:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Smritee.bhargav → Roody2

[edit]

 Not done. WJBscribe (talk) 13:34, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rgentertainment → Rg movies

[edit]

Rgentertainment → RG Movies

[edit]

Bitemyshinymetalass78 → Rx79gez8gundam

[edit]

 Not doneDan | talk 03:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd dispute this closure. The user was reblocked for editing after he made this request. It's not his fault that this request was ignored for 3 days. He stated on his talk page that he did not know he was supposed to not edit. I would recommend that this request be done, and the user unblocked. (X! · talk)  · @288  ·  05:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done — first username is offensive, new one is random characters, and he was blocked not only for the name issue, but disruption, move along. RlevseTalk 01:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: I'm going to have to disagree too. That matter of disruption is a contested matter at this time.[1] Even the blocking admin is wanting to try this again. [2] I do agree that something less random-appearing would be better. Re-file? delirious & lost~hugs~ 02:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
User is again unblocked. Advised on his talk page to select a different new user name.[3] delirious & lost~hugs~ 13:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
User clarified on his talk page that requested user name is that of an anime robot. See here for info on the character. Any chance on reconsidering if this is a WP:UNCONF violation? delirious & lost~hugs~ 05:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: I don't see a problem with it. It wouldn't be a username that would be prevented by the system if it was a new registration. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:17, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maximoox → MAXIMOOX

[edit]

 Not done User blocked for promotion. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TiMike → Rottina

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: Are you aware of (and comfortable with) the potential implications associated with using a real name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Rambling Man (talkcontribs) 20:55, December 26, 2009

Invictre → RetiredUser20100105

[edit]

 Not done Please use {{retired}}. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soniamangwana → Sonia_M

[edit]

 Not done You must log in to request a username change. However, given that you have no edits under your old username, you could also just simply register a new account. EVula // talk // // 15:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gangsta1542 → coolgeek1315

[edit]

 Clerk note: Moved from WP:CHU/U. –Juliancolton | Talk 22:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leca67 → Exclay67

[edit]

Thepointer → Bradley.ayers

[edit]

Lettingeverythinggo → lettingeverythinggo

[edit]

  •  Clerk note: The requested username is the same as your current name, aside from the first letter being in lowercase. Due to technical limitations, usernames must start with an uppercase letter. However, you may use the template {{lowercase title}} on your user and user talk pages, and change your signature to reflect your preference. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Baic → Anthony Stewart

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: Hmm. I feel the need to ask you to expound. Is the harassment to which you refer online or not? If it is online, is there any chance that you're misconstruing the warnings ([4],[5],[6],[7]) which were dispensed to you for your editorial conduct (or what appears to be more an editorial misunderstanding)? —Anonymous DissidentTalk 19:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done No reply. Dweller (talk) 12:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cornel Didit → CORNELDIDIT

[edit]

Cipher 2009 → Cipher '10

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note:. I'd rather not set a precedent for annual renames. What about User:Cipher! (or something similar) instead? WJBscribe (talk) 13:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, how about "Cipher S" - would that do? Cipher (Talk) 18:30, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Emmalyn Estrada → Dmt2009

[edit]

Dendropithecus → Dryopithecus

[edit]

Ericzinan → El_sinanovic

[edit]

Haydnwoodmusic → Haydn Wood Music

[edit]

Bella_Gatta → CodeCat

[edit]

Ohaus → Ohaus

[edit]

 Clerk note: clerk I removed the redundant "User:" in the request. User is requesting to change to the name already in use but the signature appears to be promotional. Use of a company name as a username is prohibited by the username policy. Please also review the conflict of interest policy and choose another name that is specific to yourself. delirious &lost~hugs~ 15:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

4yunweb → Uestc

[edit]

Dawidz → Madnez

[edit]

  • That would require an action by a steward to delete the SUL if they're willing to do that. I'm not aware of any precedent for someone usurping an existing SUL account. In any event, this particular request is  Not done. WJBscribe (talk) 23:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

272812A → Wrcf1

[edit]

 Clerk note: For the record, while this username does exist, it has no edits, so it could theoretically be usurped. The account is also currently blocked. Useight (talk) 21:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Done below. (X! · talk)  · @809  ·  18:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Russlaher → RussLaher

[edit]

Manikandaprabhu_it → Manikandaprabhu_cts

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: Please explain your reasoning; I'm not sure what "security breach" means in the context of a rename request, especially since you only have two edits. EVula // talk // // 15:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No response after a week. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vcdewiki → Zi.comq

[edit]

