Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webclift Airways

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Webclift Airways

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable 1 destination airline that as of yet hasn't begun business. No coverage anywhere. Praxidicae (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom: WP:GNG and in the current climate pure speculation!!--Petebutt (talk) 21:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you meant to refer to WP:CRYSTAL. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:38, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: By WP:CONSENSUS the nominator's nomination would be in error - scheduled airlines are considered to be notable. However this fails WP:CRYSTAL/WP:TOOSOON (by, essentially, two years) and shouldn't have been moved out of draftspace. Since it has, those apply, and it should be deleted without prejudice to recreation if and when the airline exists. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:38, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kindly review this page as a source of article. More articles will be published within due time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heathrow0003 (talk • contribs) 11:28am, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Heathrow0003; your source doesn't work. It asks us to input data to get results. Nightfury 15:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify (with a lock on moving it back to articlespace) with a view to incubation. As much as I want to delete there is a few (albeit not particularly decent) sources that prove that it exists, I would recommend that the creator submits it through AfC once they are happy its ready for moving to articlespace. I have noted there is a few back-and-forward pagemoves to and from draftspace, so would recommend a move protect be added once article is in dratspace. Nightfury 15:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I PRODed this back in September, and nothing much seems to have changed since. WP is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL. Article has now been in and out of Draft multiple times. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Two years from now, who knows what the travel industry will look like? Because it keeps getting moved around, if it is draftified, move protection is warranted. Bearian (talk) 21:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.