Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishen Lakhiani (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Daniel (talk) 01:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vishen Lakhiani

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Re-nominating, see WP:COIN#Paid editing agency. Please review whether the reasons of the previous nomination still apply. Janhrach (talk) 19:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Literature, and Malaysia. Janhrach (talk) 19:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Weak Keep Article is "oh look this man has created a company" type. References are extremely poor. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 11:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He may get a pass via WP:NAUTHOR. Worth a look. If so I'll change my !vote. scope_creep^Talk

There is reviews on the boooks. I think he probably passes WP:NAUTHOR. I think he is probably not notable at the moment. The coverage is quite poor. scope_creep^Talk 12:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep South China Morning Post and BBC seem to be about him, should have enough to keep it. Oaktree b (talk) 01:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 01:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I concur with Oaktree b. Additionally, NYT bestseller helps, Mindvalley is quite well known. TLA (talk) 03:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.