 Not done No GFDL edits, simply register a new username. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamoffrozensky → Anony4b2

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: Please provide a reason for renaming. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No response in a week. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Buhay Tao → Buhay Tao (ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ ᜆᜂ)

[edit]

Frabifrancis → Burfy

[edit]

Kyleleister → Squaregrouper

[edit]

 Not done The Rambling Man (talk) 23:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raytheoncompany → Cullenfamily

[edit]

 Not done per the bot. Please select a name which hasn't been registered. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nigeldeering → Bosun

[edit]

 Not done per the bot. Please select a name which hasn't been registered. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ConquestMusiGroup → ConquestMusicGroup

[edit]

 Clerk note: Promotional usernames are not permitted as per the username policy. Please request a non-promotional username or your account may be blocked. Useight (talk) 23:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per the clerk, you need to re-read the username policy and select a more appropriate username. You also need to understand WP:COI before any 'crat would be prepared to rename your account. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Akhtar.mohammadf → ---

[edit]

 Not done No reply after a week. If this is a privacy matter, the requestor can come back and request another name (the current target is too generic). —Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MisterWiki → Diego Grez

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: MisterWiki is currently blocked for 24 hours. Will evaluate when that is over. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note:Nothing's really ever for sure, but I'm just noting that currently the block has been extended to 10 years. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 02:24, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done due to extended block. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Burakdursun → BurakDursun

[edit]

 Clerk note: Moved from WP:CHU/U. (X! · talk)  · @113  ·  01:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done The username Burakdursun (talk · contribs) has made no contributions to the project aside from this edit. Please simply stop using Burakdursun and just create the BurakDursun account. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce.AV → Unknown.hr

[edit]

Safestartsystems → Jon T. Russell

[edit]

Alexandreareynolds → Alexandrea

[edit]

Bomdiasr → Alex655321

[edit]

P3d0 → Doradus

[edit]

  • Well, SoxBot is wrong in saying that the account has edits or logged actions, but it's still taken nonetheless. However, near as I can tell, it can be usurped at WP:CHUU. Please file another request there. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Will do. Sorry for putting my request in the wrong place. --P3d0 (talk) 02:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC
 Not done Moved to WP:CHU/U. bibliomaniac15 19:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mortgagebroker → Connect Mortgages

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by the username policy. Please choose another name. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Please choose a different name that is not promotional. bibliomaniac15 19:10, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tuftsmc → 123awerde123

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: This is similar to the request you made above. Please choose ONE username you wish to change to and let us know under that specific request. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Similar request with different requested username was fulfilled. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JasperLX1 → JasperLX

[edit]

Tuftsmc → 123asd789

[edit]

CURRENT → NEW

[edit]

Because I am the writer and wanted the biography on my username

 Clerk note: This request is unsalvageable. Please resubmit, being sure to fill out both CURRENT and NEW fields. —Jeremy (v^_^v Boribori!) 02:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Safeinpublic → Public Safety

[edit]

TheTechieGeek63 → Zollerriia

[edit]

I am also Zollerriia on the English Wikibooks and Simple English Wikipedia. Please see this link: Archived Revision from the English Wikibooks as of 13:06, 9 January 2010. Preceding by 1 edit, I made the request at 08:49, 9 January 2010. I'm so sorry to have bothered you. TheTechieGeek63 (talk) 08:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

  •  Bureaucrat note: Did you create the Zollerriia account here, too? If so, then there are two options: abandon the TheTechieGeek63 account and move to using the Zollerriia account, or we can rename the Zollerriia to something else and rename TheTechieGeek63 to Zollerriia. If you are also Zollerriia here, please make an edit using that account to confirm it, then post the diff here. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I would want to abandon the TheTechieGeek63 account and move to the Zollerriia account please. Yes, I am Zollerriia here on EN: Wikipedia, too. Thank you for your time. I am sorry to have bothered you. Zollerriia (talk) 01:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per user comment. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 15:16, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

afeefaazeez → lavender

[edit]

RonelduPreez → Rdpinteractive

[edit]

 Clerk note: Moved from WP:CHU/U. (X! · talk)  · @113  ·  01:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by the username policy. Please choose another name. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:24, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per above. bibliomaniac15 21:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raychelmonkey → Pink Monkey Events

[edit]

 Clerk note: (ec, thanks SoxBot) You have another request immediately above this one. Please allow some time for your request to be carried out. Also, this requested name seems promotional, which is not permitted according to policy. I'd recommend going with your first request. Useight (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Msanghviofindia → Mitesh Sanghvi

