Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vote for the Worst (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Drmies (talk) 23:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Vote for the Worst (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable web-site. The article is positively stuffed with references--almost all of which are to the web-site itself, while the few which aren't are almost all are passing mentions. CalendarWatcher (talk) 04:13, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable; no reliable sources. -- Wikipedical (talk) 04:42, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It attracted enough attention for the creator to be featured on the Late Show with David Letterman and be supported by Howard Stern's radio show. Hekerui (talk) 12:29, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ21™ 19:49, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's a poor article with far too much trivial detail, not enough third-party criticism or comment, and poor layout that could do with some tables, but the site itself appears notable with press coverage in big publications like New York Times and Entertainment Weekly [1][2][3] and [4](last few paras) as well as smaller news sources[5][6][7][8][9] --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:09, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Corn cheese (talk) 17:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.