Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White terrorism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Right-wing terrorism. If anybody wants to merge some content, be my guest, but there's probably not much. I also picked Right-wing terrorism as a target based on the discussion, but this close in no way prevents this from being boldly changed or taken to RfD. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 (T) 18:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

White terrorism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The term lacks notability. The article used in the lead to establish notability does not use the term and is an opinion piece. Nor is there evidence that terrorist acts committed by white people, particularly acts that are not motivated by racism are typically called "white terrorism." Furthermore most of the first hits on Google books return "Jonathan R. White, Terrorism:An Introduction. TFD (talk) 00:57, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Potguru (talk) 16:05, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It has different meanings because it is not a topic, just a noun modified by an adjective. So there are white criminals, white senators, white businessmen, white bus drivers, etc. (Ralph Kramden was a white bus driver.) It does not mean these are all actual topics. TFD (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How about a research paper called "Freedmen with Firearms: White Terrorism and Black Disarmament During Reconstruction" whose abstract reads: "New laws, mob actions and acts of organized white terrorism were used to subjugate free citizens and return them to their former stations of labor.". Cited only two times, but worth consideration, perhaps? http://cupola.gettysburg.edu/gcjcwe/vol4/iss1/4/ --Potguru (talk) 21:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this should all be merged to this article? White_Terror_(Taiwan)? --Potguru (talk) 22:34, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Have you even read these two articles...? They have nothing in common. More than that I agree with TFD, this is not a topic, but rather a descriptive term with many disparate uses and deffinitions. InsertCleverPhraseHere 23:19, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.