Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virus Recordings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Virus Recordings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NN company who mostly self-published music created by its owners. Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Findsources turns up very little except shop sites and a few sites who have republished this article. The Dissident Aggressor 21:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Article about founder of the label also being considered for deletion.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 04:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I think it's great they're doing work in self-published music, but I think it falls short on notability when half the links in the introduction paragraph are red. If some of the bands were notable enough to have articles maybe we'd get to a point where the publisher is. but With no bands or albums hitting the notability mark I don't think the publisher hits it either. Bryce Carmony (talk) 12:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment: What's up with the relisting? We have consensus. The Dissident Aggressor 03:56, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.