[edit]

Managedsubnet → Insurgus

[edit]

A1DF67 → Bowei Huang

[edit]

  • So you mean that once an account has been created, there is absolutely no way that the edits in the Special:Contributions of that account can be moved to the Special:Contributions of another account? Not even any administrator in Wikipedia can do that or is able to do that? The records of edits in the history pages of articles absolutely cannot be changed either if the account has already been created? When you say that you cannot, do you mean that nobody in Wikipedia can? A1DF67 (talk) 23:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's right. There is no way to merge the contribution histories of two accounts. No bureucrat, steward, or anyone else can do it (admins do not have access to the renameuser tool) - it's just not possible in MediaWiki. The closest one can get is usurpation, but that shunts the contribs of the targeted account to a random username (it does not merge them) and will not be done on accounts with GFDL-significant edits. Sorry. ——Jeremy (v^_^v Boribori!) 22:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cornel Didit → Octasilvany

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: "It's cooler" is a pretty weak reason for a username change. I'm not saying we won't do it but you should understand that we don't do this every day for people who want "cooler" names. Let us know you won't be asking for a "cooler" name next week and we'll consider changing this name. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:40, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be inclined to reject this request. It was submitted by Corneldidit (talk · contribs) rather than Cornel Didit (talk · contribs), although both accounts have filed numerous requests AFAICT. –Juliancolton | Talk 05:43, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done and both accounts have been blocked for spamming. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 15:34, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bau-Xi Photo → Robyn McCallum

[edit]

 Bureaucrat note: Please confirm that you are aware of WP:COI and that you will not be editing on behalf of any organisation with which you may be affiliated. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Also, it appears you are using this as a group account ("...we would like to change it"), which is specifically prohibited by the username policy. Each account may be used by only one person. There are no exceptions to that policy. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sethasa → Seth Asa

[edit]

  •  Clerk note: clerk I advised Seth about the question from Avi a couple of days ago. In my opinion the user would prefer his real name, as evidenced by his request here, his signature, and by the content of his user page, though i cannot say if he is aware of the implications. His contribs and signature are self-promotional; i have asked him to remove the url from his signature. delirious & lost~hugs~ 08:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done as there has been no response for over a week. Additionally, because there has been no response, it appears this editor is here only to promote themselves, so they have been blocked. If they wish to come back, they can request a new username at that time. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 15:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just to throw this out there, can we really prohibit someone from using their own real name if they agree to contribute other than self-promotion on their user page? In this case i kept hoping Seth would contribute more than his self-promoting user page. If he does decide to come back and contribute content i don't think we should force an anonymous user name upon him. delirious & lost~hugs~

Hcc webmaster → Johnny B. Webmaster

[edit]

Livadvinc → LivAdvInc

[edit]

 Not done. WJBscribe (talk) 16:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Waterplayusa → Waterplay USA

[edit]

 Clerk note: Promotional usernames are against policy. Also, you may not use your userpage for advertising. Please request a non-promotional username and remove the promotional content from your page or your account may be blocked and your userpage deleted. Useight (talk) 22:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: User is under a username block levied after this request was posted; this request, if fulfilled, will have no bearing on any unblock requests the user makes. —Jeremy (v^_^v Boribori!) 05:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. WJBscribe (talk) 16:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auréola → Nando

[edit]

 Not done. WJBscribe (talk) 16:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sexually Active → JACKY444

[edit]

 Clerk note: Account has been blocked due to sockpuppetry. Useight (talk) 21:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. WJBscribe (talk) 16:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, bummer. I wanted to "not done" one that I clerked. Useight (talk) 16:48, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zorgon X → Zyxpup

[edit]

Zorgon X (talk) 03:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Silasme → Applesoup

[edit]

Straitslaw → Straits Law Practice

[edit]

Akhtar.mohammadf → Rr768jon

[edit]

 Not done. Request completed below. Useight (talk) 15:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B.hygate → Bhygate.fortunecity.com

[edit]

 Not done. Promotional usernames are against policy. I'm allowing your current username, as it appears to be a name. Be aware, though, that your userpage may not be used promotionally, as per another policy, or it may be deleted. Useight (talk) 18:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Dunnie → user4289374892

[edit]

-- -- -- → 1 2 3 4

[edit]

