Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whers (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Whers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This fails to establish notability. Previous AfD was filled with outdated arguments that don't address it failing WP:PLOT, WP:WAF, and WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as fancruft per nom. Fails GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 21:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. They play a very minor role in the Dragonriders universe. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:58, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Terrible WP:FANCRUFT, editor who contested the redirect should be WP:TROUTed. Through I guess in 2014 the inclusionism was still stronger than today... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:19, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Usual-variety fancruft. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Blatant fancruft is so much worse than the sneaky kind. -The Gnome (talk) 13:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.