Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled The Dark Knight sequel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted per all the snow on the ground. It seems to me to be quite clear the consensus will be to delete. I will relist if there are serious objections. Hiding T 23:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled The Dark Knight sequel

Previously prodded by another user. Unsourced article about an upcoming film. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Brougham96 (talk) 18:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not even the title is known. Fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF. JohnCD (talk) 18:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:FUTFILMS, content already covered in Batman (film series)#Future. Nolan's return is pure speculation. Alientraveller (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it stands any article would be based on the limited amount of speculation there has been about any future project; currently the article would be a magnet for original research and unsubstantiated rumour. With no solid reliably sourced information about this (or any other) future project information on any future Batman film may be appropriate in the main Batman (film series) article but not as an independent piece. Guest9999 (talk) 19:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because there is no verifiable project on the way. All relevant information exists at Batman (film series)#Future and will continue to do so until production actually begins on this film. There is nothing set in stone for this project. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as even the article calls itself a rumour. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My fault. :) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above: total speculation. I also concur with Alientraveller, Guest, and Erik in regards to where info on such a project belongs until shooting starts. Looks like it's snowing. Cliff smith ^talk 21:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SNOW Delete: per WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. Schuym1 (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.