 Clerk note: clerkThis name was already approved as a rename by Avi. See the previous rename in the archive. I also clerked that. Personally, i feel that if a bureaucrat approves the rename to User:-- -- -- it is a bit much for an admin to then block the user and force a 2nd rename. Nowhere in WP:USERNAME does it state that -- -- -- is a violation. A non-English user name is hardly reason to block someone. It is Morse code for "M M M". delirious & lost~hugs~ 21:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • User's response: Thank you, Avi and delirious & lost. I agree with you wholheartedly. However, I am not looking to put up a fight. I will let the bureaucrats decide on an appropriate username. -- -- -- 21:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by -- -- -- (talkcontribs)
  • Follow-up comment: It is the lack of any links in your signature that is causing the greatest concern. Without any links it simply appears to be a typo. As you can see from above, SineBot is following you around Wikipedia marking all of your signatures as "unsigned comment added by -- -- --" so that other people will know it is a valid user name and not a typo. This general comment is now in a few places with the hope that you will see one of them. The other problem was the type of linking that JC and myself used at the top of your talk page. I didn't realise that it would imply a bureaucrat had issue with your new user name once the rename had been done. I'm sorry.delirious & lost~hugs~ 01:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Buggie111 → Four Tildes (except in symbolic format)

[edit]

Thanks, I have been wondering about that. Buggie111 (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Askinaltun → Observer

[edit]

VoteAndre39 → Andre39

[edit]

Vitz3 → Vitz3

[edit]

Cfjflorida → CFJ Florida

[edit]

 Clerk note: Appears to be in relation to the Chicago Fire Juniors youth soccer team in Florida, here and here. Useight (talk) 18:02, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sproutf → Francis Sprout

[edit]

 Clerk note: Moved from WP:CHU/U. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:19, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

S Q → Saqib Qayyum

[edit]

I wanna transfer my edits to target account. --Saqib talk 08:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Can you post (from the "Saqib Qayyum" account) confirmation that both accounts are owned by the same person? Also, the "Saqib Qayyum" account has more edits than "S Q" does; can you not just cease using the current account? (there's no way to merge the two accounts together; you'd be renamed, but the existing 932 edits would not still be attributed to the "Saqib Qayyum" name) EVula // talk // // 17:40, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I wanna attribute edits, I made using User: S Q to requested username User:Saqib Qayyum.--Saki talk 18:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: If you're asking for another account's edits to be reattributed with your current account, it is not possible. Edits cannot be reattributed without renaming. (X! · talk)  · @893  ·  20:25, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So then rename it, both accounts belong to me. --Saki talk 12:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: I think you are misunderstanding how this works. There is no way to merge the edits into one account. The software itself does not allow that to be done. You are free to use one account or the other, but the edits made under each account can not be merged. This is a technical limitation of the Mediawiki software. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CompareLegalJobs → CLJ09

[edit]

Wexeb → Martín Coba Pulido

[edit]

 Clerk note: clerk This would appear to be a rename in another language and having the corresponding English account here renamed based on this page move log from PTWP. Also see pt:Wikipedia:Renomeação_de_conta#Wexeb_.E2.86.92_Mart.C3.ADn_Coba_Pulido The pt:User:Wexeb account was re-created on PTWP after the rename was done there per the usual impersonation reasons. This user's home wiki was PTWP before the rename there detached his home wiki from the Wexeb SUL. According to the PTWP rename the user is changing from an anonymous name to his real name. My Portuguese is not great but i am pretty sure on this.
Also this user is blocked on ESWP as a sockpuppet but my Spanish is not good enough to read all of that. It seems to have something to do with a comment on a YouTube account and the user name "Wexeb" appearing in various places on the web and different eswp users claiming it to be themselves. [8] But then this user is blocked as the sockpuppet of a different user on Commons. [9]. Yet that user that Wexeb is accused of being a sockpuppet of is not blocked on Commons. It might be handy to have someone who is fluent in Spanish and Portuguese and has access to deleted pages and CU logs review this on a cross-wiki level. From what i comprehend of the languages and with a little help from Google Translate this seems to have the potential for being a huge mix up. delirious & lost~hugs~ 23:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OrGuttman → אור גוטמן

[edit]

 Clerk note:Well, if you have logged in as the new name, even accidentally, that means you can use it; since you don't seem to have many edits under this name, why not just switch to the Hebrew name yourself? You can't "bump off" an account by renaming to it, if that's what you want; you would still have to rename אור גוטמן to something new if you renamed OrGuttman to אור גוטמן. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 21:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In spite of that, I prefer you will do that. Thank You Very Much. OrGuttman (talk) 21:33, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can you do that please? OrGuttman (talk) 19:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can you do it now? Shabbat Shalom and Happy Tu Bishvat! OrGuttman (talk) 19:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]